Ozonation of 1,3,6-naphthalenetrisulphonic acid catalysed by activated carbon in aqueous phase

Page created by Melvin Bowman
 
CONTINUE READING
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329

     Ozonation of 1,3,6-naphthalenetrisulphonic acid catalysed by
                  activated carbon in aqueous phase
                                         J. Rivera-Utrilla∗ , M. Sánchez-Polo
               Departamento de Quı́mica Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
                         Received 9 February 2002; received in revised form 20 May 2002; accepted 20 May 2002

Abstract
   This paper presents experimental results of the ozonation of a model aromatic sulphonic compound, 1,3,6-naphthalenetrisul-
phonic acid (NTS), in the presence of different activated carbons with different physical and chemical surface properties.
Carbons used were commercial activated carbons (Ceca AC40, Norit, Merck, Witco, Ceca GAC, Filtrasorb 400, Sorbo) with
or without demineralisation pre-treatment. Carbon samples were texturally and chemically characterised using N2 adsorption
isotherms, mercury porosimetry, pHPZC , selective neutralisation and elemental analysis. Results show that NTS was degraded
by ozone at a faster rate in the presence of activated carbon, especially in the case of Sorbo, Ceca GAC and Norit carbons,
which display catalytic activity, probably by enhancing ozone decomposition in aqueous phase in highly oxidative species.
These catalytic properties seem to be favoured by both the basicity of the carbon surface and the higher macropore volume.
Dissolved total organic carbon from the NTS degradation compounds was removed in the presence of activated carbon through
both the catalytic activity of activated carbon to mineralise organic matter and the adsorption of these organic compounds on
activated carbon.
© 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ozone; Activated carbon; Catalysis; 1,3,6-Naphthalenetrisulphonic acid

1. Introduction                                                         Indeed, advanced oxidation processes (AOP) [1] have
                                                                        attracted considerable attention due to the destruc-
   Toxic organic contaminants, such as heterocyclic                     tive power of highly reactive free radicals involved
and phenolic compounds, present serious environmen-                     in these systems. Organic molecules are readily de-
tal risks and should be eliminated before discharge                     stroyed by OH• radicals, with typical rate constants
into natural water bodies. Unfortunately, conventional                  in the range 106 –109 M−1 s−1 .
biological effluent treatment systems cannot meet the                      In all cases, the aim of AOP is to generate OH•
abatement requirements set by the regulations be-                       radicals that react with organic molecules; never-
cause these compounds are difficult to metabolise or                    theless, due to their high reactivity and poor se-
may even inhibit microbial activity. In this context,                   lectivity, these free radicals may be consumed in
more sophisticated treatment alternatives should be                     chemical reactions with other compounds usually
implemented to deal with this type of contaminant.                      present in wastewater, such as butanol, methanol,
                                                                        carbonates and bicarbonates, which act as free rad-
  ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +34-958-248523;                         ical scavengers, stopping propagation reactions in-
fax: +34-958-248526.                                                    volved in the oxidation of aromatic compounds
E-mail address: jrivera@ugr.es (J. Rivera-Utrilla).                     [2,3].

0926-3373/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 6 - 3 3 7 3 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 1 1 7 - 0
320                J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329

