Symptoms of depression and anxiety over time in chronic hemodialysis patients

Page created by Darren Berry
 
CONTINUE READING
ORIGINAL ARTICLE                                                                                     JNEPHROL 2012; 25 ( 05 ) : 689-698
                                                                                                                DOI:10.5301/jn.5000042

Symptoms of depression and anxiety over
time in chronic hemodialysis patients

Maurizio Bossola 1, Claudia Ciciarelli 2,                              Dialysis Service, Department of Surgery, Catholic Univer-
                                                                      1

Enrico Di Stasio 3, Gian Luigi Conte 2,                                sity of the Sacred Heart, Rome - Italy
Manuela Antocicco 4, Fausto Rosa 3, Luigi Tazza 1                      Institute of Psychiatry, Catholic University of the Sacred
                                                                      2

                                                                       Heart, Rome - Italy
                                                                       Department of Clinical Chemistry, Catholic University of
                                                                      3

                                                                       the Sacred Heart, Rome - Italy
                                                                       Institute of Geriatrics, Catholic University of the Sacred
                                                                      4

                                                                       Heart, Rome - Italy

 Abstract                                                                  At multivariate analysis the relationship between BDI
                                                                           changes and MMSE and serum CRP was statistically
 Background: Little is known about the course of the                       significant. In 25 patients, the HARS decreased/re-
 symptoms of depression/anxiety and the factors pre-                       mained stable, while in 13 it increased. Characteristics
 dictive of such courses in hemodialysis (HD) patients.                    of the 2 groups of patients did not differ significantly.
 This study aimed at evaluating the possible changes of                    Conclusions: In a meaningful proportion of HD pa-
 Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hamilton Anxiety                      tients, symptoms of depression worsen over time,
 Rating Scale (HARS) over time, and factors associated                     and CRP and MMSE are independent predictors of
 with such changes in HD patients.                                         such change.
 Methods: We screened 110 patients for study partici-
 pation. Of these, 30 were excluded because of dialytic                    Key words: Anxiety, Depression, Hemodialysis, Longi-
 vintage 14 and 38
                                                                      60%, respectively (1, 2). There is evidence of an association
 patients ≤14. In patients with BDI ≤14, the BDI de-
                                                                      between depression and/or anxiety and some demograph-
 creased/remained stable in 19 and increased in 19.
                                                                      ic, clinical and laboratory variables (3-13). Depression and
 Patients with increased BDI had lower baseline MMSE
 (22.6 ± 2.6 vs. 25.9 ± 2.7, p=0.004) and higher base-                anxiety impair significantly the quality of life of HD patients (3,
 line serum CRP (6.07 ± 4.2 vs. 1.64 ± 1.59, p=0.003).                4, 14-17). In addition, numerous studies have clearly dem-
                                                                      onstrated that depression or symptoms of depression are

                                         © 2011 Società Italiana di Nefrologia - ISSN 1121-8428                                     689
Bossola et al: Depression and anxiety over time in hemodialysis

associated with increased hospitalization rate and reduced             Study design
survival (18-26). Interestingly, Hedayati et al have shown that
depression diagnosed through the Diagnostic and Statisti-              Patients were evaluated at baseline through the BDI and the
cal Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV)–based             HARS. Those with baseline BDI >14 and those with base-
SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders), was            line HARS >13 were referred to psychiatric counseling and
associated with time to death or hospitalization with a haz-           excluded from the study. Patients with baseline BDI ≤14
ard ratio of 2.11 (26).                                                were included in the study. They were reevaluated after 18
Unfortunately, little is known in HD patients about the course         months through the BDI and the HARS.
of depression and anxiety or of the course of symptoms of
depression and anxiety, or about the factors predictive of             Hemodialysis
development of depression or of its worsening (27, 28). Re-
cently, we conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the           All patients were receiving conventional 4-hour HD, 3 times a
factors associated with symptoms of depression or anxiety              week. The blood flow ranged from 250 to 300 ml/min with a
in chronic HD patients in a single HD center of a Mediter-             dialysis flow rate of 500 ml/min. All patients were treated with
ranean country (9). Patients included in that study were fol-          low-permeability membranes. Most patients were taking re-
lowed for 18 months with the aim to evaluate the course of             combinant human erythropoietin, antihypertensive medica-
the symptoms of depression and anxiety through the Beck                tions (β-blockers, calcium channel blockers and/or angioten-
Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating             sin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and other commonly used
Scale (HARS) and to identify factors predictive of changes of          drugs such as phosphate binders and vitamin D.
such scores over time. The results of this longitudinal study
are here presented.                                                    Beck Depression Inventory

