Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in patients with bipolar disorder: diffusion tensor imaging studies using tract-based spatial ...

Page created by Daniel Ward
 
CONTINUE READING
Research Paper

       Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in
        patients with bipolar disorder: diffusion tensor
       imaging studies using tract-based spatial statistics
  Cheng Yang, MM*; Lei Li, MD*; Xinyu Hu, PhD*; Qiang Luo, MM; Weihong Kuang, MD;
        Su Lui, MD, PhD; Xiaoqi Huang, MD, PhD; Jing Dai, MD; Manxi He, MD;
          Graham J. Kemp, DSc; John A Sweeney, PhD; Qiyong Gong, MD, PhD
Published online first on Aug. 29, 2018; subject to revision

   Background: An increasing number of psychoradiology studies that use tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) of diffusion tensor imaging
   have reported abnormalities of white matter in patients with bipolar disorder; however, robust conclusions have proven elusive, especially
   considering some important clinical and demographic factors. In the present study, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis of TBSS
   studies to elucidate the most consistent white-matter abnormalities in patients with bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a system-
   atic search up to May 2017 for all TBSS studies comparing fractional anisotropy (FA) between patients with bipolar disorder and healthy con-
   trols. We performed anisotropic effect size–signed differential mapping meta-analysis. Results: We identified a total of 22 data sets in-
   cluding 556 patients with bipolar disorder and 623 healthy controls. We found significant FA reductions in the genu and body of the
   corpus callosum in patients with bipolar disorder relative to healthy controls. No regions of increased FA were reported. In subgroup
   analy­ses, the FA reduction in the genu of the corpus callosum retained significance in patients with bipolar disorder type I, and the FA re-
   duction in the body of the corpus callosum retained significance in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Meta-regression analysis re-
   vealed that the percentage of female patients was negatively correlated with reduced FA in the body of the corpus callosum. Limitations:
   Data acquisition, patient characteristics and clinical variables in the included studies were heterogeneous. The small number of diffusion
   tensor imaging studies using TBSS in patients with bipolar disorder type II, as well as the lack of other clinical information, hindered the
   application of subgroup meta-analyses. Conclusion: Our study consistently identified decreased FA in the genu and body of the corpus
   callosum, suggesting that interhemispheric communication may be the connectivity most affected in patients with bipolar disorder.

Introduction                                                                   In addition to structural and functional alterations in mul-
                                                                            tiple brain regions, aberrant connectivity between regions
 Bipolar disorder (BD) is a serious chronic disease character-              seems to be crucial to the pathogenesis of BD.4,5 Diffusion ten-
 ized by the co-occurrence of manic and depressive symptoms,                sor imaging (DTI), an important psychoradiology technique
 and it has a worldwide prevalence of approximately 1%.1 Two                (https://radiopaedia.org/articles/psychoradiology), can
 main forms are distinguished in the fifth edition of the                   probe the white-matter tracts that form the infrastructure of
 ­Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5):            that connectivity. It maps the diffusion of water molecules,
  BD type I (BD I) is the classic manic–depressive disorder; a              and the calculated quantity of fractional anisotropy (FA) con-
  diag­nosis of BD type II (BD II) requires at least 1 episode of           tains information about the directionality and coherence of
  major depression and 1 hypomanic episode.2 Bipolar disorder               neuronal fibre tracts.6,7
leads to severe impairments in work role function and a high                   In studies of patients with BD, however, various regions
lifetime suicide risk; thus, there is a pressing need for a better          showing both FA increases and decreases have been re-
understanding of its neural basis. Magnetic resonance im­                   ported: for example in the prefrontal white matter, temporal
aging has been a useful way to pursue this, and numerous                    white matter and cingulum bundle.8–10 Performing a meta-
­cerebral morphological and functional abnormalities have                   analysis is a powerful way to integrate the results from many
 been reported in patients with BD.3                                        studies in an unbiased way.11 Therefore, using voxel-based

Correspondence to: Q. Gong, Huaxi MR Research Center and Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu,
610041, China; qiyonggong@hmrrc.org.cn; or M. He, Department of Psychoradiology, Chengdu Mental Health Center, Chengdu, 610031, China;
manxi_he@qq.com
*These authors contributed equally to the work.
Submitted Nov. 2, 2017; Revised Feb. 10, 2018; Accepted Feb. 26, 2018
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.170221

© 2018 Joule Inc. or its licensors

                                                               J Psychiatry Neurosci                                                               1
Yang et al.

 meta-analysis to detect common abnormalities in patients with        tant clinical and demographic factors of BD. The third aim
 BD from multiple original studies is of particular importance.       was to perform a multiple meta-regression analysis to explore
 To our knowledge, there have been 3 published voxel-wise             the potential effects of demographic and clinical characteristics
 whole-brain meta-analyses of pertinent DTI studies on BD.12–14       on white-matter microstructural differences, taking advantage
 However, these reviews had some technical limitations. First,        of AES-SDM’s ability to control for moderators.
 all 3 studies integrated both voxel-based analysis (VBA) and
 tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) techniques to compare          Methods
 white-matter abnormalities between patients with BD and
 healthy controls. Although VBA and TBSS both explore whole-          Inclusion of studies
 brain white-matter alterations, they have inherent methodo­
 logic­al differences that make combined meta-analysis problem-       We conducted our meta-analysis according to the Preferred
 atic. Voxel-based analysis is relatively straightforward and         Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
 involves spatial normalization of high-resolution images from        (PRISMA) guidelines. 23 We searched PubMed, Web of
 all studied participants to the same stereotactic space.15 The       Knowledge, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL,
TBSS technique was specifically developed to analyze diffusion        Google Scholar and Embase using the following keywords
data, and it restricts analysis to the centre of major white-matter   to identify relevant articles published up to May 2017: DTI
tracts by projecting each participant’s FA data onto the mean         < OR > diffusion tensor imaging < OR > TBSS < OR > tract-
skeleton, minimizing the misalignment problems that can arise         based spatial statistics < OR > fractional anisotropy; and bi-
from regular VBA16 and arguably making TBSS a more accurate           polar disorder < OR > bipolar depression < OR > mania.
 technique for detecting white-matter abnormalities. Second,          We also manually checked the reference lists of the re-
 given the limited number of reported DTI studies, these previ-       trieved articles for additional relevant studies.
 ous meta-analyses were unable to consider the potentially dif-          The inclusion criteria for the study selections were as fol-
 ferent neural alterations in patients with BD I and BD II, or the    lows: studies that compared whole-brain FA alteration be-
 influence of the mood state (manic, depressed or euthymic)           tween patients with BD (diagnosed according to DSM-IV cri­
 during MRI scanning. Some of the inconsistencies in reported         ter­ia) and healthy controls; studies that used the TBSS
 white-matter findings may be due to different selection of pa-       approach for DTI data analysis; studies that reported Montreal
 tient subtypes. For example, Versace and colleagues17 reported       Neurological Institute or Talairach coordinates of the whole
FA increases in the left uncinate fasciculus, left optic radiation    brain contrast of FA; studies that were published in English in
and right anterothalamic radiation, and FA decreases in the           a peer-reviewed journal; and studies that used significance
right uncinate fasciculus in patients with BD I compared with         thresholds for data that were either corrected for multiple
healthy controls. Including patients with both BD I and BD II,        comparisons or uncorrected with spatial extent thresholds.
Haller and colleagues18 reported FA decreases in the ventral             The exclusion criteria were as follows: studies that were
 part of the corpus callosum compared with healthy controls.          case reports or reviews; studies that provided 3-dimensional
 Ambrosi and colleagues19 reported lower FA in the right infer­       coordinates in stereotactic space (Montreal Neurological In-
 ior longitudinal fasciculus in patients with BD II compared with     stitute or Talairach) were unavailable; studies that reported
 patients with BD I. These different results may reflect different    fewer than 10 participants in either the BD or healthy control
neural pathophysiologies in BD I and BD II, so it is important to     groups; studies in which the patients were explicitly re-
identify their separate neurobiological markers. Now that more        cruited to have multiple combined axis I diagnoses; and the
TBSS studies have reported results taking BD subtypes into            presence of sample overlap with other included studies of
consideration, the time is ripe to conduct an updated TBSS            larger sample sizes.
meta-analysis to explore how these factors influence white-­
matter microstructural abnormalities in patients with BD.             Quality assessment and data extraction
    The first aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to
identify the most prominent and replicable white-matter               Two authors (C.Y. and L.L.) independently searched the liter-
­microstructural abnormalities associated with BD. We used            ature, assessed the quality of the retrieved articles and ex-
 anisotropic effect size–signed differential mapping (AES-            tracted and cross-checked the data. In cases of disagreement,
 SDM), a recently developed meta-analytic technique with the          another author mediated until consensus was obtained. We
 potential to quantify the reproducibility of neuroimaging            assessed study quality using a 12-point checklist (see Appen-
 findings.20 This technique enables the results from individual       dix 1, Table S1, available at jpn.ca/170221-a1) adapted from
studies to be weighted and controlled for multiple modera-            previous meta-analyses24 that considered not only the demo-
tors, including demographics, clinical information and im­            graphic and clinical characteristics of individual study par­
aging factors. It has the additional advantage that all informa-      tici­pants (items 1 to 4), but also the specific imaging method-
tion from contributing studies is used in the same map,               ology (items 5 to 10) and the consistency of the conclusions
including positive, negative and null results. The AES-SDM            and the results (items 11 and 12). Each item was given a score
 technique has been successfully applied in other neuropsychi-        of 1, 0.5 or 0 to indicate whether the criteria were fully met,
 atric studies using TBSS, including major depressive disorder        partially met or unfulfilled, respectively.
 and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.21,22 The second           We extracted the following data from each selected study:
 aim was to perform subgroup meta-analyses based on impor-            the characteristics of the participants and their illness (sample