   In the case of ozone-based processes, the presence              tronic density, leading to a decrease in its reactivity
of such free radical scavengers has a significant ef-              towards ozone.
fect on performance, so that higher ozone consump-                    The present paper aimed to study the ozonation of
tion is required to meet discharge standards [4], and              NTS, as a model contaminant, in the presence of differ-
may even lead to the formation of mutagenic organic                ent commercial activated carbons to enhance its degra-
by-products [5].                                                   dation and removal. The catalytic effect of these acti-
   In order to overcome those shortcomings, catalysts              vated carbons and the parameters affecting this ozona-
have been introduced to increase ozonation perfor-                 tion process were investigated.
mance [6]. Recently, Hewes et al. [7] reported that
ozonation of phenolic compounds was more effec-                    2. Experimental
tive when conducted in the presence of Fe(II), Mn(II),
Ni(II) or Co(II) sulphates. Moreover, Abdo et al. [8]              2.1. Methods
showed that Zn(II) and Cu(II) sulphates, Ag(I) nitrate
and Cr(III) oxide presented catalytic effects during                  Ozone was produced from pure oxygen using
ozone decolouration of textile effluents. Similar re-              an Ozokav ozone generator rated at 76 mg O3 /min.
sults were reported by Gracia et al. [9] in the case               A 2 l temperature-controlled stirred reactor system
of ozonation of humic compounds in the presence of                 was used. Experiments were conducted at 25 ◦ C and
Mn(II) and Ag(I), and by Andreozzi et al. [10] during              260 rpm. Analytical grade H3 PO4 and NaOH were
ozonation of oxalic acid with Mn(II) at low pH.                    used to adjust the pH. One litre of NTS-free solution
   There are few published experimental studies                    at the set pH was poured into the reactor and ozone
on heterogeneous catalysed ozonation of aromatic                   gas was continuously fed for 35 min to achieve satu-
contaminants. In this respect, the combined use of                 ration. Then, 1.8 ml NTS (25 g/l stock solution) was
ozone and activated carbon has been identified as                  injected into the reactor to obtain a NTS concentra-
an interesting alternative to destroy toxic and poorly             tion of around 45 mg/l. At the same time, 0.5 g acti-
biodegradable organic molecules [11,12]. Unfortu-                  vated carbon (original or demineralised) was added
nately, fundamental studies on this system are still               into the reactor. Samples were taken regularly for
required to unveil the physical and chemical mech-                 chemical assay; NaNO2 was used to stop the ozona-
anisms involved. Jans and Hoigné [13] showed that                  tion reaction. NTS concentration, dissolved ozone,
ozone reactions in aqueous phase were catalysed by                 total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved inorganic
carbon black and activated carbon. Indeed, radical                 carbon (DIC) were determined after different time
chain reactions seem to be initiated by the action of              periods.
functional groups present on the carbon surface, thus                 Commercial activated carbons Filtrasorb 400,
accelerating ozone decomposition in aqueous phase.                 Merck, Norit, Ceca AC40, Ceca GAC, Sorbo and
Zaror et al. [14] reported that ozone stability in aque-           Witco were used. NTS was obtained from Fluka; all
ous solutions is drastically reduced by the presence               other reagents were purchased from Merck.
of activated carbon, probably due to a combination
of surface catalysed ozone decomposition reactions                 2.2. Analytical methods
and chemical reactions with carbon surface functional
groups.                                                              Gas phase ozone concentration was determined by
   In previous papers [15,16], we studied the ozona-               spectrophotometry using Spectronic Genesis 5 equip-
tion of three naphthalenesulphonic acids (mono, di                 ment connected to a flow cell. Dissolved ozone con-
and trisulphonic acids) and found that the ozona-                  centration in aqueous solution was determined by the
tion rate depended on the number of sulphonic                      Karman–Indigo method [17].
groups in the aromatic rings. The degradation of                     NTS concentration was measured by HPLC using a
1,3,6-naphthalenetrisulphonic acid (NTS) was much                  Merck–Hitachi with UV detector and a 250 mm long
slower than that of 1-naphthalenesulphonic acid, be-               RP-18 (5 ␮m) LiChrosphere 100 column. A 35/65
cause of the presence of three sulphonic groups in the             methanol–water solution was used as mobile phase,
aromatic rings of NTS, which reduce the ring elec-                 containing 5 mM TBABr as ion exchanger and 10 mM
J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329                   321

