SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV

Page created by Oscar Diaz
 
CONTINUE READING
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

                Substrate Affinity and Specificity of the ScSth1p Bromodomain

                           Are Fine-Tuned for Versatile Histone Recognition

              Bartlomiej J. Blus,1,2,* Hideharu Hashimoto,1,3 Hyuk-Soo Seo,4 Aleksandra Krolak,2

                                                         and Erik W. Debler3,*

        1
            These authors contributed equally.
        2
            Laboratory of Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller

        University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
        3
            Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University,

        Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
        4
            Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
        *
            Correspondence: bblus@rockefeller.edu (B.J.B.) and Erik.Debler@jefferson.edu

        (E.W.D)
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Graphical Abstract

                                                                                                                                    2
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Highlights

             •     The ScSth1p bromodomain preferentially recognizes H3K14ac and H4K20ac

                   peptides

             •     Ser1276 and Trp1338 are key determinants of substrate affinity and specificity

             •     Mutations of these residues drastically increase substrate affinity and specificity

             •     The ScSth1p bromodomain is fine-tuned for promiscuous histone tail recognition

                                                                                                                                    3
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Summary

        Bromodomains recognize a wide range of acetylated lysine residues in histones and other

        nuclear proteins. Substrate specificity is critical for their biological function and arises

        from unique acetyl-lysine binding sites formed by variable loop regions. Here, we

        analyzed substrate affinity and specificity of the yeast ScSth1p bromodomain, an

        essential component of the “Remodels the Structure of Chromatin” complex, and found

        that the wild-type bromodomain preferentially recognizes H3K14ac and H4K20ac

        peptides. Mutagenesis studies—guided by our crystal structure determined at 2.7 Å

        resolution—revealed loop residues Ser1276 and Trp1338 as key determinants for such

        interactions. Strikingly, point mutations of each of these residues substantially increased

        peptide binding affinity and selectivity, respectively. Our data demonstrate that the

        ScSth1p bromodomain is not optimized for binding to an individual acetylation mark, but

        fine-tuned for interactions with several such modifications, consistent with the versatile

        and multivalent nature of histone recognition by reader modules such as bromodomains.

        Keywords: Chromatin, epigenetics, bromodomain, histone tails, lysine acetylation,

        chromatin remodeling, substrate specificity, binding promiscuity, x-ray crystallography,

        isothermal titration calorimetry

                                                                                                                                    4
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Introduction

        Protein acetylation is a ubiquitous post-translational modification primarily found in

        eukaryotes. Site-specific acetylation of lysine residues in histone tails plays a major role

        in regulating chromatin structure and gene expression (Garcia et al., 2007; Huang et al.,

        2015; Latham and Dent, 2007). Acetylated histone tails are a hallmark of active genes

        and multiple acetyl-lysine marks are often enriched at active promoter transcription start

        sites (TSSs) (Garcia et al., 2007). Histone acetylation is a dynamic and reversible process

        mediated by histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases (Weiner et al., 2015). The acetyl-

        lysine is recognized primarily by bromodomains, but also by the YEATS and Tudor

        domains (Filippakopoulos et al., 2012; Jurkowska et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017). Besides

        acetylation, bromodomains have been shown to recognize propionylated and butyrylated

        lysines (Vollmuth and Geyer, 2010). Consistent with their central role in chromatin

        biology and gene transcription, many bromodomains become dysregulated in numerous

        diseases including cancer and inflammatory disorders, and thus have emerged as

        prominent epigenetic drug targets (Filippakopoulos and Knapp, 2014; Fujisawa and

        Filippakopoulos, 2017).

        Bromodomains consist of a left-handed four-helical bundle (αZ, αA, αB, αC) and

        variable ZA and BC loops involved in substrate recognition (Dhalluin et al., 1999;

        Filippakopoulos et al., 2012). They have conserved motifs in their helices and loops and

        can be divided into eight families using a structure-based alignment (Filippakopoulos and

        Knapp, 2012; Filippakopoulos et al., 2012). Most bromodomains contain PDY (Pro-Asp-

        Tyr) and PϕD (ϕ denotes a hydrophobic residue) motifs in the ZA-loop. Other

                                                                                                                                    5
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        bromodomain features are conserved to a lesser extent and are family-specific. For

        instance, families I and II contain the WPF (Trp-Pro-Phe) “shelf” motif within the ZA

        loop, which is equivalent to the E/DϕF motif in family VIII. The acetyl-lysine residue is

        recognized by a conserved hydrophobic pocket located at the end of the four-helix bundle

        in each bromodomain (Dhalluin et al., 1999). In particular, two highly conserved

        residues—an Asn at the C-terminus of the αB helix and a Tyr in the ZA loop—form

        canonical hydrogen bonds with the acetyl moiety in the target protein or peptide and the

        conserved network of water molecules in the acetyl-lysine binding pocket, respectively.

        In stark contrast to this conserved pocket, the surrounding surface area is formed by

        highly variable regions which confer sequence-specific recognition of the residues

        adjacent to the acetylated lysine (Vidler et al., 2012). Biochemical profiling of histone

        peptide interactions has revealed that most bromodomains recognize several different

        acetyl-lysine marks with micromolar to millimolar affinities (Filippakopoulos and Knapp,

        2012). In addition to this binding promiscuity, multivalency of histone recognition by

        more than one “reader” module is well established, generating avidity and rationalizing

        why high affinity of recognition motifs to individual marks is often not observed

        (Ruthenburg et al., 2007).

        In order to examine the interplay between substrate binding affinity and specificity, we

        set out to characterize these properties in the ScSth1p bromodomain from Saccharomyces

        cerevisiae. This bromodomain is among the few yeast bromodomains that bind distinct

        acetylated histone peptides with apparent high affinity (Zhang et al., 2010). The ScSth1p

        protein is an ATP-dependent helicase associated with the “Remodels the Structure of

                                                                                                                                    6
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Chromatin” (RSC) complex involved in transcription regulation and nucleosome

        positioning (Cairns et al., 1996; Lorch et al., 2018; Rawal et al., 2018). The C-terminal

        bromodomain in ScSth1p is essential and recruits the RSC complex to active TSSs (Du et

        al., 1998). In this study, we determined the affinity of the ScSth1p bromodomain towards

        several acetylated histone peptides by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and report its

        crystal structure at 2.7 Å resolution. Comparison with other bromodomains allowed us to

        identify loop residues that are unique to ScSth1p. Strikingly, point mutations of these

        residues substantially increase substrate specificity and binding affinity of the ScSth1p

        bromodomain, corroborating the notion that bromodomains are fine-tuned for versatile

        histone recognition.

