Reduced Required Landing Distance Operations - Regulatory Update - Your safety is our mission - Ebaa
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Reduced Required Landing Distance
Operations – Regulatory Update
13 November 2019
Giovanni CIMA
Senior Expert – Air Operations
Your safety is our mission.
An Agency of the European Union
Overview
Issue
Regulatory Process
Outcome
Way forward
2
Issue
What
How
To land within
Why
80 % of the LDA By defining the
conditions to
To increase attain a level of
operational safety equivalent
flexibility (payload, to that of
destinations…) traditional
landing factors
To harmonise with (60%/70%)
other regulatory
systems (FAA Part
135/91K)
3
Regulatory Process: Input
Input to EASA rulemaking
• FAA rules on EOD operations
• FAR 135.385(f), FAR 91.1037(c) allowing
the use of 80% of LDA under specified
conditions and an approval scheme Inclusion of the issue in RMT.0296
• NLR study (NLR-CR-2014-206) (Review of the OPS rules on
• Considering typical business-operated aeroplane performance)
aircraft categories
• Identifying the main risks of operating with
80% of LDA
• Proposing mitigating measures
4
Regulatory Process: RMT.0296 initial scope
Implement the ICAO Global Reporting Format
• Reporting of runway surface conditions
• Airworthiness standards for aeroplane performance (performance data)
• In-flight check of landing distance at time of arrival
• Flight Crew reports after landing if braking action is different than expected
Allow flexibility for certain CAT operations
• Use of 80 % of LDA for Performance Class A aeroplanes (in business aviation) and Performance
Class B aeroplanes (at public interest sites)
Harmonisation with ICAO and FAA
Other minor issues (clarifications, consistency, etc.)
5
Regulatory Process: RMT.0296 Steps
2015 2016 02.2019 08.2019
RM Group established including NAAs, OEMs, Operators
• Augmented after NPA consultation
Coordination with parallel RMT.0704 on Aerodromes
6
Regulatory Process: NPA proposal
CAT.POL.A.255
(Performance Class A)
CAT.POL.A.355
Eligibility: MCTOM ≤ 45360 Approval from (Performance Class B)
kg, MOPSC ≤ 19, Non- NAA provided Slightly different
scheduled on demand CAT that
Risk Set of
assessment or conditions
No No No FC Equipment PIC
No special Wet check ALAP/additional
tailwind contaminated adverse qualification, checked discretion
approaches aerodrome
runways weather training, operative
conditions
monitoring
and recency
7
Regulatory Process: Comments
Summarised in Mostly on:
Comments of mixed nature CRD 2016-11 • General concept
(supporting, opposing, • Mass threshold
proposing) attached to • a/c eligibility
Opinion 02-2019 • Use of FDM
8
Outcome
Proposal finalised in Opinion 02-2019
• AFM eligibility statement in lieu of mass threshold
• Wet check harmonised with the LDTA criteria (as per new CAT.OP.MPA.303)
Final rule adopted by EC without significant changes
Extensive AMC/GM (being finalised)
9
Way forward
Regulation
adopted in Development of
Implementation
AUG 2019 AMC/GM
(2020)
(applicability by (end of 2019)
NOV 2020)
10Way forward: Implementation Challenges
Different level of
knowledge and Management of
NAAs experience with RLLD change
operations
Availability of
OEMs AFM eligibility performance
data
Air Management of
Training
Operators change
11Way forward: Implementation Monitoring
EASA
Standardisation
Inspections
reports
Number of Feedback from
accidents and NAAs on:
serious • Validity of the
incidents concept
related to RLLD • Difficulties
operations encountered
12Thank you for your attention!
easa.europa.eu/connect Your safety is our mission.
An Agency of the European UnionINTRODUCTION
EU ELIGIBLE ON DEMAND OPERATION (EOD)
Robvaneekeren@safe-runway.com
1
www.Safe-Runway.com 1EU EOD 80% LANDING FACTOR 1. INCREASED SAFETY 2. MORE DESTINATIONS 3. HIGHER PAYLOAD 4. APPLICATION & GUIDANCE https://www.safe-runway.com ROB VAN EEKEREN 2
Landing factor Dispatch requirement DRY
LDR < 60% * LDA /// LDA > 1.67 * LDR
CAT.POL.A.230: Max Landing
Mass allows full stop within
60% / 70% of LDA (dry).