NaH2 PO4 (Merck) as pH regulator; flow rate was set                    Table 2
at 1.3 ml/min.                                                         Elemental analysis (%) of the activated carbons
   Dissolved TOC and DIC were measured using a                         Activated carbon    C        H       N       S      O (by
Shimadzu TOC-5000A unit with an experimental error                                                                         difference)
of ±5%.                                                                Filtrasorb 400      87.50    0.18    0.80    0.65   10.87
   Demineralisation of activated carbons with HCl and                  Sorbo               88.61    0.27    0.61    0.37   10.14
                                                                       Merck               89.00    0.33    0.72    0.94    9.01
HF was carried out using procedures proposed by Mor-
                                                                       Ceca GAC            78.85    0.36    0.73    0.43   19.63
gan et al. [18].                                                       Ceca AC40           89.00    0.37    0.53    0.00   10.10
   The surface area of carbon samples was determined                   Norit               88.98    0.29    0.70    0.00   10.03
from the BET equation applied to the N2 adsorption                     Witco               92.55    0.17    0.00    3.04    4.24
isotherms at 77 K, which were obtained using a Mi-
cromeritics Gemini 2370 adsorption unit. The volumes
of macropores (V3 ) and wider mesopores (V2 ) were                     cial activated carbons used in this study. Greater sur-
determined by mercury porosimetry using a Quan-                        face areas, in the range 1200–1300 m2 /g, were shown
tachrome Autoscan 60 apparatus.                                        by Sorbo, Merck and Ceca AC40 activated carbons,
   The pH of the point of zero charge (pHPZC ) of car-                 whereas Witco carbon presented the smallest surface
bons was determined following the pH drift tests re-                   area (808 m2 /g). According to the data presented in
ported elsewhere [19]. The determination of acid and                   Table 1, the Sorbo and Norit carbons had the most
basic groups was carried out following the method pro-                 marked macroporosity, while Ceca GAC carbon had
posed by Boehm [20]. Elemental analysis of the car-                    the greatest mesoporosity (V2 = 0.13 cm3 /g). Witco
bons used was performed with a Fison’s Instruments                     carbon had the lowest V2 and V3 values.
Model 1108 CHS elemental analyser.                                        Regarding the surface chemistry of the activated
   Ash content in carbons was determined by incin-                     carbons, Sorbo (pHPZC = 9.42) and Norit (pHPZC =
eration at 850 ◦ C and ash chemical composition was                    9.18) carbons showed the greatest concentration
estimated by X-ray fluorescence. The procedure was                     of surface basic groups (1713 and 2050 ␮eq/g, re-
described in detail in a previous publication [21].                    spectively), whereas Ceca AC40 carbon (pHPZC =
                                                                       5.29) had the greatest concentration of surface acid
3. Results and discussion                                              groups.
                                                                          Table 2 lists the results of the elemental analysis
3.1. Activated carbon characterisation                                 of each activated carbon. The percentage of oxygen
                                                                       ranged from 19.63% for Ceca GAC carbon to 4.24%
   Table 1 summarises the results obtained from the                    for Witco carbon. All remaining carbons presented a
textural and chemical characterisation of the commer-                  very similar percentage of oxygen of around 10%.

Table 1
Characterisation of activated carbons
Activated carbon     SN2 (m2 /g)        V2 (cm3 /g)a   V3 (cm3 /g)b   pHPZC      Acid groups               Basic groups      Ash (%)
                                                                                 (␮eq/g)c                  (␮eq/g)d
Filtrasorb 400       1075               0.11           0.26           7.91       234                        570               6.6
Sorbo                1295               0.06           0.37           9.42        88                       1713               5.9
Merck                1301               0.09           0.26           7.89       114                        582               5.2
Ceca GAC              966               0.13           0.16           6.83       323                         99              12.0
Ceca AC40            1201               0.07           0.32           5.29       438                        102               8.3
Norit                 968               0.10           0.42           9.18       139                       2050               4.8
Witco                 808               0.04           0.05           6.85       183                        253               0.3
   a Volume of pores with diameter of 50–6.6 nm.
   b Volume of pores with diameter above 50 nm.
   c Determined by NaOH (0.1N) neutralisation.
   d Determined by HCl (0.02N) neutralisation.
322                   J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329

Table 3
Chemical composition of activated carbon ashes (weight, %)
Activated carbon       Si           Ti         Al            Fe       Mn          Mg          Ca          Na       K      P

Filtrasorb 400         20.19        0.82       8.41          6.32     0.02        0.49         1.79       0.31     0.55   0.02
Sorbo                  15.19        0.20       1.24          1.66     0.13        9.18         9.41       1.53     0.83   0.41
Merck                  21.29        0.87       8.66          4.37     0.03        0.48         0.99       0.40     1.21   0.06
Ceca GAC               17.14        0.31       4.38          1.19     0.08        2.48         8.86       0.00     0.08   4.11
Norit                  12.22        0.19       1.28          1.47     0.25        9.88        10.46       1.58     0.92   0.45