        Results

        The ScSth1p Bromodomain Preferentially Recognizes H3K14ac and H4K20ac

        Peptides

        Using the SMART database (Letunic et al., 2015), we designed a ScSth1p bromodomain

        construct encoding residues 1250-1359, which was expressed as a stable protein for

        biophysical and structural characterization (Figures 1A and 1B). The ScSth1p

        bromodomain was previously shown to preferentially bind to three acetylated peptides

        derived from human histones: H3K14ac, H4K20ac, and HsH2AK15ac (Zhang et al.,

        2010). Using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we found that the ScSth1p

        bromodomain binds these peptides with dissociation constants (Kds) of ~18 µM, 48 µM,

        and 44 µM, respectively (Figure 2B). These interactions are acetyl-lysine specific, as the

        unmodified histone peptides did not bind (Figures S1A and S1B). Likewise, alanine

                                                                                                                                    7
SUBSTRATE AFFINITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SCSTH1P BROMODOMAIN ARE FINE-TUNED FOR VERSATILE HISTONE RECOGNITION - BIORXIV
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        mutations of the two highly conserved acetyl-lysine recognizing residues, Tyr1290Ala

        and Asn1333Ala, completely abolished the ScSth1p bromodomain interactions with these

        acetylated peptides (Figures S1C and S1D). While the human and yeast H3 and H4

        histone tails are identical (which is why we omit their species designations in this

        manuscript), the histone H2A sequences vary significantly between the two species. Due

        to these differences, we also tested two yeast peptides homologous to HsH2AK15ac:

        ScH2AK13ac and ScHtz1K14ac (Figure 2A). Interestingly, these two peptides do not

        interact with the ScSth1p bromodomain (Figure 2C), suggesting that histone residues

        adjacent to the acetyl-lysine are critical for binding.

        Inspection of the peptide sequences used in our binding assay reveals that the interacting

        acetylated histones are enriched in positively charged residues compared to the non-

        interacting peptides (Figure 2A and Table S1). The available structures of bromodomain

        complexes with histone peptides indeed indicate that lysine and arginine residues

        flanking the acetylated lysine participate in electrostatic interactions with the

        bromodomain (Plotnikov et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2008). However, when we varied the

        ionic strength and pH of the buffer, the Kd values measured by ITC were not significantly

        altered (up to fourfold) (Figure S2). These results imply that electrostatic forces do not

        dominate the ScSth1p bromodomain interactions with the tested acetylated histone

        peptides.

        The Crystal Structure of the ScSth1p Bromodomain Reveals a Hydrophobic Acetyl-

        Lysine Peptide Binding Site

                                                                                                                                    8
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        In order to obtain structural insights into histone recognition by the ScSth1p

        bromodomain, we determined its crystal structure at 2.7 Å resolution. Crystallographic

        phases were determined by molecular replacement. The asymmetric unit contains six

        bromodomains that are highly similar to each other with a root mean square deviation of

        0.5 Å. The structure was refined to Rwork/Rfree of 23.8%/27.0% and features excellent

        geometry as evaluated by MolProbity (Table 1) (Chen et al., 2010).

        The ScSth1p bromodomain folds into a canonical left-handed four-helix bundle (αZ, αA,

        αB, αC). In the variable ZA loop, the PDY motif contributes to the αAZ helix, while the

        PMA motif, which deviates from the consensus PϕD sequence, marks the end of this loop

        (Figures 1C and 3A) (Dhalluin et al., 1999; Filippakopoulos et al., 2012). Notably, the

        surface surrounding the acetyl-lysine binding pocket of the bromodomain is relatively

        hydrophobic, consistent with the lack of large effects on peptide binding affinity at

        varying salt concentrations and buffer pH (Table S1 and Figure S2). This hydrophobic

        area distinguishes the ScSth1p bromodomain from the polar site of its human homolog

        HsSMARCA2 (Figure S4).

        The ScSth1p Bromodomain Contains a β-Hairpin Characteristic of Family VIII

        Members

        The β-hairpin located between the αZ and αZ’ helices classifies the ScSth1p

        bromodomain as a family VIII member (Figures 1C and 3B). A distance matrix

        alignment (DALI) search (Holm and Rosenstrom, 2010) against known structures in the

        Protein Data Bank (PDB) indeed confirms that the ScSth1p bromodomain is structurally

                                                                                                                                    9
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        most similar to other family VIII members, including bromodomains of HsSMARCA2

        and HsPB1 (Figures 1C and 3B) (Filippakopoulos et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2007)). The

        β-hairpin in the ScSth1p bromodomain is stabilized by a salt bridge between His1272 and

        Asp1342 in the αC helix (Figure 3C). Disruption of this salt bridge by the His1272Ala

        mutation did not affect peptide specificity or binding affinity, suggesting that it does not

        significantly contribute to recognizing acetylated histones (Figures 3D and S3A).

        Two Single Point Mutations in the ScSth1p Bromodomain Dramatically Increase

        Substrate Affinity and Specificity

        Another common feature of the family VIII bromodomains is the E/DϕF sequence, which

        substitutes for the “WPF shelf motif” found in many bromodomains (Figures 1C and 3A).

        However, the corresponding “SIF” motif in ScSth1p deviates from this consensus

        sequence. Like the WPF motif, the SIF sequence folds into a short 310-helix termed αZ’.