2                                                       J Psychiatry Neurosci
Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in bipolar disorder

size, mean age of participants, sex, age at onset, illness dura-        licated. If a brain region remained significant in all or most of
tion, symptom severity, diagnosis type, drug status, mood               the combinations of studies, we considered the finding to be
states and comorbidities); magnetic resonance methodology               highly replicable.26
(magnetic field strength, acquisition voxel size, number of                 When the sample size was sufficient, we conducted sensi-
diffusion directions and type of analysis); statistical method-         tivity subgroup analyses to test the robustness of the statis-
ology (statistical threshold and correction methods for multi-          tically significant findings by excluding studies with poten-
ple comparisons); and 3-dimensional coordinates (for voxel-             tial confounds on a one-off basis. We performed subgroup
level quantitative meta-analyses).                                      analyses of patients with BD I or BD II; with psychotic or
                                                                        nonpsychotic symptoms; during euthymic, depressed or
Voxel-wise meta-analysis: AES-SDM                                       ­mania status; and of adult or pediatric patients compared
                                                                         with healthy controls separately if sufficient data sets were
For the voxel-wise meta-analysis of the selected studies to              available. We also conducted a subgroup meta-analysis of
­detect FA differences in white matter between patients with             studies with corrected results. We conducted jackknife sensi-
 BD and healthy controls, we used AES-SDM (www.​                         tivity analysis for each subgroup result.
 sdmproject.com). 20 The AES-SDM technique uses effect
sizes to combine reported peak coordinates that are ex-                 Meta-regression analysis
tracted from databases with statistical parametric maps, and
it recreates original maps of the effect size of FA difference          We performed meta-regression analyses using age, percent-
in white matter between patients and controls. We per-                  age of female patients, symptom severity (Hamilton Depres-
formed the analysis as described in the AES-SDM tutorial                sion Rating Scale28), age at onset and illness duration in each
and related publications. 25 We used MRIcron software                   study as the independent variables. We could not study non-
(www.mricro.com/mricron/) to visualize AES-SDM maps                     drug therapy status because of a lack of reported data. We
overlaid on 3 subgroup analyses onto a high-resolution                  could not explore symptom severity as rated by the Young
brain template generated by the International Consortium                Mania Rating Scale29 by meta-regression because there were
for Brain M ­ apping.                                                   only 6 data sets. The results were weighted by the square
    The AES-SDM methods are briefly summarized here but                 root of the sample size. To minimize the reporting of spuri-
have been described in detail elsewhere.26,27 First, from each          ous relationships, we selected a more conservative threshold
 data set we extracted the peak coordinates of all white-matter         of p = 0.0005 as used in previous studies,20 requiring abnor-
 differences at the whole-brain level, and the t values or z-           malities to be detected both in the slope and in one of the ex-
scores of the regions. We converted z-scores for significant            tremes of the regressor, and discarding findings in regions
clusters straightforwardly to t statistics using an online con-         other than those detected in the main analyses. We displayed
verter. Studies reporting no group differences were also in-            the main output for each variable in a map of the regression
cluded. To avoid any potential bias toward liberally thresh-            slope. Finally, we visually inspected regression plots to dis-
olded regions, we excluded the peaks that did not appear                card fittings that were obviously driven by too few studies.26
statistically significant at the whole brain level.26 Second, we
 recreated the peak coordinates for each study using a stan-            Analysis of heterogeneity and publication bias
 dard Montreal Neurological Institute map of the effect size of
 the group differences in FA by means of an anisotropic                 Heterogeneity refers to between-study variations. We con-
 Gaussian kernel. We used a relatively wide full width at half          ducted a between-study heterogeneity analysis of individual
 maximum (20 mm) and DTI fractional anisotropy (TBSS)                   clusters using a random-effects model with Q statistics, with
 templates to control false-positive results. Findings from             thresholds of p = 0.005, peak Z = 1.00 and a cluster extent of
 studies that reported no group difference were also recreated          10 voxels. Areas showing significant heterogeneity that
 with effect-size maps, the difference being that all voxels in         also overlapped with the main findings were explored
 the effect-size group were estimated to have a null effect             ­using meta-regression analyses to understand the sources
 size. Third, we conducted standard meta-analysis to create a            of between-study variability. We also assessed publication
 mean map via voxel-wise calculation of the random-effects               bias by testing funnel plots using the Egger test via STATA
 mean of the study maps, taking into account sample size,                (www.stata.cn), in which any result showing p < 0.05 was
 intra­study variance and between-study heterogeneity. The               regarded as having significant publication bias.
 analytical parameters of the AES-SDM were as follows:
 voxel threshold p = 0.005, peak height threshold Z = 1.00 and          Fibre tracking
 cluster size threshold = 100 voxels.
                                                                        We used DTIquery software (http://graphics.stanford.edu/
Jackknife sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis                    projects/dti/) and an atlas of human white-matter anatomy30
                                                                        to help identify the most probable white-matter tracts pass-
To assess the robustness of the findings, we conducted a sys-           ing through the clusters of voxels that showed significant FA
tematic whole-brain voxel-based jackknife analysis, in which            group difference. We used the sample data of a healthy
we iteratively repeated the analysis, excluding 1 data set at a         35-year-old male provided by the DTIquery software. We
time to establish the extent to which the results could be rep-         mapped the white-matter tracts using streamline tracking