Threshold Full stop
Current Landing Distance Required LDR 60% Dispatch margin 40%
Landing distance available LDA 1
https://www.safe-runway.com 3Landing factor Dispatch requirement NEW dry
LDR < 80% * LDA /// LDA > 1.25 * LDR
CAT.POL.A.230: Max Landing
Mass allows full stop within
80% of LDA (dry).
Threshold Full stop
Landing Distance Required LDR 80% Dispatch margin
Dispatch
20%margin
20%
New EOD Landing distance available LDA 1
https://www.safe-runway.com 4LEVEL OF SAFETY : 80% = // > 60% OPERATION
Dispatch margin changed from 40% to 20% → compensation required
• Extensive Safety Assessment
80%
• Extensive EASA Working Group input Restrictions and 60%
requirements
• Extensive EASA review
Compliant AOC holders MAY request approval by the applicable NAA
https://www.safe-runway.com 5INITIAL FINDINGS OF SAFETY ASSESSMENT 1. No Tailwind 2. No contaminated runways 3. 100% reverse thrust Equivalent level of safety is achieved 4. Reduced unstable approaches and limited floating https://www.safe-runway.com 6
AFTER RULE MAKING PROCESS:
Aircraft Aerodrome
1. No Tailwind AOC Crew
2. No contaminated runways
3. 100% reverse thrust
4. Reduced unstable approaches and
limited floating Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 7REQUIREMENTS
Aircraft Aerodrome
AOC Crew
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 8REQUIREMENTS
Type of Ops
Aircraft Aerodrome
• CAT
• Not scheduled
• On Demand
AOC Crew
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 9REQUIREMENTS AOC
• # Requirements
Aircraft Aerodrome
• Risk assessment –or-
• Full compliant to
CAT.POL.A.255
AOC • Approval obtained Crew
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 10REQUIREMENTS Aircraft
Aircraft • MOPSC < 19
Aerodrome
• EOD in AFM
• Equipment
AOC • AFM performance Crew
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 11REQUIREMENTS Aerodrome
• ALAP
Aircraft • Runway status
Aerodrome
• Weather
• Wind
AOC • No “specials” Crew
• No State restrictions
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 12REQUIREMENTS Crew
Aircraft • Composition
Aerodrome
• Experience
• Training
AOC • Checking Crew
• Qualified
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 13REQUIREMENTS
SMS
Aircraft Aerodrome
• Risk management
• PIC authority
AOC • Monitoring Crew
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 14REQUIREMENTS
Aircraft
Aircraft AOC
Aerodrome
Aerodrome
AOC Crew
Crew
Operators OVERALL level of safety increases
Type of Ops
Type of Ops 60%
80% SMS
SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 15UP TO 30% MORE DESTINATIONS
+ 30%
www.Safe-Runway.com 16HIGHER PAYLOAD
✗
✓
www.Safe-Runway.com 1717EOD 80% APPLICATION
Type of Ops
AOC
Aircraft
Crew
Aerodrome
SMS
Application
✓
https://www.safe-runway.com 18HOW TO GET 80%
CAT.POL.A.255 Approval of reduced required landing distance operations
An aeroplane operator may conduct landing operations within 80 % of the landing distance available
(LDA) if it complies with the following conditions:
(1) the airplane has an MOPSC of 19 or less;
(2) the airplane has an eligibility statement for reduced required landing distance in the AFM;
(3) the airplane is used in non-scheduled on-demand commercial air transport (CAT) operations;
(4) the landing mass of the aeroplane allows a full-stop landing within that reduced landing distance;
(5) the operator has obtained a prior approval of the competent authority.
→ Request for approval needed.
https://www.safe-runway.com 19To obtain the approval, the operator shall
provide evidence on:
1. Type of operation;
2. Adequate training, checking and monitoring;
3. Flight crew composition and recency;
4. Aircraft equipment affecting landing performance;
1. No Tailwind 5. AFM and OM LLDR inclusions;
2. No contaminated runways 6. Wet runway performance;
7. Aerodrome landing analysis programme (ALAP);
3. 100% reverse thrust
8. No special-approach procedures;
4. Reduced unstable approaches and 9. No tailwind;
limited floating
10. No special approaches or landings
11. Aerodrome conditions and restrictions;
12. No contaminated runway conditions;
13. No forecasted adverse weather;
14. Final decision PIC.
https://www.safe-runway.com 20THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS
CAT.POL.A.255 Approval of reduced required landing distance operations
(a) For aeroplanes having a maximum certified take-off mass (MCTOM) of 45 360 kg or less and a maximum operational passenger seating
configuration (MOPSC) of 19 or less, used in non-scheduled on-demand commercial air transport (CAT) operations, landing operations with a
landing mass of the aeroplane allowing a full stop landing within 80 % of the landing distance available (LDA) require prior approval by the
competent authority.
