GAS REGIONAL INVESTMENT PLAN CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE - MAIN REPORT 2019 - entsog
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
GAS REGIONAL INVESTMENT PLAN
CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE
2019
MAIN REPORT
CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE 2 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................... 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................5
1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................7
2 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE CEE REGION........................................................................... 9
3 ASSESSMENT – INFRASTRUCTURE RESILIENCE IN THE CEE REGION.......................................... 24
3.1 General Note........................................................................................................................................... 24
3.2 Disrupted Demand, Remaining Flexibility and Preconditions for Assessment.................................. 25
3.2.1 Peak Day under the Normal Situation (without Disruption) ..................................................... 26
3.2.2 Peak Day under Simultaneous Ukrainian and Belarusian Gas Route Disruptions.................. 32
3.2.3 Peak Day under a Russian Gas Source Disruption..................................................................... 38
4 CEE GRIP REGIONAL N-1 ANALYSIS.................................................................................................... 44
4.1 General Note........................................................................................................................................... 44
4.2 Supply Corridors.................................................................................................................................... 44
4.2.1 Austria (AT).................................................................................................................................. 45
4.2.2 Bulgaria (BG)................................................................................................................................ 46
4.2.3 Croatia (HR)...................................................................................................................................47
4.2.4 The Czech Republic (CZ)............................................................................................................. 48
4.2.5 Hungary (HU)............................................................................................................................... 49
4.2.6 Poland (PL)................................................................................................................................... 50
4.2.7 Romania (RO)................................................................................................................................ 51
4.2.8 Slovakia (SK)................................................................................................................................ 52
4.2.9 Slovenia (Sl).................................................................................................................................. 53
4.3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................... 54
4.3.1 CEE GRIP Regional N-1 Formula.................................................................................................. 54
4.4 Disruption via Ukraine............................................................................................................................ 56
4.5 Disruption via Belarus.............................................................................................................................57
5 ROLE OF NATURAL GAS IN THE CEE REGION IN THE LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE....................... 59
5.1 General Note........................................................................................................................................... 59
5.1.1 Energy markets in the CEE region ............................................................................................... 61
5.1.2 Air Quality..................................................................................................................................... 66
5.2 Country case studies..............................................................................................................................67
5.2.1 Austria............................................................................................................................................67
5.2.2 Czech Republic............................................................................................................................. 68
5.2.3 Poland ............................................................................................................................................ 71
5.2.4 Slovakia..........................................................................................................................................75
6 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................................... 79
Abbreviations................................................................................................................................................. 80
Counry Codes (Iso)........................................................................................................................................ 81
Legal Disclaimer............................................................................................................................................. 81
List Of Annexes.............................................................................................................................................. 84
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 3FOREWORD Dear reader, It is a pleasure for us to present you the outcome of the cooperation of involved transmission system operators in the Central and Eastern Europe, the fourth edition of the regional investment plan. The current edition of the CEE GRIP builds on the previous editions of the CEE GRIPs and also on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 providing an outlook about infrastructure projects in the region that are either planned or under the construction The region is still exposed to the security of supply risks, but over the years significant improvements in this respect have been recorded as some of the planned projects have already been commissioned. The development of the infrastructure has encouraged the market integration within the region. Special emphasis of the document is put on the role of the natural gas in the CEE region. This topic is important espe- cially in time when a European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral econ- omy is getting under its way. We do think that the natural gas in the countries of the CEE region will still play the important role in the upcoming decades in order to support the energy transition and to balance the implications of social accepta- bility of the necessary changes (e.g. energy poverty). The coordination of this document was facilitated by eustream, a.s. (Slovakia). As this document is the outcome of common work, we would like to thank all parties involved in the CEE GRIP process for their beneficial support and active work. The CEE GRIP working group will be launching a post-publi- cation consultation on the CEE GRIP and that is why we would like to encourage all stakeholders and other interested parties to provide their proposals and comments in the upcoming open public consultation process. Coordination team of eustream, a.s. 4 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning and development of gas infrastructure are vital for meeting the obli-
gations under EU Directive 2009/73/EC, and these are further detailed in
Regulation (EC) 715/2009. The fourth edition of the Gas Regional Investment
Plan for Central and Eastern Europe (CEE GRIP) is strongly linked with the EU-
wide Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2018 (TYNDP 2018). A harmonised
data set is used for developing both reports in parallel. The CEE GRIP supports
and complements the TYNDP 20181. The GRIP of the CEE region is presented
based on analyses in light of the possible evolution of gas infrastructure with
a focus on specific regional matters of supply, demand, and infrastructure
capacity.
The CEE region consists of 10 countries (Austria, The following summary sets out key outputs of this
Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Germany, CEE GRIP. The findings are provided in four main
Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia). sections, depending on the subject of analysis:
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE CEE REGION
\ In total, there are 90 gas infrastructure projects \ There are 9 projects that have been commis-
planned for implementation in the CEE region sioned in the CEE countries since the release of
in the upcoming decade – 18 projects have al- the CEE GRIP 2017. These projects contributed
ready reached a final investment decision (FID) to the improved diversification of gas supply
and 72 projects are at an earlier stage of devel- sources and infrastructure integration.
opment (non-FID). \ Majority of the projects are transmission pipe-
lines projects – 80, others are 5 LNG projects
and 5 UGS projects.
ASSESSMENT – INFRASTRUCTURE RESILIENCE IN THE CEE REGION
\ Two additional stress scenarios were analysed be redirected via Nord Stream pipeline.
and presented in the report beyond the TYNDP \ The disruption case of the whole Russian gas
2018 scope. These stress scenarios are (i) a source is the most extreme possible for the
simultaneous disruption of the gas supply region and shows the countries concerned to
routes via Ukraine and Belarus and (ii) a dis- be highly dependent on Russian gas supplies.
ruption of the whole Russian gas supply source. However, with the implementation of planned
\ The simultaneous disruption of gas routes via infrastructure projects (which improve the
Belarus and Ukraine shows a supply disruption security of supply and the diversification of gas
in the countries Romania, Croatia and Bulgaria. sources and routes) this dependency is miti-
Some countries will be affected under certain gated, as these projects will foster the diversi
demand scenario – Hungary and Poland. Gas fication of gas supply sources and improve
supplies to Germany, the Czech Republic, Aus- infrastructure integration between the CEE
tria, Slovakia, and Slovenia would almost not be countries.
affected, as deliveries to these countries would
1 https://www.entsog.eu/tyndp#entsog-ten-year-network-development-plan-2018
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 5CEE GRIP REGIONAL N-1 ANALYSIS
\ The CEE GRIP Regional N-1 analysis covers gas \ Almost all countries in the CEE region obtain
supply disruption cases through Ukraine and satisfactory N-1 calculation results in the sum-
Belarus for the winter and summer periods. mer period, as each country is able to cover its
The assessment is based on the N-1 methodol- own gas demand and meet the injection re-
ogy according to Regulation (EU) 2017/1938, quirements of underground storage facilities
which was adjusted to enable the application to when the two analysed disruption cases are
be used for CEE GRIP purposes. considered. With regard to the main findings,
\ In the winter period 2020/2021 under the we can enumerate the following situations:
Ukrainian gas route disruption case, Bulgaria, – For Hungary, Austria and Romania during the
Romania and Poland do not meet the basic N-1 Ukraine disruption scenario in summer 2020,
criterion (the result has to be equal to or great- such a disruption could cause a lack of filling
er than one) for various reasons. Except for the underground storage facilities, in case the
infrastructure gaps, in the case of Poland, it is disruption lasts longer than 66 days (Hungary),
due to increased daily maximum demand by al- 125 days (Austria), or 155 days (Romania).
most 1/3 between years 2017 and 2020. The im- – Some potential problems were also identified
plementation of planned infrastructure projects in Poland in summer 2020, if the disruption via
in upcoming years can solve this situation. Belarus would last for more than 116 days.