                                                       J Psychiatry Neurosci                                                          3
Yang et al.

techniques and filtered them by tract length and a box-                            control group. For these 4 studies, we treated each subgroup
shaped region of interest centred on the coordinates of sig­                       comparison as an independent data set.
nifi­cant clusters.                                                                   The demographic and clinical characteristics of the samples
                                                                                   are reported in Table 1. Of the 556 patients, 57 (10.3%) were
Results                                                                            in a manic state at the time of scanning, 162 (29.1%) were in a
                                                                                   depressive state, and 232 (41.7%) were euthymic; the mood
Included studies and sample characteristics                                        states of 105 (18.9%) were not reported. The patients included
                                                                                   411 with BD I, 87 with BD II and 58 whose BD subtype was
Systematic search of the databases yielded 883 English re-                         not mentioned. A total of 165 patients (29.7%) were reported
search papers. Of these, 18 whole-brain TBSS studies with                          to have comorbidities, which included substance abuse,
22 data sets met our inclusion criteria. Figure 1 shows the                        panic disorder, anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disor-
flow diagram of selection of studies. The included studies                         der, obsessive–compulsive disorder and attention-deficit/​
compared FA differences in white matter between 556 pa-                            hyperactivity disorder, among others. Of the 18 DTI studies,
tients with BD (mean age 38.2 yr) and 623 healthy controls                         2 studies43,44 involved 36 adolescents with BD.
(mean age 39.3 yr). Four studies reported subgroup compari-
sons: 1 study31 compared drug-free patients with BD and pa-                        Pooled meta-analysis of all included studies
tients treated with lithium alone with the same healthy con-
trol group; another study32 compared patients with BD (with                        The pooled meta-analysis of the 22 data sets with 71 clusters
and without a history of suicide attempts) with the same                           revealed decreased FA in the genu of the corpus callosum
healthy control group; and 2 studies19,33 compared subgroups                       and 2 clusters in the body of the corpus callosum in all pa-
of patients with BD (BD I and BD II) with the same healthy                         tients with BD compared with healthy controls (Fig. 2 and

                       Articles identified through                                    Additional articles identified
                          the database search                                           through other sources
                                 n = 883                                                         n=0

                                               Records after duplicates removed
                                                            n = 298

                                                            Articles screened
                                                                  n = 298

                                                                                                         Articles excluded:
                                                                                                         Not relevant diseases = 70
                                                                                                         Reviews and letters = 51

                                                     Full text assessed for eligibility
                                                                 n = 177

                                                                                                         Articles excluded:
                                                                                                         Not TBSS approach = 65
                                                                                                         ROI approach = 40
                                                                                                         Animal sample = 32
                                         Articles included in the quantitative synthesis
                                                                                                         Not compared with healthy
                                                             n = 18
                                                                                                         controls = 19
                                                                                                         No coordinates reported = 3

Fig. 1: Flow diagram for the identification and exclusion of studies. ROI = region of interest; TBSS = tract-based spatial statistics.

4                                                               J Psychiatry Neurosci
Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants in the 18 studies (22 data sets) included in the meta-analysis (part 1 of 2)

                                              Participants, n
                                                (females)          Age, yr       Age at
                                                                                 onset,      Illness       Severity (scale                   Statistical                                                     Quality
                        Study                 BD         HC       BD     HC        yr      duration, yr        type)         Diagnosis       threshold         Drug states     Mood states    Comorbidity*   scores

                        Ambrosi et al.,     25 (12)    50 (24)   48.6    48.3     NA          20.3          9.2 (HAMD)          BD I         p < 0.008        10 AD, 16 AP,        NA             NA          11.5
                        BD I19                                                                                                                (multiple        11 AE, 16 Li,
                                                                                                                                            comparison)           6 BDZ
                        Ambrosi et al.,     25 (12)    50 (24)   48.3    48.3     NA          23.9         14.5 (HAMD)          BD II        p < 0.008         6 AD, 12 AP,        NA             NA          11.5
                        BD II19                                                                                                               (multiple        14 AE, 10 Li,
                                                                                                                                            comparison)           13 BDZ
                        Versace et al.17    31 (20)    25 (14)   35.9    29.5     25.4        12.3         RBD 2.1, DBD         BD I          p < 0.05         5 Li, 12 MS,    17 euthymic,       NA          11.5
                                                                                                           15.2 (HAMD)                        (multiple        8 AP, 7 AD,     14 depressed
                                                                                                                                            comparison)           7 BDZ
                        Kumar et al.34      22 (7)     41 (11)   34.7    33.2     NA          10.7          8.57 (SSPI)         BD           pTFCE < 0.05          55 on           NA             NA           11
                                                                                                                                                               medications,
                                                                                                                                                               including AP
                                                                                                                                                                  and MS
                        Delaloye et al.35   15 (NA)       15     67.9    68.3     34.1        33.8         1.00 (YMRS)          BD           pTFCE < 0.05      10 MS, 3 AD,     Euthymic          NA          10.5
                                                         (NA)                                                                                                  6 BDZ, 4 NL

                        Haller et al.18     19 (14)    47 (22)   68.5    69.8     39.4        29.2         0.95 (YMRS)          BD I         pTFCE < 0.05      15 MS, 5 AP,     Euthymic          NA          11.5
                                                                                                                                BD II                          7 BDZ, 5 NL,
                                                                                                                                                                  3 UM
                        Benedetti et al.,   26 (17)    21 (10)   45.1    39.9     31.6        13.5         20.1 (HAMD)          BD I         pTFCE < 0.05         26 UM         Depressed         NA           11
                        FREE31†
                        Benedetti et al.,   14 (11)    21 (10)   47.8    39.9     31.1        17.6         19.1 (HAMD)          BD I         pTFCE < 0.05          14 Li        Depressed         NA           11