(b) To obtain the approval, the operator shall provide evidence that:
(1) a risk assessment has been conducted by the operator to demonstrate that a level of safety equivalent to that intended by EU 965/2012 SUBPART C CAT.POL.A.230
CAT.POL.A.230(a)(1) or CAT.POL.A.230(a)(2), as applicable, is achieved; or
CAT.POL.A 230 Landing – dry runways
(2) the following conditions are met:
(i) special-approach procedures, such as steep approaches, planned screen heights higher than 60 ft or lower than 35 ft, low-visibility
(a) The landing mass of the determined in accordance with for the
operations, planned operations outside stabilised approach criteria, are prohibited; estimated time of landing at the destination aerodrome and at any
(ii) short landing operations in accordance with CAT.POL.A.250 are prohibited; alternate aerodrome shall allow a full-stop landing from 50 ft above
(iii) an adequate training, checking and monitoring process for the flight crew is established; the threshold:
(iv) an aerodrome landing analysis programme (ALAP) is established by the operator to ensure that the following conditions are met: (1) for turbojet-powered aeroplanes, within 60 % of the landing
(A) no tailwind is forecasted at the expected time of arrival; distance available
(B) if the runway is forecasted to be wet at the expected time of arrival, the landing distance at dispatch shall either be determined in (2) for turbopropeller-powered aeroplanes, within 70 % of the LDA
accordance with CAT.OP.MPA.303(a) or be at least 115 % of the landing distance required by CAT.POL.A.230(a)(3), whichever is longer; by way of derogation from (a)(1) and (a)(2) above, for aeroplanes that
(C) no expected contaminated runway conditions exist at the expected time of arrival; and are approved for reduced landing distance operations under , within
(D) no forecasted adverse weather conditions exist at the expected time of arrival; 80 % of the LDA.
(v) all the equipment affecting landing performance is operative before commencing the flight;
(vi) the flight crew is composed of at least two qualified and trained pilots having recency in reduced required landing distance operations;
(vii) the commander shall make the final decision to conduct reduced required landing distance operations and may decide not to do so when
they consider this to be in the interest of safety; and
(viii) additional aerodrome conditions, if specified by the competent authority, taking into account aeroplane type characteristics, orographic
characteristics in the approach area, available
www.Safe-Runway.com 21
21APPLICATION PROCESS FLOWCHARTS
CAT.POL.A.255 Approval of reduced required landing distance operations
(a) For aeroplanes having a maximum certified take-off mass (MCTOM) of 45 360 kg or less and a maximum operational passenger seating
configuration (MOPSC) of 19 or less, used in non-scheduled on-demand commercial air transport (CAT) operations, landing operations with a
landing mass of the aeroplane allowing a full stop landing within 80 % of the landing distance available (LDA) require prior approval by the
competent authority.
(b) To obtain the approval, the operator shall provide evidence that:
(1) a risk assessment has been conducted by the operator to demonstrate that a level of safety equivalent to that intended by
CAT.POL.A.230(a)(1) or CAT.POL.A.230(a)(2), as applicable, is achieved; or
(2) the following conditions are met:
(i) special-approach procedures, such as steep approaches, planned screen heights higher than 60 ft or lower than 35 ft, low-visibility
operations, planned operations outside stabilised approach criteria, are prohibited;
(ii) short landing operations in accordance with CAT.POL.A.250 are prohibited;
(iii) an adequate training, checking and monitoring process for the flight crew is established;
(iv) an aerodrome landing analysis programme (ALAP) is established by the operator to ensure that the following conditions are met:
(A) no tailwind is forecasted at the expected time of arrival;
(B) if the runway is forecasted to be wet at the expected time of arrival, the landing distance at dispatch shall either be determined in
accordance with CAT.OP.MPA.303(a) or be at least 115 % of the landing distance required by CAT.POL.A.230(a)(3), whichever is longer;
(C) no expected contaminated runway conditions exist at the expected time of arrival; and
(D) no forecasted adverse weather conditions exist at the expected time of arrival;
(v) all the equipment affecting landing performance is operative before commencing the flight;
(vi) the flight crew is composed of at least two qualified and trained pilots having recency in reduced required landing distance operations;
(vii) the commander shall make the final decision to conduct reduced required landing distance operations and may decide not to do so when
they consider this to be in the interest of safety; and
(viii) additional aerodrome conditions, if specified by the competent authority, taking into account aeroplane type characteristics, orographic
characteristics in the approach area, available
www.Safe-Runway.com 22
22EXAMPLE CAT.POL.A.255 Approval of reduced required landing distance operations
Regulation (EU) 2019/1387AMC1 CAT.POL.A.255(b)(2)(iv) Approval of reduced required landing distance operations
(a) An aeroplane operator may conduct landing operations within 80 % of the landing distance available
GENERAL
(LDA) if it complies with the(a)following conditions:
Flight crew training: (1) the airplane has an MOPSC
The operator
of 19 or
should ensure that flight crew training programmes for reduced required landing distance
less; ground training, flight simulation training device (FSTD), and/or
operations include
• Previous experience RRLDO: flightstatement
(2) the airplane has an eligibility training.for reduced required landing distance in the AFM;
• No (3) the airplane is used in non-scheduled on-demand commercial air transport (CAT) operations;
Flight crew with no reduced required landing distance operations experience should
(4) the landing mass of the (b) aeroplane allows a full-stop landing within that reduced landing distance;
• Yes on type have completed the full training programme of (a) above.
