PATPARGANJ Slum Redevelopment Scheme, Ward Number 220 - CITY LEVEL PROJECTS - Delhi Urban Art Commission
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CITY LEVEL PROJECTS PATPARGANJ Slum Redevelopment Scheme, Ward Number 220
(An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certiied Organisation) Delhi Urban Art Commission Prof. Dr. P.S.N. Rao Chairman Sonali Bhagwati Member Samir Mathur Member Sonali Rastogi Member Durga Shanker Mishra Member & Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development Vinod Kumar Secretary DUAC Staf Rajeev Kumar Gaur, Raghvendra Singh, Amit Mukherji, V. K.Tyagi, Uma Bhati, Nishi Sachdeva, Manju Anjali, Siddharth Sagar, Indu Rawat, Nihal Chand Senior Consultant Dr. Aruna Ramani Grover Satish Khanna Consultants Sulabh Goel Nikhil Pandey (3D Visulizer)
Preface
DELHI URBAN ART COMMISSION with gratitude duly acknowledges the valuable contributions of the
following in making this report:
Raj Rewal Former Chairman, DUAC
The city of Delhi, capital of this vast land of diversities, is a city laden with layers of history,
Satish Khanna Former Member, DUAC
Eric P. Mall Former Member, DUAC a place where civilizations have lived, prospered and perished over centuries. The modern
D. Diptivilasa Former Member DUAC & Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development city today, built over and around a rich tapestry of heritage, presents an opportunity
at every turn, to allow for co-existence of the past, present and the future. In order to
understand this multidimensional urban spectrum and attempt to plan the future, various
Organisations/Others city level studies have been initiated by the DUAC. I hope that these studies will help
Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India the planners of modern day Delhi to carefully articulate urban space, structure, form and
Delhi Development Authority environment and sensitively address future requirements.
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
I convey my thanks to all the Consultants and Members of the Commission who have
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
tirelessly worked on this research project to bring out this document. I also take this
East Delhi Municipal Corporation
opportunity to place on record my sincere appreciation of the efforts of Secretary and
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
other staff of DUAC for providing the necessary administrative support to make this
New Delhi Municipal Council
happen.
Geospatial Delhi Limited
I fondly hope that the authorities of the local, state and national government take these
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
studies seriously and implement, in right earnest, the suggestions given herein.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
March, 2015 Sd/-
BSES Yamuna Power Limited Prof. Dr. P.S.N. Rao
RWA Chairman, DUAC
Contents Summary
1 Slum Context 6 As per the Shelter Policy of MPD 2021, 50-55% of the 24 lakh additional dwelling units
to be provided in the plan period would be for the Urban Poor and economically weaker
1.1 Location, Connectivity and Land Use 7
1.2 MPD 2021 Requirements 8 sections in the form of houses of two rooms or less. In the existing slum settlements, the
threefold strategy of relocation from areas required for public purpose, in-situ up-gradation
1.3 Patparganj Slum 9
and the interim measure of upgradation to minimum standards is to be followed.
1.4 Existing Condition/Situations 10
2 Design Proposals 12
Objective In keeping with the above framework the Delhi Urban Art Commission
2.1 Site Restructuring 12
has undertaken alternative site speciic housing design options for slums in
2.2 Development Details 13
Patparganj which falls under the Municipal Ward No. 220.
2.3 Design Intent Option 1 14
2.3.1 Layout Concept 14
2.3.2 Cluster Concept 14
Design Intent The intent was to explore options which accommodate the owners as
2.3.3 Residential Unit Concept 14
well as rented population within the limits of the site geometry and size.