J Psychiatry Neurosci
                        TREAT31†
                        Chan et al.36       16 (4)      16 (4)   36.9    37.3     NA           0.2          3.8 (YMRS)          BD I          p < 0.001         6 Li, 7 MS      Euthymic          NA           11
                                                                                                                                            (uncorrected)        (sodium
                                                                                                                                                                valproate),
                                                                                                                                                                  12 AP
                        Lagopoulos et       58 (41)    40 (24)   23.0    24.1     15.4         7.5         13.4 (HAMD)         BD I,         pFWE < 0.05      25 AD, 23 MS,     Depressed         NA          11.5
                        al.37                                                                                                  BD II,                          37 AP, 8 UM
                                                                                                                             spectrum
                        Mahon et al.,       14 (5)      15 (7)   33.3    33.7     20.8        12.5          6.8 (HAMD)          BD I         pFWE < 0.05       10 MS, 6 AP,        NA             Yes         10.5
                        SU32†                                                                                                                                     3 UM
                        Mahon et al.,       15 (6)      15 (7)   36.5    33.7     24.8        11.7          5.4 (HAMD)          BD I         pFWE < 0.05      14 AP, 14 MS         NA             Yes         10.5
                        NSU32†
                        Sprooten et al.38   64 (46)    46 (31)   31.7    30.1     18.0        10.0          2.0 (HAMD)          BD I         pFWE < 0.05      34 MS, 28 AD,     Euthymic          Yes          12
                                                                                                                                                               23 AP, 12 Li,
                                                                                                                                                                  11 UM
                        Versace et al.39    15 (14)    24 (15)   36.3    27.7     21.6        14.7         14.9 (HAMD)          BD I         pTFCE < 0.05     10 MS, 10 AP,     Depressed         NA          11.5
                                                                                                                                                               8 AP, 6 BDZ
                        Wessa et al.40      22 (11)     21 (9)   45.4    43.0     23.0        22.0          0.1 (HAMD)          BD I,        pFDR < 0.05       10 Li, 11 AC,    Euthymic          Yes         10.5
                                                                                                                                BD II                           6 AD, 5 AP,
                                                                                                                                                                   4 UM

5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in bipolar disorder
6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Yang et al.

                        Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants in the 18 studies (22 data sets) included in the meta-analysis (part 2 of 2)

                                                   Participants, n
                                                     (females)                Age, yr         Age at
                                                                                              onset,         Illness           Severity (scale                            Statistical                                                                          Quality
                        Study                      BD           HC          BD       HC         yr         duration, yr            type)              Diagnosis           threshold             Drug states           Mood states          Comorbidity*        scores
                        Liu et al., BD I33       14 (7)       21 (13)      35.6      38.3        NA             7.3             6.7 (HAMD)               BD I             p < 0.001             2 Li, 12 AC,            7 manic,                NA                11
                                                                                                                                                                        (uncorrected)           12 AD, 1 AP           7 depressed
                        Liu et al., BD II33      13 (11)      21 (13)      35.1      38.3        NA             9.4             9.5 (HAMD)               BD II            p < 0.001            10 AC, 10 AD,            5 manic,                NA                11
                                                                                                                                                                        (uncorrected)              1 AP               8 depressed
                        Magioncalda et           61 (43)      42 (27)      44.6      44.3       25.1            19.6             6.9 manic,              BD I            pTFCE < 0.01         52 MS, 22 AD,            21 manic,                NA               11.6
                        al.41                                                                                                 21.5 depressed,                                                 35 AP, 21 BDZ,         20 depressed,
                                                                                                                               3.6 euthymic                                                       2 UM                20 euthymic
                                                                                                                                  (HAMD)
                        Oertel-Knochel           30 (14)      32 (16)      39.2      39.2        NA             10.2                  NA                 BD I            pTFCE < 0.01         24 MS, 12 AD,             Euthymic                NA               10.5
                        et al.42                                                                                                                                                               13 NL, 5 AL
                        Gao et al.43             18 (12)      18 (12)      15.1      14.1       13.8            1.3             33.4 (YMRS)              BD I,           pTFCE < 0.05           2 UM, 8 VP,               Manic                 Yes               11
                                                                                                                                                         BD II                                  7 Li, 13 AP,
                                                                                                                                                                                                   3 AD
                        Teixeira et al.44        18 (6)        20 (6)      12.3      12.7        9.5            2.8              8.7 (YMRS)            BD I,             pTFCE < 0.05              All UM               6 manic,                Yes               11
                                                                                                                                                       BD II,                                                          8 euthymic,
                                                                                                                                                      BD NOS‡                                                            4 mixed

J Psychiatry Neurosci
                        Haarman et al.45         21 (12)      22 (11)      44.7      38.2       19.5            25.2             0.2 (YMRS)              BD I            pTFCE < 0.05            Medicated              Euthymic                 No              11.5

                        AC = anticonvulsant; AD = antidepressant medication; AE = antiepileptic medication; AL = anxiolytics; AP = antipsychotic medication; BD = bipolar disorder; BDZ = benzodiazepine; DBP = depressed with bipolar disorder; FDR = false
                        discovery rate; FWE = family-wise error corrected; HAMD = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HC = healthy controls; Li = lithium; MS = mood-stabilizing medication; NA = not available; NL = neuroleptics; NOS = not otherwise specified;
                        RBD = remitted with bipolar disorder; SSPI = Signs and Symptoms in Psychotic Illness scale; TFCE = threshold-free cluster enhancement; UM = unmedicated; VP = valproate; YMRS = Young Mania Rating Scale.
                        *Comorbidity:
                            Mahon et al., SU: substance abuse or dependence (n = 3), anorexia nervosa (n = 1), panic disorder with (n = 1) and without (n = 1) a history of agoraphobia, anxiety disorder NOS (n = 2), posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 2),
                            generalized anxiety disorder (n = 1), specific phobia (n = 1) and bulimia nervosa (n = 1).
                            Mahon et al., NSU: substance abuse or dependence (n = 5), obsessive−compulsive disorder (n = 1) and agoraphobia without a history of panic disorder (n = 1).
                            Sprooten et al.: anxiety disorder (n = 30), alcohol use disorder (n = 33), substance use disorder (n = 29), nicotine dependence, current (n = 21).
                            Gao et al.: anxiety (n = 1), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (n = 1), obsessive−compulsive disorder (n = 2).
                            Teixeira et al.: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 9), oppositional defiant disorder (n = 5), generalized anxiety disorder (n = 3), conduct disorder (n = 2), simple phobia (n = 2), posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 2), panic
                            disorder (n = 1), separation anxiety disorder (n = 1), obsessive–compulsive disorder (n = 1) and Tourette syndrome (n = 1).
                            Wessa et al.: panic disorder (n = 1).
                        †
                          FREE indicates that the study includes a subgroup of drug-free patients with BD. TREAT indicates that the study includes a subgroup of lithium-treated patients with BD. SU indicates that the study includes subgroup of patients with a
                        previous suicide attempt. NSU indicates that the study includes subgroup of patients without a previous suicide attempt.
                        ‡
                          Children and adolescents were diagnosed as BD NOS if they presented with clear manic or hypomanic episodes with elation and/or grandiosity but lacked the duration needed to be classified as BD I or BD II.
Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in bipolar disorder

Table 2). No regions with increased FA were found. The                  Subgroup meta-analysis
white-matter tracts running through these 3 regions provide
interhemispheric connections to the prefrontal, orbitofron-             The subgroup meta-analysis of the studies of patients with
tal, inferior temporal and superior parietal cortices (Fig. 3).         BD I included 13 data sets that compared 346 patients with
These results showed no significant between-study hetero-               BD I to 350 healthy controls. The FA in patients with BD I
geneity. Extraction of funnel plots revealed no publication             was decreased in the genu of the corpus callosum relative to
bias. The Egger test showed no significant publication bias             that of healthy controls (Table 3). We were unable to conduct
in the genu (Egger p = 0.62) or in the anterior (Egger p =              subgroup meta-analyses of the studies of patients with BD II
0.99) or posterior (Egger p = 0.23) parts of the body of the            compared with either healthy controls or patients with BD I
corpus callosum.                                                        because of the limited number of data sets.
   As shown in Table 3, the whole-brain jackknife sensitivity             The subgroup meta-analysis of euthymic patients with BD
analysis of the pooled meta-analysis found that all 3 clusters          included 7 data sets that compared 187 euthymic patients with
were highly replicable. The most robust cluster was found in            BD to 199 healthy controls. Relative to controls, patients in the
the left genu of the corpus callosum, which was preserved               euthymic state exhibited decreased FA in the body of the cor-
throughout all 22 combinations of the data sets. The other 2 re-        pus callosum (Table 3). We were unable to conduct subgroup
sults in the body of the corpus callosum remained significant           meta-analyses of manic or depressed patients compared with
in all but 2 and 7 combinations of the data sets, respectively.         healthy controls because of the limited number of data sets.

