EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew - Pilatus ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew Document Number 02423 Initial Issue: March 23, 2018 Issue 001 Revision 05: August 31, 2021 This Operational Suitability Data (OSD) – Flight Crew report is issued by Pilatus Aircraft Ltd and is approved by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). The technical content of this document is approved under the authority of the DOA ref. EASA.21J.357.
PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
Page intentionally left blank
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 2 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
RECORD OF REVISION
Revision No. Content Date
OSD-FC Initial Issue of the Pilatus PC-24 OSD-FC
report approved by EASA on 17 April 2018 March 23, 2018
ISSUE: 001 REVISION: 00 under approval number 10065250.
OSD-FC Issue 001, revision 1 of the Pilatus PC-24
OSD-FC report approved under the authority of August 31, 2018
ISSUE: 001 REVISION: 01 DOA No. EASA.21J.357.
Issue 001, revision 2 of the Pilatus PC-24
OSD-FC OSD-FC report approved by EASA on June 14,
May 27, 2019
ISSUE: 001 REVISION: 02 2019 under approval numbers 10070197 and
10070198.
Issue 001, revision 3 of the Pilatus PC-24
OSD-FC OSD-FC report with clarification of chapter 6.4
Supervised Operating Experience (SOE), April 07, 2020
ISSUE: 001 REVISION: 03 approved under the authority of DOA No.
EASA.21J.357.
Issue 001, revision 4 of the Pilatus PC-24
OSD-FC OSDFC report approved by EASA on March 15,
January 27, 2021
ISSUE: 001 REVISION: 04 2021 under approval number 10075215 REV.
1.
OSD-FC The technical content of this document is
approved under the authority of the DOA ref. August 31, 2021
ISSUE: 001 REVISION: 05 EASA.21J.357.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 3 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
Page intentionally left blank
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 4 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECORD OF REVISION ........................................................................................................... 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ 5
ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................... 8
PREAMBLE ........................................................................................................................ 12
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 12
2 Operational Evaluation PC-24 ........................................................................................ 12
2.1 PC-24 Initial Evaluation ......................................................................................... 12
2.1.1 General .................................................................................................... 12
2.2 PC-24 Steep Approach and Unpaved Runways Evaluations ........................................ 12
2.2.1 General .................................................................................................... 12
2.3 PC-24 AYT/TF introduced by APEX BUILD 5 and UMS Build 8 Evaluations .................... 13
2.3.1 General .................................................................................................... 13
OPERATIONAL SUITABILITY DATA (OSD) – FLIGHT CREW ....................................................... 14
1 Aircraft Type Designation and Pilot License Endorsement [M] .......................................... 14
1.1 High Performance Aircraft (HPA) Classification ......................................................... 14
1.2 Aircraft Type Designation and Pilot License Endorsement .......................................... 14
2 Aircraft Specifics ......................................................................................................... 14
2.1 Aircraft Description ............................................................................................... 14
2.2 Operations .......................................................................................................... 15
2.2.1 General .................................................................................................... 15
2.2.2 All Weather / Low Visibility Operations (LVO) ................................................ 15
2.3 Aircraft Approach Category .................................................................................... 15
2.4 Maximum Altitude for SP Operations ....................................................................... 15
2.5 Abnormal and Emergency Procedures – SP and MP operations [AMC] ......................... 15
2.6 Autopilot ............................................................................................................. 16
2.7 Airborne Weather Radar ........................................................................................ 16
2.8 Part-CAT, Subpart D – Instruments, Data, Equipment ................................................ 16
3 Operator Differences Requirements (ODR) [M] ................................................................ 16
4 Master Differences Requirements (MDR) [M] ................................................................. 17
5 Specifications for Pilot Training ..................................................................................... 18
5.1 Pilot prerequisites and previous experience ............................................................. 18
6 PC-24 Initial Type Rating Training .................................................................................. 18
6.1 Theoretical Training .............................................................................................. 18
6.2 Practical Training.................................................................................................. 19
6.3 Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE) [M] ........................................................ 19
7 Differences TRAINING [M] ............................................................................................. 20
7.1 APEX Build 5 & UMS Build 8 without AYT/TF+ASP .................................................... 20
7.2 APEX Build 5 & UMS Build 8 with functionalities according ODR ................................. 20
7.3 Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE) [M] ........................................................ 21
8 Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS) / Supervised Operating Experience (SOE) /
Familiarization Flights .................................................................................................. 22
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 5 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
8.1 General ............................................................................................................... 22
8.2 Steep Approach Operations ................................................................................... 22
8.3 Unpaved Runway Operation ................................................................................... 22
8.4 Supervised Operating Experience (SOE) following PC-24 initial type rating training ........ 23
9 Specifications for Recent Experience and Currency ......................................................... 23
9.1 Specifications for Recent Experience ...................................................................... 23
9.2 Currency.............................................................................................................. 23
9.3 Recurrent Checking (OPC and LPC) ......................................................................... 24
APPENDIX 1 SP/MP TRAINING TRANSITIONS ....................................................................... 25
1 MP to SP Transition ..................................................................................................... 25
1.1 Theoretical Training (4 hours) ................................................................................ 25
1.2 Practical training, normally using an FFS (4 hours) ................................................... 25
2 SP to MP Transition ..................................................................................................... 26
2.1 Theoretical Training (4 hours) ................................................................................ 26
2.2 Flight training, normally using an FFS (2 hours as PF and 2 hours as PNF) .................. 26
3 Mixed SP and MP operations ......................................................................................... 26
APPENDIX 2 TRAINING SCHEDULE for INITIAL TYPE RATING .................................................. 27
APPENDIX 3 STEEP APPROACH OPERATIONS (AFM SUPPLEMENT REPORT 02451) ................. 28
1 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................... 28
