PLAN APPENDICES 2014 - City of Columbus
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
2014 PLAN APPENDICES
1Community Survey Results
APPENDIX 1 - PUBLIC INPUT Appendix
W h a t l o c a t i o n1
of West Franklinton?
PfUHW
B
ATL I C FSIrOaUNnR
do
DkOV
you consider the HEART
EO UtYoC OnRN?SEI DSEUR TLT
What location do you consider the HEART
oW eLsOtC AT l Yi n HE S
HEART OF WEST FRANKLINTON?
IIfF YyOoU uC OcUoL Du lCdR E AT
c rEe Aa tN eE WaP AnReK w
IN W
n EeSiTgFhRbA NoKrLhI NoT o
O Nd, p a r k i n
W H E R E W O U L D Y O U B U I L D
West Franklinton where would you build it? I T ?
If you could create a new neighborhood park in
West Franklinton where would you build it?
A2
COMMUNITY MAPPING EXCERCISE
S TA K E H O L D E R I N T E R V I E W S A L S O C O N TA C T E D
ANTHONY THOMAS
AFFORDABLE INSURANCE LIFECARE ALLIANCE BECKY’S BAKERY
Mitch Schifrin John Gregory CANONBY PLACE TOWNHOMES/
Molly Haroz EMMA INVESTMENTS
ARSHOT INVESTMENT CORPORATION Heather McCormick CENTRAL GARDENS
Bill Schottenstein Maurice Elder COLUMBINI’S
Joe Sugar COLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN
LOCAL MATTERS MINDMARKET
BL/OV Noreen Warnock COLUMBUS FIRE DEPARTMENT, ENGINE
Bart Overly HOUSE #10
LOWER LIGHTS CHRISTIAN HEALTH COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN HOUSING
CBRE CENTER AUTHORITY
Shad Phipps Dr. Dana Vallangeon COLUMBUS PEST CONTROL
Scott Behrmann COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK
MIKE’S FOREIGN CAR SERVICE CPO MANAGEMENT
CMHA Mike Caradona CVS
Bryan Brown EATON GARDENS
MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM EDART PHARMACY
COLUMBUS FOOD LEAGUE Sean McKibben EGNER CONSTRUCTION/U & I
Liz Lessner Jason Koma PROPERTIES, LLC
Hugh Jones FAMILY DOLLAR
COMMUNITY SHELTER BOARD Joanne Ranft FLORENTINE
Sara Loken Brent Justice GRIGGS VILLAGE
JUICE FAMILY MARKET
CRAWFORD HOYING NETCARE MARCS
Nelson Yoder Allan Brown MILO’S DELI AND CAFÉ/EXPRESS
Russ Hunter CATERING
Jamie Moore ORANGE BARREL MEDIA MRN, LTD
Brent Crawford Pete Scantland NAI OHIO EQUITIES
NICHOLS RENTALS/BOX PROPERTIES/
FRANKLINTON CYCLEWORKS ST. JOHN’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH HAMILTON HOLDINGS LLC
Greg Lanham Rev. Meribah Mansfield OHIO CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR
Jonathan Youngman Rev. Lee Anne Reat HOUSING
ST. JOHN’S EPISCOPAL, CONFLUENCE SHOP AND SAVE
FRANKLINTON GARDENS Jed Dearing SOUTHPARK
Ashley Laughlin SUBWAY
Nick Stanich WAGENBRENNER DEVELOPMENT SUGARMAN OFFICE FURNITURE
Mark Wagenbrenner THE NRP GROUP, LLC
FRESH FOODS HERE Eric Wagenbrenner TIM HORTONS
Caitlin R. Marquis Rob Harris UNITED DAIRY FARMERS
Michael Amicone VANNATTA BROTHERS
GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE YALE AVENUE APARTMENTS
Joy Chivers Community Survey
We are making plans for West
Franklinton and we need your help!
Share your ideas by completing the 5
SOUDER
STEVENS
NUE
CABLE AVE
exercises on both sides of this sheet.
AVENUE
BALTIMOR
REET
AVENUE
BROAD ST
E & OHIO
SR-315
RR
HARTFOR
MT.
CARMEL
GLENWOO
DAKOTA
HOSPITAL
D AVENU
PRINCETO
REET
TOWN ST
YALE AVE
Answer each question by drawing the
AVENUE
1
D AVENU
BREHL AVE
E
N AVENU
GLADDEN
corresponding symbol on the map
NUE
GREEN STR
COMMUNITY
E
TON
FRANKLIN
LIBRARY HOUSE
EET
NUE
RICH STR
E
EET
What one place would make the neighborhood better if
CENTRAL
ENUE it was dramatically different from how it is today?
ANT AV
SULLIV
AVENUE
What location do you consider the HEART of West
UE
CAMPBE
LL AVEN Franklinton?
RR
OH
IO If you could create a new neighborhood park in West
OR
E&
I-70
BA
LT
IM
Franklinton where would you build it?
T
TREE What is the one place that a visitor to Franklinton
ND S
MOU
should see?
CONTACT:
Christine Palmer Leed
HARM
Neighborhood Planner
ON AV
614.645.8791
ENUE
clleed@columbus.gov
See back for more questions
TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL IDEAS FOR
THE WEST FRANKLINTON COMMUNITY,
VISIT:
WWW.WESTFRANKLINTON.COM
GREENLAWN
NAVENUE
AVENUE
UE
E
COMMUNITY SURVEY
Appendix 1
APPENDIX 1 - PUBLIC INPUT
P U B L I C I N P U T: S U R V E Y R E S P O N S E S
Do you support the Neighborhood Park Development Guidelines Do you support demolition of select houses in areas of high vacancy in order
Do you agree with the Draft Principles, Goals and Strategies? proposed above? to create several parks spaces of at least 2 acres each in the neighborhood?
Response Response Answer Options
Response Response
Response Response Answer Options Percent Count
Answer Options Percent Count
Percent Count Yes 84.5% 49
Yes 86.4% 51
Yes 100.0% 58 No 15.5% 9
No 13.6% 8
No 0.0% 0
Please rank the following things that you would most like to see in a new neighborhood park.