        To examine the contribution of this non-conserved serine to acetylated histone peptide

        binding (Figure 3E), we mutated it to the more common glutamate found in several

        family VIII bromodomains (Figure 1C). Strikingly, the Ser1276Glu mutation increases

        peptide binding affinity by up to sixfold with respect to the wild-type bromodomain,

        resulting in a tenfold tighter binding to H3K14ac than to H4K20ac (Kd values of 3 and 31

        µM, respectively; Figures 3F and S3B).

        In addition to classifying bromodomains based on their entire structures (Filippakopoulos

        et al., 2012), they can also be grouped according to the conservation of signature residues

        in their variable acetyl-lysine binding sites (Vidler et al., 2012). According to the latter

                                                                                                                                    10
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        classification, the ScSth1p bromodomain shares conserved elements with classes 5 and 6.

        These include residues Ser1337, Val1339, Asp1342, and Tyr1287 that line the acetyl-

        lysine binding pocket (Figures 3G and 1C). Notably, Trp1338 at the end of the BC loop is

        not present in any other bromodomain and the equivalent position is most often occupied

        by Ala, Glu, or Gln (Filippakopoulos et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2010). When we mutated

        Trp1338 to the more common glutamine found in family VIII members (Figure 1C), we

        observed a dramatic effect on substrate specificity. While the Trp1338Glu mutant

        bromodomain binding to H3K14ac was comparable to the wild-type protein, its

        interactions with the H4K20ac and HsH2AK15ac peptides were completely abolished

        (Figures 3H and S3C). Hence, our results show that two single point mutations of the two

        non-conserved residues, Ser1272 and Trp1338, significantly increase ScSth1p

        bromodomain binding affinity and specificity towards acetylated histone peptides.

        Discussion

        One of the major challenges in chromatin biology is to understand how distinct patterns

        of post-translational modifications are recognized and “interpreted” or “read” by

        chromatin interacting proteins and complexes. Bromodomains are ubiquitous protein

        modules that bind site-specific acetylated lysines in histones, a key modification

        implicated in transcriptional activity. Most bromodomains recognize multiple acetylated

        substrates with a wide range of selectivity and modest binding affinity (Filippakopoulos

        and Knapp, 2012). While it has been accepted that such binding behavior can be

        understood in light of cooperative engagement with several histone modifications

        (Ruthenburg et al., 2007), the question arises whether there are intrinsic, evolutionary

                                                                                                                                    11
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        limitations to the bromodomain fold that preclude it from recognizing substrates with

        high, i.e. nanomolar affinities. To address this issue, we focused on the ScSth1p

        bromodomain, which binds several acetylated histone peptides with apparent high

        affinity in a dot-blot assay (Zhang et al., 2010). We discovered that it was surprisingly

        straightforward to substantially increase both substrate affinity and specificity by

        generating two point mutations in the bromodomain, changing only one residue at a time.

        The first of these two key residues is Ser1276 of the SIF motif within the variable ZA

        loop, which deviates from the acidic residues in the consensus E/DϕF sequence of family

        VIII bromodomains and from the tryptophan in the WPF motif present in several other

        bromodomain families (Figure 1C) (Filippakopoulos et al., 2012). For example, Ser1276

        corresponds to Glu206 in the second bromodomain of the human polybromodomain

        protein PB1, the only family VIII member whose structure has been determined in

        complex with a histone peptide to date (Charlop-Powers et al., 2010). In this NMR

        structure, Glu206 plays a key role in recognizing the Kac +1 residue alanine (Ala15) of

        the H3K14ac peptide, discriminating histone peptides with a sequence variation at this

        position (Charlop-Powers et al., 2010). Consistent with this observation, the Ser1276Glu

        mutation largely increased selectivity for H3K14ac over H4K20ac or HsH2AK15ac

        peptides. We envision that the longer side chain of Glu1276 in the mutant bromodomain

        is able to accommodate the Ala side chain at the +1 position in H3K14ac, but the bulkier

        side chains of Ile and Thr in the H4K20ac or HsH2AK15ac peptides fit to a lesser degree.

        We conclude that the exposed ZA loop residue at the position equivalent to Ser1276 is a

        major determinant of substrate affinity in the family VIII bromodomains.

                                                                                                                                    12
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        The second residue that we identified as a key determinant for the ScSth1p

        bromodomain-peptide interactions corresponds to Trp1338 at the end of the BC loop,

        proximal to Ser1276 (Figure 3E). Alignment of the 61 human and 14 yeast bromodomain

        sequences illustrates that a tryptophan residue is unique at this position, which is

        occupied by a glutamine in the majority of family VIII members (Filippakopoulos et al.,

        2012). Strikingly, our Trp1338Gln mutation had an even larger impact on peptide

        recognition than the Ser1276Glu mutation; it completely abolished the ScSth1p

        bromodomain binding to the H4K20ac and HsH2AK15ac peptides, while the affinity for

        H3K14ac essentially remained unchanged. These results suggest that the large aromatic

        surface area of the exposed Trp1338 may contribute extensive contacts with the

        interacting peptides.

        Our proposed role for Trp1338 is corroborated by its prominent location at the

        intersection of two roughly perpendicular grooves that are poised to accommodate bound

        peptides. The first groove is hydrophobic and extends above the canonical N-acetyl-

        lysine binding pocket between the ZA and BC loops, which corresponds to the preferred

        peptide binding groove in experimentally determined bromodomain-peptide complexes

        (Figure 3E) (Fujisawa and Filippakopoulos, 2017; Marchand and Caflisch, 2015; Zeng et

        al., 2008). The second groove is slightly negatively charged and is formed between the β-

        hairpin and a surface patch formed by Trp1338 and Asp1267. A binding mode of

        peptides wrapping around Trp1339 would be consistent with the large effect that the

        Trp1339Gln mutation has on peptide recognition. Precedence for such a binding mode is

        found in the structure of the HsBrd4 bromodomain complex with a diacetylated histone

                                                                                                                                    13
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        peptide (PDB code 3UVW), in which the peptide bends around Asp145 at the Trp1339-

        equivalent position at a 90° angle (Filippakopoulos et al., 2012). In contrast to Trp1338,

        the opposite edge of the second groove appears to be less important for peptide

        recognition, as the His1272Ala mutation, which presumably destabilizes the β-hairpin,

        has a negligible effect on peptide binding. Overall, the predominantly apolar character of

        the two binding grooves agrees well with our finding that the ScSth1p bromodomain-

        peptide interactions are dominated by hydrophobic contacts.