2.4 Design 15
2.4.1 Details for Pocket A 15
2.4.2 Design Proposal Pocket A 16
2.4.3 Design Calculation-Pocket A 16 Outcome Explorations have resulted in alternative design options for in-situ
2.4.4 Cluster Design 17 rehabilitation of the slum population in Patparganj.
2.4.5 Details 18
2.5 Design Intent Option 2 19 It has also resulted in establishing some insight into the inter-relationships
2.5.1 Layout Concept 19 of governing norms of FAR, density, ground coverage and setback norms.
2.5.2 Cluster Concept 19
2.5.3 Residential Unit Concept 19
2.6 Design 20
2.6.1 Details for Pocket D 20
2.6.2 Design Proposal Pocket D 21
2.6.3 Design Calculation-Pocket D 21
2.6.4 Cluster Design 22
2.6.5 Details 23
2.7 Comparision 24
3 Future Direction and Recommendations 24
3.1 On Design Intent 24
3.2 Outcome 24
3.3 Recommendations 24
SLUM CONTEXT
SLUM CONTEXT
For Economically Weaker Section Housing, the Master Plan 1.1 Location, Connectivity and Land Use
of Delhi 2021 and the National Building Code of India 2005
recommend a small unit size. This size is in keeping with Patparganj slums are located in r
ha pass
GT R
Vi tion Vinod Nagar West y
affordability of the beneiciary in the irst instance and their Municipal Ward Boundary Number d
an Sta ur B
Hap
oad
inancial capacity to retain it subsequently. 220 and is surrounded by DDA lats An ay 24
East
o
T ai w
R
l NH
With this income group it is the failure of the latter which Delhi of Mayur Vihar Phase II to the east,
pushes the head of the family to sell the house as a commodity the Yamuna riverfront to the west
Akshardham
in the market at every potential inancial crunch. Lack of and Vinod Nagar in the north. Metro Station Mayur Phase II
inancial security forces a family of 5–6 to live in a small shelter rg The area is connected to the rest
Ma
as Sanjay Lake
unit with a carpet area of 25 sq m. Vik 2 4 of the city through NH 24 and Noida
NH
This miniscule unit with four or ive independent, internal Link Road. The other form of mass
Slums
ad
spaces, i.e. 1–2 rooms, kitchen, bathroom and balcony providing rapid transit system connecting the
Ro
direct light and ventilation, implies a rather intricate spatial
Outer Ring
area is Delhi Metro, which is at a Patparganj
ng
Road
Ya
No
Me
m
Ri
Ward no
To M
un
organization which has many interstitial open to sky spaces. walkable distance. Landmarks in the
a
To
ida ine
tro
220
athur
Simmilarly when a family of 5-6, sometimes across 3 vicinity are Commonwealth Village
Lin
L
r
a
pu
Jai
in
kR
generations, is forced to live in 25 sq m of indoor area, the and Akshardham Temple.
ra
To
oa
D
space immediately outside the unit becomes very valuable, The land use is predominantly
d
t
ur
Cu
Mayur Vihar I
ip
reinforced by the requirements of the social family structure. residential. The site is surrounded
az
on
Metro Station
Gh
This calls for careful crafting of the built and the open along by an unauthorized area, planned
nd
Hi
with apportioning of common spaces around the unit. Delhi Key Map housing and an urban village.
Schools, healthcare facilities and Local Transport and Road Network
the largest recreational facility of East Legend
ass
Byp Area of Intervention Major Roads City Drains/
apur Delhi, ‘Sanjay Lake’, are at a walkable Water Bodies
24 H distance.
NH Metro Northern Railway
Legend
Schools Dispensary Parks and Playgrounds Post Ofice
Mother
Dairy Mayur Vihar Phase II Key Map Sanjay Lake
Akshardham Ward no 219 Pandav
Metro Station Nagar
R oad
Sanjay Lake
Sanjay Lake
Slum
Patparganj Sanjay Lake
Ward no 220 View
Study Area
Slum 6.6 ha Apartments
in
ra
rD
Dellopura II
ipu
Ward no 211
t
Cu
az
Gh
on
nd
Hi
Patparganj Urban Village
Patp
New Ashok Nagar
Ward no 212 arga
nj R
oad
Legend
Area of Study
Other Wards Boundary
Area of Study and Ward Boundaries Landmarks and land use in the vicinity
6 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 7
SLUM CONTEXT
SLUM CONTEXT
1.2 MPD 2021 Requirements 1.3 Patparganj Slum
Pandav N Pandav N
With the Master Plan of Delhi 2021 agar Roa
d
agar Roa
d
Patparganj slum is a cluster of ive
specifying a density of 900 dwelling School 21% School 21.7% camps.