Rating Average
Response
Answer Options 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (lowest most
Count
preferred)
Benches 7 7 9 4 5 5 4 3.59 41
Picnic tables 2 10 13 5 3 6 3 3.64 42
Picnic shelters 5 6 5 11 7 3 5 3.9 42
Walking paths 12 4 2 10 11 2 0 3.24 41
Playground equipment 16 6 2 7 9 1 1 2.86 42
Hard courts (basketball, 5 4 5 1 3 18 5 4.63 41
Sports fields 1 4 5 1 1 5 22 5.57 39
Do you support the notion of “Downtown” Franklinton and the SR Retailers, restaurants, and grocers in vibrant urban corridors benefit Do you support the draft guidelines for the “Downtown” Franklinton
315 Gateway as the focus for initial redevelopment efforts? from (and are attracted to) proximate high density housing that development area?
Response Response provides a concentration of increased buying power. Do you Response Response
Answer Options support the notion of high density housing of approximately 200 Answer Options
Percent Count Percent Count
Yes 86.8% 46 units in the SR 315 Gateway?
Yes 90.0% 45
No 13.2% 7 Response Response No 10.0% 5
Answer Options
Percent Count
Yes 82.7% 43
No 17.3% 9
Do you support the draft guidelines for the West Gateway? Do you support the draft guidelines for this area of Town Street?
Response Response Response Response
Answer Options Answer Options
Percent Count Percent Count
Yes 86.7% 39 Yes 86.8% 33
No 13.3% 6 No 13.2% 5
Do you support these conceptual land use recommendations (north Do you support these conceptual land use recommendations (south Do you support the Vacant Property Strategy? (Community meeting
of I-70)? of I-70)? feedback only)
Response Response Response Response
Response Response Answer Options Answer Options
Answer Options Percent Count Percent Count
Percent Count
89.4% 42 Yes 100.0% 29
Yes 93.6% 44 Yes
10.6% 5 No 0.0% 0
No 6.4% 3 No
Choose three of the following potential improvements to Broad Street Choose three of the following potential general improvements in West
through “Downtown” Franklinton that you believe are most important: Franklinton that you think are most important:
Merged Rating Merged Rating
Answer Options (lowest most Answer Options (lowest most
preferred) preferred)
Fewer vehicular lanes 3.34 Fixing curbs 2.88
Pedestrian “bump-outs” at intersections 3.20 New sidewalks where missing 2.45
Street trees 2.28 Alley paving 3.72
Street lights 2.70 Street lighting 3.36
Wider sidewalks 3.87 Curb ramps (new or repair) 5.79
On-street parking 5.50 Traffic calming 4.75
A4
Bike lanes 3.60 Road diet 4.48
Other (flowers, etc.) 7.68 Bike lanes / trails 5.49
Other (public art, etc.) 8.31
The following five roadway corridors require various levels of improvement. How would you rank the importance of these potential improvement corridors in West Franklinton (1 being most important and 5 being
least important)?
Rating Average
Response
Answer Options 1 2 3 4 5 (lowest most
Count
preferred)
Broad Street road
Broad
dietStreet
(Narrower
road diet
cross-section,
(Narrower on-street
cross-section,
parking,
on-street
bike lane,
parking,
crosswalks)
bike lane,
20 crosswalks)13 4 4 3 2.02 44
Central Avenue – street improvements (Curbs and sidewalks where missing, upgraded pedestrian8 intersections)
8 11 16 1 2.86 44
Town Street – street improvements (Curbs, upgraded pedestrian intersections) 11 14 13 5 1 2.34 44
Sullivant Avenue – street improvements (Curbs, upgraded pedestrian intersections 4 6 15 15 4 3.2 44
Harmon Avenue – street improvements (Curbs and sidewalks where missing) 2 3 1 2 35 4.51 43
Do you support the draft Historic Resources guidelines stated Do you support the draft Commercial and Mixed Use guidelines
Do you support the draft Residential guidelines stated above?
above? stated above?
Response Response Response Response Response Response
Answer Options Answer Options Answer Options
Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count
Yes 96.1% 49 Yes 98.1% 51 Yes 90.4% 47
No 6.9% 2 No 1.9% 1 No 9.6% 5
PUBLIC MEETING INTERACTION/INPUT
Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
The purpose of this section of the
document is to provide an overview
of the public utilities within the West
Franklinton planning area. This effort has
included obtaining the city’s most recent
utility mapping for the planning area in
a Geographic Information System (GIS)
format to review and described certain
aspects of the public water supply,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer utilities.
This effort has also included interviews of
staff with the city’s Department of Public
Utilities (DPU), including the Division of
Water (DOW) and the Division of Sewerage
and Drainage (DOSD), and the review of
current plans for the study area. Individual
summaries have been provided for each of
these three utilities based on a review of the
readily available and pertinent information.
WATER DISTRIBUTION
INFRASTRUCTURE
1.0 Existing System and Plans
The West Franklinton Neighborhood is
currently served by a network of existing
water mains which are owned and operated
A6 by the City of Columbus and maintained
by the Division of Water (DOW). The
network of existing mains is extensive
which can be attributed to the intensity of
the development in the area. Within many
of the residential blocks, the mains are
located in the rear alleys and thus individual
service lines feed the houses through
the rear. This area is encompassed in the
Central Pressure District which operates
with a control hydraulic grade line of 915
feet (NGVD 1929). There are no other water
distribution infrastructure facilities (i.e.
booster stations or storage tanks) within the
planning area.
Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
The sizes of the waterlines in the planning communicated by DOW staff through this
area vary from 1-½-inch lines serving coordination are listed below.
a couple of properties to a 36-inch
transmission main which runs along Yale • There are no planned water distribution
Avenue. A majority of the water mains in capital improvements within the planning
the area date to the early 1900s. Pipes from area.
this era are made of thick-walled cast iron • The city’s recently completed (2012)
and tend to be in better service condition Comprehensive Water Distribution
than those constructed between 1920 and System Master Plan did not identify any
1950 where the thickness of walls were system needs in this area.
reduced in the manufacturing process. The • A map of water mains break history
DOW maintains record plans for all of these for the area was provided. Breaks were
distribution lines. A portion of the water minimal and considered well below the
distribution system is shown on Exhibit 1 , threshold requiring large-scale corrective
depicting the various aspects of the system action. A majority of the documented
described above. breaks were associated with 2-inch and
smaller waterlines.