  Subjects and methods                                                 We used a validated Italian version of the BDI (29) to assess
                                                                       the presence and severity of symptoms of depression. The
Between January 2007 and April 2009, patients with                     BDI is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 21 items
ESRD on chronic HD at the Catholic University Outpatient               that evaluates a broad spectrum of depressive symptoms.
Dialysis Clinic were preliminarily screened. Exclusion cri-            Of these 21 items, 15 refer to psychological-cognitive symp-
teria were age 90 years; dialysis vintage 17 points.

690                                       © 2011 Società Italiana di Nefrologia - ISSN 1121-8428
JNEPHROL 2012; 25 ( 05 ) : 689-698

Charlson Comorbidity Index                                              minutes, and samples were kept frozen at –70°C if not ana-
                                                                        lyzed immediately. Laboratory parameters were measured
Each patient was evaluated for the presence of the follow-              by routine methods at the Department of Laboratory Medi-
ing comorbidities included in the Charlson Comorbidity In-              cine, Catholic University of Rome. CRP serum levels were
dex and according to the guidelines of the Index itself (35):           measured using a high-sensitivity immunonephelometric
myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral             method (Nephelometric 100 Analyzer; Behring, Scoppito,
vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia, de-              Italy), the lowest detection limit of which was 0.05 mg/L.
mentia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peptic ul-               Plasma IL-6 was measured by a commercially available
cer disease, mild liver disease, diabetes without end-organ             photometric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
damage, diabetes with end-organ damage, malignant tumor                 (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany).
without metastases (exclude if >5 years from diagnosis),
malignant tumor with metastases, acute or chronic leuke-                Statistical analysis
mia, moderate or severe liver disease or AIDS. The Charlson
Comorbidity Index was then calculated in each patient.                  Statistical analysis was performed by SYSTAT 7.0 software
                                                                        (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were expressed as
SF-36 Vitality Scale                                                    means ± SD, unless otherwise specified. All data were first
                                                                        analyzed for normality of distribution using the Kolmogorov-
The Italian version of the SF-36 questionnaire (36) was of-             Smirnov test of normality. When comparing differences in
fered to the patients by the attending physician. Patients              the groups, the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test was used
completed the questionnaire at home and returned it during              for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and anal-
the next dialysis session. The participants were screened               ysis of variance was used for normally distributed variables.
for fatigue status using the Vitality Scale of the SF-36 (36).          Categorial variables were compared using the chi-square
Standardized Vitality Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with            test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed
higher scores indicating better functioning (i.e., higher lev-          to study the relationship between BDI changes and patients’
els of energy). Scores above the midpoint of 50 represent               characteristics: the covariates introduced in the model were
well-being (nonfatigued group), whereas scores below 51                 variables significantly different at the univariate analysis be-
represent limitations or disability related to fatigue (fatigued        tween the 2 groups. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of
group) (37).                                                            serum CRP for the identification of patients with increased
                                                                        BDI, we analyzed receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
Mini-Mental State Examination                                           curves and calculated the areas under the curves (AUCs).
                                                                        A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically
Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Men-                      significant.
tal State Examination (MMSE) (38). The MMSE is a brief
30-point questionnaire test that is used to screen for cogni-             Results
tive impairment. It is also used to estimate the severity of
cognitive impairment at a given point in time and to follow             A total of 110 patients were screened for study participation.
the course of cognitive changes in an individual over time,             Of these, 30 were excluded because of dialytic vintage
Bossola et al: Depression and anxiety over time in hemodialysis