31. 8%
2.5% 18.2%
units per hectare for this income 55% 20.3% 8% In 1988 the two camps of Shastri
group in keeping with the high costs 18% and Jawahar Mohalla were established
of urban land in the city, the human 3.5% Percentage on-site on this site. Over the decades they
footprint is enhanced manifold in an 4 3 have widened the lanes and built a
Existing Land
EWS housing area. Use Distribution
larger number of pucca houses
In 1990 the other camps came
Sanjay Lake View
Sanjay Lake into existence when people were
Apartments
View Apartment
Existing Demographics evacuated from the site of the
Ownership = DDA
1 Mother Dairy plant at Patparganj.
Patparganj Patparganj
Status = Slum Village Village The population comprises many
Total Site Area = 6.6 ha generations of migrants from Uttar
Open Area = 1.18 ha Pradesh and Bihar.
Total Slum Area = 5.34 ha 2
Ground Coverage = 46.3%
5
Existing FAR = 1.13 Legend
Owner Population = 10505 Commercial
Rented Population = 10000 Residential 1. Mahatma Gandhi Camp
Open Spaces 2. Khoka Patri Camp
Gross Population = 20505 3. Ram Prasad Bismil Camp
Existing DUs = 4556 Social Infrastructure 4. Shastri Mohalla
Shashi Garden
Circulation (16%) 5. Jawahar Mohalla
Popu. Density/ha = 683
PPL/DUs =5
Avg. Unit Size = 9-12 sq m Land use map for Patparganj Slum Patparganj Slum Boundaries Jawahar Mohalla
Pandav
Pandav Nagar
Nagar
Ro Sanjay Lake Road
ad School
School
Sanjay Lake
View Apts
Patparganj Urban Village
Mahatma Gandhi Camp Khoka Patri Camp Ram Prasad Bismil Camp
Existing Housing Typology
Key Map
• The average size of dwelling • Single Men – In Dormitories
Existing Figure Ground Map
Socio-economic units is 9–20 sq m. • Small Family (3-4) – In one-room units
Characteristics • The rented population mostly • Extended Family (5-6) – In two-
a. The men living in the slums are lives on upper level. room unit
labourers, drivers, rickshaw-pullers,
ofice peons, petty shopkeepers,
Plot Sizes (sq m) No. of Units (%)
and rehriwalas. Extended
b. Many women are working as maids Less than 7 20
and labourers. 7-15 35 Dormitories (Single Men)
c. The average household income is 20%
Small Family (3-4) 35%
15-25 26
Rs. 8000–10,000/- in one-room unit 45%
d. There are primary, secondary and 25-35 14 Extended Family
senior secondary schools run by (5-6) in two-room unit
SLUM CONTEXT
SLUM CONTEXT
1.4 Existing Condition/Situations Structure Built Conditions Rooing
Mixed varieties of built conditions A maximum of G+2 structures with Aluminium/asbestos sheets for
Pandav
Services were observed as per site conditions several issues which need to be taken single-storeys and G. I. sections with
Nagar R The camp has inadequate basic depending upon the needs. Though care of. The average street widths local red sandstone slabs for G+1
School oad
amenities like toilets, proper the construction has been restricted vary from 0.75 m to 1 m. structures respectively, were the types
4 sewerage and other facilities. within a boundary wall by local of rooing conditions which were
Moreover, lack of proper bodies, a temporary extension could spotted in the residential dwelling
maintenance is a major concern. be seen on all the sides of the site. units. Use of RCC slabs were also
6
1
Ladders are used to climb to the seen for some newly constructed
3 1
upper loors due to lack of space buildings (temple shelters).
for constructing a common staircase,
2 Sanjay Lake View which could have been shared by a
Apartments group of dwelling units.
