Design Challenges for a fuel cell powered MP3 player
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Design Challenges for a fuel cell powered MP3 player Bas Flipsen* Delft University of Technology, faculty of Industrial Design Engineering Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE DELFT, the NETHERLANDS, firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract The main driving force for developments in power sources is longer run times and more functionality with same battery lifetime. To satisfy the quest for higher energy densities fuel cells seems to be the power source of the future for portable electronics, especially the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell. In this paper a short analysis is made into the world of fuel cells and its application field. The opportunities and disadvantages of fuel-cells have been researched. To test the feasibility of a fuel-cell power- system a design is made from available components. The fuel-cell power-system should equal the energy and power characteristics of the lithium polymer battery used in the MP3 player. The final design shows the energy and power density of the total system is much lower than the battery. Recommendations are made to increase the energy and power density of the power system, making it compete with lithium rechargeables. Keywords: Direct Methanol fuel cell, design, MP3 player, portable power source, design, hybrid fuel cell system. 1 Introduction In portable electronics the longing for long run times is the driving force for developments in power sources. At the moment the lithium ion rechargeable battery is the best option, with long runtimes, increasingly lesser charging periods and high energy densities. The Sony 383450A8 prismatic lithium- ion battery already has an energy density of 220 Wh kg-1 (475Wh L-1). The energy density of lithium- ion batteries has been increasing with 5 to 10% per year . Although Broussely and Archdale  state that the maximum attainable will probably be around 225Wh kg-1 (550Wh L-1). To satisfy the quest for higher energy densities fuel cells seems to be the power source of the future for portable electronics, especially the Direct Methanol Fuel Cells (DMFC) . To test the feasibility of DMFC systems in portable electronics a design of a fuel-cell power-system is made which can power a flash-drive MP3 player, in our case the Samsung YP Z5F. The peak loads of the MP3 player are very high (880mW) compared to its standby and standard run loads (10-72mW), making a basic fuel cell system without auxiliaries, the passive system, to bulky. To make the power source more convenient a fuel cell-battery combination, the hybrid system, is a must. This hybrid system combines best of both worlds: the high energy density of methanol and the high power density of batteries. 2 Fuel cells and its application field In theory the energy density of DMFC power-systems could be a factor 4 to 10 higher than lithium ion batteries. It is clear that a fuel-cell power-system not only consists of methanol but also a power converter, the fuel cell, a fuel tank and auxiliary components such as pumps tubing and electronics. Figure 1 shows a comparison between the DMFC power system and lithium ion batteries in a so- called Ragone plot. The DMFC system is based on the Motorola Impress charging house .
Fields of oppertunity for DMFC (L) 1C discharge line 10000 DMFC Lithium Ion (4,2V, 7Ah) lineair (25%) diminishing empty space 0,1C discharge 1000 total optimum line Peak Power (W L ) Harddrive MP3 -1 [A] [B] Laptop computer Flashdrive MP3 0,01C discharge 100 PDA Mobile phone line Sensors [C] 10 Smoke Detector 1 10 100 1000 10000 -1 Battery Capacity (Wh L ) Figure 1: volumetric comparison of the lithium-ion battery and DMFC systems. The uninterrupted lines show the two power systems, DMFC and lithium-ion. It shows that the lithium ion battery is more power dense than the DMFC system. This is mainly caused by the high volume of the fuel cell at high power output. The fuel-cell system can be optimized by diminishing empty space (long dotted line) and increasing fuel cell efficiency from 20% to 25% (short dotted line). The grey line shows the increase in power density when both optimizations are implemented. It shows that power density can be increased to approximately 60W L-1. This is still very low compared to the lithium ion battery (>2000W/L). The energy density of the DMFC system is much higher than that of the lithium battery. Increase in energy density of the DMFC system can be reached when the efficiency of the cell and system is increased. 2.1 Application field Different power and energy characteristics of different consumer electronics are added into Figure 1. Three different application fields can be distinguished. For products in field [A] the graph shows that the fuel cell system is not going to be an improvement, even when the fuel-cell system is optimized. On the other hand in field [C] the DMFC system is smaller than the lithium ion battery. This field of opportunity is especially interesting for actively fueled DMFC systems working in applications requiring low power and long runtimes. Field [B] shows the opportunity for actively fueled fuel cells combined with a battery, a so-called hybrid power source. The hybrid power source uses best of both worlds: high ‘energy density’ of the methanol and high ‘power density’ of the lithium ion battery.