   With regard to the mineral matter, Ceca GAC car-                   6.72 M−1 s−1 , whereas the indirect reaction (free rad-
bon featured the highest ash content (12%) and Witco                  ical reaction) constant was 3.7 × 109 M−1 s−1 . Thus,
carbon the lowest (0.3%) (Table 1). Filtrasorb 400 ash                the radical reaction proved more efficacious in oxidiz-
presented a high Fe (6.32%) and Al (8.41%) content,                   ing NTS. The main compounds obtained in the degra-
whereas Norit and Sorbo had a low content of Fe and                   dation of NTS by ozone are: oxalic acid, formic acid,
Al and a significant fraction of Mg and Ca (around                    and sulphate ions [15,16].
9–10% each) (Table 3). Unlike other samples, ashes                       The carbons that most enhanced the NTS ozonation
from Ceca GAC showed a high P (4.11%) content.                        rate were those with greatest pHPZC values and high-
A substantial concentration of Ti (∼
                                   =1%) was detected                  est concentrations of surface basic groups (Table 1).
in Filtrasorb 400 and Merck ash samples, while Mn                     However, no clear relationship was observed between
contents were significant in Norit and Sorbo ashes                    the NTS ozonation rate and the SN2 of the activated
(0.25 and 0.13%, respectively). These metals are fre-                 carbon. Thus, Merck carbon had the largest surface
quently used as catalysts in oxidation processes. In-                 area (SN2 = 1301 m2 /g) but did not show the highest
deed, Ti is favoured as catalyst in photocatalysis [22]               rate of NTS oxidation. These results indicate that the
and Bhat and Gurol [23] recently used low concentra-                  process of ozonation catalysed by activated carbon is
tions of MnO2 to enhance chlorobenzene degradation                    not affected by its microporosity. On the other hand,
by ozone.                                                             the carbons that most favoured the removal of NTS
                                                                      from the medium (Sorbo and Norit) were those with
3.2. Ozonation of NTS in the presence of activated                    greatest macropore volumes (Table 1). These pores act
carbons                                                               as transport pores, facilitating the access of ozone to
                                                                      the carbon surface and reducing diffusion problems.
3.2.1. Influence of chemical and textural                             Thus, the low catalytic activity showed by Witco car-
characteristics of activated carbon on the NTS                        bon could be related, in part, to its small V2 and V3
oxidation rate                                                        values. However, there was no close relationship be-
   Fig. 1 shows experimental results of NTS ozona-                    tween macropore volume and catalytic activity in the
tion in the presence of the different activated carbons.              remaining carbons under study.
All of the carbons increased the ozonation rate. Sorbo,                  Although activated carbon is a heterogeneous mate-
Norit, and Ceca GAC carbons greatly enhanced NTS                      rial with a large number of surface groups and different
degradation rates, whereas Witco activated carbon had                 pore size distributions, the above results suggest that
a lower effect on the NTS degradation rate. These re-                 the catalytic activity of these activated carbons in NTS
sults were obtained at pH 2.3, at which there is poor                 ozonation is mainly a function of the carbon basicity.
NTS reactivity towards ozone in the absence of ac-                    Thus, the catalytic activity seems to be enhanced by
tivated carbon [15]. The greater rate of NTS ozona-                   increased carbon basicity.
tion in the presence of these carbons could, therefore,                  The basicity of an activated carbon is due to
be explained by an increase in free radical hydroxyl                  the presence of basic oxygen-containing functional
concentration. In previous investigations [15,16] of                  groups (e.g. pyrones or chromenes) and/or graphene
the ozonation of NTS in the absence of activated car-                 layers acting as Lewis bases and forming elec-
bon, we found that the direct reaction constant was                   tron donor–acceptor (EDA) complexes with H2 O
J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329                323

Fig. 1. NTS ozonation in the presence of commercial activated carbons. pH 2.3, T 298 K. (䉫) Without carbon; (䊊) Filtrasorb 400; (䉭)
Merck; (䊐) Ceca GAC; ( ) Ceca AC40; (×) Norit; (+) Sorbo; ( ) Witco.

molecules. These latter basic sites are located at ␲                 3.2.2. TOC removal during ozonation treatment
electron-rich regions within the basal planes of car-                   The TOC present in solution is an important pa-
bon crystallites away from the crystallite edges [24].               rameter to evaluate the efficacy of a given water treat-
This delocalised ␲ electron system can act as a Lewis                ment system. Fig. 2 shows the TOC concentration as a
base in aqueous solution:                                            function of NTS ozonation time in the presence of the
−C␲ + 2H2 O  C␲–H3 O+ + OH−                              (1)        activated carbons. All activated carbons reduced the
                                                                     TOC during ozonation time and Norit, Sorbo and Ceca
The delocalised ␲ electron system of basic carbons                   GAC carbons had the greatest effect on TOC removal.
and oxygenated basic groups (chromene and pyrone)                    The increased TOC concentration of Norit, Merck,
would, therefore, act as catalytic centres of reaction,              Sorbo and Filtrasorb 400 activated carbons (Fig. 2)
reducing the ozone molecules to hydroxyl ion and hy-                 after 10 min ozonation may be due to electrophilic at-
drogen peroxide following the reactions:                             tack on surface aromatic rings of the activated carbon,
O3 + H2 O + 2e−  O2 + 2OH−                               (2)        generating soluble organic by-products.