BDI over time                                                           level of depression, anxiety and functional and occupational
                                                                        impairment did not remit spontaneously in HD patients. The
At baseline, 42 patients had BDI >14 and 38 patients ≤14.               finding that the BDI increased over time in 48.1% of pa-
Patients with BDI >14 were referred to psychiatric counsel-             tients included in the present study may suggest the need
ing, while patients with baseline BDI ≤14 were followed over            for strict monitoring of chronic HD patients for symptoms of
time. In 19 patients, the BDI decreased or remained stable,             depression, to avoid the risk of underrecognition and under-
and in 19 it increased. The characteristics of these 2 groups           treatment of depression.
of patients are shown in Table I. When compared with pa-                We also found that CRP was as an independent predictive
tients with stable or decreased BDI at month 18, patients               factor of BDI increase in chronic HD patients. These results
with increased BDI at month 18 had lower baseline MMSE                  are in accordance with those of the study of Pasco et al that
and higher baseline serum CRP levels. Multivariate logistic             showed that C-reactive protein is an independent risk marker
regression analysis showed that the relationship between                for de novo major depressive disorders in women (39). In 3
BDI changes and MMSE and serum CRP level was statisti-                  other longitudinal studies, raised markers of systemic inflam-
cally significant (Tab. II). The AUC for the predictive value of        mation have been shown to predate the onset of depressive
CRP for the change of BDI over time was 0.87 (95% con-                  symptoms (40-42). The fact that depression or symptoms
fidence interval, 0.74-1.00, p
JNEPHROL 2012; 25 ( 05 ) : 689-698

TABLE I
DEMOGRAPHIC, CLINICAL AND LABORATORY CHARACTERISTICS OF ALL PATIENTS AND OF PATIENTS STRATI-
FIED ACCORDING TO CHANGE OF BDI OVER TIME
                                        Whole group             BDI stable/decreased            BDI increased at
                                                                                                                        p Value
                                          (n=38)                 at month 18 (n=19)             month 18 (n=19)
Marital status
  Married/living with partner                  23                             11                       12
  Divorced/separated                            -                              -                        -
  Widowed                                       2                             1                         1
  Single                                      13                             7                         6
                                                                                                                         0.982
Work
  Yes                                          16                              8                       8
  No or retired                                22                             11                       11                1.000
Age, years                               58.4 ± 17.1                    53.2 ± 15.8               64.1 ± 17.1            0.099
Duration of dialysis, months             65.2 ± 11.7                    80.5 ± 86.7               48.7 ± 28.4            0.212
Body mass index                           25.1 ± 3.9                     25.5 ± 3.8                24.8 ± 4.1            0.639
BDI baseline                              7.9 ± 4.1                      8.6 ± 3.4                  7.2 ± 4.6            0.379
BDI month 18                             11.2 ± 10.1                     5.1 ± 3.6                17.9 ± 10.6
Bossola et al: Depression and anxiety over time in hemodialysis

TABLE II
MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BDI CHANGES AND PATIENT
CHARACTERISTICS

Variable                                  β                          SE                          p Value       Odds ratio (95% CI)

MMSE                                    0.512                      0.261                          0.046          1.67 (1.00-2.78)
C-reactive protein                     -0.652                      0.330                          0.048          0.52 (0.27-0.99)

The covariates introduced in the model were those variables significantly different at the univariate analysis between the 2
groups.
BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; SE = standard error.

TABLE III
DEMOGRAPHIC, CLINICAL AND LABORATORY CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS STRATIFIED ACCORDING TO
CHANGE OF HARS OVER TIME
                                         HARS stable/decreased                            HARS increased
                                             at month 18                                   at month 18                  p Value
                                                (n=25)                                        (n=13)
Age (years)                                       58.1 ± 16.3                                    59.2 ± 19.7             0.877
Duration of dialysis (months)                     64.6 ± 63.8                                    66.7 ± 64.2             0.940
Body mass index                                    25.1 ± 3.8                                    25.1 ± 4.5              0.986
BDI baseline                                        7.4 ± 4.1                                     9.1 ± 3.8              0.347
HARS baseline                                       8.7 ± 3.4                                     8.5 ± 3.9              0.910
HARS month 18                                       5.5 ± 4.2                                    14.1 ± 4.1
JNEPHROL 2012; 25 ( 05 ) : 689-698