        Our results on substrate specificity of the ScSth1p bromodomain have important

        implications for the recruitment of its resident RSC chromatin remodeling complex. In S.

        cerevisiae, the H3K14ac and Htz1K14ac marks are enriched at TSSs, but it is unknown

        whether both are required for chromatin remodeling initiation (Pokholok et al., 2005;

        Ramachandran et al., 2015). As the ScSth1p bromodomain recognizes H3K14ac, but not

        the ScHtz1K14ac mark (Figure 2C), our data suggest that ScSth1p recruits the RSC

        complex to TSSs via the interaction with the H3K14ac mark. Indeed, Htz1-depleted cells

        do not alter nucleosome positioning at TSSs in yeast (Hartley and Madhani, 2009),

        further suggesting that the Htz1 histone H2A variant may not be required for RSC

        recruitment to chromatin. Given that ScRsc4p represents another H3K14ac reader module

        in the RSC complex (Kasten et al., 2004; VanDemark et al., 2007), these two essential

        RSC components may cooperatively bind to two histone tails, thereby increasing the

        binding affinity and specificity of the RSC complex at active TSSs (Figure 4). In addition

        to the H3K14ac binding, the ScSth1p bromodomain recognizes the H4K20ac

        modification, yet its biological function in yeast remains elusive.

                                                                                                                                    14
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        In conclusion, our structure-based mutational analysis shows that substrate binding

        affinity and specificity are finely balanced by individual residues in the ScSth1p

        bromodomain. Instead of recognizing a single chromatin mark with high affinity, our

        results are consistent with the notion that multiple histone modifications—each

        interacting with intermediate affinity—are cooperatively “read” with high affinity and

        specificity. In this scenario, the bromodomains of the RSC components ScSth1p and

        ScRsc4p may cooperatively facilitate recruitment of the RSC complex towards a subset

        of TSSs marked by the H3K14 acetylation. Our ScSth1p bromodomain point mutants

        may prove as valuable tools to probe the mechanism of ScSth1p-dependent recruitment of

        the RSC complex to chromatin in vivo.

                                                                                                                                    15
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Materials and Methods

        Protein Expression and Purification

        The DNA fragment corresponding to the S. cerevisiae Sth1p bromodomain (residues

        1250-1359) was generated by PCR from genomic DNA and cloned into a modified

        pGEX-4T1 vector (Addgene) using Ligation Independent Cloning (LIC), as previously

        described (Seo et al., 2013). The resulting fusion protein contained an N-terminal GST

        tag followed by a cleavage site for the tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease. The ScSth1p

        bromodomain was expressed in E. coli BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL cells (Stratagene)

        following overnight induction at an OD600nm of 0.8 with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thio-

        galactoside (IPTG) at 18°C in LB media containing chloramphenicol (34 mg/L) and

        ampicillin (100 mg/L). Cells were lysed using a cell disruptor (Avestin) in a lysis buffer

        containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 3

        mM DTT, 1 mM benzamidine, supplemented with phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride

        (PMSF), 1 µg/mL bovine lung aprotinin and leupeptin (Sigma). After centrifugation at

        30,000 × g, the supernatant was loaded onto a GSTrap column (GE Healthcare) and

        washed extensively with lysis buffer. The ScSth1p bromodomain was eluted with 20 mM

        HEPES pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, and 3 mM DTT supplemented with 15

        mM reduced glutathione (Sigma). Following an on-column GST-tag cleavage by TEV

        protease at 4°C overnight, the bromodomain was further purified over a HiLoad 16/60

        Superdex 75 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM HEPES pH

        7.5, 200 mM NaCl, and 3 mM DTT. Peak elution fractions were concentrated to 5-10

        mg/mL, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C.

                                                                                                                                    16
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Peptide Synthesis

        Synthetic histone peptides for ITC binding experiments were synthesized and HPLC-

        purified to 95-98% purity at the Proteomics Resource Center (The Rockefeller

        University). The correct sequence for each peptide was confirmed by mass spectrometry.

        All peptides are 15 amino acids long and contain a C-terminal non-histone tyrosine for

        concentration measurements at OD280nm.

        ScSth1p Bromodomain Mutagenesis

        Constructs for the ScSth1p bromodomain mutants (Ser1276Glu, His1272Ala,

        Trp1338Gln, or Tyr1290Ala/Asn1333Ala) were generated using QuikChange site-

        directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Mutant bromodomain expression and purification

        were carried out as for the wild-type protein. Gel filtration-purified protein was

        concentrated to 5-10 mg/mL, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.

        ITC Binding Assays

        Samples for the ITC experiments were dialyzed extensively against 20 mM HEPES pH

        7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM TCEP using Float-A-Lyzer dialysis devices with a molecular

        weight cutoff of 0.5-1 kDa (Spectrum Laboratories). For a subset of ITC experiments,

        composition of the binding buffer (pH 7.5) was adjusted to 75 or 300 mM NaCl, or the

        buffer pH was set to 6.0 or 8.5 at 150 mM NaCl (see Table S1 for details). After dialysis,

        purified bromodomain and histone peptides were filtered (0.22 µm) and centrifuged,

        followed by determining their concentration by UV absorbance at 280 nm. All titration

        experiments were performed using an automated MicroCal Auto-iTC200 instrument (GE

                                                                                                                                    17
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Healthcare) at 15°C. For each titration, a concentrated solution of the peptide (at 1 mM)

        was titrated into the ITC reaction cell containing the wild-type or mutant ScSth1p

        bromodomain (at 90 µM). The heat of sample dilution was separately measured for each

        experiment or determined from the final plateau of each titration, and subtracted from the

        binding data. The corrected ITC curves were analyzed using a nonlinear least-squares

        minimization method in ORIGIN 7.0 to determine the binding stoichiometry (n),

        dissociation constant (Kd) and enthalpy (ΔH). These parameters were subsequently used

        to determine free Gibbs energy (ΔG) and the entropic component (TΔS) using ∆G = -RT

        ln(1/Kd) and TΔS = ΔH – ΔG equations, where R and T are gas constant (1.99

        cal/(mol*K)) and absolute temperature (288 K), respectively. The fitting parameters were

        allowed to float freely in the fitting procedure. All titrations were repeated at least twice.