2 Theoretical Training (2.0 hours) .................................................................................... 28
3 Practical Training, Normally using a FFS Training (2.0 hours as PF, 2.0 hours as PNF) ....... 28
3.1 Initial Practical Training ......................................................................................... 29
3.1.1 Initial practical training for steep approach operations ................................... 29
3.2 Recurrent Practical Training [M] ............................................................................. 29
4 Training Areas of Special Emphaisis (TASE) .................................................................... 29
5 Checking ..................................................................................................................... 30
APPENDIX 4 UNPAVED RUNWAY OPERATION (AFM SUPPLEMENT REPORT 02444) .................. 31
1 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................... 31
2 Theoretical Training (1.5 hours) .................................................................................... 31
3 Practical Training (1.5 hours as PF) ............................................................................... 31
4 Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE) [M] .............................................................. 32
5 Recurrent Training ........................................................................................................ 32
APPENDIX 5 DIFFERENCE TRAINING VARIANTS PC-24 TF & PC-24 AYT/TF ............................. 33
1 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................... 33
2 Theoretical Training ...................................................................................................... 33
3 Practical Training ......................................................................................................... 34
3.1 TASE Items .......................................................................................................... 34
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 6 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
3.2 Additional Items ................................................................................................... 34
4 Operator Difference Requirement (ODR) [M] ................................................................... 35
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 7 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
ACRONYMS
AFM ............................ Airplane Flight Manual
AMC ........................... Acceptable Means of Compliance
AP ............................. Auto Pilot
ASP ........................... Automatic Speed Protection
ATO ............................ Approved Training Organisation
AYT ............................ Auto Yaw Trim
BAZL ........................... Bundesamt für Zivilluftfahrt (CAA Switzerland)
CBT ............................ Computer Based Training
CS-FCD ...................... Certification Specifications for Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew Data
CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014
CRM ........................... Crew Resource Management
CPDLC ........................ Controller Pilot data Link Communication
CS-FSTD(A) .................. Certification Specifications for Aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devices of 4 July
2012
Difference Level ........... a designated level of difference as defined in CS-FCD for the evaluation of pilot
training, checking and currency
DU .............................. Display Unit
EASA .......................... European Aviation Safety Agency
EFIS ............................ Electronic Flight Instrument System
EGPWS ....................... Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System
EICAS ......................... Engine Indication and Crew Alert System
FCL ............................. Flight Crew Licensing
FCOM.......................... Flight Crew Operational Manual
FD .............................. Flight Director
FFS ............................. Full Flight Simulator (Level C or D)
FMS ............................ Flight Management System
FOCA ......................... Federal Office of Civil Aviation (CAA Switzerland)
FSTD .......................... Flight Simulation Training Device
GPWS ......................... Ground Proximity Warning System
HPA ........................... High-Performance Aeroplane
LIFUS .......................... Line Flying Under Supervision
LPC ............................ License Proficiency Check
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 8 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
LST ............................. License Skill Test
MDR .......................... Master Differences Requirements
MFD ........................... Multi-Function Display
MMEL ......................... Master Minimum Equipment List
MP ............................. Multi-Pilot
ODR ........................... Operator Differences Requirements
OSD ........................... Operational Suitability Data
OTD ............................ Other Training Device
Part-ARA Annex VI to Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012 of 30 March 2012 amending
Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technical requirements and
administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation
(EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
Part-ARO ..................... Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying down
technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the
Council (as amended)
Part-CAT ...................... Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying down
technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the
Council (as amended)
Part-FCL ...................... Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying
down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation
aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and
of the Council (as amended)
Part-ORA ..................... Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012 of 30 March 2012
amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technical requirements and
administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation
(EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
Part-ORO ..................... Annex III to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying down
technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the
Council (as amended)
Part-SPA ...................... Annex V to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying down
technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the
Council (as amended)
PDVA .......................... Pilot Defined Visual Approach
PF ............................... Pilot Flying
PFD ............................ Primary Flight Display
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 9 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
PNF ........................... Pilot Not Flying
PM.............................. Pilot Monitoring
QPM ........................... Quiet Power Mode
Route Sector .............. as defined in Part-FCL [“Route sector" means a flight comprising take-off, departure,
cruise of not less than 15 minutes, arrival, approach and landing phases]
RVSM ........................ Reduced Vertical Separation Minima
SAL............................. Steep Approach Landing
SOE ............................ Supervised Operating Experience
SOP ............................ Standard Operating Procedure
SP .............................. Single-Pilot
TASE ........................... Training Areas of Special Emphasis
TAWS .......................... Terrain Awareness and Warning System
TCAS .......................... Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System
TCDS .......................... Type Certificate Data Sheet
TF .............................. Tactile Feedback
TOLD ......................... Take-off and Landing Data
TSC ........................... Touch Screen Controller
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 10 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
Page intentionally left blank
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 11 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
PREAMBLE
1 INTRODUCTION
Where references are made to requirements and where extracts of reference texts are provided,
these are at the amendment state at the date of evaluation or publication of this document. Users
should take account of subsequent amendments to any references, in particular concerning
requirement for civil aviation aircrew and air operations.
Determinations made in this document are based on the evaluations of specific configurations of
aircraft models, equipped in a given configuration and in accordance with current regulations and
guidance.