Noteworthy is the fact that baseline vitamin D levels were               a bias for this kind of study if we consider the differences in
not predictive of BDI increase at month 18. Recently, we                 diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and in the patient–
found a significant negative correlation between the BDI                 physician relationship. Finally, to the best of our knowledge,
and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in chronic HD patients (9).               this is one of the largest longitudinal studies evaluating the
Hoogendijk et al reported the results of a large population-             course of symptoms of depression and anxiety in chronic
based study showing an association of depression status                  HD patients. Second, we used a depressive inventory such
and severity with decreased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D                    as BDI for the assessment of the presence and severity of
levels and increased serum parathyroid hormone levels (66).              depression. Indeed, we choose the BDI just because it was
Other cross-sectional studies have led to similar conclu-                originally created as an instrument for measuring the sever-
sions in the general population (67, 68) and in chronic dis-             ity of depression, although it is sometimes used by health
eases (69).                                                              care providers to reach a quick diagnosis (71).
Interestingly, the mean and the median HARS did not change               In summary, the present study showed that in a significant
significantly at month 18, and in less than one third of the             proportion of chronic HD patients, the symptoms of depres-
patients, the HARS score increased over time. In addition,               sion worsen over time and that in such patients CRP and
we did not find differences in the demographic, clinical and             MMSE are independent predictors of the increase of the
laboratory characteristics of patients in whom the HARS at               BDI score. These results suggest the importance of carefully
month 18 decreased or remained stable, with respect to                   monitoring chronic HD patients to avoid underrecognition
those in which the HARS increased. As suggested by Cukor                 and undertreatment of depression. However, further stud-
et al, it is possible that the difference between the course of          ies in diverse populations are needed to confirm or not our
depression and anxiety is due to the fact that the “effect of            results and to establish generalizability.
depression is more robust and easily detectable and that,
to observe the effect for anxiety, a large sample would be               Financial support: None.
required” (27).
The present study has some limitations. First, the sample                Conflict of interest statement: None.
of the patient population was relatively small. However, the
sample was representative of the HD patients of the city                 Address for correspondence:
of Rome and of Lazio, a central region of Italy. In fact, our            Maurizio Bossola, MD
                                                                         Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica
population had characteristics similar to the overall popula-
                                                                         Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore
tion of Lazio region derived from the Lazio Dialysis Register            Largo A. Gemelli, 8
(Registro Dialisi Lazio [RDL]) (70). In addition, we believe             IT-00168 Rome, Italy
that the inclusion of cohorts from different centers could be            maubosso@tin.it

                                                                               ety in urban hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.
     References                                                                2007;2(3):484-490.
                                                                         4.    Cukor D, Coplan J, Brown C, et al. Anxiety disorders in adults
1.    Hedayati SS, Finkelstein FO. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and                treated by hemodialysis: a single-center study. Am J Kidney
      management of depression in patients with CKD. Am J Kid-                 Dis. 2008;52(1):128-136.
      ney Dis. 2009;54(4):741-752.                                       5.    Drayer RA, Piraino B, Reynolds CF III, et al. Characteristics of
2.    Kimmel PL, Cukor D, Cohen SD, Peterson RA. Depression                    depression in hemodialysis patients: symptoms, quality of life
      in end-stage renal disease patients: a critical review. Adv              and mortality risk. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(4):306-312.
      Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007;14(4):328-334.                            6.    Jadoulle V, Hoyois P, Jadoul M. Anxiety and depression in
3.    Cukor D, Coplan J, Brown C, et al. Depression and anxi-                  chronic hemodialysis: some somatopsychic determinants.

                                            © 2011 Società Italiana di Nefrologia - ISSN 1121-8428                                        695
Bossola et al: Depression and anxiety over time in hemodialysis