\ Due to geographical reasons, the disruption of – All these identified problems would be fully
supplies via Belarus only affects Poland, but solved by the commissioning of the planned
the assessment indicates a decreasing de- projects in the following years.
pendency over the entire time span for both
winter and summer periods.
ROLE OF NATURAL GAS IN THE CEE REGION
IN THE LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE
\ A gradual transformation of the energy mar- \ Switch to natural gas from carbon-intensive
kets in the CEE region is ongoing since 1990. and polluting energy sources will help to re-
With a partial switch from a high to low and ze- duce emission in a considerable manner and to
ro-emission sources of energy and the applica- improve the air quality in the CEE region as a
tion of energy efficiency measures greenhouse whole.
gas emissions have been reduced considera- \ There are various projects of greening the gas
bly. Despite these developments carbon inten- system in early development phases; mainly in
sive fuels still play a major role in the energy area of energy storage, P2G, testing of hydro-
markets. gen-natural gas mixtures on gas transmission
\ Natural gas in the countries of the CEE region system elements. These technologies are not
will play important role in the upcoming decade mature enough yet to be deployed on a large
to support the energy transition and to balance scale and on a commercial basis. The legisla-
the implications of social acceptability of the tive and regulatory framework needs to be
necessary changes (e. g. energy poverty). adapted to recognize the existence of these
technologies in energy markets and to incen-
tivize their development.
6 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 20191 INTRODUCTION
The Gas Regional Investment Plans (GRIPs) are being prepared to promote
regional cooperation, which is enshrined in EU Directive 2009/73/EC, Article
7 and further detailed by REG 715/2009, Article 12. This report represents the
fourth edition of the Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central and Eastern
Europe (CEE GRIP) and provides a specific regional view of supply, demand,
and capacity developments in the CEE region for the upcoming decade.
The aim of this report is to support and add to the Beyond the TYNDP 2018, the CEE GRIP provides an
previously published EU-wide Ten-Year Network additional overview of broader gas market dynam-
Development Plan 20182 (TYNDP 2018) prepared ics by looking at aspects linked to supply scenarios,
by the European Network of Transmission System market integration, and the security of supply (SoS)
Operators for Gas (ENTSOG). The goal is to provide on the regional level. The key analysed areas which
additional information focusing on the CEE region formed the main focus of this report are:
and to emphasize the regional gas infrastructure \ The future development of gas transmission
outlook by assessing the basis for identification of infrastructure in the CEE region
potential future gas infrastructure needs in the
region. This CEE GRIP edition is fully based on a \ Specific simulations of network modelling to
harmonised data set, as was used for developing assess market integration and SoS
the TYNDP 2018. This ensures consistency be- \ The development of a regional approach to
tween these two reports. Due to the fact that the SoS demand and supply scenarios
CEE GRIP is published after the TYNDP 2018, the \ CEE GRIP Regional N-1 analysis up to a 10-year
contributing transmission system operators time frame
(TSOs) in the CEE GRIP took the opportunity to
present the updated commissioning years of the in- On top of that, the present edition of the CEE GRIP
frastructure projects planned in this region. If any takes a closer look at the role played by natural gas
modifications to the source data from the TYNDP in Central-Eastern Europe to build low-emission
2018 were used in this report, they are clearly ex- economies and meet the climate and energy objec-
plained in the text of specific chapters and annexes. tives of the European Union in the long-term per-
The difference between the TYNDP 2018 and the spective.
CEE GRIP is also analysed in the time period. While The general methodological approach used in the
the TYNDP 2018 looks 20 years ahead due to REG CEE GRIP is based on the one used in the TYNDP
347/2013 and the ENTSOG Methodology for 2018. For analyses and results carried out beyond
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Gas Infrastructure Projects the focus of the TYNDP 2018, the description of the
currently in force3, the CEE GRIP focuses on a specific methodology used is detailed in the re-
10-year timeline to provide more precise informa- spective chapters concerned. The status and all
tion about the near future. data used in the report reflect the best information
available at the moment of collection. Throughout
this document, the CEE TSOs support the exchange
of valuable information and analysis for all implied
actors and assist the market in assessing gas infra-
structure needs in the CEE region.
2 https://www.entsog.eu/tyndp#entsog-ten-year-network-development-plan-2018
3 https://www.entsog.eu/methodologies-and-modelling#2nd-cba-methodology
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 7TSOs CONTRIBUTING TO THE CEE GRIP
The CEE GRIP region covers 10 countries, with the involvement of 17 TSOs. The complete list of countries
and TSOs contributing to the CEE GRIP is presented in the table below.
INVOLVED TSOs
Country: TSO:
Austria GAS CONNECT AUSTRIA GmbH
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH
Bulgaria Bulgartransgaz EAD
Croatia Plinacro d.o.o.
Czech Republic NET4GAS, s.r.o.
Germany Fluxys TENP GmbH
GASCADE Gastransport GmbH
Gasunie Deutschland Transport Services GmbH
GRTgaz Deutschland GmbH
ONTRAS Gastransport GmbH
Open Grid Europe GmbH
terranets bw GmbH
Hungary FGSZ Ltd.
Poland Gas Transmission Operator GAZ-SYSTEM S.A.
Romania Transgaz S.A.
Slovakia eustream, a.s.
Slovenia PLINOVODI d.o.o.
Table 1.1 : The list of TSOs contributing to the CEE GRIP
Work on this edition of the CEE GRIP was coordinated by eustream, a.s.
The CEE GRIP document was aknowledged by the following TSOs contributing to the CEE GRIP: GAS CON-
NECT AUSTRIA GmbH, Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH, Bulgartransgaz EAD, Plinacro d.o.o., NET4GAS,
s.r.o., Fluxys TENP GmbH, GASCADE Gastransport GmbH, Gasunie Deutschland Transport Services GmbH,
GRTgaz Deutschland GmbH, ONTRAS Gastransport GmbH, Open Grid Europe GmbH, terranets bw GmbH,
FGSZ Ltd., Gas Transmission Operator GAZ-SYSTEM S.A., Transgaz S.A. and PLINOVODI d.o.o
8 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 20192 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
IN THE CEE REGION
This chapter focuses on the infrastructure level. It provides a short summary of
projects that have been commissioned since the publication of the last edition
of the CEE GRIP. As was the case in the previous editions, it also gives an over-
view of gas projects planned for implementation in the upcoming decade.