Major modifications to the aircraft evaluated require additional OSD assessment for type
designation, training / checking / currency, operational credits, and other elements within the
scope of the OSD evaluations. Minor modification (21.A.263) and upgrades can be evaluated acc.
Annex 1 of EU 748/2012 (Part-21) - latest amendment.
In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No
69/2014 of 27 Jan 2014, the Operational Suitability Data contained in this document are identified
as follows:
[M] ............... Mandatory Operational Suitability Data, bearing the status of rule (see GM No 3 to 21A.15(d)).
[AMC] .......... Non-mandatory Operational Suitability Data, bearing the status of Acceptable Means of
Compliance (see GM No 3 to 21A.15(d)).
2 OPERATIONAL EVALUATION PC-24
2.1 PC-24 INITIAL EVALUATION
2.1.1 GENERAL
An initial operational evaluation for the PC-24 was performed in February/March 2018 by an EASA
evaluation team to assess SP and MP type rating qualification requirements.
The operational evaluation was performed in accordance with the Certification Specifications for
Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew Data CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014 as
certification basis.
2.2 PC-24 STEEP APPROACH AND UNPAVED RUNWAYS EVALUATIONS
2.2.1 GENERAL
A follow on operational evaluation for the PC-24 was performed in May 2019 by an EASA evaluation
team to assess the qualification requirements for Steep Approach and Unpaved Runways
operations.
The operational evaluation was performed in accordance with the Certification Specifications for
Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew Data CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014 as
certification basis.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 12 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
2.3 PC-24 AYT/TF INTRODUCED BY APEX BUILD 5 AND UMS BUILD 8 EVALUATIONS
2.3.1 GENERAL
A follow on operational evaluation for the PC-24 was performed on 4.10.2020 – 7.10.2020 by an
EASA evaluation team to assess the qualification requirements for the following new functions
introduced with APEX Build 5 with UMS Build 8:
• Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT)
• Tactile Feedback (TF)
• Touch Screen Controller (TSC)-optional
The operational evaluation was performed in accordance with the Certification Specifications for
Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew Data CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014 as
certification basis.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 13 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
OPERATIONAL SUITABILITY DATA (OSD) – FLIGHT CREW
1 AIRCRAFT TYPE DESIGNATION AND PILOT LICENSE ENDORSEMENT [M]
1.1 HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT (HPA) CLASSIFICATION
With reference to Part-FCL, the PC-24 is designated as High Performance Aircraft (HPA).
1.2 AIRCRAFT TYPE DESIGNATION AND PILOT LICENSE ENDORSEMENT
With reference to Part-FCL, FCL.010 (‘type of aircraft’) and GM1 FCL.700, the Pilatus PC-24 has
been evaluated for aircraft categorisation and license endorsement.
The PC-24 has been classified as a single-pilot high-performance aeroplane requiring a pilot type
rating. The license endorsement is established as “PC-24”.
EASA Type Rating & License Endorsement List – Aeroplanes:
SP/ OE GM /
Aircraft License
OEB /
Manufacturer Endorse Variants Complex SP HPA/ Remarks
Model / Name OSD FC
ment MP available
PC-24
PC-24 AYT
Pilatus Aircraft
PC-24 X X SP HPA X OSD FC PC-24
Ltd. PC-24 TF
PC-24 AYT/TF
2 AIRCRAFT SPECIFICS
2.1 AIRCRAFT DESCRIPTION
Refer to OEM PC-24 documentation.
Issue 001, Revision 1 of this report includes the major change for increased MTOW of 8300 kg in
the OEM documentation for aircraft MSN 131-up, as well as MSN 101 to 130 post SB 42-002.
Issue 001, Revision 2 of this report includes the EASA approved major changes for operations for
Unpaved Runways, and Steep Approach which were specifically evaluated by EASA. This revision
also includes all the latest EASA approved major changes that have been evaluated under Pilatus
DOA, including (but not limited to):
• APEX Build 4 (3.10)
• Take-off with Flaps 8°
Issue 001, Revision 3 of this report added clarification in chapter 6.4 Supervised Operating
Experience (SOE).
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 14 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
Issue 001, Revision 4 of this report includes the EASA approved major changes to Software and
Hardware that have been evaluated by the EASA OSD team. This includes the following changes
(but not limited to):
• APEX Build 5 UMS Build 8
• AYT, ASP, TF
• TSC
• RADAR 7000
• FMS TOLD & PDVA
Furthermore, to evaluate and compare the handling quality of the base PC-24 aircraft with PC-24
aircraft equipped with Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT), Tactile Feedback (TF) and Touch Screen Controller
(TSC), as introduced with APEX Build 5 with UMS Build 8, an EASA OSD T2 & T3 test was executed.
Applicability for Aircraft serial numbers are listed in the ODR table.
Issue 001, Revision 5 of this report includes the PC-24 AYT training variant based on the PC-
24 AYT/TF variant.
2.2 OPERATIONS
2.2.1 GENERAL
All PC-24 operations permitted by the latest EASA approved issue of the PC-24 AFM at the time of
issue of this OSD-FC report have been evaluated.
2.2.2 ALL WEATHER / LOW VISIBILITY OPERATIONS (LVO)
PC-24 operations to lower than ILS Category I minima have not been evaluated.
2.3 AIRCRAFT APPROACH CATEGORY
With reference to Part-CAT, CAT.OP.MPA.320(b) the approach category for the PC-24 is as follows:
Aircraft Category
PC-24 B
This category is based on the approach speed provided by the manufacturer and need to be
reconsidered if operators increase the approach speed.