(5) the operator has obtained a prior approval of the competent authority.
• Yes on different type (b) To obtain the approval referred(c) Flight to
crew with (a)(5),
in point previous the operator
increasedshall provide
reduced evidence
required landingofdistance
either of the
operations experience of a
• Yes with same operator following circumstances: similar type of operation with another EU operator, may undertake the following:
(1) that aiv)
• Yes with another EU operator riskan adequate
assessment has training,
an abbreviated
(1) been conducted checking
toground
demonstrate and that
training
monitoring process
a levelifofoperating
course safety equivalentfortoathe
an aircraft of that
type or class different from
intendedflight crew is gained;
by point established;
that of the
CAT.POL.A.230(a)(1) aircraft
or on
(2), which
as the
applicable, previous
is reduced
achieved; required landing distance operations experience was
• Required training (2) that the following conditions are met:
• Full (2) ansuch
(i) special-approach procedures, abbreviated ground, FSTD
as steep approaches, planned and/or
screenflight
heightstraining cou60
higher than rseftifor
operating the same type
• Ground training lower than 35 ft, low-visibility or class and variant of the same aircraft type or class on which
operations, approaches outside stabilised approach criteria approved under the previous reduced required landing
distance operations experience was gained; this course should include at least the provisions of the
point CAT.OP.MPA.115(a), are prohibited;
• FSTD conversion
(ii) short landing operationsrequired
training contained in this AMC; the operator may reduce the number of approaches/landings
by the conversion
in accordance with point training if the type/class
CAT.POL.A.250 or the variant of the aircraft type or class has the same
are prohibited;
• Flight training (iii) landing on contaminated or similar operating procedures, handling characteristics and performance characteristics as the previously
runways
operated is prohibited;
aircraft type or class.
• Abbreviated (iv) an adequate training, checking and monitoring process for the flight crew is established;
(d) Flight crew with reduced required landing distance operations experience with the operator may
• Difference (v) an aerodrome landing analysis
undertake programme
an abbreviated(ALAP) is established
ground, FSTD and/or byflight
the operator to ensure
training course that to
according thethe following conditions:
following conditions are met: when changing aircraft type or class, the abbreviated course should include at least the content of the
• ……………etc. (A) no tailwind is forecast atconversion
the training; when changing to a different variant of aircraft within the same type or class rating that
has theexpected time ofoperating
same or similar arrival; procedures, handling characteristics and performance characteristics, as
(B) if the runway is forecasttheto previously
be wet at operated
the expectedaircraft time
typeof class, a the
orarrival, difference courseatordispatch
landing distance shall appropriate to the
familiarization
change of variant
either be determined in accordance should
with point fulfil the abbreviated
CAT.OP.MPA.303(a) orcourse’s purposes; and
(b) as applicable, when be
or shall changing
115 %toofa different variant of
aircraft within the same type or class rating that has significantly different operating procedures, handling
https://www.safe-runway.com the landing distance determined for dry runways,
characteristics whichever
and performance is longer; the abbreviated course should include the
characteristics, 23 content of the
conversion training.CONCLUSION
Aircraft Aerodrome + 30%
Ad-vantages
AOC
Dis-Crew
advantages
Type of Ops
80% SMS
https://www.safe-runway.com 24APPLICATION PROCESS CHALLENGE SOLUTIONS
• Do it your own requires
• Training
• Large number • Legal
• Detailed requirements • Time consuming
• Easy to miss one