In order to reach the widest group of project pro- The path towards a well-functioning and competi-
moters, the data set has been based on the process tive gas market in Central-Eastern Europe is not yet
run by ENTSOG for the purpose of the TYNDP 2018. complete however. The region continues to be
This ensures the full involvement of all relevant strongly dependent on Russian gas as its major gas
stakeholders, including the TSOs, SSOs, LSOs, and supply source, and the north-south gas corridor is
third-party project promoters in the region. still under development. This case shows that the
The EU energy policy aims to support the develop- activity linked to the need for new infrastructure de-
ment of an internal energy market that guarantees velopments to foster diversification of gas supply
secure, competitive, sustainable and affordable sources and to further improve market integration
sources of energy for customers. Actions to sup- remains highly dynamic and remains part of the
port this policy are being undertaken in the gas sec- core business of the CEE TSOs. Such actions are ex-
tor. They focus on putting in place an appropriate pected to contribute towards the enhancement of a
regulatory framework and the adequate level of regional gas market in the CEE region with a high lev-
necessary infrastructure for both the present and el of security, competition and liquidity.
the future. In relation to infrastructure activity, sig- Table 2.1 summarises investment projects that
nificant developments have taken place in the Cen- were included in the CEE GRIP 2017 and have been
tral-Eastern Europe (CEE) region in recent years. commissioned since the release of the last CEE
This was primarily done by improving cross-border GRIP report in May 2017.
integration between individual countries, reinforc-
ing internal network grids, and increasing physical
diversification of gas supplies in the region.
Promoter Name Code
Bulgartransgaz EAD A project for the construction of a gas pipeline BG-RO TRA-N-379
Fluxys TENP GmbH Revers flow TENP Germany TRA-F-208
GRTgaz Deutschland GmbH CS Rothenstadt TRA-F-337
West to East operation of the IP Waidhaus TRA-F-753
Open Grid Europe GmbH Pipeline project “Schwandorf-Finsing” TRA-F-343
Compressor station “Herbstein” TRA-F-344
Compressor station “Werne” TRA-F-345
Plinacro Ltd LNG evacuation pipeline Omišalj – Zlobin (Croatia) TRA-N-90
SNTGN Transgaz SA NTS developments in North-East Romania TRA-N-357
Table 2.1 : Investment projects commissioned after the publication of the CEE GRIP 2017
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 9CEE GRIP – Project progress details
CEE GRIP – Investment projects by type and
implementation status
UGS Less-Advanced; LNG Advanced; 1; 1 %
2; 2 %
LNG FID; 1; 1 %
UGS Non-FID; 5; 6 % LNG FID; 1; 1 %
UGS FID; 0; 0 %
LNG Less-Ad-
UGS FID; 0; 0 % LNG Non-FID; 4; 4 % vanced; 3; 4 %
UGS Advanced;
TRA FID; 17, 19 % 3; 3 %
TRA Non-FID;
63; 70 %
TRA Less-
Advanced;
28; 31 %
TRA Advanced;
TRA FID; 17; 19 % 35; 39 %
LNG FID TRA Non-FID
LNG Non-FID UGS FID LNG Advanced TRA Less-Advanced
TRA FID UGS Non-FID LNG FID UGS Advanced
LNG Less-Advanced UGS FID
Figure 2.1 : Investment projects included in TRA Advanced UGS Less-Advanced
the CEE GRIP by type and implementation TRA FID
status
Figure 2.2 : CEE GRIP – Project progress details
TSOs and other project promoters submitted a to-
tal of 90 investment projects within the geographi- Figure 2.3 displays more detailed split of the non-
cal coverage area of the CEE GRIP in the TYNDP FID projects by their maturity status as defined by
2018. Compared to the previous edition the number TYNDP 2018 – advanced and less-advanced pro-
of projects decreased by 21. The CEE GRIP projects jects.
are planned to be commissioned in the upcoming Note: For Germany are counted only the projects
decade. promoted by the CEE GRIP participating TSOs.
TWh/year
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Austria Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Germany Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia
LNG FID LNG Non-FID TRA Non-FID TRA FID UGS Non-FID
Figure 2.3 : Investment projects included in the CEE GRIP by type and implementation status by country
10 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019The following tables present the main information corporated to the assessments and analysis pro-
on the projects within the geographical coverage vided in the following chapters in this report.
area of the CEE GRIP. The current edition of the Gas More detailed data concerning these projects is
Regional Investment Plans shall be based on the available in the TYNDP 2018 Annex A.