        Thermodynamic parameters for representative ITC titrations are provided in Table S1.

        Crystallization and Structure Determination of the ScSth1p Bromodomain

        Crystals of the ScSth1p bromodomain were grown at 20°C in sitting drops containing 1

        µL of the protein at 5 mg mL-1 and 1 µL of a reservoir solution consisting of 0.2 M

        magnesium chloride hexahydrate, 0.1 M BIS-TRIS pH 6.5, 25% (w/v) polyethylene

        glycol 3,350, and 3% (w/v) trimethylamine N-oxide dihydrate. For cryoprotection,

        crystals were stabilized in the mother liquor supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol and

        flash cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K at the NE-

        CAT beamline 24ID-E at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory,

        and processed using XDS (Kabsch, 2010). The crystals belong to the space group C121,

        with unit cell dimensions of a=141.8 Å, b=74.6 Å, c=72.5 Å, α=γ=90°, and β=92.9° and

                                                                                                                                    18
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        diffracted to 2.7 Å resolution (Table 1). Crystallographic phases were obtained by

        molecular replacement using the fourth bromodomain of human poly-bromodomain

        containing protein 1 (PB1; pdb: 3TLP) as a search model using PHASER (McCoy et al.,

        2007) from the CCP4 program suite. After molecular replacement, iterative cycles of

        manual rebuilding and restrained refinement were carried out in COOT (Emsley and

        Cowtan, 2004) and PHENIX (Adams et al., 2010), respectively. The stereochemical

        quality of the structural model was assessed with MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010). There

        were no residues in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran plot (Table 1). Figures

        were generated with PyMOL (DeLano Scientific) (Schrodinger, 2015).

        Acknowledgements

        First and foremost, we would like to acknowledge our mentor G. Blobel for supporting

        our research. We would like to thank C. Adura for helping us with the Auto-iTC200

        instrument (High-Throughput and Spectroscopy Resource Center, Rockefeller

        University), H. Zebroski III for peptide synthesis (Proteomics Resource Center,

        Rockefeller University), and R. Rajashankar (NE-CAT) for assisting with x-ray data

        collection. We would like to thank E. Coutavas for critical reading of the manuscript.

        This work was funded by the Rockefeller University and the Howard Hughes Medical

        Institute.

                                                                                                                                    19
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Author Contributions

        B.J.B., H.H, H-S.S, and E.W.D designed the experiments; B.J.B., H.S-S., and A.K

        performed the experiments; B.J.B., H.H., H-S.S, and E.W.D analyzed the data, and

        B.J.B., H.H., A.K., and E.W.D. wrote the manuscript.

        Accession Code

        The ScSth1p bromodomain coordinates and structure factors have been deposited at the

        Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the accession number 6MR4.

                                                                                                                                    20
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure 1. Purification and Sequence Alignment of the ScSth1p bromodomain.

        (A) Domain architecture of the ScSth1p protein. The N-terminal helicase/SANT-

        associated (HSA) domain, the catalytic ATPase module consisting of the recA domains,

        Snf2 ATP coupling (SnAc) domain, and the C-terminal bromodomain are shown.

        (B) A size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) elution profile for the ScSth1p

        bromodomain (residues 1250-1359) is shown together with peak elution fractions

        analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The bromodomain elutes as a single monomeric peak.

         (C) A structure-guided multiple sequence alignment of the ScSth1p bromodomain with

        similar yeast and human bromodomains. The sequences of the six bromodomains in the

        human PB1 protein are displayed. Secondary structure elements and the loop regions are

        shown above the alignment. Similar and identical residues within the conserved

        bromodomain sequences are colored grey and yellow, respectively, and the residues

        mutated in this study are highlighted in red. Highly-conserved sequence motifs across all

        bromodomain families are shown below the alignment. Φ and x denote hydrophobic and

        any residues, respectively.

        Figure 2. The ScSth1p Bromodomain Specifically Interacts with Histone Marks

        Associated with Active Gene Transcription

        (A) Primary sequences of the acetylated 15-mer histone peptides used in the ITC binding

        assay. Acetyl-lysine is highlighted in the center for each peptide. Positively and

        negatively charged residues are colored in blue and red, respectively. The +1 position in

        each sequence marks a residue critical for bromodomain specificity. All peptides contain

        a C-terminal non-histone tyrosine (y) for spectrophotometric concentration determination

                                                                                                                                    21
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        at 280 nm.

        (B-C) ITC binding profiles for the ScSth1p bromodomain interactions with acetylated

        histone peptides: H3K14ac, H4K20ac, HsH2AK15ac (panel B) and ScHtz1K14ac,

        ScH2AK13ac (panel C). Raw heat signals generated during each titration are displayed in

        the top panel as time traces. Below, integrated titration data are displayed and were

        analyzed by the one-set of sites model (continuous lines). The determined dissociation

        constants (Kds) are displayed for the interacting peptides in (B), whereas no binding

        (N.B.) was detected in (C).

        Figure 3. Structure and Mutational Analysis of the ScSth1p Bromodomain

        (A) Overall structure of the ScSth1p bromodomain shown with labeled secondary

        structure elements: αZ (blue), ZA-loop (magenta), αB (green), αC (orange) and αA

        (pink). The ZA-loop contains the SIF motif as part of the αZ’ helix and the β-hairpin.

        (B) Structural alignment of the ScSth1p and HsSMARCA2 (pdb: 4QY4) bromodomains.

        (C) A detailed view of the interactions between the β-hairpin and αC helix. His1272 in

        the β-hairpin forms two hydrogen bonds: one with Asp1270 in the β-hairpin, the other

        with Asp1342 in the αC helix.

