LOCALIZING THE SDGS IN COLOMBIAN CITIES - TWITTER: @REDCOMOVAMOSCOL - #CÓMOVAMOS - SDSN TRENDS
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Cómo Vamos Cities Network ● Private and civil society partnership focused on the generation of reliable, comparable and trustworthy city-level data. ● Contribute to the development of more transparent and effective local governments and responsable, participative and informed citizenships. ● 16 programs around Colombia, gathering more than 35 municipalities, including 13 capital cities (Bogota, Medellin, Cali among others). ● 20 years of experience (1st program, Bogota 1998)
General objective
Contribute to the localization
of the SDGs in colombian
cities through the design and
development of a city-
tailored toolkit for the
priorization of 2030 urban
targets and indicators,
aggregated on a open data
urban dashboard.
*The project has been developed together with tgraduate students from the University of Columbia (SIPA)Enabling environment
1. Context: 78% urban population, 80% GDP,
System of cities (50 cities > 100K)
2. National policy and institutional framework
(CONPES, White paper, 2018)
3. Multi-level governance: high levels of
devolution, specially in planning.
4. Multi-stakeholder approach: active but not
sufficient involvement with other actors.
5. Weakened national urban policy and weak
linkages with other key agendas (Rural).
6. Robust subnational finance framework
7. Accountability: solid public and private
initiatives (e.g. RCCV) *Based on UCLG and SDSN conceptual frameworksUrban Alliance - 5 urban challenges
• Contribution to the definition of a national urban policy aligned with the SDGs,
the 2030 Agenda and other national priorities (e.g. Peace Process).
• Identification of 78 “urban” targets and 2015 baseline for 13 cities.
Poverty, informality and inequality
Quality of education
Climate action and urban resilience
Sustainable and inclusive communities
Citizen secutiry, peace and gender inequalityUrban Toolkit and Dashboard
#
1 •Evaluation PHASES TYPE CATEGORIES
IND./SDG
aligned with 4
Localization year Local Govt. Tier 1
state Plans 1 Main indicator (National Level)
(Methodology and data available)
1 Main indicator (National and subnational level) Tier 1
Phase 1
2 (2015-2020) Secondary indicators
City •Goals, targets 2 Tier 1
(Subnational level)
Performanc and indicators
e Tier 2
New indicators
1+ (Methodology exists but data not
(Subnational level - Flexible)
widely available)
Phase 2 Tier 2-3
5 New indicators (Subnational level)
•Citizen (2021-2025) (Methodology in development)
3 participation, Phase 3 Tier 3
Citizenship awareness, 5 New indicators (Subnational level)
(2026-2030) (Methodology in development)
appropiation
*Reference: Klopp (2017)Urban Toolkit and Dashboard
CONPES
CONPES
Meta Meta Mejor ciudad del Valores de Valores de
ODS Nombre del Indicador Fuente Línea Base Meta CONPES Meta internacional Valores de ref. Disponibilidad
ODS Proyectada grupo ref.2 ref.3
2015*
a 2030
12 12.5 Tasa de reciclaje y nueva utilización de residuos sólidos Ciudatos 8,6% 17,9% X BID (mayor a 10%) X >10 5-10 7.5 7.5-3 54,75% 23,98% - 54,74% < 23,97% Disponible
Se cuenta con un Se cuenta con un No se cuenta con
17 17.1 Existencia de presupuesto participativo BID Disponible
esquema de esquema de esquemas de
Observatorio de Transparencia y
17 17.1 Índice de Desempeño Fiscal OTyC 100-70 70-40 40-0 Disponible
Corrupción
7Recent achievements
Selected as international Included in Colombia’s most Co-authors of Colombia’s 1st Included as part of Terridata
best practice recent VNR Light Report¡Gracias!
Luis Hernán Sáenz
National Coordinator
RCCV- Colombia redcomovamos@gmail.com
Facebook: /RedComoVamosCol
Twitter: @redcomovamoscol
www.redcomovamos.org
Twitter: @redcomovamoscol - #CómoVamosYou can also read