Hybrid system are generally more complex than active fuel-cell systems and definitely more complex than the lithium ion battery self. The number of components and production cost of fuel cell systems is in general higher compared to ‘easy’ to produce lithium ion batteries. When looking at innovation strategies the first DMFC system on the market will probably a low-power product with a long runtime. Thus the first implementation of DMFC systems in portable electronics will probably be passive or active fuel-cell systems powering applications such as ad-hoc sensors and the smoke detector. For products with variable power load, like the laptop computer, PDA cell phone and MP3 player, the passive fuel cell system, field [C], is not going to be sufficient. A hybrid option, field [B], can improve runtime for these products. Because generally the runtime of a flash-drive portable MP3 player is high this product is a good application for hybrid fuel-cell systems. 2.2 Analysis of the MP3 player For this project a small comparison is made between different flash-drive MP3 players and according to the specifications sheets the Samsung YP-Z5 has the longest runtime up to 35 hours. The battery used in this model works at 3,8 Volts and is rated at 820mAh. In Table 1 an overview is given of the characteristics of the MP3 player and the battery. MP3 player size 90x42,2x11,4mm3 Battery size 66x33x4mm3 Battery weight 21g Battery volume percentage 20%v/v Capacity 3,7Vx820mAh Battery life 20-35h Mean power 87-152mW Energy density 348Wh L-1; 145Wh kg-1 Mean power density 9-17W L-1; 4-7W kg-1 Table 1: overview of the characteristics of the Samsung YP-Z5 MP3 player. 3 Power tests of the MP3 player To get a more precise impression on the runtimes and power profile of the MP3 player the Samsung Z5F is tested under different conditions. First a durability test is conducted. Second the different power modes are measured: (i) standby, (ii) play MP3 (56, 128kbps, etc), (iii) light on/off and (iv) pictures. These measurements give the nominal, mean and peak power output of the fuel cell system to be designed. 3.1 Test Setup The power draw of the battery depends on different aspects of play mode as described in above. All tests are executed with a Grant SQ800 data logger at a measure rate of 1 second. Figure 2 shows the test setup. The current is measured over a resistor of 1Ω and the voltage is measured over the MP3 player.
Current Ω 1Ω measurement V + 3,8V, 820mAh _ Working V Voltage measurement Figure 2: test setup to measure the current draw and working voltage for the Samsung Z5F MP3 player. 3.2 Durability test In Figure 3 the durability test results are shown. The test is executed while playing the U2 album “All that you can't leave behind” at 128kbps and in shuffle mode. After 46,5 hours the MP3 player ended playing. The mean power draw during this continuous play mode is 70mW. The current draw ranged in between 17 and 22mA and the voltage ranged from 3,4 to 4,1V. The maximum calculated capacity of the battery is 864mAh or 3315mWh. 4,5 25 600,0 4 20 500,0 3,5 WMA 128kBs MP3 128kBs 3 400,0 power use (mW) 15 Current (mA) Voltage (V) 2,5 300,0 2 10 Voltage (V) 1,5 Current (mA) 200,0 1 5 0,5 100,0 0 0 28-06-06 28-06-06 29-06-06 29-06-06 30-06-06 30-06-06 1-07-06 0,0 0:00 12:00 0:00 12:00 0:00 12:00 0:00 0 50 100 150 200 250 tim e time (sec) Figure 3: voltage and current use during a full discharge in Figure 4: power draw of two different compression continuous play mode, without interruption. formats, WMA and MP3, both at 128kBs. 3.3 Bit-rate and file compression test From test executed with bitrates ranging from 56kbps to 256kbps no difference was found in the power draw. At every bit-rate the power draw for MP3’s was 72mW (with lights out, 50% loudness). However a large difference is found when different compression formats are used. In Figure 4 the power draw is depicted for the same song but differently compressed to either a MP3 or WMA file, played at 128kbps. When both the backlight and the screen were set to off the power drawn is 72 and 99mW for respectively the MP3 and WMA file. In general the power draw of the system is largely prescribed by the backlights and the LCD screen (see Table 2).