        (D) ITC binding profiles for interactions between the ScSth1p His1272Ala mutant

        bromodomain and H3K14ac, H4K20ac or HsH2AK15ac peptides. Binding data were

        analyzed by the one-set of sites model (continuous lines) and the obtained Kd values are

        displayed.

        (E) Electrostatic surface potential of the ScSth1p bromodomain (left panel). Positive and

        negative surface potential is colored in blue and red, respectively. The electrostatic

                                                                                                                                    22
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        surface potential scale is shown, where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute

        temperature. A cartoon representation of the ScSth1p bromodomain structure is displayed

        in the same orientation with the mutated residues highlighted (right panel). The

        hydrophobic acetyl-lysine binding pocket and the slightly negatively charged cleft

        between the β-hairpin and αC helix are indicated.

        (F) ITC binding profiles for the interactions between the ScSth1p Ser1276Glu mutant

        bromodomain and H3K14ac, H4K20ac, and HsH2AK15ac peptides. Binding data were

        analyzed by the one-set of sites model (continuous lines) and the obtained Kd values are

        displayed.

        (G) A close-up view of the acetyl-lysine binding site in the ScSth1p bromodomain.

        (H) ITC binding profiles for the interactions between the ScSth1p Trp1338Gln mutant

        bromodomain and H3K14ac, H4K20ac, and HsH2AK15ac peptides. The H3K14ac

        peptide binding data were analyzed by the one-set of sites model (continuous lines),

        whereas the remaining peptides do not bind (N.B.).

        Figure 4. The ScSth1p Bromodomain Contributes to the RSC Complex Association

        with H3K14ac-Modified Chromatin.

        A proposed schematic representation of the RSC complex binding to transcriptionally

        active chromatin. The bromodomains in ScSth1p and ScRsc4p—key members of the RSC

        complex—are thought to interact with acetylated histones to direct RSC to promoter

        transcription start sites (TSSs) marked with H3K14 acetylation. The remaining

        bromodomain-containing components of the RSC complex, ScRsc1 and ScRsc2, are

                                                                                                                                    23
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        omitted for clarity. Once attached to promoters, the RSC complex creates a nucleosome-

        free region flanked by strongly positioned nucleosomes.

                                                                                                                                    24
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure 1.

                                                                                                                                    25
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure 2.

                                                                                                                                    26
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure 3.

                                                                                                                                    27
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure 4.

                                                                                                                                    28
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Table 1.

                                  Table 1. Data Processing and Refinement Statistics
                                  PDB ID                                    6MR4
                                  Wavelength [Å]                            0.97918
                                  Space group                               C121
                                  Unit cell (a, b, c) [Å]                   141.8, 74.6, 72.5
                                  Unit cell (α, β, γ ) [°]                  90.0, 92.9, 90.0
                                  Resolution [Å]                            72.45-2.71 (2.84-2.71)a
                                  Rmerge                                    0.083 (0.581)
                                                                      10.8 (1.7)
                                  Completeness [%]                          98.6 (99.5)
                                  Redundancy                                3.1 (3.2)
                                  CC ½                                      0.99 (0.60)
                                  Obs. Reflections                          64,102 (8,612)
                                  Unique Reflections                        20,385 (2,722)

                                  Refinement
                                  Resolution [Å]                            2.71
                                  No. Reflections                           20,371
                                  Rwork/ Rfree [%]                          23.8/27.0
                                  No. Atoms
                                                   Protein                  5476
                                                  Solvent                   27
                                  B-factors [Å2]
                                                   Protein                  41.6
                                                  Solvent                   58.9
                                  R.m.s. deviations
                                          Bond lengths [Å]                  0.006
                                             Bond angles [°]                0.6
                                  All atom clash score                      7.7
                                  Ramachandranb [%]
                                                 Favored                    98.74
                                                 Allowed                    1.26
                                  Rotamer outliers [%]                      0
                                  Cβ deviation                              0
                                 Data were collected on a single crystal.
                                 a
                                   Values in parentheses are for highest-resolution shell.
                                 b
                                   As determined by MolProbity.

                                                                                                                                    29
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Supplemental Information

        Substrate Affinity and Specificity of the ScSth1p Bromodomain

        Are Fine-tuned for Versatile Histone Recognition

        Bartlomiej J. Blus, Hideharu Hashimoto, Hyuk-Soo Seo, Aleksandra Krolak, and Erik W.
        Debler

                                                                                                                                    30
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure S1.

        Figure S1. Related to Figure 2. The ScSth1p Bromodomain Contains a Canonical
        Binding Pocket for Acetyl-Lysine Recognition.
        (A-B) ITC binding profiles for the ScSth1p bromodomain interactions with unmodified
        (non-acetylated) (A) H3K14 and (B) H4K20 peptides are shown in the top panel as time
        traces. No appreciable heat of binding (N.B.) was observed for either peptide. (C) ITC
        binding profiles for the ScSth1p Tyr1290Ala/Asn1333Ala mutant bromodomain
        interactions with H3K14ac, H4K20ac, and HsH2AK15ac peptides. No appreciable heat
        of binding (N.B.) was observed. (D) A size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) elution
        profile for the ScSth1p bromodomain mutant bromodomain (Tyr1290Ala/Asn1333Ala).
        Below, peak elution fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The mutant ScSth1p
        bromodomain elutes as a single monomeric peak.

                                                                                                                                    31
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure S2.

        Figure S2. Related to Figure 2. Effect of Buffer Ionic Strength and pH on ScSth1p
        Bromodomain Interactions with Acetylated Histone Peptides.
        (A-B) ITC binding profiles for the ScSth1p bromodomain interactions with H3K14ac and
        H4K20ac peptides at various binding conditions. ITC titrations were performed in 20
        mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 mM TCEP supplemented with 75 mM or 300 mM NaCl (panel
        A) or in 20 mM HEPES pH 6.0 or 8.0, 0.5 mM TCEP, and 150 mM NaCl (panel B).
        Binding data were analyzed by the one-set of sites model (continuous lines) and the
        obtained Kd values are displayed.