Historical hydrant testing data was • The DOW staff feels the system functions
obtained which indicated static pressures well in the West Franklinton Area.
in the study area ranged between 80 psi • The practice of locating water mains
and 94 psi, which are optimal levels. The within the alley is no longer approved
minimum normal operating pressure for a and DOW staff has concerns about the
water system as identified by the Ohio EPA ability to maintain lines which are
is 35 psi. Available fire flow values range currently located in the alleys.
between 1,130 gpm and 6,400 gpm, with a • The number of water mains providing
majority in excess of 2,000 gpm. Flow tests system connectivity across major
near the low end of the range appear to be features (i.e., limited access highways,
A8 the result of site specific constraints such railroads, etc.) is good with an
as a small diameter main and do not appear acceptable amount of redundancy.
to suggest a lack of system performance. • The DOW would look at any
While fire flow requirements are dependent transportation improvements to see if
on land use and building particulars, these there are ‘projects of opportunity’ where
values appear to be adequate. they could replace or rehabilitate existing
infrastructure at reduced costs.
2.0 Coordination with the city’s DPU
In the course of conducting this study, 3.0 Future Anticipated Improvements
the team met with planning, engineering within the Planning Area
and administration staff from the DOW. As noted above, there are no specific
The intent of these discussions was capital improvement projects currently
to better understand any identified planned for this area related to the existing
needs or planned activities for the West water distribution system.
Franklinton Neighborhood. The key points
4.0 Design Standards and Regulatory • The DOW will discourage the practice
Considerations of tapping the large diameter
While it has been identified that the existing transmission mains with small diameter
water distribution system is generally taps serving only one or two customers.
in good operating condition, there are The preferred concept would be to utilize
a number of items for consideration if large diameter taps (6-inch and larger) off
redevelopment of the West Franklinton of the transmission mains to be the
Neighborhood is being planned, as listed tapping location for small diameter
below. services.
• Any new water mains will need to be
• Water lines 4-inches and smaller will designed in accordance with the DOW
not likely be able to meet current fire flow design guidelines and the regulations
(and potentially domestic) demands for of the Ohio EPA’s Division of Drinking
redevelopment. It should be anticipated and Ground Waters. Of particular note
that redevelopment in areas served by is that new water mains will need to
water lines 4-inches and smaller will be constructed a minimum of ten feet
require upsizing of those lines. Current from sanitary sewers and twenty feet
standards provide that all distribution from buildings. This can be challenging in
mains should be 6-inches and larger. densely populated urban areas and
• While it has been identified that the should be considered early in the
system is serving the existing demands planning and engineering process.
adequately, changes in land use could • It should be noted there are no water
result in the increase of water demands mains along Broad Street between
which in-turn could reduce the level of Souder Avenue and Central Avenue. The
service. In conjunction with existing properties along this stretch are
redevelopment efforts, site specific served by water mains located in
hydraulic analyses should be performed the alleys to the north and south. If
to confirm the adequacy of the redevelopment of the Broad Street
system to meet the domestic and fire corridor is a focus area, consideration
flow demands of the new land uses. should be given to locating a new main
Specific consideration should be given along Broadway to reduce dependency
to the current design standards for on the mains located in the alleys.
required fire flows which are heavily
dependent on building type and use.
• Where redevelopment is occurring,
the DOW will likely encourage that water
mains be relocated outside of the alleys.
This may be especially difficult where the
development does not occur on
both sides of the alleys as the existing
buildings have internal plumbing which
accommodates rear fed water services.
Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
SANITARY AND COMBINED SEWERS
McKINLEY AV E
The information below pertains to the RIVER ST
sewer system serving the planning area. IRENE PL
This section includes a discussion of both
sanitary and combined sewers, where ¦
¨
§ 70
MERRIM
AC ST
PR
US
90
HAY DEN
sanitary sewers convey only domestic/
40
STEVE N
AVE
SCHULT
LL
"
/B WENDE
R O
non-domestic sanitary flow and combined
AD
CENTR
GUILFO
TO
AV E
S AVE
Z
I7
sewers convey both sanitary flow and
AV E
0
W
AL AV E
stormwater runoff. Current investigations
R
D AV E
indicate that combined sewers have been CAPITA
eliminated from the West Franklinton
I70
planning area except along Scott Street and
W
90
TO
Town Street.
U S40
/B
LECHNER AVE
RO
T
TO WN S
1.0 Existing System and Plans
AD
BREHL
¦
¨
§
CENTR
WREXHAM AV
Most of the sewer systems in the planning
70
BELVIDERE AV
area were at one time combined systems;
AL AV E
however, past capital improvement projects
I7
VE
EN A
0
R
E DO
in this area have created separate storm
V
EN A
DOR
COLUMBIAN AV
NASHOBA AV
GUILFO
and sanitary sewers. Currently, the vast
LECHNER AVE
BELVIDE RE AVE
WREXHAM AV
majority of the planning area is served by
R
D AV E
AVE
Legend IVAN
T
a separate sanitary sewer system. The SULL UN
E
IO
LARC
N
current sewer mapping information for this (
! Design Sanitary R elief (D SR) AV
HELE
E
RYAN A
AV E
O
Center SH
area suggests the potential for combined
WO O
WAL
MB A
N ST
AY
C SW
TO W
Trunk Sewer STI
V
sewers near SR 315 (a 30-inch sewer at
D
PLA
E
VE
V
BUR
AS A
THO M
N
N AV West Franklinton Bou ndary
E AVE
Scott Street; RP 308), and at Town Street
S END
UNIO FO R
D
Y AV
SAF
A10
We stside Sanita VE
NT A ry Sewer
G MO
(a 36-inch sewer; RP 21). These sewer
E
SPRIN
REED
AVE
EDW
OSIS
PK
VE
RD A
systems would only receive sanitary flows
O
SAFF
HILLT
RG
NASH
IN
ST
Scio to Main Trunk Sew er
BUTL
WRE
BELV
CLAR
U
ST
as an overflow from other existing sewers.
ISB
ON IA
O BA
RR
XH
ER A
IDE R
ST
K AV
Abandoned combined sewers are indicated ND COUNTY, OHIO
HA
AM A
MOU
AV
CITY OF COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN
AV
V
E AVE
E Y AVE
E
WEST FRANKLINTON
E
on mapping as along the west end of HUMPHR
V
YVE
Rich Street, and along Greenlawn Avenue. UTILITY ST EXHIBIT 2
TT
BROW N RD
G HN
¹
ES
MAIN SANITARY
VAU TRUNK SEWERS
Further confirmation of the disposition of ¤
£ 62
BUT
T
the other mapped combined sewer systems
LER
AV E Feet
0 500 1,000 REA 2,000 GARLING AVE
AV E
is recommended as part of any future VE
Date: December, 2014
engineering efforts in this area.