MP3 128kBs WMA 128kBs Start (everything on) 264 (186-363) mW 321 (245-519) mW Lights off 236 (156-450) mW 230 (169-428) mW Screen off 72 (61-92) mW 99 (78-191) mW Table 2: The difference of in mean, minimum and maximum power draw for the same MP3 and WMA file. 3.4 Display and loudness test To get a better insight in the power draw of the LED lights and the LCD screen, a luminance test has been executed. For this test the screen luminance is raised from lights off (0%) to maximum luminance (100%), when screen was on and the music was set to off. The power draw of the LEDs seems to be linear to the percentage of luminance and ranges from 146mW at 0% to 381mW at 100% luminance. From these figures it can be concluded that the power draw of the LCD screen plus internal components is equal to 146mW and the backlights will take up a mean 235mW at maximum luminance. To get an impression of the influence of sound level a loudness test is executed. The song (128kbps, MP3) is repeated at 5 different sound levels (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and at 100%). When lights and screen are set to off, the power consumption of the first four sound levels did not change much, ~73mW. When the sound level was boosted to 100% the power consumption increased to approximately 114mW, with lights and screen set to off. 3.5 Start up and power down test Peak powers are very large, and the maximum peak power was measured during power down: 867mW for almost 2 seconds. The startup and the power down of the system are shown in Figure 5. When the system shuts down it goes into standby mode, still draining approximately 10mW continuously. After 24 hours of inactivity the system completely shuts down and doesn’t drain the battery anymore. Startup from standby mode is different and shorter in time than a full start-up. standby 1.000 coarsened load curve start up lights on lights off power down 900 5,82mWh 3,17mWh 1,26mWh 1,27mWh 350 Pow er MP3 128kBs 800 300 Pow er WMA 128kBs 700 mean pow er MP3 power use (mW) 250 mean pow er WMA 600 load (mW) 500 200 400 150 300 100 200 100 50 - 0 1 21 41 61 81 101 121 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 time (sec) tim e (s) Figure 5: Start up and power down of the MP3 player. Figure 6: the coarsened load curve. 3.6 Live user scenario’s When designing a fuel cell system two parameters are very important: the mean and maximum peak power draw of the load. Based on user profiles these parameters can be chosen. Assuming the power
drain per function can be summed, the following equation can be used for simulating the dynamic power draw of the MP3 player: E = ∫ ( Pstandby + Pscreen + Pbacklight + Pmusic ) dt (1) Where: Pstandby = 10mW Pscreen = 136mW (for both on and off) Pbacklight = 235 ⋅ I light intensity 61 − 104mW for MP3 Pmusic = (at 75% and 100% loudness) 89 − 130mW for WMA In this case we are going to assume the worst case scenario, namely an “intensive user”, listening to one song at a time. After listening to it he/she is using the display to skip to the next number or picture. The load profile of Figure 4 is used and coarsened as visualized in Figure 6. This load curve has been repeated for at least 2 hours, equaling 30 cycles. Figure 7 shows a pie-chart diagram of the power breakdown of the MP3 player. backlight (@100%) LCD added when Standby; 10 loudness (@100%) using WMA; 30 added when using WMA Standby loudness (@100%); 104 backlight (@100%); 235 LCD; 136 Figure 7: mean power use of different functions in the MP3 player. As can be seen from the Figure 6 the WMA files are more demanding than the MP3 files. The nominal power drain for 128kBs WMA files is 150mW and the maximum power draw is 321mW. Between songs the user is probably playing with the MP3 player for ~10 seconds at maximum power drain of 321mW. The load characteristic which this standardized user is demanding is quantized in Table 3.
Period PMP3 PWMA EMP3 EWMA (sec) [mW] [mW] [mWs] [mWs] Playing 10 264 321 2640 3210 Start 30 264 321 7920 9600 Lights off 30 236 230 7080 6900 Screen off 180 72 99 12960 17820 Total 240 - - 30600 37560 Mean - 122 150 - - Table 3: The load curve in numbers as visualized in Figure 6. 4 Design of the Fuel cell powered MP3 player Now that the physical boundaries and the power characteristics of the product are known a design has to be made to verify if a fuel cell system is feasible. The goal of this design exercise is to test the feasibility of a fuel-cell power-system which fits into the volume of an existing battery compartment and fulfills the performance need of an intensive user. The fuel cell system should be as small, have an energy density which equals or exceeds that of a standard lithium-ion rechargeable battery, and is made out of commercially available components. The following requirements are the main drivers for this design: - The power-system plus the fuel tank must fit in the battery compartment of the Samsung YP-5Z MP3 player (66x33x4mm) and weighs less than 21g. - the system peak power has to be at least 868mW, maximum of 900mW - The power-system should work for an intensive user, requiring a user profile equal to that of Figure 6, for at least 2 hours or 30 cycles. - The runtime of the power system should equal or exceed that of the existing lithium-polymer battery (17h for intensive user, 46,5h maximum). - The energy available for an intensive user should be equal to 3,1Wh. - The power and energy density of the system should be equal or exceed 100W L-1 and 348Wh L-1. - The power system module should be easy to assemble and disassemble 4.1 Fuel cell model The theoretical reversible open cell voltage (E) can be calculated and is for methanol fueled fuel cells equal to 1,206V. In practice this value will never be reached and the practical open cell voltage (VOC) is used more often. The value of the open cell voltage is not constant but depends on the working temperature, the methanol concentration, cathode loading and other parameters. A multiple regression analysis is executed taking 47 measured points from 3 different DMFC cases [5-7]. This analysis resulted in the following function describing the open cell voltage (in mV) as a function of temperature (in K), methanol concentration (in mol dm-3), and cathode loading (in mg cm-2): VOC = 457 + 1,58 ⋅ T − 10,8 ⋅ N + 18, 6 ⋅ mcath (2) Other parameters, like active surface area, fuel flow, cathode anode loading, and air flow, have been evaluated and have no significant influence on the open cell voltage.