                                                                                                                                    32
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure S3.

        Figure S3. Related to Figure 3. SEC Elution Profiles for the ScSth1p Mutant
        Bromodomains.
        (A-C) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) elution profiles for the ScSth1p
        bromodomain mutants. (A) The ScSth1p His1272Ala mutation likely affects the stability
        of the β-hairpin, resulting in a shifted and asymmetric elution profile. (B-C) Ser1276Glu
        and Trp1338Gln mutant bromodomains elute like the wild-type protein. Below, peak
        elution fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE.

                                                                                                                                    33
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Figure S4.

        Figure S4. Related to Figure 3. Surface Charge Distribution of the ScSth1p and
        HsSMARCA2 Bromodomains.
        (A) Surface charge distribution of the human SMARCA2 bromodomain (left panel).
        Positively charged regions of the structure are colored in blue, whereas negative and
        neutral regions are labeled in red and white, respectively. The electrostatic potential scale
        is shown, where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T stands for absolute temperature. The
        structure is displayed as a cartoon in the same view (right panel). The negatively-charged
        acetyl-lysine binding pocket and the hydrophobic cleft formed by the β-hairpin and αC
        helix are highlighted. These structural features distinguish the HsSMARCA2 and
        ScSth1p bromodomains (B). The highlighted Glu1407 and Gln1473 residues in
        HsSMARCA2 (A) correspond Ser1276 and Trp1338 in the ScSth1p bromodomain (B),
        which we mutated in this study.

                                                                                                                                    34
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Table S1: Thermodynamic Parameters for the ScSth1p Bromodomain Binding to
Acetylated Histone Peptides

    ScSth1p                                                                                             ∆H                  ∆S
                              Peptide             Binding condition               Kd (µM)
 bromodomain                                                                                       (kcal·mol-1)       (cal·mol-1·K-1)
      WT                    H3K14ac             75 mM NaCl, pH 7.5               8.8 ± 0.3          -11.1 ± 0.1            -15.4
                                                                                18.2 ± 0.3
        WT                  H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                 -9.5 ± 0.1              -11.4
                                                                                18.8 ± 1.7*
        WT                  H3K14ac             300 mM NaCl, pH 7.5             32.8 ± 0.8         -10.0 ± 0.1              -14.2
        WT                  H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 6.0             16.2 ± 0.5          -9.4 ± 0.1              -10.6
        WT                  H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 8.5             28.2 ± 0.6         -10.0 ± 0.1              -13.7
        WT                   H3K14              150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                   -                    -
                                                                                 3.4 ± 0.1
     S1276E                 H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -14.6 ± 0.1              -25.5
                                                                                3.3 ± 0.8*
                                                                                12.9 ± 0.6
     H1272A                 H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -18.1 ± 0.0              -40.3
                                                                                12.7 ± 1.2*
Y1290A/N133A                H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
                                                                                23.8 ± 0.6
    W1338Q                  H3K14ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                 -7.2 ± 0.1               -4.5
                                                                                21.8 ± 2.7*
        WT                  H4K20ac             75 mM NaCl, pH 7.5              28.4 ± 0.4         -12.3 ± 0.1              -21.7
                                                                                48.1 ± 1.2
        WT                  H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -12.7 ± 0.2              -24.3
                                                                                46.2 ± 4.9*
        WT                  H4K20ac             300 mM NaCl, pH 7.5             69.9 ± 2.4         -10.4 ± 0.3              -16.9
        WT                  H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 6.0             26.8 ± 0.1         -10.9 ± 0.1              -16.9
        WT                  H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 8.5             62.5 ± 2.0         -10.9 ± 0.2              -18.4
        WT                   H4K20              150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                  -                     -
                                                                                30.9 ± 1.0
     S1276E                 H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -12.4 ± 0.2              -22.4
                                                                                30.2 ± 2.0*
                                                                                84.0 ± 2.8
     H1272A                 H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -21.3 ± 0.1              -55.2
                                                                                 70 ± 20*
Y1290A/N1333A               H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
   W1338Q                   H4K20ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
     WT                   ScHtz1K14ac           150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
     WT                   ScH2AK13ac            150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
                                                                                44.2 ± 0.6
        WT               HsH2AK15ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -12.7 ± 0.1              -24.3
                                                                                40.1 ± 4.8*
                                                                                13.4 ± 0.2
     S1276E              HsH2AK15ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -15.6 ± 0.1              -31.9
                                                                                13.9 ± 0.6*
                                                                                22.2 ± 0.5
     H1272A              HsH2AK15ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                                -19.7 ± 0.0              -47.0
                                                                                22.8 ± 2.7*
Y1290A/N133A             HsH2AK15ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
   W1338Q                HsH2AK15ac             150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5                N/B                    -                    -
        *Indicates the mean value of Kd and sample standard deviation error obtained
         from three independent measurements
         N/B indicates lack of binding