                 A                                                                      B

               a1

               a2

               a3

      Fig. 2: Results of pooled meta-analysis. Panel A shows the coronal and sagittal view showing decreased fractional anisotropy in
      patients with bipolar disorder versus healthy controls in the genu of corpus callosum (a1), the posterior of the body of corpus
      callosum (a2) and the anterior of the body of corpus callosum (a3). Panel B shows the most probable white-matter tracts passing
      through 3 clusters of voxels (−10, 28, 16; −18, −32, 32; and 16, −6, 36) in 3-dimensional images using DTIquery.

                                                        J Psychiatry Neurosci                                                           7
Yang et al.

   The subgroup meta-analysis of adult patients with BD                                             prevented the detection of white-matter abnormalities when
(age > 18 yr) included 20 data sets that compared 520 adult                                         comparing patients with BD with or without psychosis.
patients with BD to 585 healthy controls. The adult patients                                          The subgroup jackknife sensitivity analyses of bipolar
had decreased FA in the genu and the body of the corpus                                             subtypes, mood states and adult participants, as well as the
callosum, sharing 2 clusters with the results of the pooled                                         corrected studies, found the meta-analysis results to be
meta-analysis (Table 3). We were unable to conduct sub-                                             highly replicable when focusing only on the BD I, euthymic,
group meta-analysis of adolescent patients because of a lack                                        adult and corrected subgroups.
of data sets.
   The subgroup meta-analysis of the studies with cor-                                              Meta-regression analysis
rected results included 19 data sets that compared 513 pa-
tients with BD and 565 healthy controls. The results were                                           The results of the meta-regression analysis showed that the
consistent with the pooled meta-analysis (Appendix 1,                                               percentage of female patients with BD driven by 21 data
­Table S2), showing few effects of the uncorrected results on                                       sets was negatively associated with FA reduction in the
 the overall conclusions.                                                                           body of the corpus callosum (Fig. 3). However, the results
   Only 5 included studies34,37,38,43,44 reported white-matter                                      should be interpreted with some caution, because they were
alter­ations in patients with BD and psychosis. One study in-                                       seemingly driven by 2 outlier studies with very high site ef-
cluded only BD patients with psychosis, and the other 4 re-                                         fects. 37,38 We detected no effect of Hamilton Depression
ported only the percentage of patients with psychosis and                                           ­Rating Scale score, mean age, age at onset or illness dura-
did no subgroup analysis. The limited number of studies                                              tion on white-matter alterations.

 Table 2: Clusters of fractional anisotropy reductions in patients with bipolar disorder relative to healthy controls

                                                                 Maximum                                                                Cluster

                                       MNI coordinates               SDM                                       Number of
 Region                                    x, y, z                  Z value          p value                    voxels                 Breakdown (number of voxels)
 Genu of corpus callosum                   –10, 28, 16               –2.209                ~0                    388                        Corpus callosum (321)
                                                                                                                                                Left striatum (21)
                                                                                                                                   Left anterior thalamic projections (20)
                                                                                                                                 Left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (15)
                                                                                                                                               Left cingulum (11)
 Body of corpus callosum                  –18, –32, 32               –2.470                ~0                    180                      Corpus callosum (125)
                                                                                                                                             Left cingulum (43)
                                                                                                                                  Left superior longitudinal fasciculus (12)
 Body of corpus callosum                   16, –6, 36                –1.303
Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in bipolar disorder

 Table 3: Results of jackknife analysis and subgroup analysis from 18 studies (22 data sets) included in the meta-analysis*

 Analysis                                                    Region of FA reduction:                      Region of FA reduction:                         Region of FA reduction:
                                                             genu of corpus callosum                      body of corpus callosum                         body of corpus callosum

 Jackknife sensitivity analysis
  Excluding Wessa et al.40                                               Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Versace et al.17                                             Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Chan et al.36                                                Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Benedetti et al., FREE31                                     Yes                                           Yes                                             No
  Excluding Benedetti et al., TREAT31                                    Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Haller et al.18                                              Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Delaloye et al.35                                            Yes                                           Yes                                             No
  Excluding Mahon et al., SU32                                           Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Mahon et al., NSU32                                          Yes                                           Yes                                             No
  Excluding Gao et al.43                                                 Yes                                           No                                              No
  Excluding Sprooten et al.38                                            Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Oertel-Knochel et al.42                                      Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Lagopoulos et al.37                                          Yes                                           Yes                                             No
  Excluding Teixeira et al.44                                            Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Ambrosi et al., BD I19                                       Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Ambrosi et al., BD II19                                      Yes                                           No                                              No
  Excluding Magioncalda et al.41                                         Yes                                           Yes                                             No
  Excluding Versace et al.39                                             Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Kumar et al.34                                               Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Liu et al., BD I33                                           Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Liu et al., BD II33                                          Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
  Excluding Haarman et al.45                                             Yes                                           Yes                                             Yes
 Subgroup analysis
  studies with adult BD                                                  Yes                                           Yes                                             No
  Studies with BD I                                                      Yes                                           No                                              No
  Studies with euthymic-state BD                                          No                                           Yes                                             No

 BD = bipolar disorder; FA = fractional anisotropy.
 *“Yes” indicates that the specific region of FA reduction was significant in the specific jackknife analysis and subgroup analysis; “No” indicates that the specific region of FA reduction was
 not significant in specific analysis.

Discussion                                                                                           losum in patients with BD compared with healthy controls, a
                                                                                                     result that was consistent with those of 2 other DTI studies
The current study pooled the largest number of TBSS studies                                          using a region-of-interest method focusing on the corpus cal-
to date in patients with BD to conduct a quantitative meta-                                          losum.49,50 This brain region has been increasingly implicated
analysis. To the best of our knowledge, no similar work has                                           in patients with BD: for example, a multicentre structural
been reported, especially regarding the clinical and demo-                                            MRI study reported a decrease in the mid-sagittal area of the
graphic effects of BD subtypes, psychotic features, mood                                              body of the corpus callosum in patients with BD compared
states, age and sex. Voxel-wise meta-analysis using AES-                                              with healthy controls.51 It is tempting to speculate that im-
SDM revealed that patients with BD have decreased FA in                                               paired interhemispheric communication is important in the
the genu of the corpus callosum and in 2 clusters in the body                                         pathophysiology of BD. The recent meta-analysis by Wise
of the corpus callosum; these results were robust under jack-                                         and colleagues14 reported that patients with BD showed de-
knife analysis. We found a significant negative association                                          creased FA in the left cingulum, the left genu of the corpus
between the percentage of female patients and the FA in the                                          callosum and the right anterior superior longitudinal fascicu-
body of the corpus callosum. Subgroup analyses of the BD I                                           lus compared with healthy controls. Our findings are not
studies, euthymic studies and adult studies reproduced the                                           completely consistent with those of previous meta-analyses,
significant findings of decreased FA in the genu and the body                                        because we found no significant abnormalities in any tracts
of the corpus callosum. These results suggest that abnormal­                                         other than the corpus callosum. There are several possible rea-
ities in white-matter tracts may be involved in the patho­                                           sons for this. First, previous meta-analyses included both TBSS
logic­al mechanisms of BD.                                                                           and VBA studies, whereas we only included TBSS studies,
   The corpus callosum is the largest white-matter bundle                                            ­because there is reason to believe that these can more accu-
that connects the bilateral cerebral hemispheres, integrating                                         rately identify white-matter abnormalities.16 Second, we were
emotional, cognitive, motor and sensory functions.46–48 We                                            able to include many more TBSS studies than the previous
found decreased FA in the genu and body of the corpus cal-                                            meta-analyses, increasing the precision of effect-size estimates.