data used in the TYNDP 2018. For the sake of clari-
ty, the presented updates as of 30 May 2019 are in-
AUSTRIA
REPUBLIC
CP
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP
NO HW NG
TRA-N-136
SC EITU
RD AR
L
LSF
Stuttgart M
ZW
EG
AL
Brno
D
AL
Leonberg
Forchheim Břeclav
TRA-F-340 České Budějovice
P TRA-F-918
Oberkappel
LFF
Reinthal
Wertingen
WAG
TRA-N-021 Lanžhot
BACI
MO TRA-N-902
t
Finsing NAC
es
TRA-N-133
aW
O
Burghausen Linz Nit
München
nt
Wolfersberg Pe Baumgarten Láb
ntor Inzenham Ivánka Pr
VIENNA
HA
BRATISLAVA
G
hayngen Haidach
Lindau Kufstein Kittsee
Pfronten Kiefersfelden Salzburg Mosonmagyaróvá
Leiblach TRA-N-423
LIECHT. AUSTRIA Győr
TAG
Innsbruck
LAND Graz
Weitendorf
pass Arnoldstein Klagenfurt TAG II SO TRA-N-389
TRA-F-954
L
Murfeld Cersak
v
TAG
I
TRA-N-112 Tornyiszentmiklós Si
Tarvisio TRA-N-361
Bordano
Kidričevo
HUNG
v
P Pince P
TRA-N-094
Trento Flaibano TRA-N-1227 TRA-N-390 Nagykanizsa
Bizzarone TRA-N-108
SLOVENIA Rogatec TRA-N-325
Ajdovščina LJUBLJANA P TRA-N-1057 Ko
TYNDP Name Promoter Expected Update of PCI
2018 Code commissioning expected (3rd list)
year (according commissioning
to TYNDP 2018) year *
TRA-N-954 TAG Reverse Flow Trans Austria 2019 2020 No
Gasleitung GmbH
TRA-N-361 GCA 2015/08: Entry/Exit Murfeld GAS CONNECT 2022 2024 Yes
AUSTRIA GmbH
TRA-N-021 Bidirectional Austrian-Czech Interconnector GAS CONNECT 2021 2024 Yes
(BACI) ** AUSTRIA GmbH
TRA-N-423 GCA Mosonmagyaróvár GAS CONNECT 2022 2024 Yes
AUSTRIA GmbH
Notes: *Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
**Implementation of the PCI project BACI will depend on the outcome of the pilot project ‘Trading Regional Upgrade’.
Table 2.2: List of projects in Austria
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 11BULGARIA
IN
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP. LEBADA
PIPELA
S-B
P Bibeşti TRA-N-1322
TRAN
BELGRADE TRA-F-358 TRA-F-358 BUCHAREST
Horezu
TRA-N-1322
P
TRA-N-964 Constanţa
Mehedinti Podisor TRA-N-362
LUCEAFARU
Silistra Negru Voda
Kardam
Giurgiu
Ruse
TRA-F-298
IBR
Valchi Dol
Kirevo-Zaječar TRA-N-1197
TRA-N-1197 Kozloduy Oryahovo Provadia Varna KAVARNA
TRA-N-592
SERBIA Niš UGS-N-138 P
Pleven
TRA-N-654 TRA-N-594
GALATA
EA
TRA-N-593 TRA-F-298 Rupcha KALIAKRA
ST
TRA-F-137 TRA-F-298
RIN
P Lozenets
G
Dimitrovgrad
Novi Iskar
TRA-F-298 Burgas
UNMI Pristina
SOFIA BULGARIA
P TRA-F-298
ITB
KOSOVO Stara Zagora
Dupnitsa P TRA-F-298 TRA-N-1197
TRA-N-965 Ihtiman TRA-N-140 Srtandszha
Sopot Kyustendil Malkoclar
Zidilovo
Tetovo Kirklareli
SKOPJE TRA-F-378
Gostivar Novo Selo TRA-N-976 TRA-F-298 Edirne
IGB
NORTH Kulata P Petrich Istanbul
MACEDONIA
A TRA-N-980 Sidirokastron Xanthi
Prilep Komotini TRA-N-128
Gevgelija Karperi TRA-N-010
Kafasan P Tekirdag Marmara
Idomeni Kilkis Alexandroupolis Ereglisi
S-N-1229 Bitola TA
P
P TRA-N-063 Kipi P
TRA-N-967 IDO
N
Kavala
LNG-N-062 P
SE
PO
UGS-N-385 TRA-N-1129
TRA-F-051 Nea Messimvria
TRA-N-1090 Bursa
TYNDP NameP Thessaloniki TRA-N-1092Promoter Expected Update of PCI
AP TRA-F-941 Alexandroupolis LNG os Karacabey
TAP Code
2018 commissioning expected (3rd list)
S ar
year (according commission-
to TYNDP 2018) ing year *
TRA-F-137 Interconnection Bulgaria- Serbia Ministry of Energy 2022 Yes
TRA-F-378 Interconnector Greece-Bulgaria ICGB a.d. 2025 Yes
(IGB Project)
TRA-N-140 Interconnection Turkey-Bulgaria Bulgartransgaz EAD 2022 No
TRA-N-298 Rehabilitation, Modernization and Bulgartransgaz EAD 2024 Yes
Expansion of the NTS
TRA-N-654 Eastring – Bulgaria Bulgartransgaz EAD 2028 Yes
UGS-N-138 UGS Chiren Expansion Bulgartransgaz EAD 2024 Yes
TRA-N-592 Looping CS Valchi Dol – Line valve Novi Bulgartransgaz EAD 2022 Yes
Iskar
TRA-N-593 Varna-Oryahovo gas pipeline Bulgartransgaz EAD 2022 Yes
TRA-N-594 Construction of a Looping CS Provadia – Bulgartransgaz EAD 2022 Yes
Rupcha village
TRA-N-1197 Expansion of the gas infrastructure Bulgartransgaz EAD 2022 No
between BG-TR and BG-RS borders
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
Table 2.3: List of projects in Bulgaria
12 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019CROATIA
Map of projects in the specified country basedG IIon the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018.
TRA-N-389
Arnoldstein Klagenfurt TA TRA-N-831
SO
L
Murfeld Cersak
v
TAG
I
TRA-N-112 Tornyiszentmiklós Siófok
Tarvisio TRA-N-361
Bordano
H U N G A R Y TRA-N-123
Kidričevo
v
P Pince P
TRA-N-094
Flaibano TRA-N-1227 TRA-N-390 Nagykanizsa
TRA-N-108
SLOVENIA Rogatec TRA-N-325
Ajdovščina LJUBLJANA P TRA-N-1057 Kozármisleny
TRA-N-092 Sub
Istrana TRA-N-008 Gorizia
Sempeter TRA-N-086 ZAGREB
Trieste Drávaszerdahely
Lučko Sombor
Venezia TRA-N-354 Kozarac
P TRA-F-334 Donji Miholac
Umag Koper Karlovac
Porto
Viro TRA-N-336 Rijeka Zlobin
TRA-N-075 TRA-N-1058
Osijek
TRA-N-070 Bačko Nov
TRA-F-214 Cavarzere Omisalj P TRA-N-90 TRA-N-1057 Slobodnica
Porto Levante Krk LNG Krk Vel. Kladusa Sotin
TRA-N-303 P
LNG-N-082 Jasenica
Lička TRA-N-910
Vodnjan TRA-N-066
Rakovica Tržac Cazin Brod
Ravenna Pula Bos. Krupa Modrica
Bihač Banja Luka
TRA-N-224
Gospič BOSNIA
AND
TRA-N-009 C R O AT I A Loznic
San Marino
HERZEGOVINA
S.M. Zadar Travnik Zenica Zvornik
Knin
G.Vakuf
Benkovac
Ancona TRA-N-851 Kiseljac
TRA-N-007 TRA-N-910
Recanati SARAJEVO
Imotski Posušje
Perugia Split
TRA-N-009
IA
TRA-N-302 Mostar
P
TRA-N-974
A
d
TRA-N-068
AD
ri
RIA
Cellino Ploče
a
TRA-N-009
TIC
ti
A P
IA
P MONTENE
c
I PE
Chieti
LIN
S
E
L’Aquila
e
TRA-N-974 PODGORICA
a
TRA-N-009
ROME TRA-N-068
IA
P
Campobasso
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 13TYNDP Name Promoter Expected Update of PCI
2018 Code commissioning expected (3rd list)
year (according commission-
to TYNDP 2018) ing year *
TRA-F-334 Compressor station 1 at the Croatian gas Plinacro Ltd 2019 Yes
transmission system
LNG-N-82 LNG terminal Krk LNG Hrvatska 2023 Yes
d.o.o.
TRA-N-90 LNG evacuation pipeline Omišalj – Plinacro Ltd 2019 No
Zlobin (Croatia)
TRA-N-86 Interconnection Croatia/Slovenia Plinacro Ltd 2021 Yes
(Lučko – Zabok – Rogatec)
TRA-N-66 Interconnection Croatia –Bosnia and Plinacro Ltd 2020 No
Herzegovina (Slobodnica- Bosanski Brod)
TRA-N-75 LNG evacuation pipeline Zlobin-Bosiljevo- Plinacro Ltd 2020 Yes
Sisak-Kozarac
TRA-N-1057 Compressor stations 2 and 3 at the Croatian Plinacro Ltd 2022 Yes
gas transmission system
TRA-N-302 Interconnection Croatia-Bosnia and Plinacro Ltd 2021 No
Herzegovina (South)
TRA-N-68 Ionian Adriatic Pipeline Plinacro Ltd 2023 No
TRA-N-70 Interconnection Croatia/Serbia Plinacro Ltd 2023 No
(Slobdnica-Sotin-Bačko Novo Selo)
TRA-N-1058 LNG Evacuation Pipeline Plinacro Ltd 2023 Yes
Kozarac-Slobodnica
TRA-N-303 Interconnection Croatia-Bosnia and Plinacro Ltd 2027 No
Herzegovina (west)
TRA-N-336 Interconnection Croatia/Slovenia Plinacro Ltd 2027 No
(Umag-Koper)
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019..