                                                                                                                                    35
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        References
        Adams, P.D., Afonine, P.V., Bunkoczi, G., Chen, V.B., Davis, I.W., Echols, N., Headd, J.J.,
        Hung, L.W., Kapral, G.J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., et al. (2010). PHENIX: a
        comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta
        Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213-221.
        Cairns, B.R., Lorch, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, M., Lacomis, L., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst,
        P., Du, J., Laurent, B., and Kornberg, R.D. (1996). RSC, an essential, abundant
        chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87, 1249-1260.
        Charlop-Powers, Z., Zeng, L., Zhang, Q., and Zhou, M.M. (2010). Structural insights
        into selective histone H3 recognition by the human Polybromo bromodomain 2. Cell
        Res 20, 529-538.
        Chen, V.B., Arendall, W.B., 3rd, Headd, J.J., Keedy, D.A., Immormino, R.M., Kapral, G.J.,
        Murray, L.W., Richardson, J.S., and Richardson, D.C. (2010). MolProbity: all-atom
        structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol
        Crystallogr 66, 12-21.
        Dhalluin, C., Carlson, J.E., Zeng, L., He, C., Aggarwal, A.K., and Zhou, M.M. (1999).
        Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature 399, 491-
        496.
        Du, J., Nasir, I., Benton, B.K., Kladde, M.P., and Laurent, B.C. (1998). Sth1p, a
        Saccharomyces cerevisiae Snf2p/Swi2p homolog, is an essential ATPase in RSC and
        differs from Snf/Swi in its interactions with histones and chromatin-associated
        proteins. Genetics 150, 987-1005.
        Emsley, P., and Cowtan, K. (2004). Coot: model-building tools for molecular
        graphics. Acta Crystallographica Section D 60, 2126-2132.
        Filippakopoulos, P., and Knapp, S. (2012). The bromodomain interaction module.
        FEBS Lett 586, 2692-2704.
        Filippakopoulos, P., and Knapp, S. (2014). Targeting bromodomains: epigenetic
        readers of lysine acetylation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13, 337-356.
        Filippakopoulos, P., Picaud, S., Mangos, M., Keates, T., Lambert, J.P., Barsyte-Lovejoy,
        D., Felletar, I., Volkmer, R., Muller, S., Pawson, T., et al. (2012). Histone recognition
        and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family. Cell 149, 214-
        231.
        Fujisawa, T., and Filippakopoulos, P. (2017). Functions of bromodomain-containing
        proteins and their roles in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18, 246-
        262.
        Garcia, B.A., Hake, S.B., Diaz, R.L., Kauer, M., Morris, S.A., Recht, J., Shabanowitz, J.,
        Mishra, N., Strahl, B.D., Allis, C.D., et al. (2007). Organismal differences in post-
        translational modifications in histones H3 and H4. J Biol Chem 282, 7641-7655.
        Hartley, P.D., and Madhani, H.D. (2009). Mechanisms that specify promoter
        nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137, 445-458.
        Holm, L., and Rosenstrom, P. (2010). Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D.
        Nucleic Acids Res 38, W545-549.
        Huang, H., Lin, S., Garcia, B.A., and Zhao, Y. (2015). Quantitative proteomic analysis
        of histone modifications. Chem Rev 115, 2376-2418.

                                                                                                                                    36
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 25, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/559005. The copyright holder for this preprint
 (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
                                    All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

        Jurkowska, R.Z., Qin, S., Kungulovski, G., Tempel, W., Liu, Y., Bashtrykov, P.,
        Stiefelmaier, J., Jurkowski, T.P., Kudithipudi, S., Weirich, S., et al. (2017). H3K14ac is
        linked to methylation of H3K9 by the triple Tudor domain of SETDB1. Nat Commun
        8, 2057.
        Kabsch, W. (2010). Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 125-132.
        Kasten, M., Szerlong, H., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Werner, M., and Cairns,
        B.R. (2004). Tandem bromodomains in the chromatin remodeler RSC recognize
        acetylated histone H3 Lys14. EMBO J 23, 1348-1359.
        Latham, J.A., and Dent, S.Y. (2007). Cross-regulation of histone modifications. Nat
        Struct Mol Biol 14, 1017-1024.
        Letunic, I., Doerks, T., and Bork, P. (2015). SMART: recent updates, new
        developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D257-260.
        Lorch, Y., Maier-Davis, B., and Kornberg, R.D. (2018). Histone Acetylation Inhibits
        RSC and Stabilizes the +1 Nucleosome. Mol Cell 72, 594-600 e592.
        Marchand, J.R., and Caflisch, A. (2015). Binding Mode of Acetylated Histones to
        Bromodomains: Variations on a Common Motif. ChemMedChem 10, 1327-1333.
        McCoy, A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Adams, P.D., Winn, M.D., Storoni, L.C., and Read,
        R.J. (2007). Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40, 658-674.
        Plotnikov, A.N., Yang, S., Zhou, T.J., Rusinova, E., Frasca, A., and Zhou, M.M. (2014).
        Structural insights into acetylated-histone H4 recognition by the bromodomain-PHD
        finger module of human transcriptional coactivator CBP. Structure 22, 353-360.
        Pokholok, D.K., Harbison, C.T., Levine, S., Cole, M., Hannett, N.M., Lee, T.I., Bell, G.W.,
        Walker, K., Rolfe, P.A., Herbolsheimer, E., et al. (2005). Genome-wide map of
        nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122, 517-527.
        Ramachandran, S., Zentner, G.E., and Henikoff, S. (2015). Asymmetric nucleosomes
        flank promoters in the budding yeast genome. Genome Res 25, 381-390.
        Rawal, Y., Chereji, R.V., Qiu, H., Ananthakrishnan, S., Govind, C.K., Clark, D.J., and
        Hinnebusch, A.G. (2018). SWI/SNF and RSC cooperate to reposition and evict
        promoter nucleosomes at highly expressed genes in yeast. Genes Dev 32, 695-710.
        Ruthenburg, A.J., Li, H., Patel, D.J., and Allis, C.D. (2007). Multivalent engagement of
        chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 983-
        994.
        Schrodinger, LLC (2015). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8.
        Seo, H.S., Blus, B.J., Jankovic, N.Z., and Blobel, G. (2013). Structure and nucleic acid
        binding activity of the nucleoporin Nup157. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 16450-
        16455.
        Singh, M., Popowicz, G.M., Krajewski, M., and Holak, T.A. (2007). Structural
        ramification for acetyl-lysine recognition by the bromodomain of human BRG1
        protein, a central ATPase of the SWI/SNF remodeling complex. Chembiochem 8,
        1308-1316.
        VanDemark, A.P., Kasten, M.M., Ferris, E., Heroux, A., Hill, C.P., and Cairns, B.R.
        (2007). Autoregulation of the rsc4 tandem bromodomain by gcn5 acetylation. Mol
        Cell 27, 817-828.
        Vidler, L.R., Brown, N., Knapp, S., and Hoelder, S. (2012). Druggability analysis and
        structural classification of bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding sites. J Med Chem 55,
        7346-7359.
                                                                                                                                    37
You can also read