A
E
A
PK
EV
D
WHIT N
R
EHE A
RG
Scal e: 1" = 1,000'
D RD GE REAVER LN
SCO TT
U
ISB
Three main sanitary trunk sewers serve JACK Jo b No : 2013-1867
RR
SO N RANS
RD BURG
HA
AV E
the planning area. Exhibit 2 depicts She et: 1 of 1
the location of these trunk sewers and J:\20131867\GIS \layouts\Utility_Exhibit_2_Main_S anitary_Trunk_S ewer.mxd
their sewershed (tributary) areas. A brief(
!
I 670 59 LO NG ST
I 670 ¤
£ 33 (
! ELM ST
N HIGH
FRO NT
GAY S T
YALE AVE
RODGERS AVE
T
McKINLEY AV E LY NN S
ST
WALL S
(
!
ST
T
RIVER S 315
E BRO A
D ST
42
ANSO N
ST
SO UDE
WISCO N
SCO TT
THIRD S
! 33
(
T
MAY AV MAY A
HARTF
SR 315
AVE
CABLE GAY S T AD ST (
!
CHICAG
FO O S S W BRO
RINCET
GRE EN
S T
SKIDMO
YALE A
SCO TT
R
ST
SIN
T
E
O RD AV
AVE
26
MILL S
T
STATE S
SR 315
GIFT ST
STARLIN
(
!
AV E
DSR 96
O AVE
T
O N AV E
VE
¤
£
ST
DAVIS A
RE S T
(
! 23
BELLE S
McDO W
E
(
!
T
VE
HARTFO
WALL S
G ST
27
LUCAS
SO UDE
¤
£
VE
40
GRUBB
MARTIN
ST
GRE EN
STATE (
!
ELL ST
T
DAKOTA
L ST
CAPITA
T
R AVE
ST
AL ST RICH ST
RD AVE
T 28
STATE S
YALE A
(
!
S
AV E
ST
T
(
!
SANDUSK
T
L NUT S
AVE
GIFT ST
W WA ST
CHERRY
GLENW
CYPRE
HAWKE
PLATO
0"
SKIDMO
ST
VE
T RICH ST E MAIN
TO WN S
WES T PA
PRINCE
T MAIN ST (
!
SECO ND
TO WN S R ST
NUT ST NOBLE
JEW ETT
RY D
SS AV E
OO D AV
L CHER
Y ST
A
PL
W
S AVE
W T Y ST
RE S T
RICH S CHERR
T
RICH S
T
DANA A
R
O N AV E
SR315
T
K AVE
RICH ST Y ALY
AVO ND
ST
E
CHERR
ST
ST
DAVIS A
MOUND
YALE A
ALY
VE
PLAIN
¦
¨
§
DAKOTA
70
ALE
SHO R
I70-I71 I70- I71
L AV E
FULTO
VE
S HIG H
VE
N ST
864
SR
AVE
I 70
T
36 " (
!
AVE
315
N
ST
AVE 15
OW S SR3
ST
BELL AVE S TO
DSR 95 BE LL I71
C AMP 508 ST
0 HOS TE R
YALE A
(
! 0W I7 (
!
TO I7
SR 3
T
15 S BECK S
NACE AVE
VE SR3 I70
AS A
¦
¨
§
BREHL
THO M
VE
HOLTON
E
15
70
N AV
PEARL
UNIO
MAIER PL
E DR
AV E
I70
I70
TO AN OR E ST
HAN SYCAM
ST
AV E
I71
D
E
MT CA
UN BUC
TO
MO
N
¦
¨
§
I71
TO
70
¤
£
LVARY
S
23
I7 0
FRO NT
DANA
CE DR
BREH
PIER
W
BANK S
AVE
WALL S
36 "
AVE
ST
L AV E
M
ST
i7
ICK
A
REN
IE
T
1
SO U
R
T
HAR
P
KE
KOSSUTH ST
L
¦
¨
§
D
MON
71
ER A
S AVE WHITTIER ST 84
GRIG G
AV
(
!
VE
FRO NT
E
I 71
GR
90
86
E
"
WALL S
EN
(
!
I 71
83
ST
F
878
(
!
IEL
Scioto Main Sanitary (
!
D
T
DR
Trunk Sewer
KIRBY AVE
WHARTON AVE
GRE E
GREENLAW N AVE
N
LAW N
FRONT ST
TO I7
Westside Sanitary
Sewer OS IS
1S
D ST
F ST
STIMME L H ST
¦
¨
§
G ST
RD 71
I ST
138
(
!Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
description of these trunk sewers is of the DSRs2. The location of the DSRs is
provided below. described below, along with a summary of
the City’s previous actions to address the
• Scioto Main Sanitary Trunk Sewer: a 90- identified DSRs.
inch diameter sewer at 0.04-0.06% slope
located along State Street near Central • DSR 96 is located on an alley East of
Avenue and Princeton Avenue (RP 2418, Glenwood Avenue and North of
2419, 2420). This trunk sewer serves West Broad Street at structure
most of the west side of Columbus, number 0008S0224. DOSD initiated,
including portions of the cities of Dublin a Sewer System Inflow and Infiltration
and Hilliard. (I&I) Remediation Project, to improve the
• West Side Sanitary Trunk Sewer: a 36- sanitary collection system in the Sullivant
inch diameter sewer at 0.04-0.09% Avenue area while mitigating DSR 96
slope, serving the south side of the activations and Water-in-Basement (WIB)
planning area. This sewer was complaints.
rehabilitated in 2006 (CC-14765).