2.4 MAXIMUM ALTITUDE FOR SP OPERATIONS
The aircraft volume is very small and a decompression will lead to a fast reduction of pressure in
the cabin and cockpit. When pressurization is lost, the time of useful consciousness without
additional emergency oxygen decreases rapidly with increasing operating altitudes.
[AMC] Operators should establish a maximum altitude for SP operations when not permanently
wearing the oxygen mask.
2.5 ABNORMAL AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES – SP AND MP OPERATIONS [AMC]
The Emergency / Abnormal procedures in the manufacturer’s QRH and AFM, provide guidance to
operators and should be followed as closely as possible.
A QRH should be available for all operations.
Operators should ensure that appropriate Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and realistically
achievable Normal, Abnormal and Emergency procedures are available for SP, as well as for MP
operations.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 15 of 36PC-24 EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew The SOP should include clear instructions on the termination of a flight in case of an emergency / abnormal situation during SP operations, taking into account the increase of workload for the single pilot. Part-CAT, AMC5 CAT.OP.MPA.110(8) contains aerodrome operating minima for SP operations. Note: Normal and abnormal procedures are specifically designed for SP operations, to be conservative and simple, without cumbersome troubleshooting steps for abnormal procedures. Differentiation for MP operations should focus on incorporating the crew coordination of checklist execution in the operator's SOP. The FCOM gives adequate guidance for how to conduct crew coordination during MP checklist operations. 2.6 AUTOPILOT Part-ORO, ORO.FC.202 contains provisions for SP operations under IFR or at night which include pilot experience and currency, conversion and recurrent training, as well as checking requirements. In accordance with Part-CAT, CAT.IDE.A.135, an autopilot with at least altitude hold and heading mode is required when operating under IFR in SP operations. 2.7 AIRBORNE WEATHER RADAR In accordance with Part-CAT, CAT.IDE.A.160 and AMC1 CAT.IDE.A.160, an airborne weather radar is required when operating the PC-24 at night or in IMC in areas where thunderstorms or other potentially hazardous weather conditions, regarded as detectable with airborne weather detecting equipment, may be expected to exist along the route. 2.8 PART-CAT, SUBPART D – INSTRUMENTS, DATA, EQUIPMENT EU operators must show compliance with applicable elements of Annex IV to EU Regulation 956/2012 (Part-CAT, Subpart D), prior to beginning commercial transport operations. The PC-24 is designed to support Part-CAT, Subpart D operations with the necessary optional equipment installed. Operator specific items have not been evaluated. Operators must demonstrate to the competent Authority, compliance with Part-CAT, Subpart D (Instruments, Data, and Equipment) relevant to their aircraft prior to entry into service. 3 OPERATOR DIFFERENCES REQUIREMENTS (ODR) [M] Refer to Section 4 of Appendix 5 Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423 Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 16 of 36
PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
4 MASTER DIFFERENCES REQUIREMENTS (MDR) [M]
MDR Table
PC-24 From Airplane (base)
PC-24 PC-24 AYT PC-24 TF PC-24 AYT/TF
PC-24 N/A D/B/B D/B/A D/B/B
PC-24 AYT D/B/B N/A D/B/B A/A/A
To Airplane
(candidate) PC-24 TF D/B/A D/B/B N/A D/A/A
PC-24 AYT/TF D/B/B D/B/B D/A/A N/A
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 17 of 36PC-24 EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew 5 SPECIFICATIONS FOR PILOT TRAINING 5.1 PILOT PREREQUISITES AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE [M] Part-FCL, FCL.720.A applies regarding experience requirements and prerequisites for type ratings for SP high performance complex aeroplanes and for MP operations. In addition, pilots must have a minimum of 500 hrs. total flying experience when operating a PC-24 as SP or as PIC in MP operations. [AMC] Prior knowledge on advanced EFIS, FMS operation and integrated avionics is recommended for PC-24 initial type rating training. Pilots without this previous experience in such systems should be offered additional training either integrated into the Initial Type Rating course or prior to entry into the training programmes described in this report. [AMC] Pilots with limited or no experience of high performance aeroplanes will benefit from additional training which should be completed before starting the type rating course: a High Performance Airplane Course or ATPL Theory Course will suffice. [AMC] ATOs should have a method of determining if additional training is necessary in case of little or no experience with automatic flying (FMS, PFD, glass cockpit) and/or high performance aeroplanes. This can be accomplished through a pre-screening process or a signed declaration / pre-requisites form by the applicant that verifies automatic flying experience. [M] Pilots undergoing training for their first SP crew qualification on a single pilot high performance complex ACFT, or having less than 500 hours experience in SP operations, shall conduct the initial training as well as their skill test in SP operation. [AMC] Pilots undergoing training as MP crew should have completed an MCC course, before commencing MP training for a PC-24 type rating. [AMC] For MP operations CRM and MCC aspects should be incorporated throughout the theoretical and practical training. [AMC] ATOs should review their training courses when applicable aircraft modifications occur. 6 PC-24 INITIAL TYPE RATING TRAINING 6.1 THEORETICAL TRAINING [AMC] Theoretical training should include classroom / CBT training and System Integration using a suitable OTD device. 44.5 hours are recommended for classroom / CBT training and 6 hrs are recommended for additional System Integration. Theoretical training should include a method to ensure a level of knowledge and competency. Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423 Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 18 of 36
PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
[M] Theoretical training must include the following elements:
• Ground training (G) such as CBT/OTD;
• Systems Integration (SI) training such as in the FTD/OTD;
• Training (F) that includes operation of the Flight Management System (FMS).
[AMC] Thorough knowledge of the ACE Honeywell pilot guide is recommended in order to fully
understand the avionic system.
