Hubble, Galaxies and Expanding Universe

Page created by Stephen Keller
 
CONTINUE READING
Hubble, Galaxies and Expanding Universe
Hubble,
Galaxies and
    the
 Expanding
  Universe
Hubble, Galaxies and Expanding Universe
Bases of modern cosmology
 General relativity (gravity)
 Physics of elementary particles
 Observational results of 20th-century
  astronomy (optical, radio, x-ray, γ-ray,
  ultraviolet)
Hubble, Galaxies and Expanding Universe
Task of lecture
   New “tools” of observational astronomy,
    1850-1920
   The “Great Debate” of 1920 on the nature of
    nebulae
   Erwin Hubble’s observational work
     Galaxies are “island universes” outside the Milky
      Way
     Expanding universe of galaxies

   The rise of astrophysics in America
Tools: Photography
   Daguerreotypes (1839) and wet plates (1840):
    sunspots and moon
   Dry plates (1870s): long exposures collect
    more light than eye alone, longer
    “integration” allows seeing fainter objects
     Shapes of nebulae, many new nebulae
     Accurate star maps
     Stellar motions and magnitudes
     Stellar spectra and classification
     Doppler-shifted spectra
Tools: Mountain observatories
    Advantages of reflectors by c. 1910
      Achromatic   optics
      larger mirrors supported at back
      glass quality not so important
      shorter focal lengths mean shorter tubes
       and smaller domes
Lens                                           Mirror

       Refractor
                                   Reflector
The world’s biggest telescopes
   Lord Rosse’s “Leviathan”, 1845
              72” reflector (speculum mirror)
   Lick Observatory (SE of San Francisco), 1880s
              36” refractor
   Mt. Wilson Observatory (above Los Angeles), 1910s
              100” reflector
   Mt. Palomar Observatory (SE of Pasadena), 1940s
              200” reflector
   After 1970, “smarter” replaces “bigger”
              Multiple mirrors, new detectors (charge-coupled devices),
               computer image processing, adaptive optics, space
               telescopes, radio/x-ray/infrared telescopes
   Largest optical telescope: VLT in Chile
              Four mirrors each 8.2m (=320”) or area of one 16m (=630”)
Biggest telescopes, 1850-1950
                           Mount
                           Wilson
               Rosse’s
               Leviathan

                                    Mount Palomar
 Lick
 Observatory
Tools: Cepheid variable stars
   Variable supergiants
     Luminosity cycles of 1-100 days
     Stars pulsate in size, post-Main Sequence

   Henrietta Leavitt at Harvard, 1908
        – 24 cepheids in Small Magellanic Cloud, i.e., all same distance
        – Found period-luminosity relation
   Harlow Shapley, Mt. Wilson, 1918
        – Measures distance to 11 cepheids
        with trigonometric parallax (solar motion)
        – Calibrates cepheids as distance
        indicators, i.e, as “standard candles”
How big is the “universe?”
Jacob Kapteyn’s “stellar system” model, 1910s
      – Based on star counts, proper motions, ,statistics, no absorption

                                                 3,000 pc
Shapley’s globular cluster model, 1918
                                                            Globular
                        Sun
                              8000 pc                       clusters
                                        Center
                                        of MW

                    Overall diameter = 100,000 pc!
Competing models of
nebulae, 1900-1925
                           MW
I. Nebulae =
Island                    Sun
universes           M31

        MW                Sun

                  M31

II. Nebulae = Gas clouds in Milky Way
“Great Debate” on scale of
universe
   National Academy of Sciences, April 1920
   Shapley’s “Large Universe” model (Mt. Wilson)
       – Milky Way large (dia 100,000 pc) and contains all nebulae
              Distance to globular clusters from cephieds
       – M31 close (from “nova” seen in 1885)
       – “Zone of avoidance” (most nebulae observed around poles
         of MW galaxy) means nebulae “know” where MW is and
         are located within it (orbit its center?)
       – van Maanen’s observed rotating spirals must be close or else
         arms would move at v > c if those spirals were size of MW
       – THUS, Milky Way galaxy comprises the entire universe!
Van Maanen’s rotation of M33

     Non-reproducible observations!
The “Great Debate” continued
   Heber Curtis’s “Island Universes” model (Lick)
       Milky Way small (dia=10,000 pc) and nebulae are
        other island universes like MW
         – Distance to globular clusters from average stars
     M31 far (observed “nova” in the nebula)
     “Zone of avoidance” means few nebulae in MW so
      most observed nebulae must be extragalactic
     van Maanen’s spirals? Bad data and must be rejected!
         – Curtis’s own observations showed NO rotation of arms
Hubble confirms island
universes, 1923-25
   – Hubble to Shapley, 1923: “You will be interested to hear
     that I have found a Cepheid in M31. I have followed the
     nebula closely this season and in the last five months
     have netted 9 novae and 2 variables .... The distance
     comes out to something over 300,000 pc.”
   – Shapley replies: “This letter destroyed my universe!”
   – Curtis was right about island universes, wrong on size
     of Milky Way
          MW is 30,000 pc in diameter, 200 pc thick
          M31 is ca. 800,000 pc away from MW
Shapley loses the battle, but
wins the war
   Shapley loses the “great debate” ...
     Shapley’s “nova” were “supernovae,” i.e., he
      placed M31 too close
     van Maanen’s data on rotational rates could not
      be replicated
     Interstellar absorption in MW makes Shapley’s
      cepheids closer (“faintness means farness”
      disrupted by absorption)
   But Shapley succeeds Pickering as Director
    of Harvard Observatory in 1921 (retired 1952)
Hubble’s expanding universe
   Earliest cosmological models by Einstein
    were static
   Vesto Slipher in 1910s measured redshifts of
    22 spiral nebulae, but had no distances
       Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ
   Other observers sought distance-velocity
    relationship for globular clusters, but data
    were ambiguous
       In an expanding universe would expect a
        distance-velocity relationship
Distance versus velocity in an
expanding universe
Raisin Bread:
                  T=0
                              T = later

Universe:

       T=0
                  T = later
Hubble’s Distance-Vel relation
   How to measure distances to far nebulae with
    various “standard candles”
     Distances to 6 nebulae via cepheids
     Then distances to 14 nebulae via brightest stars
     Then distances to 22 via luminosity of nebula

   Redshifts easier to measure
   Hubble’s Law: V = H0D,
     H0 = slope of line,
                                   Vel
    or Hubble Constant
     Assume constant velocity
     Exanding universe!!                    Distance
Hubble’s 1929 diagram

        From http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/d_1996/hub_1929.html (6 May 2003)
Implications of Hubble’s Law
 Farther away a galaxy is, the faster it
  recedes (i.e., expanding universe)
 Can use Hubble Law to estimate
  distances from measured redshifts
 Hubble age of expansion
     – V = H0D
     – But V also = D/T, so 1/H0 = T of expansion
     – H0(1929) = 540 km/sec/Mpc, or T = 2 billion yrs
     – H0(2005) ≈ 72 km/sec/Mpc, or T = 14 b yrs
Problems with Hubble Age
   Gravity slows expansion so Hubble Law
    overestimates age
     Went faster earlier
     Has taken less time to reach current state

   Accelerating forces may also affect
    assumption of uniform velocity
       Einstein’s cosmological constant is back!
   Hubble’s “distance ladder” was flawed (not
    all galaxies have same intrinsic brightness)
You can also read