• Complex restrictions • Outsource application process
• Complex requirements • Partial
• Legal challenges • Full
Ad-
• → tip balance sooner Dis-
• NAA understanding vantages
advantag
es
Let us help you
https://www.safe-runway.com 25SPECIALIZED 80% EOD LLDR CHECKLISTS
AOC Holder AOC Holder DISPATCH items Reference COMMANDER items Reference
items Reference items Reference APPROVAL RRLD AOC RRLD operations authority
Approval for RRLD Generic or Specific (separate risk RRLD operations authority Approval for RRLD Generic or Specific (separate risk RRLD operations authority Approval RRLD Requirements in OM Approval for RRLD operations by
competent authority Own separate risk assessment
assessment) Own separate risk assessment assessment) Own separate risk assessment
operations by operations by RRLD flight is CAT, non-scheduled and &
On-demand
non-schedule on demand
DISPATCH Approval RRLD
competent competent authority Commanders approval Commander authority
AIRCRAFT MOPSC
authority Aerodrome Aerodrome Landing Analysis
Aerodrome limitation
ALAP
TYPE OF OPERATIONS non-schedule on demand
Aerodrome facilities Friction improved runway COMMANDER Approval commander RRLD for
AOC Holder flight Flight crew composition RRLD RRLD training f) Runway safety margins
AOC Holder flight Flight crew composition RRLD RRLD training this flight
crew requirements crew requirements Flight crew RRLD training and RRLD training Aerodrome restrictions (b) Topography
Flight crew RRLD training and RRLD training checking established
Aerodrome specials
CREW TRAINING and CHECKING RRLD training
checking established Aerodrome weather weather at time of arrival is COMPOSITION
Flight crew RRLD recency compliant Have a RRLD recency expected50% of headwind is used.
QUALIFICATION RRLD qualification
Flight crew RRLD recency Have a RRLD recency
Flight crew RRLD qualified RRLD qualification Runway status RECENCY Have a RRLD recency
compliant Aerodrome information source Runway is at ETA forecasted
Contaminated
Flight crew RRLD qualified RRLD qualification Commanders authority Approval commander RRLD for this Runway is at ETA forecasted Wet
flight
Commanders authority Approval commander RRLD for
Wind Wind
this flight LDA declared distance Aerodrome declared distances are
considered AIRCRAFT NO LLDR MEL, Aircraft Equipment
Approach procedures Steep approach
AFM ELIGIBLE, Eligibility
AOC holder planned screen heights < 35 or >
60 fee AFM PERFORMANCE CS-25.1592
RRLD flight is CAT, non-scheduled CAT non-schedule on demand
AOC holder Operations and & On-demand
Stabilized approach criteria
operations CAT.POL.A.235
RRLD flight is CAT, non- CAT non-schedule on demand AFM WET PERFORMANCE AFM includes wet performance
Operations scheduled and & On-demand requirements RRLD Trend analysis and monitoring RRLD Trend analysis and monitoring
Landing procedures low visibility operations
Short landings
requirements Aircraft AFM RRLD performances CS-25.1592
RRLD Trend analysis and RRLD Trend analysis and Operations manual contains RRLD Performance Information for CAT.POL.A.235
monitoring monitoring specifics Landing Distance Assessment RRLD no MEL items
AFM contains eligibility statement
Aircraft Equipment
Eligibility
Operations manual contains Performance Information for AFM contains MOPSC MOPSC AERODROME ALAP ALAP
RRLD specifics Landing Distance Assessment AFM RRLD limits RESTRICTIONS
AFM wet performance AFM includes wet performance
FACILITIES
AOC holder Aircraft Destination runway Favorable runway RUNWAY STATUS
Planning 80%
requirements Alternate(s)
Runway planned
LDR Aerodrome declared distances
AOC holder Aircraft LDA
Dry LDR Runway is at ETA forecasted Dry
are considered
requirements AFM contains RRLD performances, CS-25.1592 ALTERNATE(S)
limits and requirements CAT.POL.A.235 Wet LDR Runway is at ETA forecasted Wet RUNWAY PLANNED Favorable runway
AFM includes wet performance Runway planned
AFM contains RRLD CS-25.1592 Wind 50% of headwind is used.