[M] Theoretical training for PC-24 equipped with Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT), Tactile Feedback (TF) and/or
Touch Screen Controller (TSC) must include the elements according Appendix 5.
6.2 PRACTICAL TRAINING
[M] SP Operations. Practical training for a PC-24 initial type rating requires of a minimum of 16
hours as PF.
[M] MP Operations. When combined with the initial type rating training, practical training for MP
operations requires 32 hours which includes, no less than: 16 hours as PF; 4 hours as PM.
[AMC] For pilots current on the PC-24 for SP operations, including completion of SOE/LIFUS (if
required), practical training for MP operations should be conducted in accordance with Appendix 1.
[AMC] Practical training should be performed using an FFS (Level C or D). FFS time may be reduced
if other qualified FSTDs are used as described in AMC2.ORA.ATO.125.
[M] Practical training for PC-24 (equipped with Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT), Tactile Feedback (TF) and/or
Touch Screen Controller (TSC) must include the elements according Appendix 5.
6.3 TRAINING AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS (TASE) [M]
All TASE items must be included in initial and in recurrent training, unless specified otherwise.
TASEs must receive special emphasis as indicated, during
• Electronic Displays, normal, reversionary and degraded operations
• Computerized AFM Data, mass and balance
• OEI operation and engine failure in different flight phases, including transition between
manual and automatic flying
• Primary Flight Display (PFD), Flight Director (FD)
• Flight Management System (FMS), especially Tab Structure and Windowing.
• Flight Path Vector vs. Flight Director
• Electronic Checklist (Normal and Non-Normal procedures)
• Autothrottle operations
• Abnormal Flightcontrols, i.e. flap failures
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 19 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
• Weather Radar function on ground and in flight
• Flight in ice crystal
• Rudder Bias and Yaw-Damper function
• MFD Dropdown Menu
• VNAV operation
• Handling of Emergency Brake
7 DIFFERENCES TRAINING [M]
7.1 APEX BUILD 5 & UMS BUILD 8 WITHOUT AYT/TF+ASP
No difference training is required, provided no new options/functionalities are installed in conjunction
with the accomplishment of SB 42-011 Honeywell Primus APEX DFZ Build 5.0 Software Load and SB
42-012 Upgrade of the Utility Management System to Build 8.0.
7.2 APEX BUILD 5 & UMS BUILD 8 WITH FUNCTIONALITIES ACCORDING ODR
Training, checking and currency levels D/B/B are applicable for differences training from PC-24 to
the PC-24 AYT. Level D training is performed on the aircraft or requires the use of an FSTD with the
minimum qualification of FFS Level D and covers the equipment of the new variant.
• Automatic Yaw Trim (AYT)
• MFC or TSC (It is recommended to combine theoretical training for both devices)
• INAV enhancements
Training, checking and currency levels D/B/A are applicable for differences training from PC-24 to
the PC-24 TF. Level D training is performed on the aircraft or requires the use of an FSTD with the
minimum qualification of FFS Level D and covers the equipment of the new variant.
• MFC or TSC (It is recommended to combine theoretical training for both devices)
• Tactile Feedback TF & Automatic Speed Protection ASP
• INAV enhancements
Training, checking and currency levels D/B/B are applicable for differences training from the PC-24
to the PC-24 AYT/TF variant. Level D training is performed on the aircraft or requires the use of an
FSTD with the minimum qualification of FFS Level D and covers the standard equipment of the new
variant:
• Automatic Yaw Trim (AYT)
• Tactile Feedback TF & Automatic Speed Protection ASP
• MFC or TSC (It is recommended to combine theoretical training for both devices)
• INAV enhancements
Training of optional equipment will be provided according order placement by the respective
customer. Options are:
• Take off & Landing Data Computation TOLD
• RDR7000 3D solid state Weather Radar
• Pilot Defined Visual Approach PDVA
• FANS 1/A+ interface CPDLC & ADS-C
• Integrated SATCOM
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 20 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
• Sirius XM Weather
[AMC] The training footprint including the course duration is shown in Appendix 5.
Difference Training can be incorporated in the initial type rating course.
[M] Difference Training from PC-24 equipped with Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT), Tactile Feedback (TF) and
Touch Screen Controller (TSC) to PC-24 or the PC-24 TF must include the knowledge and awareness
of the following equipment:
• YD without AYT function
• For PC-24: No Autothrottle ASP, Overspeed Protection Mode only,
• Multi Function Controller MFC
The YD without AYT function must be emphasized during practical training especially for OEI flying
training during Take Off and during Missed Approach.
[AMC] Practical difference training is recommended to be done using respective PC-24 variant FFS
Level D.
7.3 TRAINING AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS (TASE) [M]
The following aircraft systems or procedures shall receive special emphasis during difference
training:
• Yaw Damper including Automatic Yaw Trim AYT function for PC-24 (equipped with Auto-Yaw
Trim (AYT))
• Yaw Damper without AYT function for PC-24 and PC-24 TF.
• TSC + TSC blank/failure, if used/optional
Specifications for Checking
Checking must be performed in accordance with applicable EU regulations for civil aviation aircrew
and air operations.