                                                                               J Psychiatry Neurosci                                                                                           9
Yang et al.

 Third, the clinical samples in our included studies differed in     the corpus callosum connects several areas, including the lat-
 detail from those in previous meta-analyses.                        eral primary motor cortex, supplementary motor areas
    The white-matter fibres passing through the genu of the          (SMA), the primary sensory cortex and the parietal cortex.80
 corpus callosum connect the bilateral prefrontal cortices,          Previous functional studies have shown that the rostral part
 which are known to play a role in decision-making, attention,       of the SMA (the pre-SMA) is involved in memory storage,
 reward-processing and emotion regulation.52,53 Previous             learning, transition, and motor and speech control, and the
 structural studies found decreased volume in both the ven-          pre-SMA connects to the cingulated gyrus, which is part of
 tral and dorsal prefrontal cortex in patients with BD,54,55 and     the limbic system related to cognitive and emotional regula-
 several functional studies have observed decreased dorsal           tion, while the caudal part of the SMA, the SMA proper and
 and ventral prefrontal activity in patients with BD during          the primary motor area are responsible for motor function.81
 language tasks and executive-related tasks.56,57 Additionally,     Together, the SMA may be a transitional region of the limbic
several studies have reported that the ventral prefrontal cor-      and motor system, which plays an important role in the
tex is implicated in the “top–down” regulation of emotional         translation of emotion into motor actions.81 Although emo-
processing in patients with BD.58,59 The FA reduction in the         tional dysfunction is one of the main symptoms of BD, previ-
 genu of the corpus callosum in the present study suggests           ous studies have shown that patients with BD also have
 impaired prefrontal interhemispheric connectivity, perhaps          ­motor impairments such as psychomotor retardation,82 agita-
 leading to neurocognitive deficits in processing speed and         tion,83 attentional deficits and impairments in fine-motor
 working memory,60 for example, and to emotional dysregula-         skills.84–87 We therefore suggest that the FA decrease in the
 tion in patients with BD. Our subgroup analysis of patients         body of the corpus callosum might be related to motor and
 with BD I reproduced the finding of decreased FA in the             emotional dysfunction in patients with BD. Interestingly, our
 genu of corpus callosum compared with healthy controls,             subgroup analyses of euthymic patients with BD and adult
 which was consistent with the findings of some previous DTI         patients with BD replicated the FA decrease in the body of
 studies.61,62 There are clinical differences between BD I and       the corpus callosum. This finding was consistent with 1 pre-
BD II. In DSM-5, BD I is the classic manic–depressive disor-         vious study, which found that euthymic patients with BD
der, while BD II features depressive and hypomanic epi-              had decreased FA in the body of the corpus callosum com-
sodes; furthermore, the clinical manifestations and treat-           pared with unaffected siblings.73 Several studies have re-
ments of BD I and BD II are different.63,64 The FA reduction in       ported that brain structural and functional abnormalities are
 the genu of the corpus callosum reflected a disconnection of         related to current mood states in patients with BD.88,89 Our re-
 the paralimbic system, which plays a central role in emo-          sults may indicate a persistent callosal dysconnectivity in
 tional regulation,3,65 and might lead to manic-type behaviours     ­euthymic patients with BD, which is consistent with the ob-
such as inappropriate euphoria, excessive psychomotor be-            servation that cognitive impairment and executive dysfunc-
haviour, hypersexuality and paranoia, consistent with the            tion still exist in euthymic patients with BD.90,91
clinical characteristics of patients with BD I.65                        Meta-regression analysis found that FA in the body of the
    The pathobiological interpretation of FA reduction is com-       corpus callosum (decreased overall in patients with BD com-
 plex, because it can be influenced by many factors, such as re-     pared with healthy controls) was negatively associated with
 gional myelination levels, intra- and extracellular volume, the     the percentage of female patients. This result may indicate
 degree of intra-voxel fibre crossing, axonal density and aver-      that female patients have lower FA values in the body of the
 age axonal diameter.66 Previous studies have suggested that         corpus callosum than male patients. Sex differences have been
 abnormalities in the corpus callosum that are detected early in     observed in the clinical characteristics of BD. Female patients
 pediatric patients with BD may be due to altered myelination        with BD may be more likely to have comorbidities and de-
 during neurodevelopment.67 Meanwhile, several studies have          pressive symptoms, which may result in high suicide risk and
reported a reduction of myelin-producing oligodendrocytes            impaired occupational function.2 The sex differences of FA in
in the prefrontal cortex in patients with BD.68–70 The genu of        the body of the corpus callosum may be related to differences
 the corpus callosum and the prefrontal cortex are both late-         in the clinical aspects of BD. A series of morphological studies
 myelinating areas and are therefore more vulnerable to dam-          reported a smaller corpus callosum in female patients than in
 age than the early-myelinating splenium.71–73 We speculate           male patients with BD.92–94 However, 1 study reported no sig-
 that the FA reduction in the genu of the corpus callosum may       nificant difference in the integrity of the body of the corpus
 be related to a reduction of myelination and may result in a       callosum when comparing male with female patients with
 pathobiological process that directly slows the transfer of        BD.67 These inconsistencies may have resulted from different
 inter­hemispheric information in patients with BD.47 To help        demographic characteristics, data acquisition methods and
confirm this hypothesis, further studies with more DTI indi-         other confounding factors in studies of patients with BD.
ces, such as axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity, would be          Medication exposure is an important potential con-
useful, because there is evidence from animal studies that           founder, and understanding the effect of medications on
­axial diffusivity is primarily an axonal marker and radial dif-     white-matter abnormalities in patients with BD is critical for
 fusivity is primarily a myelin marker.74–76                         the interpretation of results. Because only 1 primary study
    Our finding of decreased FA in the body of the corpus cal-       enrolled unmedicated patients with BD, we could not ex-
 losum in patients with BD compared with healthy controls            clude the confounding influences of medication. Several im-
 was consistent with several previous studies.77–79 The body of      aging studies have evaluated the effect of psychotropic

10                                                     J Psychiatry Neurosci
Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in bipolar disorder