• The Olentangy-Scioto River Interceptor The study of this area included system
Sewer (OSIS): a 126-inch x 66-inch capacity evaluations and various field
sewer at 0.05% slope, serving all investigations. Exhibit 3 illustrates the
combined sewer areas for Columbus study area boundary. All sewers in the
and a large service area east and west of Sullivant Avenue study area were cleaned
the Olentangy River (RP 1054). The OSIS and televised in 2010. Since that
receives flow from the southern portion time, DSR 96 has not registered a
of the planning area bounded by the single activation (overflow). The study
Scioto River, Greenlawn Avenue and east recommended increased cleaning and
of I-71. inspection frequencies, modifications to
the existing operations and maintenance
A12 Two Designed Sanitary Reliefs (DSR) are (O&M) programs including grease
located in the planning area. These are control and root control, open-cut sewer
cross connections between the sanitary point repairs, sewer replacements, sewer
sewer system and either a water way or a rehabilitation, and additions to the
storm sewer system. DSRs are designed to Project Dry Basement Program.3
allow sanitary flow that exceeds the sewer
system capacity to surcharge and overflow • DSR 95 is located at Sullivant Avenue
in order to prevent exposure of the public and east of Dana Avenue at structure
to raw sewage. The 2005 Wet Weather number 0007S0215. This DSR is located
Management Plan (WWMP)1 presents the on the Scioto Main Sanitary Trunk Sewer
plans to mitigate potential Sanitary Sewer (RP 867). DSR 95 was addressed in the
Overflow (SSO) due to wet weather. Exhibit Wet Weather Management Plan
2 illustrates the location of DSR 95 and 96 (WWMP) as part of the Large Scale
and Figure 1 illustrates historical activations System Strategy4. There are currently no
City of Columbus, Wet Weather Management Plan (WWMP) CIP 650360 and CIP 650390, July 1, 2005
1
City of Columbus, DOSD, Monthly reported SSOs to OEPA
2
City of Columbus, Field Investigations Report, Sullivant Avenue Sewer System Remediation I/I Study, CIP 450405.12,
3
December 201270
I 6
S
C
SR 3
IO
TO
R
IV
15
E
McKINLEY R
AV
CONRA IL RAILROAD
GREE
JO NE
MEEK
G
GRRU
UB
GLEN
BB
B S
N ST
S TT
S
T ST AV
SCOT
AV
WOOD
OA D ST
W BR
AV
Legend CITY OF COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
WEST FRANKLINTON
Combined Sewer Manhole UTILITY EXHIBIT 3
¹
Sanitary Sewer Manhole WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Feet
Combined Sewer 0 200 400 800
Sanitary Sewers Date: July, 2014
D D D Abandoned Sewer
Scale: 1" = 400
Job No: 2013-1867
Priority Area Perimeter
Sheet: 1 of 1
J:\20 131 86 7\GIS\la yo uts\Utili ty_ Exhib it_3 _West_Fra nklin to n_ Su llivan _Stu dy_A rea .m xdAppendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
recommendations developed as part of OSIS in wet weather and provide continued
that strategy that would directly service of the sewer system through the
affect the future re-development of the pump station. During normal, dry-weather
West Franklinton planning area. Future flow conditions, the Greenlawn Avenue
planning or engineering efforts should sewer discharges by gravity to the OSIS.
be done to determine the potential for
any improvements to eliminate DSR 95 The city has previously conducted area-
that would affect future projects in the wide improvements in the planning area
West Franklinton area. to rehabilitate the sanitary sewer system.
Improvements included lining the system to
A sanitary pump station has been recently improve system capacity, removing certain
constructed and is currently under operation blockages and reducing the potential
at the east side of Greenlawn Avenue5 near for inflow and Infiltration (I/I) during wet
the Scioto River (Figure 2). The purpose weather events.
of the pump station is to protect against
future back-ups from the OSIS to sanitary 2.0 Coordination with the City’s DPU
sewer services along Greenlawn Avenue DPU is currently implementing the Blueprint
during wet weather events. The sanitary Columbus initiative which is an Integrated
pump station has an automated sluice gate Solutions planning effort to mitigate
which would hydraulically disconnect the activations of DSRs within targeted areas
Greenlawn Avenue sewer system from the using sustainable stormwater practices,
A14
City of Columbus, 2005 Wet Weather Management Plan (WWMP), Section 11, Exhibit 11.2.1, Pg 2
4
City of Columbus, DOSD, CIP 650742-100004 Greenlawn Avenue Storm & Sanitary Sewer Improvements, 2013
5namely green infrastructure (GI). In an
agreement between the city and the Ohio Relative to sewer system capacity, there
EPA, portions of the city’s WWMP have were no specific areas of concern noted
been suspended while the city pursues the within West Franklinton. However, DPU
application of GI in identified DSR areas. As maintains a comprehensive sewer system
part of Blueprint Columbus, the application model that will be used to identify any
of GI is intended as an area-wide capacity issues for future land use changes.
improvement with the goal of providing
more effective drainage and eliminating 3.0 Future Anticipated Improvements
significant sources of inflow and infiltration within the Planning Area
(I/I) to the sanitary sewer system, thereby As mentioned previously, portions of the
reducing the potential for SSOs associated WWMP have been suspended and are
with wet weather events. The use of GI has being reconsidered under the Blueprint
the additional benefit of improving water Columbus initiative. One of the original
quality associated with stormwater runoff WWMP projects under reconsideration is
and complements the overall objective of the Olentangy Relief Tunnel (ORT) project.
the city’s WWMP to reduce the discharge of A north-south tunnel corridor has been
contaminants and pollutants to the streams identified for the ORT project which would
and rivers within the city. pass through the West Franklinton planning
area. There are proposed access shafts
As discussed, given the current status of and relief sewers associated with the ORT
the DSRs 95 and 96, the West Franklinton that would impact portions of the planning
planning area is not currently under area. Details of the proposed ORT project
consideration for this initiative. However, are provided in Appendix O of the WWMP
Blueprint measures could be utilized in report6. Further coordination with DOSD is
West Franklinton to promote water quality recommended as the West Franklinton plan
and overall stormwater management. advances.
Future sewer capital improvement projects 4.0 Design Standards and Regulatory
involving sewer lining will be evaluated Considerations
in conjunction with other improvement The design requirements of the Sanitary
projects at which time DPU will make the Sewer Design Manual should be
determination as to the necessity and followed when evaluating proposed
process for rehabilitating those sewer lines. changes to the current sewer system,
In other words, if there was a roadway including providing documentation of any
project or other significant improvement changes to sewershed tributary areas,
within a given area, DPU would focus population densities and design flows. As
attention and address the needs of mentioned previously, the DPU maintains
the sewer lines in that project area. a comprehensive sewer model that may
This process would apply to any future be necessary to evaluate any significant
redevelopment efforts within the planning changes to the sewer system.
area.