[M] The following items must be included in the skill test and proficiency check exercises for PC 24
aircraft:
• YD including Automatic Yaw Trim function for PC-24 (equipped with Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT))
• Touch Screen Controller TSC for PC-24 (equipped with Touch Screen Controller)
• YD without AYT function for PC-24
• Multi Function Controller MFC for PC-24
Recurrent Checking (OPC and LPC)
Recurrent checking is addressed in Part-ORO, specifically in ORO.FC.130, ORO.FC.220,
ORO.FC.230, AMC1 ORO.FC.230, GM1 ORO.FC.230, ORO.FC.240, and AMC1 ORO.FC.240
[AMC] Recurrent checking can be performed on any PC 24 aircraft, provided that the respective
difference training on the variant aircraft has been completed.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 21 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
8 LINE FLYING UNDER SUPERVISION (LIFUS) / SUPERVISED OPERATING
EXPERIENCE (SOE) / FAMILIARIZATION FLIGHTS
8.1 GENERAL
LIFUS should be performed in accordance with ORO.FC.220 and AMC1 ORO.FC.220(e). Furthermore,
GM1 ORO.FC.220(d) provides guidelines for operators to use when establishing their individual
requirements.
Supervised Operating Experience (SOE) may be established in accordance with Part-FCL, FCL.720.A
(d) through the operational suitability evaluation.
[AMC] In addition to the license and experience prerequisites, the SOE requirements in the table of
Section 8.4 below shall be met.
[AMC] Where there is a change of operating conditions or route structure this should be taken into
account and may need additional route sectors to cover these elements.
8.2 STEEP APPROACH OPERATIONS
Approval of steep approach operations is described in Part-CAT, Subpart C, CAT.POL.A.245
The PC 24 is operationally suitable for steep approach landing operations up to an approach path
angle of 6,65 degrees, in accordance with the applicable AFM Supplement.
[M] Specific theoretical and practical training is required before conducting steep approach landing
operations.
[AMC] Pilots should be trained using the instructor led Pilatus Steep Approach Procedure provided
by Pilatus or equivalent approved SOPs.
[M] Pilatus Steep Approach Training is assessed as Level D / A / A for training, checking and
currency.
Further details are contained in Appendix 3.
8.3 UNPAVED RUNWAY OPERATION
Operations on unpaved runways are unique for jet powered aircraft and should emphasize the
differences in performance and the handling characteristics on unpaved surfaces during taxiing,
takeoff, and landing.
[M] Training should consist of 1.5 hours of ground training and a minimum of two Take offs and
landings on unpaved runways. Taxiing on unpaved surface shall be addressed during training as well.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 22 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
8.4 SUPERVISED OPERATING EXPERIENCE (SOE) FOLLOWING PC-24 INITIAL TYPE RATING
TRAINING
[M] In accordance with Part-FCL, FCL.720.A (d) the exercise of the privileges of the PC-24 type
rating for SP operations or MP operations as PIC, is initially limited to flight under supervision of a
PC-24 instructor as follows:
License and previous experience requirements SOE
CPL (A) with ATPL theory (frozen) / ATPL(A)
none
PILOT IN COMMAND (PIC)
and previous turbo-jet aircraft type rating
MP Operations as
SP Operations
PPL / CPL / CPL (A) with ATPL theory (frozen) / ATPL(A); and
ME Rating + IR Rating; and 25 hrs
or
Minimum of 1000hrs total flying experience
PPL / CPL / CPL (A) with ATPL theory (frozen) / ATPL(A); and
ME Rating + IR Rating 50 hrs
Min. 500hrs total flying experience
PPL / CPL; and
MP Operations
as CO-PILOT
ME Rating + IR Rating
Min. 200hrs total flying experience 0 Hrs
Min. 70Hrs PiC
License endorsement: “Co-Pilot only”
Flight hours under supervision shall be entered in the pilot’s logbook or equivalent record and
signed by the supervising pilot. The limitation is removed when the pilot demonstrates that the
required hours of supervised operating experience (SOE) have been completed.
If the training course and skill test have been performed in MP operation, the type rating should be
restricted to “MP operations only”.
No SOE requirements have been established for MP operations as co-pilot.
[AMC] Flights under supervision should include a representative cross-section of the normal
operation of the aircraft.
9 SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECENT EXPERIENCE AND CURRENCY
9.1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECENT EXPERIENCE
Recent experience requirements are contained in Part-FCL.
9.2 CURRENCY
Requirements are contained in Part-FCL.060 and Part-ORO.FC.230.
Differences Currency is not applicable.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 23 of 36PC-24 EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew 9.3 RECURRENT CHECKING (OPC AND LPC) Recurrent checking is addressed in Part-ORO, specifically in ORO.FC.130, ORO.FC.220, ORO.FC.230, AMC1 ORO.FC.230, GM1 ORO.FC.230, ORO.FC.240, and AMC1 ORO.FC.240. Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423 Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 24 of 36
PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
APPENDIX 1 SP/MP TRAINING TRANSITIONS
[AMC] PC-24 Transition Training SP to MP (and vice versa)
The following syllabus contains a minimum training for pilots when transitioning from MP to SP or
from SP to MP operations.
1 MP TO SP TRANSITION
The theoretical knowledge instruction shall be conducted by an authorized instructor holding the
appropriate type / class rating or any instructor having appropriate experience in aviation and
knowledge of the aircraft concerned, e.g. flight engineer, maintenance engineer or flight operations
officer and shall cover the applicable syllabus, as appropriate.
1.1 THEORETICAL TRAINING (4 HOURS)
The transition course should start with theoretical training to address the following subjects:
• SP psychology, decision making, communications and limitations;
• SP task, resource and workload management and personal organization;
• SP operation and management of avionics suite, including charts and ECL, as applicable;
• Differences between MP and SP Abnormal and Emergency procedures;
• Emergency Phraseology; and
• SP operations in icing conditions.