­ edications on white-matter changes in patients with BD.
m                                                                         the pathophysiology of BD. Subgroup analyses found white-
One structural MRI study reported larger bilateral temporal               matter structural differences in patients with BD I, and in
lobe white-matter volumes in patients with BD who were                    adult and euthymic patients. Furthermore, the results of the
taking antipsychotic medications than in patients who were                meta-regression analysis shed light on the structural under-
not taking them.95 Among patients with BD, longer duration                pinnings of the sex differences in the clinical manifestations
of lithium treatment is associated with increased FA, sug-                of patients with BD. In future studies, attention should be
gesting that this medication might enhance white-matter in-               given to differences in clinical type, mood state, and demo-
tegrity.96 In another study, decreased FA was found in partic-            graphics to better define neural mechanisms in patients with
ipants treated with lithium, but not in those who were                    BD. Differentiating mood- and type-related white-matter ab-
unmedicated; however, there was no significant difference                 normalities is important for elucidating the core pathophysi-
when directly comparing lithium-using and non-lithium-­                   ology of BD and will give better insight into the nature of the
using patients.31 It has been reported that lithium and other             disease. The present study also adds to the development of
mood stabilizers can improve white-matter integrity and                   psychoradiology, the branch of radiology that applies clinical
promote myelination by acting on neuroglial signalling path-              imaging to psychiatry and psychology.100–103
ways and increasing neurotrophic factors.97,98 Further studies
designed to detect the effect of medication exposure on                   Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the National Natu-
white-matter changes in patients with BD are needed.                      ral Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81621003, 81220108013,
                                                                          81761128023, 81227002 and 81030027), the National Key Technologies
                                                                          R&D Program (program no. 2012BAI01B03) and the Program for
Limitations                                                               Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team (PCSIRT, grant
                                                                          no. IRT16R52) at the University of China. Q. Gong acknowledges
First, the participants varied in terms of sociodemographic and           support from his Changjiang Scholar Professorship Award of China
clinical characteristics. Although we performed subgroup                  (award no. T2014190) and American CMB Distinguished Professor-
                                                                          ship Award (award no. F510000/G16916411), administered by the
analyses of patients with BD I, euthymic patients with BD, and            Institute of International Education, in the United States.
adult patients with BD, the limited data sets precluded com-
                                                                          Affiliations: From the Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), De-
prehensive subgroup analyses (in particular of the important              partment of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University,
contrast between BD I and BD II) and meta-­regression analy-              China (Yang, Li, Hu, Luo, Lui, Huang, Sweeney, Gong); the Depart-
ses. Further research is needed investigating the contribution            ment of Psychiatry, West China Hospital of Sichuan University,
of other clinical characteristics, such as age of onset, comorbid-        China (Kuang); the Department of Psychoradiology, Chengdu Men-
ities and disorder severity. Second, the heterogeneity of MRI             tal Health Center, China (Kuang, Dai, He); the Liverpool Magnetic
                                                                          Resonance Imaging Centre (LiMRIC) and Institute of Ageing and
image acquisition — including voxel size, field intensity of the          Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom (Kemp);
magnetic resonance system, diffusion direction and slice thick-           the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Univer-
ness — may influence the accuracy of the results of our meta-             sity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States (Sweeney); and the
analysis. Third, the main meta-analysis included primary                  Department of Psychology, School of Public Administration, Sichuan
                                                                          University, China (Gong).
­studies, all but 1 of which enrolled medicated patients, so the
 confounding influences of medication could not be excluded.              Competing interests: None declared.
 Fourth, the meta-regression finding that the percentage of fe-           Contributors: C. Yang, L. Li, X. Hu and Q. Gong designed the study.
 male patients with BD was negatively related to the FA in the            C. Yang and L. Li acquired and analyzed the data, which X. Hu,
 body of the corpus callosum was driven by 2 outlying studies.            Q. Luo, W. Kuang, S. Lui, X. Huang, J. Dai, M. He, G.J. Kemp and
                                                                          J.A. Sweeney also analyzed. C. Yang, L. Li, X. Hu, Q. Luo, W. Kuang
 Fifth, it has been reported that more than 50% of patients with          and J. Dai wrote the article, which all authors reviewed. All authors
 BD will experience psychotic symptoms in their lifetime, and it          approved the final version to be published and can certify that no
 is difficult to accurately distinguish BD from other psychiatric         other individuals not listed as authors have made substantial contri-
 disorders in patients with psychotic symptoms.99 However,                butions to the paper.
 data limitations precluded a subgroup analysis comparing pa-
 tients with BD with or without psychosis. Because 5 of our pri-          References
 mary studies included patients with BD and psychosis, we
                                                                           1.   Merikangas KR, Chakravarti A, Moldin SO, et al. Future of genet-
 could not exclude the effects of psychosis features on our re-                 ics of mood disorders research. Biol Psychiatry 2002;52:457-77.
 sults. Future studies comparing patients who have BD with                 2.   American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic
 and without psychosis are needed to elucidate this.                            and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. American
                                                                                Psychiatric Association: Washington (DC); 2013.
                                                                           3.   Strakowski SM, Delbello MP, Adler CM. The functional neuro-
Conclusion                                                                      anatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings.
                                                                                Mol Psychiatry 2005;10:105-16.
We qualitatively and quantitatively reviewed a large number                4.   Brambilla P, Bellani M, Yeh PH, et al. White matter connectivity in
                                                                                bipolar disorder. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009;21:380-6.
of published TBSS studies in patients with BD. Meta-analysis               5.   Sarrazin S, Poupon C, Linke J, et al. A multicenter tractography
of FA findings found that the most robust and replicable                        study of deep white matter tracts in bipolar I disorder: psychotic
white-matter differences were in the genu and body of the                       features and interhemispheric disconnectivity. JAMA Psychiatry
                                                                                2014;71:388-96.
corpus callosum. These white-matter tracts connect the bilat-              6.   Assaf Y, Pasternak O. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based white
eral frontal, temporal and parietal cortices, indicating the im-                matter mapping in brain research: a review. J Mol Neurosci 2008;​
portance of disrupted interhemispheric communication in                         34:51-61.

                                                        J Psychiatry Neurosci                                                                 11
Yang et al.