6
City of Columbus, DOSD, Wet Weather Management Plan (WWMP), Appendix O, July 2005Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
CONR AIL
Due to the proximity of the West Franklinton
planning area to the Jackson Pike
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP),
both the West Side Sanitary Trunk Sewer
and the Scioto Main Sanitary Trunk Sewer
experience backup flow conditions. A flow
meter, referred to as ’Columbus_S1’ is ¦
¨
§70
installed in the Scioto Main Sanitary Trunk
Sewer at structure number 0007S0471,
which is located near Mound Street and
the ramp between Mound and I-70. ¤
£
40
This meter has collected flow data since
1995 and documented a surcharge event
on December 16, 2011 which indicated
the flow depth may reach elevation
C en tr al A
697.78 (NGVD 29). Tributary sewers to
the Scioto Main Sanitary Trunk Sewer
ve
may receive a flow backup under similar
conditions. For example, invert elevations
of the sewer located at the alley east of
ve
Princeton Avenue (RP 67) range between Sulliv
an t A
696.89 and 697.40, below the observed
Legend
697.78 flow elevation. As such, sewer ¦
¨
§70
capacity calculations using a conventional
West Columbus Floodwall
Railroad
spreadsheet tool may not be applicable. West Franklinton Boundary
The presence of the two DSRs in the study 100-Year (1% Annual C hance) Floodplain
area (DSR 95 and 96) may lead the City
A16 to limit any changes to land use in the
planning area that would increase flow rates
Source:
FEMA - DFIRM (June 17, 2008)
in the sewer system without the benefit of
the detailed model evaluation to determine CITY OF COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
if the system would be adversely impacted. WEST FRANKLINTON
UTILITY EXHIBIT 4
¹
FLOOD HAZARD AREA
Feet
0 500 1,000 2,000
December, 2014
Date:
¤
£62
Scal e: 1" = 1,000'
Jo b No : 2013-1867
She et: 1 of 1
J:\20131867\GIS\layouts \Utility_Ex hibit_4_Flood_Hazard_Area.mx dCO
NR
¤
£
AIL
33
¦
¨
§
RR
670
¤
£ 40
R.R.
(
!
315
d St
W B roa
St
W T ow n
r
ve
Ri
to
St
io
W R ic h
Sc
R.R.
¦
¨
§70
¦
¨
§ 70
R.
R.
e
¦
¨
§ 71
¦
¨
§
70
H ar m
on A
ve
¦
¨
§71
¤
£
23
Scio
to R
ive r
Greenla wn Ave
¦
¨
§
71
¤
£
23Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
STORM SEWER SYSTEM AND The majority of the storm system within
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT the planning area discharges to the south,
under I-70 and eventually to the Scioto
1.0 Existing System and Plans River within Lou Berliner Park. Due to
The majority of the planning area is the presence of the floodwall there are
protected by the West Columbus Floodwall numerous pump stations in the vicinity of
which extends along the west bank of the the planning area to manage stormwater
Scioto River between Dry Run, a tributary runoff in the event of high water in the
to the Scioto River at the far northwest river. Most of these pump stations are
corner of the planning area, and a point associated with drainage along I-70 and
just north of the Frank Road underpass at SR 315. The existing storm systems are
I-71. Without the presence of the floodwall, separated into the sub-watershed areas
the planning area would be significantly described below. These sub-watersheds
impacted by the 100-year flood hazard (1% and various pump stations are shown on
annual chance floodplain) of the Scioto Exhibit 5 . The designated sub-watershed
River. As it stands, the areas protected areas are intended to be general in nature
by the levee are considered to be non- and reflect the major storm sewer systems
floodprone and are not subject to the city’s within the planning area. Smaller, isolated
floodplain management regulations as part storm sewers may cross these boundaries
of any future redevelopment activities. The at various locations.
flood hazard designations for the planning
area are shown on the Flood Insurance • The Northern Sub-watershed (north of
Rate Map (FIRM) for Franklin County and I-70) which discharge under the highway
Incorporated Areas, Number 39049C, and to the Scioto River in Lou Berliner
panels 308 and 309, dated June 17, 2008. Park. This area is served by the Renick
Run pump station located along the west
There is still some portions of the planning side of I-71, which is associated with the
A18 area within the 100-year floodplain and floodwall.
those are shown on Exhibit 4. The floodwall • The Eastern Sub-watershed (1) that
does not protect areas east of I-71, appears to discharge to an outfall at the
including the portion of the planning area Scioto River very near to the SR 315
along Greenlawn Avenue between the bridge. This area is served by a pump
highway and the Scioto River. There is an station on the east side of the highway
embankment along the river at this location and north of West Broad Street
but it is not a certified levee. Recent borings (designated ST-2).
into this levee indicate it is not constructed • The Eastern Sub-watershed (2) which
in accordance with current levee design discharges beneath SR 315 and to
standards7. Additionally, overtopping of the Scioto River just north of the I-70/71
the levee is anticipated during larger flood bridge. There is a floodwall pump station
events. associated with this system located
at Dodge Park. There appears to be an
overflow built into this system that would
OSIS Augmentation Relief Sewer Final Design Report, Test Pits and Test Borings, 2010
7allow a portion of the flow in this system 2.0 Coordination with the City’s DPU
to be directed south to the same outfall Currently there are no planned storm
as the northern sub-watershed. system improvements within West
• The Southern Sub-watershed (south Franklinton. Future service requests may
of I-70). There appear to be two separate provide some indication of recurring
storm systems associated with this area; problems associated with the capacity and/
however, they both discharge to the or maintenance of the system that could be
same river outfall as the northern area addressed through redevelopment and the
and are served by the Renick Run pump related public infrastructure improvements.
station. Unlike the sanitary sewer system, DPU
• The Greenlawn Avenue Sub-watershed does not maintain a model of the existing
which includes a local storm sewer storm sewer system. Models would likely
system discharging to the Scioto River need to be developed to understand
which is protected from backwater potential limitations in storm sewer capacity
flooding from the Scioto River by a flap in conjunction with future projects. The
gate installed at the outfall and a sluice application of the Stormwater Drainage
gate installed within the storm sewer. In Manual is discussed later in this section of
case of high water elevations in the river the document.