5
7 Inadequate services
Patparganj Urban Village
2
Shashi Garden
Poorly maintained parks and playgrounds
Existing Area Layout for Patparganj Slums
Open Spaces
There are 8 open spaces of varying
sizes in the settlement with a gross area
Dwelling Unit (DUs) Parking & Accessibility of 1.18 ha. To prevent encroachment
Typology On-road parking for scooters and the Delhi Development Authority has
DU typologies were found, with cycle-rickshaws encroach upon the enclosed these spaces by 1.5 m high
several loors relecting the changing pedestrian walking areas and ROWs. boundary walls. Depending upon size
family needs of increasing numbers. Connectivity by public transport also and location, these open spaces are
In some cases, additional loors have is an issue with people walking to the used as playgrounds, spaces for civil and
been added to be rented out to main road for travelling. religious events, parking and dumping
enhance the family income. yards.
Pandav
Nagar
Road
3 4
Different DU typology existing is the area Approach road to the site
5 6 Area Map Showing Open Spaces
7
DU typology according to needs Encroached ROWs Open Spaces are used as dumping grounds
10 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 11
DESIGN PROPOSALS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.1 Site Restructuring 2.2 Development Details
Site Statistics Shelter Unit
Pa
nd The Shelter Policy of Master Plan of Delhi 2021 stipulates the need to carefully calibrate the equation between Floor
av
1 Site Area 6.6 ha Na Area Ratio (FAR) and density for optimum land utilization. It has been observed that in the irst two Master Plan
g ar
Petrol Ro periods, housing areas have not fully delivered the envisaged FAR, leading to underutilization of infrastructure. In general
2 Parks & Playgrounds 0.44 ha a
Pump d the stipulated FAR for housing is 200, but MPD 2021 also recommends enhancement of FAR by 50% in sites located
Pocket A in the vicinity of Metro corridors and signiicant road corridors. Due to the small unit size in the case of EWS housing,
3 Gross Area Available 5.08 ha 11791.6 sq m
meeting the target FAR is usually a challenge albeit the higher permissible ground coverage. This is in keeping with the
felt need that EWS housing must be low-rise, i.e. 2 to 3 loors, as the connection with the ground is crucial due to the
Total number of Remunerative Area
4 2101 7911.6 sq m small-unit size. This leads to the question of how to have higher FAR which ensures optimization of the value of urban
DUs
land and creates habitable high-rise living for the EWS community.
5 Population to be 10505
accommodated
Social
Pocket B Infrastructure
Bazaar 3683.1 3798.7 sq m
Community
Park
747.5 sq m Plot Details
sq m
2570.6 sq m 900 dwelling units per hectare; with plot sizes of 5.34 hectares this converts to 4806
1 Permissible Density dwelling units at Patparganj Slums
843.6
sq m Maximum of 400 wherever necessary although the norm of 200 as per residential group
2 Permissible FAR housing shall prevail
1857.5 s
Playgrou m
3 Shelter size 25 – 30 sq m
Legend 4 Ground Coverage Is subject to local conditions with the stipulation that setback shall be maintained.
q
Commercial (1.1%)
nd
5 Parking Norm 0.25 ECS per 100 sq m of total built-up area.
Residential (56.8%)
Open Spaces (6.8%) Pocket D Pocket C
Social Infrastructure (7%)
11603.4 sq m 10429.3 sq m
Remunerative Area (12%)
Proposed Circulation (16.3%)
Existing Road Shelter Details
1 Heights
Structure Plan Maximum of 15 m for low-rise development with staircase; lifts to be provided for
1.1 Building height buildings beyond 15 m
1.2 Habitable room Minimum of 2.6 m
As per MPD 2021 1.3 Kitchen Minimum of 2.6 m
Redevelopment Schemes for Slum/EWS/JJ Clusters/In-Situ Development should follow certain guidelines as stated
below: 1.4 Bath/WC or combined Minimum of 2.1 m
Minimum plot size 2000 sq m (facing 9 m Road) 1.5 Corridor Minimum of 2.1 m
Density Norm Slum/EWS = 900 DUs/ha+15% variation 1.6 Staircase Minimum of 2.1 m
DU Size = 25- 30 sq m
2 Room Size
Maximum FAR = 400
Mixed Use = 10% of FAR 2.1 Habitable room A minimum of 12.5 sq m in a one-room shelter unit
Where there are 2 rooms, the irst room shall be a minimum of 9.5 sq m (minimum side
Land use distribution of site 2.5 m) and the second a minimum of 6.5 sq m (minimum side 2.1 m)
By retaining the existing community spaces and recognizing the surrounding road network, the proposed land 2.2 Kitchen Minimum area of 3.3 sq m with minimum side of 1.5 m
use distribution has taken into account the meaningful relationship of order of internal spaces and site periphery.