1.2 PRACTICAL TRAINING, NORMALLY USING AN FFS (4 HOURS)
The practical training should include the following subjects:
• Use and setup of avionics suite, PFD and MFD, including selection of display
• Use of Flight Director and Autopilot, monitoring of modes;
• Engine failure after take-off;
• In flight restart of failed engine;
• Operation of TCAS;
• Sequencing of CAS messages regarding subsequent/secondary failures;
• Loss of cabin pressure control and Emergency Descent procedures;
• Instrument flying on standby instruments;
• Failure of trim system;
• Smoke procedures, including smoke removal;
• Approaches/Landing with reduced flap setting;
• Approaches/Landing with failed engine;
• Engine Fire on the Ground;
• Emergency Evacuation; and
• Use of the ECL, if applicable.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 25 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
2 SP TO MP TRANSITION
MCC procedures should be defined in the operations manual and be introduced during the
transition training.
2.1 THEORETICAL TRAINING (4 HOURS)
The transition course should start with theoretical training to address the following subjects:
• Multi Crew psychology, decision making, communications and limitations;
• Multi Crew task, resource and workload management and organization, MCC procedures;
• MP operation and management of avionics suite, including ECL/optional and Charts;
• Differences between SP and MP Abnormal and Emergency procedures;
• Emergency Phraseology;
• MP operations in icing conditions.
2.2 FLIGHT TRAINING, NORMALLY USING AN FFS (2 HOURS AS PF AND 2 HOURS AS PNF)
The flight training should address the following subjects:
• Use and setup of avionics suite, PFD and MFD, including selection of display
• Use of FD and AP, monitoring of modes;
• MCC Procedures;
• Operation of TCAS;
• Sequencing of CAS messages regarding subsequent/secondary failures;
• Loss of cabin pressure control and Emergency descent procedures;
• Instrument flying on standby instruments;
• Smoke procedures, including smoke removal;
• Trim failure;
• Engine Fire on the Ground;
• Emergency Evacuation; and
• Use of ECL, if applicable.
3 MIXED SP AND MP OPERATIONS
Training should also address aspects of mixed SP and MP operations by the same pilot.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 26 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
APPENDIX 2 TRAINING SCHEDULE for INITIAL TYPE RATING
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom
Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10
Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Theoretical
Knowledge
Exam
Day 11 Day 12 Day 13 Day 14 Day 15
FFS 1 FFS 2 FFS 3 FFS 4 FFS 5
Day 16 Day 17 Day 18 Day 19 Day 20
FFS 6 FFS 7 Skill Test
All FFS must be completed in a Level C or D simulator.
System Integration Training should be arranged according Training Schedule.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 27 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
APPENDIX 3 STEEP APPROACH OPERATIONS (AFM
SUPPLEMENT REPORT 02451)
1 PREREQUISITES
[M] Before starting steep approach training, pilots must be current and qualified on the Pilatus PC-
24. Alternatively, steep approach landing training may be integrated in initial type rating training of
the Pilatus PC-24.
2 THEORETICAL TRAINING (2.0 HOURS)
[M] Theoretical training must include limitations, operational requirements, system limitations,
performance, normal and non-normal procedures, as well as MMEL items, specific to steep approach
operations.
The course should start with theoretical training to address the following subjects:
• System Description
• Limitations
• SAL Normal Operation
• SAL Abnormal Operation
• Performance
• LCY Operation
• Optional LSZA Operation
3 PRACTICAL TRAINING, NORMALLY USING A FFS TRAINING (2.0 HOURS AS PF,
2.0 HOURS AS PNF)
[M] Practical training requires a Pilatus PC-24 FFS Level C or D.
[M] SAL SPO requires an additional training module on the aircraft.
• 1 SAL to Missed Approach
• 1 SAL to Landing (on any airfield with or without GS guidance, can be simulated with FMS
vertical path)
[AMC] Practical training should include
• a briefing prior to the training sessions, to include limitations, normal and non-normal
procedures, and performance with special emphasis on landing distances and brake cooling;
and
• phases of the steep approach to include the stabilized approach concept as a key success
for steep approach landing, appropriate slats / flaps configuration, approach speed and flare
initiation.
[AMC] Practical training should consist of 4.0 hours in an FFS and should be divided evenly between
time as PF and as PNF.
For SPO Operation the practical training can be reduced, whereas a min of 2 hours without briefing
has to be considered.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 28 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
3.1 INITIAL PRACTICAL TRAINING
3.1.1 INITIAL PRACTICAL TRAINING FOR STEEP APPROACH OPERATIONS
[M] The initial practical training for steep approach operations shall be comprised of steep
approaches under different conditions, such as day / night, crosswind / dry / wet runway, ILS / LPV
/ visual approach.
The following approaches shall be included in the above, following a 5.5 up to 6,65 degree approach
path angle:
• one approach to a full stop landing with normal procedures; and
• one approach with a go-around/abandoned approach with normal procedures; and
• one approach in turbulent and gusty wind conditions, including speed adders as necessary;
and
• one approach with an abuse in speed and not complying with 1000ft stabilization criteria,
managed by the crew; and
• one approach with an engine failure after commencement of steep approach, followed by a
full stop landing or a go-around at pilot discretion.
[M] Training module on the aircraft for SPO only: 1 SAL to Missed Approach and 1 SAL to Landing
(on any airfield with or without GS guidance, can be simulated with FMS vertical path)
[AMC] Initial practical training should include basic requirements concerning short runway
operations, including TDZ requirements.
3.2 RECURRENT PRACTICAL TRAINING [M]
Recurrent training shall be performed every 6 months.