and the associated gate closure, DOSD
will mobilize portable pumps to clear the As referenced previously, the City’s
ponding of stormwater runoff. Integrated Solutions planning initiative
• There are storm systems associated with promotes the use of GI features to mitigate
the major highways abutting the planning the impacts of stormwater runoff. This
area which have their own outfalls. For is in addition to other similar initiatives
the most part, it appears these drainage and technical guidance provided by the
systems are separate from the storm city related to the use of GI as an integral
sewers within the other portions of the component of stormwater management
planning area. plans for both site development projects
• There is a small portion of the planning and public infrastructure improvements.
area south of I-70 where the existing Although the on-going Blueprint Columbus
storm sewer system is not well-defined initiative does not currently apply to
and the outfall is not apparent. This West Franklinton, the city will continue
area is currently shown on Exhibit 5 to promote the use of GI to manage
as not being associated with any of the stormwater runoff in this area. Given
designated sub-watersheds. the potential for storm sewer capacity
limitations, such practices may become
There are no specific plans to reference in a fundamental component of future site
regard to the existing storm system, but improvements.
operating protocols related to the floodwall
and stormwater pump stations impacting
the planning area are available through
DOSD.Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW CONRAIL
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
3.0 Future Anticipated Improvements
"
72
within the Planning Area
48"
As noted previously, there are no
currently planned improvements to the ¦
¨
§70
72
48"
"
existing storm sewer system, but future
individual projects may reveal limitations ¤
£
40
in the existing system that need to be 60" 66"
48"
addressed through localized or area-wide
improvements. However, given the nature 54"
R.R.
54"
of the existing system and its relationship 78"
to the pump stations near the river outfalls, 72"
it is unlikely that these improvements would 60"
be permitted to increase the amount of
flow being discharged to those outfalls. 54
"
Future redevelopment within the planning 60"
area may need to consider beneficial use of
open space to ensure sufficient stormwater
60"
management is provided in conjunction 54
" ¦
¨
§ 70
with other proposed land uses changes.
4.0 Design Standards and Regulatory
Considerations
The city’s Stormwater Drainage Manual
(August 2012) provides the technical
requirements associated with stormwater
management that will pertain to any future
redevelopment of West Franklinton. The
A20 manual outlines numerous requirements
related to the analysis and design of
stormwater management features; however, ¤
£ 62
there are two specific requirements that
could have the biggest impact on future
infrastructure improvements, as described
below.
• Providing stormwater quantity controls
as outlined in Section 3.2 of the manual.
These requirements pertain to managing ¤
£ 62
the peak flow rate of stormwater runoff
within the limits of an individual project
area. Based on these requirements, J:\20131867\GIS\layouts \Utility_Ex hibit_5_Storm_Sewer_Sys tem.mxd
any private site development or publicCO
NR
AIL
RR
R.R. (
!
¤
£
23
48"
ST-2
¤
£
40
d St
W B roa
66"
(
!
315
St
r
W T ow n
ve
Ri
¦
¨
§
71
to
66"
St
io
W R ic h
Sc
72"
54"
Dodg e Pa rk
48"
Pump Station
¦
¨
§ 70
¦
¨
§
70
82"
72"
48"
(
!
R.
"
72
R.
82"
48" ¦
¨
§
70 48" 48
"
48"
Legend
(
! Storm Sewer Outfalls
60
"
H ar m
Storm Pump Station
Storm S ystem
Outfall
60"
on A
Not Ma pp ed
Storm Sewer Diameter (in.)
102 "
¤
£
ve
23 Railroad
West Franklinton Boundary
72
"
Northern Sub-watershed
Eastern Sub-watershed (1)
72
Scio
"
to R Eastern Sub-watershed (2)
ive r
60"
Southern Sub-watershed
Greenlawn Ave Sub-watershed
48" 54"
Greenla wn Ave (
!
¦
¨
§71
Note: Sub-watershed boundaries
are approximate and general in nature.
54"
CITY OF COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
66" 72"
WEST 72"
FRANKLINTON
66"
UTILITY EXHIBIT 5
¹
STORM SEWER SYSTEM
¤
£
23
Feet
0 600 1,200 2,400
96"
Date: October, 2014
96"
¦
¨
§
71 Scal e: 1" = 1,200'
96" Jo b No : 2013-1867
Renick Run 111 "
Pump Station (
! She et: 1
66" of 1
66"
60"Appendix 2
PUBLIC UTILITIES OVERVIEW
APPENDIX 2 - UTILITIES
infrastructure improvement project (other Variances from the manual requirements
than underground utility improvements) can be requested for a project; however,
would be required to provide stormwater the technical justification for such requests
detention to achieve the required peak can be a significant effort and the use of the
flow rate control. This requirement variance process is generally discouraged
pertains to all projects, including except under circumstances of obvious
redevelopment projects and projects that hardship. In West Franklinton opportunities
may reduce the amount of impervious should be considered to address
land cover in a given area. stormwater management on an area-
wide basis as opposed to site-by-site or
• Providing post-construction water quality project-by-project. Collaborations between
as outlined in Section 3.3 of the manual. individual projects, whether publicly or
The requirement for water quality is also privately funded, present opportunities
mandated by the Ohio EPA’s to develop more favorable stormwater
Construction General Permit related management plans and succeed in
to stormwater discharges. These achieving some of the more stringent of
requirements pertain to managing runoff those requirements. This approach has the
from smaller rainfall events and added benefit of potentially reducing overall
capturing/filtering pollutants commonly project costs.
associated with stormwater runoff.
The previous references to GI features
explained their attributes in terms of
post-construction water quality and
the manual provides technical guidance
on these features, as well as others.
Furthermore, the city is in the process
of developing more detailed design
A22 guidance related to GI applications
as part of their Blueprint Columbus
initiative. Although there are conventional
engineering approaches to managing
stormwater runoff and providing post-
construction water quality, the use of
GI has the distinct advantage of being
easily integrated into any site
development and public infrastructure
improvement project, including the use
of bio-retention practices in landscaping
areas and the use of pervious pavement
in roadways and parking areas.2014
MARKET STUDY
(PLAN APPENDIX 3)
PREPARED BY:A. Introduction
The
purpose
of
the
market
analysis
was
to
identify
short-‐
and
long-‐term
market-‐supported
opportunities
with
ongoing
redevelopment
strategies
for
the
West
Franklinton
Planning
Area
as
part
of
an
overall
comprehensive
land
use
planning
effort.