Table 2.4: List of projects in Croatia
14 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Lodz
P
Map of projects in theLeipzig
specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018. Odolanów TRA-N-245
Lasów
EUGA
OPAL
L
Reckrod Sayda Wroclaw
STEGAL
Olbernhau
Deutschneudorf
Hora Svaté Kateřiny TRA-N-273
TRA-N-814
Brandov
GERMANY Brandov
TRA-F-752
TRA-F-247
Kędzierzyn-Koźle P
LE
TRA-F-275
EL
Rimpar Hradec Králové Katowice Tworzeń
TRA-N-273
Z
GA
PRAGUE Oświęcim
TRA-N-755 Rothenstadt
CZECH Cieszyn
STORK II
ME
GA Plzeň Skoczów
L
Waidhaus
STORK
Schwandorf
REPUBLIC
I
CP
TRA-N-136
LSF
M
EG Brno
AL Žilina Poprad
Forchheim Břeclav TRA-N-017
TRA-F-340 České Budějovice
P TRA-F-918
Oberkappel SLOVAKIA
LFF
Reinthal
Wertingen
WAG
TRA-N-021 Lanžhot Zvolen
BACI
MO TRA-N-902 Nad Turňou
t
Finsing NAC
es
TRA-N-133
aW
O
Burghausen Linz Nitra
nt
München
Pe
Baumgarten Láb
Wolfersberg TRA-N-1235
Inzenham Ivánka Pri Nitre Vel'ké Zlievce
VIENNA
HA
BRATISLAVA
G
Haidach Balassagyarmat
Kufstein Kittsee
Pfronten Kiefersfelden Salzburg Mosonmagyaróvár TRA-N-524
TRA-N-423 TRA-N-636
TYNDP Name Promoter Expected Update
Győr of PCI
2018 Code AUSTRIA commissioning expected (3rd list)
year (according commissioning
to TYNDP 2018) year *
TRA-N-136 Czech-Polish Gas Interconnector (CPI) NET4GAS, s.r.o. 2022 2023 Yes
TRA-F-752 Capacity4Gas (C4G) – DE/CZ NET4GAS, s.r.o. Phase 1: 2019 Yes
Phase 2: 2021
TRA-F-918 Capacity4Gas (C4G) – CZ/SK NET4GAS, s.r.o. 2020 No
TRA-N-133 Bidirectional Austrian Czech Interconnection NET4GAS, s.r.o. 2021 2024a) Yesb)
(BACI)
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
a) The expected commissioning year of the BACI project was postponed due to testing of the pilot project “Trading Regional Upgrade” (TRU).
b) The PCI status of the project was granted with the following addition: Implementation of BACI as a PCI will depend on the outcome of the pilot project
‘Trading Regional Upgrade’.
Table 2.5: List of projects in the Czech Republic
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 15ZEEPIPE
E
FRANPIP
B/13
Egtved
GERMANY Nybro
EUROPIPE II
COPENHAGEN
EU
Malmö
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP.
RO
NO
NOGAT
Dragør
TRA-N-780
PIP
RPI
Trelleborg
Faxe
NG
E
BORNHOLM
BALTIC
PE
T
Ellund PIPE
KHAM
DEUDA
N
TRA-N-1198 TRA-N-271
Groningen
Dornum TRA-N-1199 Greifswald
TRA-F-1271 Brunsbüttel LNG
Quarnstedt
NGT Krummhörn Świnoujście
TRA-N-1200 Hetlingen LNG-F-272
Hamburg
Sülstorf
T
NEL
GA
Emden NETRA
TRA-N-1267 Kamminke
NO
TRA-N-949 Płoty
Balgzand Oude Statenzijl NEL Kraak
Oldenburg
Bunde
Steinbrink TRA-N-763
Julianadorp Bunder-Tief
L
Szczecin
TRA-N-951 Wardenburg
NE
Vlieghuis
G
EUGAL
OPAL
RH
TRA-N-1173
L
Steinitz
NE
AMSTERDAM Nordlohne
Rehden
THE NETHERLANDS
L
WA
Emsbüren TRA-N-291 Ahlten
NO
Maasvlakte Enschede
e Terminal Rotterdam Drohne BERLIN Mallnow
TRA-N-192 Winterswijk Hannover
LNG-N-050 Zevenaar
Legden Kienbaum
Münster Lwòwek
Elten TRA-N-1254
AL
JAG
L
Hilvarenbeek Werne
TRA-F-329
DA
Zelzate
EUGAL
K
WE
OPAL
Zandvliet E LIN Guben Gubin
Poppel ZE
Tegelen Essen Dortmund
TRA-N-500 TRA-N-763
Obbicht Düsseldorf
MIDA
Dilsen
‘s-Gravenvoeren Haanrade Kassel
Leipzig
L
BRUSSELS
Bocholtz Lasów
EUGA
Broichweiden
OPAL
Stolberg
Eynatten
BELGIUM
L
Raeren/Lichtenbusch
Blaregnies Herbstein Reckrod Sayda
STEGAL
Olbernhau
Deutschneudorf
TRA-N-814 Hora Svaté Kateřiny
Brandov
GDLux AL
GERMANY Brandov
TE
ID
NP
Brâs / Pétange M
TRA-F-752
LUX.
E
LL
Gernsheim Rimpar Hradec Králové
ZE
Remich
GA
LUX. MEGAL PRAGUE
Lampertheim TRA-N-755 Rothenstadt
TRA-N-047 P TE ME
Plzeň CZECH
AL
NP GA
EG
Cheppy L
Obergailbach Waidhaus
M
TRA-N-047
Medelsheim Karlsruhe
Schwandorf
REPUBLIC
NO HW NG
SC EITU
RD AR
L
Au
LSF
am Rhein
Stuttgart M
ZW
AL
EG
D
-Saint-Julien AL
Leonberg
Forchheim
NP
P Morelmaison TRA-F-340 České Budějovice
TE
TRA-N-047 Oberkappel
LFF
TRA-N-021
WAG
Wertingen MO
t
Finsing NAC
es
Voisines TRA-N-133
aW
O
Burghausen Linz
nt
München
Pe
Wolfersberg Baumgarten
Fallentor Inzenham VIENNA
Wallbach Thayngen Haidach
Oltingue Basel Lindau Kufstein
Pfronten Kiefersfelden Salzburg
E
Rodersdorf
SAÔN
Leiblach
Palleau Zürich
AUSTRIA
E
VAL D
LIECHT.