      Clin Nephrol. 2005;63(2):113-118.                                     22. Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, et al. Psychosocial fac-
7.    Davison SN, Jhangri GS. The impact of chronic pain on                     tors, behavioral compliance and survival in urban hemodialy-
      depression, sleep, and the desire to withdraw from di-                    sis patients. Kidney Int. 1998;54(1):245-254.
      alysis in hemodialysis patients. J Pain Symptom Manage.               23. Peterson RA, Kimmel PL, Sacks CR, Mesquita ML, Simmens
      2005;30(5):465-473.                                                       SJ, Reiss D. Depression, perception of illness and mortal-
8.    Kalender B, Ozdemir AC, Koroglu G. Association of depres-                 ity in patients with end-stage renal disease. Int J Psychiatry
      sion with markers of nutrition and inflammation in chronic                Med. 1991;21(4):343-354.
      kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Nephron Clin              24. Troidle L, Watnick S, Wuerth DB, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger
      Pract. 2006;102(3-4):c115-c121.                                           AS, Finkelstein FO. Depression and its association with peri-
9.    Bossola M, Ciciarelli C, Di Stasio E, et al. Correlates of symp-          tonitis in long-term peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney
      toms of depression and anxiety in chronic hemodialysis pa-                Dis. 2003;42(2):350-354.
      tients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(2):125-131.                      25. Hedayati SS, Grambow SC, Szczech LA, Stechuchak KM,
10.   Hung KC, Wu CC, Chen HS, et al: Serum IL-6, albumin and                   Allen AS, Bosworth HB. Physician-diagnosed depression as
      co-morbidities are closely correlated with symptoms of de-                a correlate of hospitalizations in patients receiving long-term
      pression in patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Nephrol                hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46(4):642-649.
      Dial Transplant 2010 Jul 14.                                          26. Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Briley LP, et al. Death or hospi-
11.   Dogan E, Erkoc R, Eryonucu B, Sayarlioglu H, Agargun                      talization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated
      MY. Relation between depression, some laboratory param-                   with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney Int.
      eters, and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail.            2008;74(7):930-936.
      2005;27(6):695-699.                                                   27. Cukor D, Coplan J, Brown C, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL.
12.   Santoro A, Mancini E. Hemodialysis and the elderly patient:               Course of depression and anxiety diagnosis in patients treat-
      complications and concerns. J Nephrol. 2010;23(Suppl 15):                 ed with hemodialysis: a 16-month follow-up. Clin J Am Soc
      S80-S89.                                                                  Nephrol. 2008;3(6):1752-1758.
13.   Andrade CP, Cruz MC, Urrutia M, et al. Evaluation of de-              28. Soykan A, Boztas H, Kutlay S, et al. Depression and its
      pressive symptoms in patients with chronic renal failure. J               6-month course in untreated hemodialysis patients: a pre-
      Nephrol. 2010;23(2):168-174.                                              liminary prospective follow-up study in Turkey. Int J Behav
14.   Park HC, Yoon HB, Son MJ, et al. Depression and health-                   Med. 2004;11(4):243-246.
      related quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients.         29. Sica C, Ghisi M. The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety
      Clin Nephrol. 2010;73(5):374-380.                                         Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: psycho-
15.   Tentori F, Mapes DL. Health-related quality of life and de-               metric properties and discriminant power. In: Lange MA,
      pression among participants in the DOPPS: predictors and                  ed. Leading-edge psychological tests and testing research.
      associations with clinical outcomes. Semin Dial. 2010;23(1):              Hauppauge, New York: NOVA; 2007:27-50.
      14-16.                                                                30. Chilcot J, Wellsted D, Farrington K. Screening for depres-
16.   Son YJ, Choi KS, Park YR, Bae JS, Lee JB. Depression,                     sion while patients dialyse: an evaluation. Nephrol Dial Trans-
      symptoms and the quality of life in patients on hemodialy-                plant. 2008;23(8):2653-2659.
      sis for end-stage renal disease. Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(1):            31. Watnick S, Wang PL, Demadura T, Ganzini L. Validation of 2
      36-42.                                                                    depression screening tools in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney
17.   Dogan E, Erkoc R, Eryonucu B, Sayarlioglu H, Agargun MY.                  Dis. 2005;46(5):919-924.
      Relation between depression, some laboratory parameters,              32. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J
      and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2005;             Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-55.
      27(6):695-699.                                                        33. Nifosì F, Violato E, Pavan C, et al. Psychopathology and clini-
18.   Shulman R, Price JD, Spinelli J. Biopsychosocial aspects                  cal features in an Italian sample of patients with myofascial
      of long-term survival on end-stage renal failure therapy. Psy-            and temporomandibular joint pain: preliminary data. Int J
      chol Med. 1989;19(4):945-954.                                             Psychiatry Med. 2007;37(3):283-300.
19.   Wai L, Richmond J, Burton H, Lindsay RM. Influence of                 34. Cassano GB, Pancheri P. Trattato Italiano di Psichiatria. Mi-
      psychosocial factors on survival of home-dialysis patients.               lan, Italy: Masson; 1993.
      Lancet. 1981;2(8256):1155-1156.                                       35. Di Iorio B, Cillo N, Cirillo M, De Santo NG. Charlson Comor-
20.   Burton HJ, Kline SA, Lindsay RM, Heidenheim AP. The re-                   bidity Index is a predictor of outcomes in incident hemodialy-
      lationship of depression to survival in chronic renal failure.            sis patients and correlates with phase angle and hospitaliza-
      Psychosom Med. 1986;48(3-4):261-269.                                      tion. Int J Artif Organs. 2004;27(4):330-336.
21.   Ziarnik JP, Freeman CW, Sherrard DJ, Calsyn DA. Psycho-               36. Mingardi G, Cornalba L, Cortinovis E, Ruggiata R, Mosconi
      logical correlates of survival on renal dialysis. J Nerv Ment             P, Apolone G; DIA-QOL Group. Health-related quality of life
      Dis. 1977;164(3):210-213.                                                 in dialysis patients: a report from an Italian study using the