Recurrent training shall comprise, as a minimum, three steep approaches following a 5.5 or up to
6.65 degree approach path angle, as pilot flying, including:
• one approach to a full stop landing with normal procedures; and
• two approaches with the introduction of a non-normal situation during the approach.
4 TRAINING AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS (TASE)
[M] The following items must receive special emphasis as specified, during theoretical (GT) and
practical training (PT) for steep approach landing operations:
• Aircraft operating, navigation and system limitations, applicable to steep approach (GT;PT)
• Limiting Weights (GT)
• Automatic flight control system (GT)
• Flight management system (GT; PT)
• Approach speed (GT)
• Approach gradient (GT)
• Landing speed (GT)
• Landing gradient (GT)
• Visual Approaches (GT;PT)
• Crosswind conditions (GT;PT)
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 29 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
• Minimum decision heights (GT;PT)
• Landing aerodrome limits including day and night scenes (GT; PT)
• FMS / Landing Data (GT;PT)
• Before Landing considerations (GT;PT)
• Required flare technique (GT:PT)
• Go-around considerations (GT;PT)
• Non-Normal Procedures (GT;PT)
• Configuration (GT; PT)
• Steep approach mode (GT; PT)
• Fluctuation of speed and pilot action (GT;PT)
• Landing field length and landing speed (GT)
• Stopping Distance (GT;PT)
• AEO and OEI approaches following a go-around or landing (GT;PT)
• Application of approach speed adders considering the criticality of flying above or below Vref
(GT;PT)
• Management of approach speed in turbulence and gusty wind conditions (PT)
5 CHECKING
[M] There is no specific requirement for checking following Pilatus PC-24 steep approach training. A
certificate of completion steep approach training is sufficient to demonstrate qualification.
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 30 of 36PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
APPENDIX 4 UNPAVED RUNWAY OPERATION (AFM
SUPPLEMENT REPORT 02444)
1 PREREQUISITES
[M] Before starting training to operate on unpaved runways, pilots must be current and qualified on
the Pilatus PC-24.
Alternatively, unpaved runway operation may be integrated in initial type rating training of the
Pilatus PC-24.
Operations on unpaved runways are unique for jet powered aircraft and should emphasize:
• the importance of the assessment of the runway surface conditions,
• the differences in performance, and
• the handling characteristics
on unpaved surfaces during taxiing, takeoff, and landing.
2 THEORETICAL TRAINING (1.5 HOURS)
The course should start with theoretical training to address the following subjects:
• AFM Supplement 02444 Review of every chapter
• Hardware changes (Gravel Kit)
• PC-24 AFM Section 5
• Performance Calculation
• Quick Reference Handbook
• Review of Information Unpaved Surfaces
• Review of Visual Material for Pilots Runway Assessment
3 PRACTICAL TRAINING (1.5 HOURS AS PF)
[M] A minimum of 2 Take off and landings on unpaved runways and taxiing on unpaved surface
should be addressed during training.
The flight training should address the following subjects:
• Normal Procedures according to AFM section 4
• Flyover Tactics Recco
• Landing Flaps 33 Normal or Maximum Braking
• Landing Flaps 15 Normal or Maximum Braking
• Normal Take off Flaps 15
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 31 of 36PC-24 EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew 4 TRAINING AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS (TASE) [M] Handling during ground operation on unpaved RWY Performance and W&B according AFM for unpaved RWY operation Importance of surface condition 5 RECURRENT TRAINING If a pilot has not performed any flights to an unpaved surface within 6 months, he shall review the theoretical training to ensure that he is aware of the specifics of this operation as described in the AFM supplement If a pilot operates into an unpaved surface, he shall perform the airport/runway assessment before each flight according to the AFM supplement and in close contact with the local airport operator. Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423 Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 32 of 36
PC-24
EASA Operational Suitability Data (OSD) - Flight Crew
APPENDIX 5 DIFFERENCE TRAINING VARIANTS PC-24 AYT,
PC-24 TF & PC-24 AYT/TF
1 PREREQUISITES
[M] For Difference training: PC-24 Type Rating Course MPO completed. Optional PC-24 Type Rating
Course SPO completed.
For Initial training: General Pilot prerequisites according paragraph 5 SPECIFICATIONS FOR PILOT
TRAINING of this report.
2 THEORETICAL TRAINING
[M] Theoretical training must include limitations, operational requirements, system description and
limitations, performance, normal and abnormal procedures, as well as MMEL items, specific to the
PC-24 AYT/TF.
For initial training PC-24 equipped with Auto-Yaw Trim (AYT), Tactile Feedback (TF) and/or Touch
Screen Controller (TSC). The content below has to be covered in the initial training.
[AMC] Theoretical classroom training for standard equipment should be a minimum of 2 hours.
Suggested timing per element can be provided by Pilatus upon request.
All equipment consist of the following elements and footprint:
Normal &
System Application
System / Elements Limitations Abnormal
Description Exercises
Procedures
Auto Yaw Trim (1) x x x
Automatic Speed Protection
x x x
&Tactile Feedback (1)
TSC (2) x x x x
UMS 8.0 Changes (1) x
TOLD (3) x x x x
RDR7000 (3) x x x
PDVA (1) x x
FANS1/A+ (3) x x x
Updated INAV x
SATCOM (3) x x x
(1) optional for MSN 101-211, standard for MSN 212-up
(2) optional for MSN 185-211, standard for MSN 212-up
(3) optional
Operational Suitability Data Document No: 02423
Issued: August 31, 2021 Page 33 of 36You can also read