2.3 Water closet Minimum area of 0.9 sq m with minimum side of 0.9 m
Remunerative area and social infrastructure has been located along the main road on a prime piece of land in order to
make the scheme feasable. The greens have been strategically located centrally, keeping in mind the accessibility issues 2.4 Bath Minimum area of 1.2 sq m with minimum side of 1.0 m
for people coming in from nearby areas for weekly markets along with a large common green which can be used by 2.5 Combined bath and WC Minimum area of 1.8 sq m with minimum side of 1.0 m
neighbouring areas 2.6 Balcony Minimum of 0.9 m width to a maximum of 1.2 m width and not to overhang above roads
A. Social Infrastructure (7%): already includes a mosque and a temple. Proposal includes two Primary Schools,
3.0 Staircase
two dispensaries and a banquet hall
B. Parks and Playgrounds (6.8%): includes common playground and space for Rehri Bazaar. 3.1 Flight Width Minimum of 0.9 m for 3 storeys and above
C. EWS Housing (56.8%): includes all typologies of EWS housing with tot lots and community service areas with 3.2 Riser Maximum of 200 mm
parking spaces
3.3 Tread Minimum of 250 mm
D. Remunerative Area (12%): which can be given to builder as incentive for construction of EWS and site development.
12 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 13
DESIGN PROPOSALS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.3 Design Intent Option 1 2.4 Design
2.3.1 Layout Concept The plan has been worked out on a module which has large central greens, commercial use along main roads and the
The layout concept takes into vehicles at the periphery. Population to be accommodated-10500.
account the existing social fabric Pa
nd Pocket D Pocket A
and connections that residents have av
N Site Area: 1.16 ha Site Area: 1.17 ha
created over decades of living. ag Community green DUs: 675 (G+4)
ar DUs: 675 (G+4)
located strategically
Ro Density: 581 DU/ha Density: 577 DU/ha
It generates a hierarchy of areas ad between three pockets to
Sr. Secondary
comprising public, semi-public, semi- Pocket A encourage use
School
private and private spaces within Remunerative Area
the site layouts and residential units,
creating secure spaces and a feeling
Co rk a)
of ownership.
mm
Pa 3 h
Pandav Nagar Road
(0
Spaces have been designed so as
un
.5
Petrol Pump
it y
Social
to encourage outdoor activities like Infrastructure
ar
walking, cycling, and social activities Pocket B Baza
Bazaar Remunerative
among all age groups. Type A Area (0.79 ha)
Community
Commercial and institutional Park a)
8h
buildings will be located at road ( 0.1
ro und
edges and junctions to create quiet yG
Pla
al
and safe residential pockets, with Soci tructure
s
Inf a
r Entry
access to parking. Main
Playgrou Pocket C
Type B
nd
Intermediate greens
Pocket B make places more active and
Pocket C allow for social interaction
Site Area: 1.04 ha Site Area: 0.37 ha
DUs: 215 (G+4) among the residents.