 7.   Repple J, Meinert S, Grotegerd D, et al. A voxel-based diffusion           33.   Liu JX, Chen YS, Hsieh JC, et al. Differences in white matter abnor-
      tensor imaging study in unipolar and bipolar depression. Bipolar                 malities between bipolar I and II disorders. J Affect Disord 2010;​
      Disord 2017;19:23-31.                                                            127:309-15.
 8.   Ha TH, Her JY, Kim JH, et al. Similarities and differences of white        34.   Kumar J, Iwabuchi S, Oowise S, et al. Shared white-matter dyscon-
      matter connectivity and water diffusivity in bipolar I and II disorder.          nectivity in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis.
      Neurosci Lett 2011;505:150-4.                                                    Psychol Med 2015;45:759-70.
 9.   Bruno S, Cercignani M, Ron MA. White matter abnormalities in bi-           35.   Delaloye C, Moy G, de Bilbao F, et al. Longitudinal analysis of cog-
      polar disorder: a voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study. Bipolar            nitive performances and structural brain changes in late-life bipo-
      Disord 2008;10:460-8.                                                            lar disorder. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;26:1309-18.
10.   Mahapatra A, Khandelwal SK, Sharan P, et al. Diffusion tensor imag-        36.   Chan WY, Yang GL, Chia MY, et al. Cortical and subcortical white
      ing tractography study in bipolar disorder patients compared to first-           matter abnormalities in adults with remitted first-episode mania
      degree relatives and healthy controls. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2017;​           revealed by tract-based spatial statistics. Bipolar Disord 2010;
      71:706-15.                                                                       12:383-9.
11.   Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Laird AR, et al. Ten simple rules for neuro-        37.   Lagopoulos J, Hermens DF, Hatton SN, et al. Microstructural
      imaging meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018;84:151-61.                     white matter changes in the corpus callosum of young people with
12.   Nortje G, Stein DJ, Radua J, et al. Systematic review and voxel-                 bipolar disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study. PLoS One 2013;​
      based meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in bipolar               8:e59108.
      disorder. J Affect Disord 2013;150:192-200.                                38.   Sprooten E, Brumbaugh MS, Knowles EE, et al. Reduced white
13.   Vederine FE, Wessa M, Leboyer M, et al. A meta-analysis of                       matter integrity in sibling pairs discordant for bipolar disorder.
      whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging studies in bipolar disorder.                Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:1317-25.
      Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2011;35:1820-6.                  39.   Versace A, Almeida JR, Quevedo K, et al. Right orbitofrontal corti-
14.   Wise T, Radua J, Nortje G, et al. Voxel-based meta-analytical evi-               colimbic and left corticocortical white matter connectivity differen-
      dence of structural disconnectivity in major depression and bipolar              tiate bipolar and unipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 68:560-7.
      disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2016;79:293-302.                                 40.   Wessa M, Houenou J, Leboyer M, et al. Microstructural white mat-
15.   Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods.                    ter changes in euthymic bipolar patients: a whole-brain diffusion
      Neuroimage 2000;11:805-21.                                                       tensor imaging study. Bipolar Disord 2009;11:504-14.
16.   Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Tract-based spatial         41.   Magioncalda P, Martino M, Conio B, et al. Patterns of microstruc-
      statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuro-           tural white matter abnormalities and their impact on cognitive
      image 2006;31:1487-505.                                                          dysfunction in the various phases of type I bipolar disorder. J Affect
17.   Versace A, Almeida JR, Hassel S, et al. Elevated left and reduced                Disord 2016;193:39-50.
      right orbitomedial prefrontal fractional anisotropy in adults with         42.   Oertel-Knochel V, Reinke B, Alves G, et al. Frontal white matter al-
      bipolar disorder revealed by tract-based spatial statistics. Arch Gen            terations are associated with executive cognitive function in euthy-
      Psychiatry 2008;65:1041-52.                                                      mic bipolar patients. J Affect Disord 2014;155:223-33.
18.   Haller S, Xekardaki A, Delaloye C, et al. Combined analysis of             43.   Gao W, Jiao Q, Qi R, et al. Combined analyses of gray matter
      grey matter voxel-based morphometry and white matter tract-                      voxel-based morphometry and white matter tract-based spatial
      based spatial statistics in late-life bipolar disorder. J Psychiatry             statistics in pediatric bipolar mania. J Affect Disord 2013;150:70-6.
      Neurosci 2011;36:391-401.                                                  44.   Teixeira AM, Kleinman A, Zanetti M, et al. Preserved white matter
19.   Ambrosi E, Chiapponi C, Sani G, et al. White matter microstruc-                  in unmedicated pediatric bipolar disorder. Neurosci Lett 2014;​
      tural characteristics in bipolar I and bipolar II disorder: a diffusion          579:41-5.
      tensor imaging study. J Affect Disord 2016;189:176-83.                     45.   Haarman BCM, Riemersma-Van der Lek RF, Burger H, et al. Diffu-
20.   Radua J, Rubia K, Canales-Rodriguez EJ, et al. Anisotropic kernels               sion tensor imaging in euthymic bipolar disorder: a tract-based
      for coordinate-based meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies. Front                spatial statistics study. J Affect Disord 2016;203:281-91.
      Psychiatry 2014;5:13.                                                      46.   Bellani M, Yeh PH, Tansella M, et al. DTI studies of corpus callo-
21.   Chen G, Hu X, Li L, et al. Disorganization of white matter architec-             sum in bipolar disorder. Biochem Soc Trans 2009;37:1096-8.
      ture in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of diffusion ten-       47.   Brambilla P, Nicoletti M, Sassi RB, et al. Corpus callosum signal in-
      sor imaging with tract-based spatial statistics. Sci Rep 2016;6:21825.           tensity in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder. J Neurol
22.   Chen L, Hu X, Ouyang L, et al. A systematic review and meta-                     Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:221-5.
      analysis of tract-based spatial statistics studies regarding atten-        48.   Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, et al. Development of the hu-
      tion-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev                       man corpus callosum during childhood and adolescence: a longi-
      2016;68:838-47.                                                                  tudinal MRI study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
23.   Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for            1999;23:571-88.
      systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.                49.   Li J, Kale Edmiston E, Chen K, et al. A comparative diffusion ten-
      BMJ 2009;339:b2535.                                                              sor imaging study of corpus callosum subregion integrity in bipo-
24.   Du M, Liu J, Chen Z, et al. Brain grey matter volume alterations in              lar disorder and schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2014;221:58-62.
      late-life depression. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2014;39:397-406.               50.   Wang F, Kalmar JH, Edmiston E, et al. Abnormal corpus callosum
25.   Lim L, Radua J, Rubia K. Gray matter abnormalities in childhood mal-             integrity in bipolar disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Biol
      treatment: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2014;​171:854-63.         Psychiatry 2008;64:730-3.
26.   Radua J, Mataix-Cols D. Voxel-wise meta-analysis of grey matter            51.   Sarrazin S, d’Albis MA, McDonald C, et al. Corpus callosum area
      changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2009;​195:​            in patients with bipolar disorder with and without psychotic fea-
      393-402.                                                                         tures: an international multicentre study. J Psychiatry Neurosci
27.   Radua J, Via E, Catani M, et al. Voxel-based meta-analysis of re-                2015;40:352-9.
      gional white-matter volume differences in autism spectrum disor-           52.   Neubert FX, Mars RB, Sallet J, et al. Connectivity reveals relation-
      der versus healthy controls. Psychol Med 2011;41:1539-50.                        ship of brain areas for reward-guided learning and decision mak-
28.   Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy-               ing in human and monkey frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
      chiatry 1960;23:56-62.                                                           2015;​112:E2695-704.
29.   Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, et al. A rating scale for mania: re-       53.   Volman I, Roelofs K, Koch S, et al. Anterior prefrontal cortex inhi-
      liability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978;133:429-35.            bition impairs control over social emotional actions. Curr Biol 2011;​
30.   Wakana S, Jiang H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, et al. Fiber tract-based                  21:1766-70.
      atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology 2004;230:77-87.             54.   Haldane M, Frangou S. New insights help define the pathophysi-
31.   Benedetti F, Yeh PH, Bellani M, et al. Disruption of white matter                ology of bipolar affective disorder: neuroimaging and neuropa-
      integrity in bipolar depression as a possible structural marker of               thology findings. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2004;​
      illness. Biol Psychiatry 2011;69:309-17.                                         28:943-60.
32.   Mahon K, Burdick KE, Wu J, et al. Relationship between suicidality         55.   Wang F, Kalmar JH, He Y, et al. Functional and structural connec-
      and impulsivity in bipolar I disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging                tivity between the perigenual anterior cingulate and amygdala in
      study. Bipolar Disord 2012;14:80-9.                                              bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:516-21.

 12                                                               J Psychiatry Neurosci
You can also read