696                                            © 2011 Società Italiana di Nefrologia - ISSN 1121-8428
JNEPHROL 2012; 25 ( 05 ) : 689-698

      SF-36 Health Survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14(6):                   sociation between major depression and levels of soluble in-
      1503-1510.                                                                  tercellular adhesion molecule 1, interleukin-6, and C-reactive
37.   Jhamb M, Weisbord SD, Steel JL, Unruh M. Fatigue in pa-                     protein in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes.
      tients receiving maintenance dialysis: a review of defini-                  Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(2):271-277.
      tions, measures, and contributing factors. Am J Kidney Dis.           52.   Loftis JM, Huckans M, Ruimy S, Hinrichs DJ, Hauser P. De-
      2008;52(2):353-365.                                                         pressive symptoms in patients with chronic hepatitis C are
38.   Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Examina-                    correlated with elevated plasma levels of interleukin-1beta
      tion: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):                 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Neurosci Lett. 2008;430(3):
      922-935.                                                                    264-268.
39.   Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Williams LJ, et al. Association of            53.   Dervisoglu E, Kir HM, Kalender B, Eraldemir C, Caglayan C.
      high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with de novo major de-                  Depressive symptoms and proinflammatory cytokine levels
      pression. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197(5):372-377.                             in chronic renal failure patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;
40.   Milaneschi Y, Corsi AM, Penninx BW, Bandinelli S, Guralnik                  108(4):c272-c277.
      JM, Ferrucci L. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and incident        54.   Taskapan H, Ates F, Kaya B, et al. CRP and depression in pa-
      depressive symptoms over 6 years in older persons: the In-                  tients on chronic dialysis. Clin Nephrol. 2003;60(6):443-444.
      CHIANTI study. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(11):973-978.                  55.   Sonikian M, Metaxaki P, Papavasileiou D, et al. Effects of
41.   van den Biggelaar AH, Gussekloo J, de Craen AJ, et al. In-                  interleukin-6 on depression risk in dialysis patients. Am J
      flammation and interleukin-1 signaling network contribute to                Nephrol. 2010;31(4):303-308.
      depressive symptoms but not cognitive decline in old age.             56.   Howren MB, Lamkin DM, Suls J. Associations of depression
      Exp Gerontol. 2007;42(7):693-701.                                           with C-reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: a meta-analysis. Psy-
42.   Gimeno D, Kivimäki M, Brunner EJ, et al. Associations of C-                 chosom Med. 2009;71(2):171-186.
      reactive protein and interleukin-6 with cognitive symptoms of         57.   Maes M. Depression is an inflammatory disease, but cell-me-
      depression: 12-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study. Psy-               diated immune activation is the key component of depres-
      chol Med. 2009;39(3):413-423.                                               sion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;
43.   Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley                       35(3):664-675.
      KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when                58.   Jehn CF, Kühnhardt D, Bartholomae A, et al. Association of IL-
      the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci.                   6, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function, and depres-
      2008;9(1):46-56.                                                            sion in patients with cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2010;9(3):
44.   Adler UC, Marques AH, Calil HM. Inflammatory aspects of                     270-275.
      depression. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2008;7(1):19-23.            59.   Pyter LM, Pineros V, Galang JA, McClintock MK, Prendergast
45.   Irwin MR, Miller AH. Depressive disorders and immunity:                     BJ. Peripheral tumors induce depressive-like behaviors and
      20 years of progress and discovery. Brain Behav Immun.                      cytokine production and alter hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
      2007;21(4):374-383.                                                         axis regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(22):
46.   Alesci S, Martinez PE, Kelkar S, et al. Major depression is                 9069-9074.
      associated with significant diurnal elevations in plasma in-          60.   Tsirpanlis G, Bagos P, Ioannou D, et al. The variability and
      terleukin-6 levels, a shift of its circadian rhythm, and loss               accurate assessment of microinflammation in haemodialysis
      of physiological complexity in its secretion: clinical implica-             patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(1):150-157.
      tions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):2522-2530.                 61.   Alesci S, Martinez PE, Kelkar S, et al. Major depression is
47.   Marques-Deak AH, Neto FL, Dominguez WV, et al. Cytokine                     associated with significant diurnal elevations in plasma in-
      profiles in women with different subtypes of major depres-                  terleukin-6 levels, a shift of its circadian rhythm, and loss
      sive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(1-2):152-159.                       of physiological complexity in its secretion: clinical implica-
48.   Christian LM, Franco A, Glaser R, Iams JD. Depressive                       tions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):2522-2530.
      symptoms are associated with elevated serum proinflamma-              62.   Bossola M, La Torre G, Giungi S, Tazza L, Vulpio C, Luciani
      tory cytokines among pregnant women. Brain Behav Immun.                     G. Serum albumin, body weight and inflammatory parame-
      2009;23(6):750-754.                                                         ters in chronic hemodialysis patients: a three-year longitudi-
49.   Zautra AJ, Yocum DC, Villanueva I, et al. Immune activation                 nal study. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28(3):405-412.
      and depression in women with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheu-            63.   Ciaccio M, Bivona G, Di Sciacca R, et al. Changes in serum
      matol. 2004;31(3):457-463.                                                  fetuin-A and inflammatory markers levels in end-stage renal
50.   Musselman DL, Miller AH, Porter MR, et al. Higher than nor-                 disease (ESRD): effect of a single session haemodialysis.
      mal plasma interleukin-6 concentrations in cancer patients                  Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(2):212-214.
      with depression: preliminary findings. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;         64.   Martins C, Mazza do Nascimento M, Pecoits-Filho R, et al.
      158(8):1252-1257.                                                           Insulin resistance is associated with circulating fibrinogen
51.   Lespérance F, Frasure-Smith N, Théroux P, Irwin M. The as-                  levels in nondiabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. J