                                                                                                                               (3)
   It is widely known [25–28] that both hydroxyl ion
and hydrogen peroxide act as initiators of the ozone                    This attack was experimentally observed by ozonat-
decomposition process in aqueous phase.                              ing activated carbons in the absence of NTS (Fig. 3).
   Thus, the higher degradation rate of NTS in the pres-             All of the activated carbons were attacked by ozone
ence of Sorbo (pHPZC = 9.42) and Norit (pHPZC =                      to a greater or lesser extent, yielding soluble organic
9.18) carbons is because these carbons have greater                  by-products. Under these experimental conditions, ba-
reducing properties, favouring reactions 2 and 3 and,                sic carbons present a greater increase in dissolved
therefore, increasing the extent of ozone decomposi-                 TOC after the first 10 min of ozonation. The reduc-
tion into highly oxidative radicals.                                 tion in dissolved TOC with the increase in ozonation
324                  J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329

Fig. 2. TOC removal during NTS ozonation in the presence of activated carbon. pH 2.3, T 298 K. (䉫) Without carbon; (䊊) Filtrasorb
400; (䉭) Merck; (䊐) Ceca GAC; ( ) Ceca AC40; (×) Norit; (+) Sorbo; ( ) Witco.

(Fig. 3) may be due to: (i) mineralisation of organic                organic matter to CO2 by highly reactive species catal-
matter by highly reactive species and (ii) reduction in              ysed by activated carbon and (ii) the adsorption of ox-
activated carbon reactivity by the generation of oxy-                idised by-products from NTS on activated carbon.
genated functional groups that reduce electronic den-                   In order to determine the contributions of adsorption
sity on the surface. The comparison of results shown                 and catalysis to the overall process of TOC removal,
in Fig. 2 with those in Fig. 3 indicates that TOC re-                experimental studies were undertaken using reactor
moval is much faster in the presence of NTS than in                  in discontinuous mode. A solution of NTS (45 mg/l)
its absence.                                                         was treated with ozone for 25 min and then degasified
   The reduction in dissolved TOC during NTS ozona-                  for 5 min, in order to remove the dissolved ozone.
tion (Fig. 2) may be due to: (i) mineralisation of                   The concentration of dissolved ozone was followed

Fig. 3. Dissolved TOC during ozonation of commercial activated carbon. pH 2.3, T 298 K. (䊊) Filtrasorb 400; (䉭) Merck; (䊐) Ceca
GAC; ( ) Ceca AC40; (×) Norit; (+) Sorbo; ( ) Witco.
J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329           325

Table 4                                                               sation of the organic matter present. This carbon pro-
Contribution of catalytic and adsorptive mechanisms to the global     duced the catalytic removal of 2.47 mg/l of dissolved
process
                                                                      organic matter after 30 min of treatment (Table 4). This
Activated           Adsorption       Catalysis         DIC           greater catalytic capacity is due to a larger amount of
carbon              (mg/l)           (mg/l)            (mg/l)a        free radicals in solution. Sorbo carbon is of basic na-
Filtrasorb 400      2.14             1.55              1.53           ture (pHPZC = 9.42) and thus, as commented above,
Sorbo               3.14             2.47              2.37
                                                                      has a greater reducing capacity, producing the decom-
Merck               2.12             1.75              1.75
Ceca GAC            2.85             1.89              1.80           position of the ozone in aqueous phase.
Ceca AC40           4.05             0.68              0.60              On the other hand, although Ceca GAC is consid-
Norit               3.54             1.34              1.54           ered of neutral nature (pHPZC = 6.83), it showed a ma-
Witco               3.44             0.45              0.41           jor catalytic contribution to the removal of dissolved
   a Increase in dissolved inorganic carbon due to the presence       organic material. This may have resulted from the
of activated carbon in the system after 30 min of ozonation.          presence of a large amount of mineral matter (Table 1).
                                                                      In accordance with these findings, the metallic centres
up using indigo. After the ozone was removed, 0.5 g                   present in mineral matter would behave as active cen-
of activated carbon was added and the solution was                    tres in the ozone decomposition process in aqueous
agitated for 30 min.                                                  phase. This aspect will be discussed later. Witco car-
   The reduction in TOC observed in the above exper-                  bon showed the smallest catalytic contribution, due to
iment may be considered exclusively due to the ad-                    its low basicity and insignificant ash content (0.3%).
sorption of NTS ozonation products on the activated                      In order to enhance the dissolving of the CO2 gen-
carbon. Knowledge of the contribution of adsorption                   erated and thereby determine the increase in miner-
to TOC removal allows the catalytic contribution of                   alisation of organic matter caused by the presence of
the carbon to be determined, simply subtracting the                   the activated carbon, NTS ozonation experiments were
contribution of adsorption from the difference between                run at pH 7. As an example, Fig. 4 shows the evolution
the initial TOC and the TOC after ozone/activated car-                of the TOC in the presence and absence of Ceca GAC
bon treatment of the NTS for 30 min.                                  activated carbon during NTS ozonation at pH 2 and 7.
   Table 4 lists the values of the catalytic and adsorp-                 At pH 7, a decrease in TOC was observed in both the
tive contributions to TOC removal in the carbons under                absence and the presence of activated carbon. Thus,
study. Sorbo carbon showed the greatest catalytic con-                the difference between the dissolved inorganic car-
tribution, indicating that it caused a greater minerali-              bon (from the mineralisation of organic matter) deter-