TAG
BERN Innsbruck
SWITZERLAND Graz
16 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019TYNDP Name Promoter Expected Update of PCI
2018 Code commissioning expected (3rd list)
year (according commission-
to TYNDP 2018) ing year *
TRA-N-814 Upgrade for IP Deutschneudorf ONTRAS Gastransport 2019 No
et al. for More Capacity GmbH
TRA-F-241 MONACO section phase I bayernets GmbH 2018 No
(Burghausen-Finsing)
TRA-F-291 NOWAL – Nord West Anbindungs GASCADE Gastransport 2020 No
leitung GmbH
TRA-F-208 Reverse Flow TENP Fluxys TENP GmbH, Open 2018 2020 No
Germany Grid Europe GmbH
TRA-F-1271 Compressor Station Krummhoern Open Grid Europe GmbH 2022 No
TRA-F-937 Nord Stream 2 Nord Stream 2 AG 2019 No
TRA-N-340 CS Wertingen bayernets GmbH, 2019 No
Open Grid Europe GmbH
TRA-N-763 EUGAL – Europäische Gasanbin GASCADE GmbH / Fluxys 2020 No
dungsleitung (European Gaslink) Deutschland GmbH / GUD
GmbH&Co.KG / ONTRAS
GmbH
TRA-N-949 Oude(NL)-Bunde(DE) GTG H-Gas Gastransport Nord GmbH 2027 No
TRA-N-951 Embedding CS Folmhusen in Gasunie Deutschland 2020 No
H-Gas Transport Services GmbH
TRA-N-808 Transport of gas volumes to the Gasunie Deutschland 2025 No
Netherlands Transport Services GmbH
TRA-F-329 ZEELINK Open Grid Europe GmbH, 2023 No
Thyssengas GmbH
TRA-N-755 CS Rimpar GRTgaz Deutschland GmbH, 2023 No
Open Grid Europe GmbH
TRA-N-809 Additional East-West transport Gasunie Deutschland 2020 No
Transport Services GmbH
TRA-N-955 GUD: Complete conversion to Gasunie Deutschland 2030 No
H-Gas Transport Services GmbH
LNG-N-1198 LNG Terminal Brunsbüttel Gasunie Deutschland 2021 No
Transport Services GmbH
TRA-N-1199 LNG Terminal Brunsbüttel – Gasunie Deutsch-land 2021 No
Grid Integration Transport Services GmbH
TRA-N-1267 Upgrade Sülstorf station NGT GmbH, GUD GmbH & 2019 No
Co. KG, Fluxys D GmbH
TRA-N-1200 Expansion MS Hetlingen Gasunie Deutschland 2022 No
Transport Services GmbH
TRA-N-1254 CS Elten Open Grid Europe GmbH, 2022 No
Thyssengas GmbH
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
Table 2.6: List of projects in Germany
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 17HUNGARY Žilina Poprad
Břeclav TRA-N-017
TRA-F-190
P TRA-F-918
Reinthal
SLOVAKIA
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP .
Budince
TRA-N-021 Lanžhot Zvolen Jablonov UGS-N-356
BACI
TRA-N-902 Nad Turňou Košice Uzhgorod
TRA-N-133 Nitra Vel’ké
Kapušany
Baumgarten Láb TRA-N-1235 TRA-N-628
Ivánka Pri Nitre Vel'ké Zlievce
VIENNA
HA
Beregovo
G BRATISLAVA Balassagyarmat Beregdaróc
Kittsee
Mosonmagyaróvár TRA-N-524 TRA-N-656 Tekovo
TRA-N-423 TRA-N-636
Mediesu A
Győr
TAG
BUDAPEST
Hajduszoboszlo
EA
Graz Vecsés Satu Mare
ST
Ercsi RI
Weitendorf NG
TRA-N-389 Adony
TRA-N-831
SO
L
urfeld Cersak
v
Siófok
TRA-N-361 TRA-N-112 Tornyiszentmiklós P Városföld
TRA-N-377 UGS-N-371
HUNGARY
dričevo P
v
Pince P
TRA-N-123
A-N-094
TRA-N-390 Nagykanizsa TRA-F-286
A Rogatec TRA-N-325 P Csanádpalota
A P TRA-N-1057 Kozármisleny Subotica Horia
TRA-N-086 ZAGREB Kiskundorozsma Nădlac Arad TRA-N-1322
Lučko Drávaszerdahely
TRA-F-358 TRA-N-959
Kozarac Sombor
P TRA-F-334 Donji Miholac TRA-N-959
Karlovac Hateg
Osijek
TRA-N-075 TRA-N-1058 P
TYNDP Name TRA-N-1057 TRA-N-070 Bačko Novo
Promoter Selo Expected Update of PCI
Slobodnica Jupa
TRA-N-303 Vel.Code
2018 Kladusa Sotin commissioning expected (3rd list) TRA
year (according commission-
to TYNDP 2018) ing year *
TRA-N-524 Enhancement of Transmission Capacity of Magyar Gáz 2022 Yes
Slovak-Hungarian interconnector Tranzit Zrt.
TRA-N-636 Development of Transmission Capacity at Magyar Gáz 2022 2019 Yes
Slovak-Hungarian interconnector Tranzit Zrt.
TRA-N-286 Romanian-Hungarian FGSZ Ltd. 2019 Yes
reverse flow Hungarian section 1st stage
TRA-N-325 Slovenian-Hungarian interconnector FGSZ Ltd. Phase 1: 2022 Phase 1: 2023 Yes
Phase 2: 2023 Phase 2: 2025
TRA-N-656 Eastring – Hungary FGSZ Ltd. 2028 Yes
TRA-N-831 Vecsés-Városföld gas transit pipeline Magyar Gáz 2022 Yes
Tranzit Zrt.
TRA-N-123 Városföld CS FGSZ Ltd. 2022 Yes
TRA-N-377 Romanian-Hungarian FGSZ Ltd. 2022 Yes
reverse flow Hungarian section 2nd stage
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
Table 2.7: List of projects in Hungary
18 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019POLAND
BA LTIC P
IP E
Jurbarkas
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP. Jauniunai
Šakiai Kaunas
TRA-N-271 FSRU
Greifswald Polish Baltic Kaliningrad
Sea Coast RUSSIA VILNIUS
GIPL
Świnoujście LNG-N-947
LNG-F-272 Gdansk TRA-F-341
Kamminke
Płoty
TRA-N-763
Szczecin
GIPL
Sionim
POLAND
EUGAL
OPAL
TRA-N-1173
TRA-F-212 Tietierowka
L
Damaslawek Po
Ro
EuRoPoL Eu
BERLIN UGS-N-914
Mallnow Kondratki
EuRoPoL
Kienbaum
Lwòwek Wloclawek
Kobryn
Poznan P Rembelszczyzna Wysokoje
EUGAL
OPAL
Guben Gubin TRA-F-247 WARSAW
TRA-N-763
Lodz
P
Odolanów TRA-N-245
Lasów
EUGA
OPAL
Wronów
L
Sayda Wroclaw TRA-N-245
Olbernhau
Deutschneudorf
Hora Svaté Kateřiny TRA-N-273
TRA-N-814
Brandov
Brandov TRA-F-247
TRA-F-752
Kędzierzyn-Koźle P
E
TRA-F-275
LL
Hradec Králové Katowice Tworzeń
ZE
TRA-N-273
GA
PRAGUE Rzeszow
Oświęcim Jaroslaw
CZECH Cieszyn
STORK II
Plzeň Skoczów Pogórska Wola Drozdovychi Lviv
STORK
Drozdwicze
REPUBLIC Strachocina
Hermanowice
TRA-N-621
I
CP
TRA-N-136
Brno Ivano-Frankivsk
Žilina Poprad
Břeclav TRA-N-017
České Budějovice TRA-F-190
P TRA-F-918
TYNDP
Oberkappel Name Reinthal
S L O V A K Promoter
IA Expected
Budince
Update of PCI
WAG
TRA-N-021 Lanžhot UGS-N-356
2018 Code Zvolen Jablonov commissioning expected (3rd list)
BAC
TRA-N-902 Nad Turňou Košice
t
Uzhgorod
es
aW
year (according commission-
nt
Pe
to TYNDP 2018) ing year *
TRA-F-212 Gas Interconnection Poland-Lithuania (GIPL) – PL section GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2021 Yes
TRA-F-247 North-South Gas Corridor in Western Poland GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2020 2021 Yes
TRA-N-273 Poland-Czech Republic interconnection (PL section)** GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2022 2023 Yes
TRA-F-275 Poland-Slovakia interconnection (PL section) GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2021 Yes
LNG-F-272 Upgrade of LNG terminal in Świnoujście GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2023 Yes
TRA-N-621 Poland-Ukraine Gas interconnection (PL section) GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2020 2022 No
LNG-N-947 FSRU Polish Baltic Sea Coast GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2022 2025 No
TRA-N-271 Poland-Denmark interconnection (Baltic Pipe) – PL section GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2022 Yes
TRA-N-245 North-South Gas Corridor in Eastern Poland GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2022 2029 Yes
UGS-N-914 UGS Damasławek GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2026 No
TRA-N-1173 Poland-Denmark interconnection (Baltic Pipe) – GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2022 Yes
onshore section in Poland
TRA-N-1202 GCP GAZ-SYSTEM/ONTRAS – incremental capacity project GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. 2022 2023 No
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
** In the process of assessing demand for incremental capacity between the gas transmission systems of GAZ-SYSTEM and NET4GAS conducted in 2019,
demand indication was submitted for incremental capacity in the direction from Poland to the Czech Republic. In order to meet the market demand for
incremental capacity at this interconnection point, the operators decided to initiate technical analysis for the entry-exit system concerned. More informa-
tion on plans to extend capacities at the Polish-Czech border will be provided by the project promoters under the ongoing incremental procedure.