                                               © 2011 Società Italiana di Nefrologia - ISSN 1121-8428                                       697
Bossola et al: Depression and anxiety over time in hemodialysis

    Ren Nutr. 2007;17(2):132-137.                                        68. Wilkins CH, Sheline YI, Roe CM, Birge SJ, Morris JC. Vitamin
65. Djernes JK. Prevalence and predictors of depression in                   D deficiency is associated with low mood and worse cog-
    populations of elderly: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;            nitive performance in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry.
    113(5):372-387.                                                          2006;14(12):1032-1040.
66. Hoogendijk WJ, Lips P, Dik MG, Deeg DJ, Beekman AT,                  69. Armstrong DJ, Meenagh GK, Bickle I, Lee AS, Curran ES, Finch
    Penninx BW. Depression is associated with decreased                      MB. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with anxiety and de-
    25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased parathyroid hormone                    pression in fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(4):551-554.
    levels in older adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(5):             70. Agency for Public Health, Lazio Region. Registro Dialisi del
    508-512.                                                                 Lazio. Rome, Italy: Agency for Public Health; 2008.
67. Jorde R, Waterloo K, Saleh F, Haug E, Svartberg J. Neuro-            71. Hersen M, Turner SM, Beidel DC. Adult psychopathology
    psychological function in relation to serum parathyroid hor-             and diagnosis. 5th ed. Wiley; New York, NY. 2007:301-302.
    mone and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: the Tromsø
    study. J Neurol. 2006;253(4):464-470.                                Accepted: September 5, 2011

698                                         © 2011 Società Italiana di Nefrologia - ISSN 1121-8428
You can also read