Fig. 4. Influence of pH on TOC removal during NTS ozonation. T 298 K. (䉬) pH 2.3 without carbon; (䉫) pH 2.3 with carbon; (䊏) pH
7 with carbon; (䊐) pH 7 without carbon.
326                  J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329

mined in the presence and absence of activated car-                  ash content), with the demineralised sample showing
bon yields a measurement of the catalytic effect of                  similar behaviour to that of the original Witco car-
the activated carbon on TOC removal (DIC). In fact,                 bon. Fig. 5 depicts, as an illustration, the results of
Table 4, which includes DIC values, shows that the                  NTS ozonation in the presence of both demineralised
increase in inorganic carbon due to the presence of                  and original Ceca GAC carbon samples. These find-
activated carbon is very similar to the experimentally               ings indicate that the mineral matter in activated car-
determined value of the catalytic contribution of the                bon must contribute positively to the catalytic activity
carbon to the overall removal of organic matter. These               of the carbons in NTS ozonation.
results confirm the goodness of the method used to                      In a previous study [33], we discovered that car-
determine the contribution of the catalytic process to               bon demineralisation treatment using HCl and HF did
the overall removal of organic matter.                               not affect the concentration of oxygen surface groups.
                                                                     Moreover, the pHPZC values of our demineralised ac-
3.2.3. Influence of mineral matter present in carbon                 tivated carbons, determined in the present study, are
on its catalytic activity                                            similar to those of the original carbons. Thus, the lower
                                                                     degradation rate of NTS in the presence of deminer-
3.2.3.1. Effect of carbon demineralisation treatment                 alised carbon would be mainly due to a reduction in
on NTS oxidation rate. Al Hayek et al. [29] reported                 its mineral matter content.
that phenol ozonation was enhanced in the presence of                   The increase in the extent of ozonation reactions
Fe(III) supported on alumina. Karpel Vel Letimer et                  with heterogeneous catalysis is an incipient method-
al. [30] found that ozonation of salicylic acid, peptides            ology and there is still considerable uncertainty about
and dissolved humic substances was enhanced when                     the mechanism by which the metals produce decom-
supported metals were present. Moreover, the catalytic               position of the ozone in aqueous phase. Among the
activity of MnO2 and TiO2 to decompose ozone in                      metals, Mn has been the most widely studied. Ma and
aqueous phase is widely known [31,32].                               Graham [34] reported that MnO2 , formed in situ by
   In order to quantify the extent to which mineral mat-             ozonation of atrazine in the presence of small amounts
ter present in activated carbon affects ozonation, ex-               of Mn(II), leads to a much greater degree of atrazine
periments were conducted using demineralised carbon                  oxidation by ozone. The authors ascribed these re-
samples. In all carbons, the rate of NTS ozonation was               sults to the generation of highly oxidative intermediate
reduced when the activated carbon used was deminer-                  species, although they did not propose the mechanism
alised. The only exception was Witco carbon (0.3%                    involved. Andreozzi et al. [31] described a significant

 Fig. 5. Effect of Ceca GAC activated carbon demineralisation on NTS ozonation. pH 2.3, T 298 K. (䊐) Untreated; (䊏) demineralised.
J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329                 327