performances, limits and CAT.POL.A.235 RRLD MEL items listed Aircraft Equipment No tailwind is forecasted at ETA
OPERATION APPROACH PROCEDURES
requirements AFM includes wet performance AFM contains eligibility statement Eligibility Landing mass CAT.POL.A.105 General SPECIAL PROCEDURES
RRLD MEL items listed Aircraft Equipment AFM contains MOPSC MOPSC Dry LDR
STEEP APROACHES
CAT.POL.A Landing – dry
AFM contains eligibility Eligibility runway SHORT RUNWAYS
statement ADVERSE WEATHER
AOC holder Aerodrome information source Aerodrome (ALAP)
AFM contains MOPSC MOPSC WIND 50% of headwind is used.
Aerodrome No tailwind is forecasted at ETA
AOC holder Aerodrome information source Aerodrome (ALAP) requirements DRY PERFORMANCE
WET PERFORMANCE Runway is at ETA forecasted
DISPATCHER
ALAP established An ALAP is established
Aerodrome Aerodrome Facilities, limitations and Aerodrome restrictions and Wet
requirements restrictions conditions are considered
ALAP established An ALAP is established Aerodrome declared distances are LANDING MASS CAT.POL.A.105 General
Aerodrome Facilities, limitations Aerodrome restrictions and considered
and restrictions conditions are considered
Aerodrome declared distances
are considered
AOC HOLDER PIC
CAA
https://www.safe-runway.com 26EXAMPLE CHECKLISTS AMC2 CAT.POL.A.255(b)(2)(iv) Monitoring
AOC Holder
• (a) Reduced required landing distance operations
items Reference
Approval for Generic or Specific (separate
risk assessment)
RRLD operations authority
Own separate risk
should be continuously monitored by the operator to
RRLD operations assessment
by competent detect any undesirable trends before they become
authority
AOC Holder flight Flight crew composition
RRLD
RRLD training hazardous.
crew Flight crew RRLD training RRLD training
requirements and checking established
Flight crew RRLD recency
compliant
Have a RRLD recency
• (b) A flight data monitoring (FDM) programme, as
Flight crew RRLD qualified RRLD qualification
Commanders authority Approval commander RRLD
for this flight
required by ORO.AOC.130, is an acceptable method to
monitor operational risks related to reduced required
AOC holder
Operations
RRLD flight is CAT, non-
scheduled and & On-demand
CAT non-schedule on
demand
landing distance operations.
requirements RRLD Trend analysis and RRLD Trend analysis and
monitoring monitoring
Operations manual contains Performance Information for
GM2 CAT.POL.A.255(b)(2)(iv) Monitoring
RRLD specifics Landing Distance Assessment
AOC holder
Aircraft
• Although ORO.AOC.130 requires FDM only for
requirements
AFM contains RRLD CS-25.1592
aeroplanes with a maximum certified take-off mass
RRLD Trend analysis and (MCTOM) of more than 27 000 kg, FDM may be
performances, limits and CAT.POL.A.235
requirements
RRLD Trend analysis
AFM includes wet
performance
and monitoring
RRLD MEL items listed
AFM contains eligibility
Aircraft Equipment
Eligibility monitoring used voluntarily on aeroplanes having smaller
statement
AFM contains MOPSC MOPSC
MCTOM. It is recommended for all operators
AOC holder
Aerodrome
Aerodrome information
source
Aerodrome (ALAP)
conducting reduced required landing distance
requirements
ALAP established An ALAP is established operations.
Aerodrome Facilities, Aerodrome restrictions and
limitations and restrictions conditions are considered
Aerodrome declared
distances are considered
RRLD TREND ANALYSIS
AOC HOLDER AMC & GM DETAIL
https://www.safe-runway.com 27APPLICATION PROCESS
TRAINING
GUIDANCE MATERIAL
https://www.safe-runway.com 28EU EOD 80% LANDING FACTOR
1. OPERATORS FULLY COMPLIANT WITH 80% REQUIREMENTS ENJOY:
1. An improved Level of safety for all their operations;
2. Up to 30% more destinations;
3. Higher payload to shorter runways.
2. HELP AVAILABLE FOR:
1. Application process,
2. Training and
3. Specific guidance
https://www.safe-runway.com ROB VAN EEKEREN 29QUESTIONS / REMARKS?
ROB VAN EEKEREN
ROBVANEEKEREN@SAFE-RUNWAY.COM
0031 6 125 90 997
30
https://www.safe-runway.com 30You can also read