Table 2.8: List of projects in Poland
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 19ROMANIA
S L O V A K I AMap of projects inBudince
the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP.
Oleksiivka
Jablonov UGS-N-356
Nad Turňou Košice Uzhgorod
Vel’ké
Kapušany
TRA-N-628 Anan’iv
Beregovo
Balassagyarmat Beregdaróc
TRA-N-656 Tekovo
ATI
Mediesu Aurit MOLDOVA
Hajduszoboszlo Ungheni
EA
Satu Mare ST TRA-N-655 CHISINAU Grebenyky
RI Iaşi
NG
Odesa
TRA-N-831 Târgu Mureş
Városföld P UGS-N-233 Kaushany
TRA-N-357
AI
TRA-N-123 TRA-N-377 UGS-N-371 P
RI,
DK
TRA-F-286
I, S
AT
Onesti
P Csanádpalota Coroi TRA-N-357
ODESSA
Subotica Horia TRA-N-959
Kiskundorozsma Nădlac Arad TRA-N-1322 Orlovka
TRA-F-358 TRA-N-959 Mediaș EAS
TRI TRA-N-139
TRA-N-959 Sibiu
NG TRA-N-1277
P
Isaccea
ko Novo Selo P
Hateg
ROMANIA
Jupa
TRA-N-1322 TRA-N-655
TRA-F-358
PIPELALKAN
TRA-F-358
Novi Sad COBALCESCU
INE
LEBADA
S-B
P Bibeşti TRA-N-1322
TRAN
BELGRADE TRA-F-358 TRA-F-358 BUCHAREST
Horezu DOINA
TRA-N-1322
P
TRA-N-964 Constanţa
Mehedinti Podisor TRA-N-362 ANA
LUCEAFARUL
Silistra Negru Voda
Kardam DOMINO
Giurgiu
Ruse
TRA-F-298
IBR
Valchi Dol
Kirevo-Zaječar TRA-N-1197
TRA-N-1197 Kozloduy Oryahovo Provadia Varna KAVARNA
TRA-N-592
SERBIA Niš UGS-N-138 P
Pleven
TRA-N-654 TRA-N-594
GALATA
EA
TRA-N-593 TRA-F-298 Rupcha KALIAKRA
ST
TRA-F-137 TRA-F-298
RIN
P Lozenets
G
Dimitrovgrad
MONTENEGRO Novi Iskar
TRA-F-298 Burgas
BULGARIA
20 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019TYNDP Name Promoter Expected Update of PCI
2018 Code commissioning expected (3rd list)
year (according commission-
to TYNDP 2018) ing year *
TRA-N-357 NTS developments in North-East SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2019 2021 No
Romania
UGS-N-233 Depomures Engie Romania S.A. 2023 Yes
TRA-N-139 Interconnection of the NTS with the DTS SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2019 2020 Yes
and reverse flow at Isaccea
TRA-N-964 New NTS developments for taking over SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2019 2021 Yes
gas from the Black Sea shore
TRA-F-358 Development on the Romanian territory SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2020 2020 Yes
of the NTS (BG–RO–HU–AT Phase 1)
TRA-N-1322 Development on the Romanian territory SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2022 2022 Yes
of the NTS (BG–RO–HU–AT Phase 2)
TRA-N-362 Development on the Romanian territory SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2020 2021 Yes
of the Southern Transmission Corridor
TRA-N-655 Eastring – Romania SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2028 Yes
UGS-N-371 Sarmasel undeground gas storage in Societatea Naţională 2024 Yes
Romania de Gaze Naturale
ROMGAZ S.A.
TRA-N-959 Further enlargement of BG–RO–HU–AT SNTGN Transgaz S.A. 2023 2025 Yes
transmission corridor (BRUA) phase 3)
LNG-N-376 Azerbaijan, Georgia, Romania Inter AGRI LNG Project 2026 Yes
connector – AGRI Company SRL (RO)
TRA-N-1268 Romania-Serbia Interconnection SNTGN Transgaz SA 2020 2020 No
TRA-N-1277 Upgrading GMS Isaccea 1 and GMS SNTGN Transgaz SA 2019 2021 No
Negru Voda 1
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
Table 2.9: List of projects in Romania
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 21SLOVAKIA
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP.
Kędzierzyn-Koźle P
Hradec Králové Katowice Tworzeń TRA-F-275
TRA-N-273 Rzeszow
Oświęcim Jaroslaw
CZECH Cieszyn
STORK II
Skoczów Pogórska Wola Drozdovychi
STORK
Drozdwicze
REPUBLIC Strachocina
Hermanowice
TRA-N-621
I
CP
TRA-N-136
Brno
Žilina Poprad
Břeclav TRA-N-017
Budějovice TRA-F-190
P TRA-F-918
Reinthal
SLOVAKIA Budince
TRA-N-021 Lanžhot Zvolen Jablonov UGS-N-356
BACI
TRA-N-902 Nad Turňou Košice Uzhgorod
TRA-N-133 Nitra Vel’ké
Kapušany
Baumgarten Láb TRA-N-1235 TRA-N-628
Ivánka Pri Nitre Vel'ké Zlievce
VIENNA
HA
Beregovo
BRATISLAVA
G
Kittsee Balassagyarmat Beregdaróc
Mosonmagyaróvár TRA-N-524 TRA-N-656
TRA-N-423 TRA-N-636
Győr
TAG
BUDAPEST
Hajduszoboszlo
Graz Vecsés Satu Mare
Ercsi
Weitendorf
TYNDP Name Promoter Expected Update of PCI
2018 Code commissioning expected (3rd list)
year (according commissioning
to TYNDP 2018) year *
TRA-F-190 Poland-Slovakia interconnection eustream, a.s. 2021 Yes
TRA-F-902 Capacity increase at IP Lanžhot entry eustream, a.s. 2019 No
TRA-N-628 Eastring – Slovakia Eastring B.V. 2028 Yes
TRA-N-17 System Enhancements – Eustream eustream, a.s. 2027 No
TRA-N-1235 Firm transmission capacity increase eustream, a.s. 2022 No
at the IP Veľké Zlievce
UGS-N-356 Underground Gas Storage Velke Kapusany NAFTA a.s. (joint 2023 No
stock company)
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
Table 2.10: List of projects in Slovakia
22 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019AUSTRIA
SLOVENIA
Graz
Map of projects in the specified country based on the ENTSOG TYNDP 2018 MAP .