Fig. 6. Effect of Ceca GAC activated carbon demineralisation on TOC removal during NTS ozonation. pH 2.3, T 298 K. (䊐) Untreated;
(䊏) demineralised.

improvement in oxalic acid ozonation at acidic pH in-                   As above, experiments were performed at a pH 7
duced by the presence of MnO2 , although they did not                to observe the increase in DIC produced by the pres-
account for these findings.                                          ence of demineralised activated carbon in the system
   All of the metals that showed catalytic activity in               (Table 5), which was slightly lower than that produced
ozonation processes in organic compounds are part                    by the presence of the original carbons (Table 4). The
of the mineral matter of the activated carbons used                  present results indicate that the generation of highly
(Table 3). However, it is difficult to ascertain the role            oxidative species that participate in TOC removal is
of each metal in the catalyzed ozonation of NTS.                     reduced when demineralised carbon is used. This con-
   The present results showed that some components                   firms that the mineral matter present in activated car-
of the mineral matter of carbons behave as active                    bon intervenes in the ozone decomposition into highly
centres in the decomposition of ozone in aqueous                     oxidative species.
phase, enhancing NTS ozonation. Nevertheless, fur-                      Interestingly, the ozonation of activated carbon in
ther research is required to identify the mechanism by               the absence of NTS was little affected by deminer-
which this matter operates in the process of catalytic               alisation pre-treatment, as shown in Fig. 7. Indeed,
ozonation.                                                           ozonation of pre-treated and virgin Ceca GAC car-
                                                                     bon samples yielded similar dissolved TOC from
3.2.3.2. Influence of demineralisation treatment on                  the ozone attack to carbon, indicating that metallic
TOC removal. In all cases, the efficacy of the                       sites may not be involved in the generation of solu-
ozone/activated carbon system to remove dissolved
organic matter deriving from NTS degradation was                     Table 5
reduced when demineralised carbons were used.                        Dissolved inorganic carbon increase in the presence of deminer-
Fig. 6 shows, as an example, results obtained for                    alised activated carbon
NTS ozonation in the presence of both untreated and                  Activated carbon                                  DIC (mg/l)
demineralised Ceca GAC activated carbon samples.
                                                                     Filtrasorb 400                                    0.75
There was a lesser mineralisation of the dissolved                   Sorbo                                             1.85
organic matter as a result of the absence of mineral                 Merck                                             0.95
matter in the carbons. The absence of metallic sites                 Ceca GAC                                          0.44
on the carbon surface leads to a reduction in the con-               Ceca AC40                                         0.00
                                                                     Norit                                             0.34
centration of highly oxidative species that mineralise
                                                                     Witco                                             0.00
organic matter.
328                  J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329

Fig. 7. Effect of activated carbon demineralisation on TOC evolution during Ceca GAC ozonation. pH 2.3, T 298 K. (䊐) Untreated; (䊏)
demineralised.

ble by-products. However, the removal of this TOC                       The mineral matter present in activated carbons en-
from solution is also enhanced in the case of original               hanced their catalytic activity, increasing the rate of
activated carbon, which, again, points out the role                  NTS degradation and enhancing TOC removal, con-
of the mineral matter in the removal of TOC from                     tributing to the mineralisation of the organic material
solution.                                                            present in solution.