Pocket D DUs: 605 (G+4) Segregated children’s play
Density: 581DU/ha Density: 581DU/ha
area to accommodate their
2.3.2 Cluster Concept needs.
Residential units are organized Type C
around a courtyard which provides Site Layout Site Area: 6.6 hectares
Total no of DUs proposed: 2170
natural light, ventilation and safety. Residential area: 3.74 ha
This produces a healthy internal Area under social infrastructure: 0.46 ha
environment. Distribution of Dwelling Units Incentive to builder: 0.79 ha
The EWS units designed are 2.4.1 Details for Pocket A
modular and can be adapted
according to site variations, with 2.3.3 Residential Unit Concept Pandav
building heights of G+4. As vehicular There are openings provided in all rooms to facilitate maximum amount of School N agar Ro
ad
movement will be restricted to the natural light and ventilation. The door has been positioned to maximize the Total Site Area 1.17 ha
periphery, with access only during full potential of the 27.5-29 sq m carpet area provided by the scheme as the
emergencies, the distances between placement of doors and windows is crucial when designing small spaces. Ground Coverage 41.5%
buildings inside the cluster will vary
Sanjay Lake FAR 2.07
between 5-7 m. View
Apartments
Density 577 DUs
Type of Units G+4
Patparganj Urban No of DUs on
Village Ground Floor 135
Total no. of DUs 675
Legend 8 ECS +
Proposed Site Parking 70 two-
Pocket A wheelers
Unit -A Unit -B Unit -C Key Plan
14 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 15
DESIGN PROPOSALS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.4.2 Design Proposal Pocket A 2.4.4 Cluster Design
Banquet
Hall
Provision for parking along the pocket
periphery
Unit A
Interconnected EWS units blocks
B
Inclusive design for residential and green
spaces interwoven in the layout
A
C A
Vehicular movement along the main
7.5 ROW road
Plan of Type A Plan of Type B
View A
Road 7.5 m
Unit A - 36 sq m Unit A,B,C - 35 sq m
Ground + Four Floors Located in ive storey block
Rooms - 2, Kitchen, Toilet Rooms: 2 - Kitchen, Toilet, Balcony
Bigger open greens provided to control
Gross area - 36 sq m Gross area - 35 sq m
spillover of activities
Carpet area - 27.5 sq m Carpet area - 27.5/27/27 sq m
G+4
Parking
Unit C
Road 7.5 m
Informal bazaar to cater to daily needs of
the residents
Provision for social infrastructure
encouraging social interaction
Ground Floor Layout for Pocket A
2.4.3 Design Calculation-Pocket A
Pandav
School Nagar R
oad
Total Site Area 1.17 ha Module Unit Type A
Sanjay Lake View A
View Ground Coverage 41.5%
Apartments
View A Proposed Built-up on Covered Area DUs
Floors (ha)
Ground Floor Vehicular movement Encouraging Segregate area
0.415 135 on the periphery G+4 Structure pedestrianization of play
First Floor 0.415 135
A’
Second Floor 0.415 135
Patparganj Urban A
Village Third Floor 0.415 135
Total Built-up area 2.07
Legend
Pocket A FAR 2.07
Key Plan Section AA’: Showing skyline and road space utilization
16 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 17DESIGN PROPOSALS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.4.5 Details 2.5 Design Intent Option 2
G+4 Encouraging
Central Open Space Structure Pedestrianization 2.5.1 Layout Concept
In an attempt to accommodate
rented and owner population, a mix Pa
nd
of low to high-rise blocks are being av
N ag
proposed. ar
Roa
Apart from retaining the existing d
social infrastructure, the layout
Pocket A Remunerative Area
accommodates functions like an
Section AA’: Showing Skyline informal bazaar to cater to local
needs.
It also generates a hierarchy of
areas comprising public, semi-public,
semi-private and private spaces
Pocket B Social
within the site layouts and residential Infrastructure
Bazaar
units, creating a secured space and a Community
feeling of ownership. Park
Spaces have been designed so as
to encourage outdoor activities, like
walking, cycling, and social activities Type A
among all age groups. Pocket C
Commercial and institutional
Playgrou
buildings will be located at road
edges and junctions to create quiet
nd
and safe residential pockets, with
access to parking for residential Type B
pockets. Pocket D
Type C
View B
2.5.2 Cluster Concept
The EWS units designed are modular
Salient Features: and can be adapted according to Distribution of Dwelling Units
School
Pandav
Nagar R a. Provision of basic amenities in the form of dedicated site variations, with building heights
oad
spaces for community use and playgrounds. of G+4, S+9 and S+11. As vehicular
A’
b. Accommodation of all the inhabitants within the trafic will be restricted to the
area. periphery, with access only during
c. Providing better living conditions and an aesthetic emergencies, the distance inside the 2.5.3 Residential Unit Concept
Sanjay Lake quality for the redeveloped EWS housing. cluster will vary between 8-11 m. With the intent of accommodating the owner and rental population, the units
View
Apartments
The roof space will be utilized to are classiied as two-room and single units respectively. To facilitate maximum
allow homemakers/house-owners amount of natural light and ventilation, openings are provided in all rooms. The
to engage in activities that can be a unit size varies from 27.5–29 sq m carpet area.