Weitendorf
Arnoldstein Klagenfurt TAG
II TRA-N-389
SO
L
Murfeld Cersak
v
TAG
I
Tarvisio TRA-N-361 TRA-N-112 Tornyiszentmiklós
Bordano
Kidričevo P
v
Pince
TRA-N-094
Flaibano TRA-N-1227 TRA-N-390
TRA-N-108
S L O V E N I A Rogatec
Ajdovščina LJUBLJANA P TRA-N-1057
Istrana TRA-N-008 Gorizia TRA-N-092
Sempeter TRA-N-086 ZAGREB
Trieste
Lučko
Venezia TRA-N-354 Kozarac
P TRA-F-334
Umag Koper Karlovac
Porto
Viro TRA-N-336 Rijeka Zlobin TRA-N-075
Cavarzere Omisalj P TRA-N-90
TYNDP Porto Levante
Name Krk LNG Krk Promoter
TRA-N-303 Vel.
Expected Kladusa
Update of PCI
2018 Code LNG-N-082 Jasenica
Lička commissioning TRA-N-910
expected (3rd list)
Vodnjan year (according commissioning
Cazin
Rakovica Tržacyear *
to TYNDP 2018)
Ravenna Pula Bos. Krupa
TRA-N-390 Upgrade of Rogatec interconnection Plinovodi d.o.o. 2022 Bihač
2023 Yes
(M1A/1 Interconnection Rogatec)
TRA-N-94 CS Kidričevo, 2nd phase of upgrade eustream, a.s. 2022 2023 No
TRA-N-108 M3 pipeline reconstruction from Plinovodi d.o.o. 2022 2025 No
CS Ajdovščina to Šempeter/Gorizia
TRA-N-112 R15/1 Pince - Lendava - Kidričevo Plinovodi d.o.o. 2023 2023/2025 Yes
TRA-N-389 Upgrade of Murfeld/Ceršak interconnec- Plinovodi d.o.o. 2022 2023 Yes
tion (M1/3 Interconnection Ceršak)
TRA-N-92 CS Ajdovščina, 1st phase of upgrade Plinovodi d.o.o. 2022 2025 No
Notes: * Update of expected commissioning year reflects a situation as of 30 May 2019.
Table 2.11: List of projects in Slovenia
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 233 ASSESSMENT – INFRASTRUCTURE
RESILIENCE IN THE CEE REGION
3.1 GENERAL NOTE
This assessment chapter focuses on the ability of the European gas system to
meet the supply-demand balance under stress scenarios. The CEE GRIP pro-
vides a look at two different stress scenarios which were not presented in the
TYNDP 2018. These stress scenarios are a simultaneous disruption of the gas
supply routes via Ukraine and Belarus and a disruption of the Russian gas
supply source. The situation under normal conditions is also presented in the
chapter in order to provide a baseline comparison as to how the CEE region is
affected by these two specific stress scenarios.
Assessment results for CEE GRIP specific simu- The European approach does not consider poten-
lations are based on the TYNDP 2018 methodol- tial internal bottlenecks, gas quality issues, and the
ogy and data set. Specifically, all data serving as adaptation of national infrastructure to disruption
the basis for infrastructure modelling in the CEE re- scenarios. In the TYNDP 2018 the assessment is
gion originate from the TYNDP 2018, and all rele- carried out from a European perspective, under the
vant data were collected by ENTSOG in a dedicated assumption of perfect market functioning. This en-
collection process. The ENTSOG simulation tool sures a focus on conclusions where solving the
was used to model the scenarios described, which identified gap cannot be managed by market or
ensures consistency with the TYNDP 2018. regulatory rules and would presumably require
The ENTSOG model works on a top-down approach infrastructure development with cross-border sig-
where countries are used as the basic blocks inter- nificance.
linked by cross-border capacity. Applicable capacity Regarding the planned infrastructure projects, only
is the sum of technical capacity at interconnection the total years of a project’s operation are consid-
points between two neighbouring countries and the ered in the assessment. This means that the first
application of the “lesser-of-rule” to the values of full year of operation used in the assessment is the
the capacity at both sides of the border for each in- first full calendar year following the expected com-
terconnection point (IP). Storage facilities, national missioning date (the expected capacity increment).
gas production, and LNG terminals enter the model All projects related to the CEE region are listed in
within the corresponding country and not accord- Chapter 2 – Infrastructure Projects in the CEE
ing to their territorial location. Furthermore, the Region. For more details concerning a particular in-
model assumes that each modelled country repre- frastructure project, please see the TYNDP 2018
sents a single entry/exit zone. Therefore, the con- Annex A.
sideration of internal interconnections is limited.
24 | Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 20193.2 DISRUPTED DEMAND, REMAINING FLEXIBILITY AND PRECONDITIONS
FOR ASSESSMENT
This analysis presents the evolution of a Curtail- \ Best Estimate, for the years 2020 and 2025
ment Rate (CR) and a Remaining Flexibility (RF) in- \ Distributed Generation, for the year 2030
dicator in the CEE region under the following stress
scenarios modelled for the years 2020, 2025 and \ EUCO 2030, for the year 2030
2030: \ Sustainable Transition, for the year 2030
\ Simultaneous disruption of the gas supply For two climatic situations:
routes via Ukraine and Belarus \ 1-day Design Case (DC, Peak Day)
\ Disruption of the Russian gas supply source \ 2-week high demand case (2W, 14-day uniform
The baseline reference scenario is the normal situ- risk)
ation when there is no disruption. The target of this And three infrastructure levels which are consid-
analysis is not to identify which projects might di- ered in the assessment:
rectly mitigate the risks of demand disruption or
low Remaining Flexibility but to determine their im- \ LOW infrastructure level
pact under the stress scenarios described. \ ADVANCED infrastructure level
The preconditions for this assessment are based on \ PCI 3rd list infrastructure level
the TYNDP 2018 methodology. The assessment is All assessment results prepared for the CEE GRIP
prepared under three demand scenarios4: can be found in the CEE GRIP Annex A – Modelling
Results. The following figure describes the differ-
ences between the infrastructure levels.
Minimum development Advanced Non-FID
of infrastructure Non-FID projects with
common to all scenarios projects PCI label
FID FID FID
projects projects projects
Existing Existing Existing
infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure
Low Advanced PCI
Basis for the System complementary
infrastructure gaps perspective
basis for project-specific assessment for all 4th
PCI applicants
Figure 3.1: Infrastructure Levels (Source: TYNDP 2018)
According to the TYNDP 2018 methodology, the pendently for each country, meaning that they do
Remaining Flexibility (RF) indicator measures the not share European supply flexibility. The higher the
resilience of a zone (at the country level). The indi- indicator value is, the better the resilience. In cases
cator is calculated for high demand situations as where countries experience disrupted demand, the
the additional share of demand each country is able Remaining Flexibility is equal to zero.
to cover before an infrastructure or supply limita-
tion is reached. This calculation is made inde-
4 For detailed information about the methodology used, please see the TYNDP 2018 and its annexes which are available under the following link:
https://www.entsog.eu/tyndp#entsog-ten-year-network-development-plan-2018
Gas Regional Investment Plan for Central-Eastern Europe 2019 | 25You can also read