4. Conclusions                                                       Acknowledgements

   Basic activated carbons have greatest catalytic                     The authors thank the financial support pro-
activity in the ozonation process. The basal plane                   vided by the MCT-DGI and FEDER (Project:
electrons and oxygenated surface groups of basic                     PPQ2001-3246-C02-01).
nature (chromene and pyrone) in activated carbons
are mostly responsible for ozone decomposition in                    References
aqueous phase. The ozone reduction on the surface
of activated carbon generated OH− ions or H2 O2                       [1] R. Andreozzi, V. Caprio, A. Insola, R. Marotta, Catal. Today
that initiated the decomposition of ozone in aqueous                      53 (1999) 51.
                                                                      [2] J. Hoigné, H. Bader, Water Res. 10 (1976) 377.
phase into highly oxidative species, which are re-                    [3] A.D. Nadezdin, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27 (1988) 377.
sponsible for the increase in the NTS ozonation rate.                 [4] M.C. Yeber, J. Rodrı́guez, J. Freer, J. Baeza, N. Durán, H.D.
Furthermore, these species are able to mineralise dis-                    Mansilla, Water Sci. Technol. 40 (1999) 337.
solved organic matter, decreasing the TOC. A high                     [5] J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo, C.A. Zaror, J. Chem.
                                                                          Tech. Biotech., in press.
macroporosity in carbon also enhances the ozonation
                                                                      [6] B. Legube, N. Karpel Vel Letimer, Catal. Today 53 (1999) 61.
process, reducing diffusion problems and, therefore,                  [7] C.G. Hewes, R.R. Davinson, Water AICHE Symp. Series 69
favouring access of the ozone to the active centres of                    (1972) 71.
the carbon surface.                                                   [8] M.S.E. Abdo, H. Shaban, M.S.H. Bader, J. Environ. Sci.
   Ozone attacks activated carbon, leading to soluble                     Health A23 (1988) 697.
                                                                      [9] R. Gracia, J.L. Aragues, J.L. Oveilleiro, Water Res. 32 (1998)
organic matter production that increases the dissolved                    57.
TOC concentration in the first part of ozonation, par-               [10] R. Andreozzi, A. Insola, V. Caprio, M.G. D’Amore, Water
ticularly in the case of basic carbon.                                    Res. 26 (1992) 917.
J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39 (2002) 319–329                    329

[11] G. McKay, G. McAleavey, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 66 (1988)            [24] L.R. Radovic, C. Moreno-Castilla, J. Rivera-Utrilla, in: L.R.
     532.                                                                   Radovic (Ed.), Chemical and Physical Carbon, Vol. 27,
[12] C.A. Zaror, J. Chem. Tech. Biotech. 70 (1997) 21.                      Marcel-Dekker, New York, 2000, p. 227.
[13] U. Jans, J. Hoigné, Ozone Sci. Eng. 20 (1998) 67.                 [25] J. Staehelin, J. Hoigné, Environ. Sci. Tech. 16 (1982)
[14] C.A. Zaror, R. Arriagada, H. Peña, Env. Tech., in press.               676.
[15] M. Sánchez-Polo, J. Rivera-Utrilla, C.A. Zaror, J. Chem.          [26] J. Staehelin, J. Hoigné, Environ. Sci. Tech. 19 (1985)
     Tech. Biotech. 77 (2002) 148.                                          1206.
[16] J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo, C.A. Zaror, Phys. Chem.       [27] M. Gurol, P. Singer, Environ. Sci. Tech. 16 (1982) 377.
     Chem. Phys. 4 (2002) 1129.                                        [28] J. Sotelo, F. Beltrán, F. Benitez, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 26
[17] H. Bader, J. Hoigné, Water Res. 15 (1981) 449.                         (1987) 39.
[18] M.E. Morgan, R.G. Jenkins, P.L. Walker, Fuel 60 (1981) 189.       [29] N. Al Hayek, B. Legube, M. Doré, Environ. Tech. Lett. 10
[19] M.A. Ferro-Garcı́a, J. Rivera-Utrilla, I. Bautista-Toledo, C.          (1989) 415.
     Moreno-Castilla, Langmuir 14 (1998) 1880.                         [30] N. Karpel Vel Letimer, B. Delouane, B. Legube, F. Luck,
[20] H.P. Boehm, Adv. Catal. 16 (1966) 179.                                 Ozone Sci. Eng. 21 (1999) 261.
[21] H. Valdés, M. Sánchez-Polo, J. Rivera-Utrilla, C.A. Zaror,        [31] R. Andreozzi, A. Insola, V. Caprio, R. Marotta, V. Tugano,
     Langmuir 18 (2002) 2111.                                               Appl. Catal. A Gen. 138 (1996) 75.
[22] O. Legrini, E. Oliveros, A.M. Braun, Chem. Rev. 93 (1993)         [32] H. Allemane, B. Delouane, H. Paillard, B. Legube, Ozone
     671.                                                                   Sci. Eng. 15 (1993) 419.
[23] N. Bhat, M.D. Gurol, in: Proceedings of the Conference on         [33] C. Moreno-Castilla, F. Carrasco-Marı́n, F.J. Maldonado-
     27th Industrial Waste Mid-Atlantic, Bethlehem, PA, USA,                Hódar, J. Rivera-Utrilla, Carbon 36 (1998) 145.
     1995, p. 371.                                                     [34] J. Ma, N.J.D. Graham, Ozone Sci. Eng. 19 (1997) 227.
You can also read