View B
source of income.
A
Patparganj Urban
Village
Legend
Pocket A
Key Plan Unit -A Unit -B Unit -C
18 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 19DESIGN PROPOSALS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.6 Design 2.6.2 Design Proposal Pocket D
The plan has been worked out on a module that is self-suficient, self-contained, and provides for the daily needs of the
residents. Population to be accommodated–16855. Bazzar
Pocket A Provision of parking along the main
Community green located Site Area: 1.17 ha road for NMV’s and few cars
Pocket D
Site Area: 1.16 ha strategically, to segregate DUs: 1019
activities of all age groups (G+4,S+9/11) Community Informal bazaar to cater to daily needs
DUs: 1024 (G+4,S+9/11) Sr. Secondary
Density: 882 DU/ha and avoid conlict Density: 871DU/ha Park of the residents
School
Intermediate greens
make places more active and Provision for social infrastructure to
allow for social interaction encourage social interaction
G+4
Pandav N
among the residents.
Co
Pa mm Petrol Pump
rk un
agar Roa
ity
Remunerative G+9 Inclusive design for residential and
green spaces interwoven in the layout
d
ar
Baza Area (0.79 ha)
Playgrou
Pocket D
Vehicular movement along the main
7.5 ROW road
nd
S+11
Unit B
Road 7.5 m
re Segregated playground for children
d ial ctu
ou
n Soc astru ntry
Gr Infr Main E
y
Pla
G+4
Unit A
Parking
Site layout Pocket B
Site Area: 0.37 ha Stilt
DUs: 334 (S+9, S+11)
Density: 902 DU/ha m
Road 7.5
Pocket C
Site Area: 1.04 ha Ground Floor Layout for Pocket D
DUs: 934 (G+4, S+9/11) Site Area: 6.6 hectares
Density: 898 DU/ha Total no of DUs proposed: 3311
Residential area: 3.74 ha
Area under social infrastructure: 0.46 ha 2.6.3 Design Calculation-Pocket D
Incentive to builder: 0.79 ha
Pandav
School Nagar Ro
ad Total Site Area 1.16 ha
2.6.1 Details for Pocket D
Ground Coverage 33.7%
Pandav Proposed Built-up on Covered Area DUs
School Nagar R Floors (ha)
o ad
Sanjay Lake Ground Floor 0.39 118
Total Site Area 1.16 ha View
Apartments First Floor 0.46 150
Ground Coverage 33.7% Second Floor 0.46 150
Sanjay Lake
Third Floor 0.46 150
View FAR 3.1
Apartments Fourth Floor 0.46 150
Density 850 DUs Fifth Floor 0.24 54
Sixth Floor 0.24 54
Type of Units G+4/S+9/S+11 Seventh Floor 0.24 54
Patparganj Urban
Village No. of DUs on Ground Patparganj Urban Eight Floor 0.24 54
118 Village
Floor
Ninth Floor 0.24 54
Total no. of DUs 1024 Tenth/Eleventh Floor 0.09 18
Legend
Proposed Site Legend Total Built-up area 3.6
2 ECS + 60 two-
Pocket D Parking
wheelers Pocket D FAR 3.1
Key Plan Key Plan
20 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 21DESIGN PROPOSALS
DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.6.4 Cluster Design 2.6.5 Details
Central Open Space Stilt for Parking Encouraging Pedestrianization
B
Section BB’: Showing Skyline
C
A A
Plan of Type A Plan of Type B
Unit A: 25 sq m Unit A,B,C: 38 sq m
Ground + Four Floors Located: S+9/12 storey block
Rooms: 1, Kitchen, Toilet Rooms: 2, Kitchen, Toilet, Balcony
Gross area: 25 sq m Gross area: 38 sq m
Carpet area: 21.5 sq m Carpet area: 27.5/27/27 sq m
View B
Pandav
N
Salient Features:
agar Ro
a d a. Provision of basic amenities in the form of dedicated
Module Unit Type A View A: Showing surrounding urbanscape School
spaces for community use and playgrounds.