Specifically,
the
scope
of
the
market
analysis
was
to
identify
market-‐supported
opportunities
(near-‐
and
long-‐term)
for
residential
and
retail/service
businesses
based
on
a
thorough
understanding
and
analyses
of
the
local
rental
and
for-‐sale
housing
market,
commercial
market
conditions,
demographic
projections,
socio-‐economic
characteristics,
and
the
availability
and
appropriateness
of
potential
redevelopment
sites.
The
recommendations
for
short-‐term
opportunities
represent
uses
which
are
supported
within
a
five-‐year
period
based
on
current
market
conditions
and
redevelopment
efforts.
Long-‐term
opportunities,
10
years
and
beyond,
were
identified
and
used
to
assess
local
aspirational
goals
of
the
community
and
in
identifying
realistic
steps
toward
creating
a
more
vibrant
and
sustainable
neighborhood.
B. Residential
Analysis
West
Franklinton
is
a
large
planning
area,
in
fact
one
of
Columbus’
largest
historic
neighborhoods.
Because
of
the
expansive
nature
of
the
area
and
the
diverse
locational
market
dynamics,
the
most
effective
way
to
analyze
the
housing
market
is
to
divide
it
into
more
manageable
submarkets.
Based
on
the
thoroughfares
and
mobility
patterns;
socio-‐economic
characteristics;
hard
boundaries
and
city
block
orientation,
the
area
was
divided
into
seven
housing
submarkets
for
further
analysis.
Northwest Northeast
Central East
Central West
Southeast
Southwest
Far South
1|
P a g e
1. Housing
Type
Some
of
the
most
stable
and
economically
diverse
neighborhoods
in
Columbus
offer
a
wide
variety
of
housing
types.
Lacking
housing
choices
and/or
having
a
surplus
of
one
or
more
unit
types
can
limit
a
neighborhood’s
revitalization
potential.
a.
Housing
Type
In
comparison
to
the
City
of
Columbus,
West
Franklinton
has
a
slightly
higher
proportion
of
single-‐family
housing
stock;
much
higher
share
of
duplexes
(+8.7%);
and
significant
shortfall
of
higher
multifamily
housing
of
3
or
more
units.
Excluding
the
Far
South
Submarket,
multifamily
housing
in
the
remaining
areas
of
West
Franklinton
(north
of
Interstate
70)
is
very
low
at
20.0%.
The
higher
share
of
duplex
units
in
West
Franklinton
makes
increasing
homeownership
rates
in
the
area
challenging.
Typically
stable
neighborhoods
have
ownership
in
no
more
than
one-‐fourth
of
their
duplex
units.
Housing
Type
Submarket
Single-‐Family
Duplex
3+
Units
Total
Northwest
469
250
35
754
Northeast
89
80
12
181
Central
West
461
260
343
1,054
Central
East
364
236
221
821
Southwest
84
18
33
135
Southeast
442
66
60
568
Far
South
37
16
520
573
Total
1,946
926
1,224
4,096
Neighborhood
%
47.5%
22.6%
29.9%
100.0%
City
of
Columbus
%
45.7%
13.9%
39.5%
100.0%
Difference
+1.8%
+8.7%
-‐9.6%
b. Home
Sizes
The
median
size
of
homes
in
the
neighborhood
range
from
670-‐square-‐foot
for
a
one-‐
bedroom
home,
up
to
1,630-‐square-‐foot
for
a
four-‐bedroom
single-‐family
home.
Home
Sizes
Median
Home
Size
By
Bedroom
Type
(Square
Feet)
Dwelling
Type
One-‐Br
Two-‐Br
Three-‐Br
Four-‐Br
Single-‐Family
670
1,008
1,372
1,630
Duplex
781
977
1,217
-‐
Unit
sizes
by
bedroom
type
for
multifamily
housing
are
not
available
from
the
Franklin
County
Auditor.
The
square
feet
of
living
space
of
multifamily
developments
are
rarely
advertised/published
and
a
few
leasing
agents
were
aware
of
the
unit
sizes
at
their
projects.
2|
P a g e
c. Year
Built
With
a
median
year
built
of
1920,
the
housing
stock
in
West
Franklinton
is
much
older
compared
to
the
citywide
median
of
1974
(Source:
2012
American
Community
Survey
1-‐
Year
Estimates).
Nearly
two-‐thirds
of
the
housing
stock
built
in
the
1940s
and
1950s
were
within
the
Northwest
and
Southeast
Submarkets.
According
to
the
Franklin
County
Year
Built
Auditor,
80%
of
the
housing
stock
Decades
Share
of
Housing
Stock
in
West
Franklinton
was
built
Pre-‐1940s
80.3%
prior
to
1940.
The
housing
stock
1940s-‐1950s
10.3%
built
since
2000
represents
new
1960s-‐1970s
3.5%
construction
at
the
nursing
1980s-‐1990s
1.6%
college,
single-‐family
and
senior
2000
to
Present
4.3%
Tax
Credit
housing,
and
public
housing
for
seniors
(Worley
Median
Year
Built
1920
Terrace).
Source:
Franklin
County
Auditor
2. Rental
Housing
–
Subsidized
Subsidized
rental
housing
in
West
Franklinton
represents
16.0%
of
the
entire
housing
stock
in
West
Franklinton.
This
is
comparable
to
the
share
of
subsidized
housing
in
Columbus’
emerging1
Weinland
Park
neighborhood
(16.7%).
Subsidized
Rental
Housing
Public
Housing/
Tax
Credit/
SF
Rental
SF
Rent-‐to-‐Own
Senior
Tax
Total
Submarket
Section
8
Section
8
Apts.
Tax
Credit
Tax
Credit
Credit
Units
Northwest
-‐
-‐
4
-‐
-‐
4
Northeast
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
0
Central
West
100
-‐
13
28
-‐
141
Central
East
-‐
36
7
9
54
106
Southwest
-‐
-‐
-‐
1
-‐
1
Southeast
-‐
2
2
2
-‐
6
Far
South
352
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
396
Total
452
44
26
40
54
654
Projects
Worley
Terrace;
Network
City
View;
Boulevard
Homes
Hawthorne
South
Park
Restoration
I;
Lucas
Homes
Village
Lucas
Homes;
CHN
Central;
Griggs
Village
SF-‐
Single-‐Family
1
The
term
“emerging”
is
used
throughout
this
report
to
reflect
neighborhoods
that
have
made
positive
gains
in
the
past
few
years
in
household
counts
and
investment
preceded
by
multiple
years
of
disinvestment
and
population
decline.
3|
P a g e
You can also read