B’
b. Introduction of activity rooms which caters to
housewives who want to work, as well as for other
Vehicular movement on the periphery Activity Area Encouraging Pedestrianization Segregate area of play
Sanjay Lake social activities.
View
B c. Providing better living conditions and aesthetic
Apartments
quality for the redeveloped EWS housing.
View C
B
S+11 Structure
S+9 Structure A’
A
Patparganj Urban A
A
Village
G+4 Structure
S+11 Structure
View C: Showing the varying skyline and space
Section AA’: Showing skyline and road space utilization Key Plan distribution
22 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 23DESIGN PROPOSALS
2.7 Comparision
S. No. Parameters Existing Option 1 Option II
21%
Residential Mass G+2 23% S+11
1 Distribution 9% 100% 35%
G+1 G+4 S+9
70% G 40%
G+4
2 Density 690 DUs/ha 580 DUs/ha 885 DUs/ha
3 Ground Coverage 61% 41% 37%
4 FAR 1.13 200 300
1.1%
Legend Legend Legend
Commercial 1.1% Commercial Commercial
16.3% (An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certiied Organisation)
21% Residential 16.3% Residential Residential
2.5% 12%
Open Spaces Open Spaces 56.8% Open Spaces
5. Land use Distribution 55% 12%
56.8% 7%
18% Social Infrastructure 7% Social Infrastructure Social Infrastructure
6.8% 6.8%
Circulation Circulation Circulation
3.5%
Remunerative Area Remunerative Area
Delhi Urban Art Commission
The Delhi Urban Art Commission was set up by an Act of Parliament in 1973
3.1 On Design Intent to “advise the Government of India in the matter of preserving, developing
Since the size of the site is reasonably large, it made it easier to explore the possibility of apportionment of land for
remunerative purpose. Taking into account the social and commercial requirements of the existing population, it was and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design within
possible to allocate 0.8 ha of land for it. From the onset, it was recognized that to achieve the maximum permissible
FAR of 400 with units of 25 to 30 sq m was not a mathematical possibility. However, the high rental population on Delhi and to provide advice and guidance to any local body in respect of any
the site opened the possibility of two alternatives explorations:
a. To house the owner population in only two-room units. project of building operations or engineering operations or any development
b. To house the owner population in two-room units and the rental population in single-room units.
proposal which affects or is like to affect the skyline or the aesthetic quality of
3.2 Outcome the surroundings or any public amenity provided therein”.
This led to two satisfactory design solutions. In the irst option, a total FAR of 200 was achieved by accommodating an
average of 2901 PPHA. The density being reasonable and the unit design being compact, the resultant scheme has ive-
storey walk-up apartments. A low-rise layout with satisfactory open spaces and social infrastructure emerged.
In the second option, the attempt was made to accommodate all rental as well as owner population. In this option the
average density of 4426 PPHA was achieved with a FAR of 300. However, with a careful mix of low-rise (5 storey),
medium-rise (stilt + 9 storey) and high-rise (stilt + 11 storey) blocks it was still possible to create satisfactory open
spaces for community use.
3.3 Recommendations
• As the relationship between 400 FAR and 900 dwelling units per hectare with a unit size of 25 to 30 sq m is a
mathematical paradox, there is a need to cut back on the FAR. Alternately this FAR, if sustainable from the point of
view of available physical infrastructure in the precinct and neighbourhood, could be transferred to the remunerative
component.
• The setback provision on small plots needs to be re-examined as it precludes the creation of satisfactory community
open spaces by scattering precious open land as peripheral ribbons. This is particularly important since the lack of
restriction on ground coverage allows for multiple explorations in the realm of low and medium-rise development.
24 CITY LEVEL PROJECT(An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certiied Organisation)
fnYyh uxj dyk vk;ksx
Delhi Urban Art Commission
Tel: 24619593, 24618607, 24690821, 24636191, Fax: 24648970
Email: duac74@gmail.com Website: www.duac.orgYou can also read