The practical working voltage V can be described as the open cell voltage minus the Ohmic losses ∆VΩ, the activation losses ∆Vact, the crossover and internal currents ∆Vcross, and the mass transportation and concentration losses ∆Vmass, which can be modeled as : V = VOC − ∆VΩ − ∆ (Vact + Vcross ) − ∆Vmass or: V = VOC − i ⋅ r − A ⋅ ln ( i + ic ) + m ⋅ exp ( n ⋅ i ) (3) Where: i current density variable in mA cm-2 r Area Specific Resistance  0,19kΩ cm2 at 120° C ic crossover current density ~ 0,25i A combined slope of the Tafel line for the anode and cathode A= ( 2RTα F )a + ( 2RTα F )c m Mass-transfer overvoltage constants (based on the 2,11E-2 mV n Ballard PEMFC ) 4,00E-2 cm2 mA-1 αa charge transfer coefficient at the anode  0,239 αc charge transfer coefficient at the cathode  0,875 F Faraday’s constant 96,485 C mol-1 R Molar gas constant 8,314 J K-1 mol-1 The practical V-i curve is shown in Figure 8. With the fuel-cell model described above the size for the different components can now be set up. This will be described in detail in the following paragraph. 500 50 gaseous flow p fluid flow Load 450 45 electric flow accumulator 400 40 information flow µC 3,8V sensors (flow, + - m methanol, power Boost 350 35 (Vi), temperature) converter on/off Power (mW/cm2) + - 300 30 p Voltage (mV) Fuel Tank CH3OH Methanol feed Clean Air 250 25 Mixing or O2 cathode chamber m f anode H2O (1M) Water feed fuel mix f 200 20 150 15 fuel mix H2O + + 100 10 CO2 Air H2O condns. Air filter CO2 filter H2O condns. H2O 50 5 Humidifyer fuel mix Heat exch. 0 0 CO2 Air 0 50 100 150 200 250 current density (m A/cm 2) CO2 venting Air Figure 8: V-i characteristics used in the fuel cell model at Figure 9: functional overview of all components in the T=298K, mcathode=2mg cm-2 and N=1 mol dm-3 (~4%v/v). DMFC system. 4.2 System design In Figure 9 an overview is given of all components, mass flows and the interconnections. An intermediate accumulator is needed to take care of peak-power load which probably results in a decrease of the fuel cell volume, weight and cost. In the following paragraphs the main components will be discussed and sized. The physical properties of fuel cell are based on the model as described in
previous paragraph. The physical properties of all other components like the pumps and tank are based on a mass-flow and fuel cell performance model as described by Larminie . In our case the system is a parallel/series hybrid. The fuel cell delivers a constant power output. The battery is charged when the load is low and delivers power when peak power is needed. In this case the fuel cell can be sized based on mean power instead of maximum power output. 4.3 Sizing of the fuel-cell flat-pack The requirement for the fuel cell is a repetitive load-profile as described in Figure 6. The mean output power of the fuel cell should deliver is at least 150mW. Taking charge efficiency, overall Ohmic losses (~90%) and power using auxiliaries (-10%) into account the power output of the fuel cell should be around 185mW. The basic volume requirement and specifically the maximum thickness of the power system results in a flat pack architecture of the cells. The number of cells needed is at least three, to acquire a workable voltage of 0,7-1V. Higher number of cells probably will increase costs and surface area. The fuel cell output voltage will be boosted to a working voltage of 3,8V. In Table 4 an overview is given of the general specifics of the fuel-cells flat-pack needed to fulfill the load. Every fuel cell membrane is placed in between two endplates made out of injection-molded carbon- filled polymers (see Figure 10d). The mass flows needed to fulfill to the output power can be found in Table 5. Fuel cell membrane Nafion117 Cathode loading mc 2 mg cm-2 Anode loading ma 4 mg cm-2 Active surface area A 3x 14x14mm2 End plates 6 plates 22x22x1,5mm3 Number of cells 3 Nominal output voltage V 0,76V Open Cell voltage VOC 1,58V Nominal current density i 125mA cm-2 Cell end temperature T 302K Methanol concentration N 1 Mol L-1 Fuel cell efficiency 21% Table 4: General specifics of the fuel-cell flat-pack calculated to deliver a constant power of 185mW. Anode IN Anode OUT Total CH3OH 31 µL min -1 CH3OH 28 µL min-1 Total H2O 783 µL min-1 H2O 766 µL min-1 CO2 1679 µL min-1 Cathode IN Cathode OUT Air flow 26,8 mL min-1 CH3OH x-over 0,6 µL min-1 of which O2 flow 5,07 mL min-1 Air flow 24,0 mL min-1 of which O2 flow 2,54 mL min-1 H2O fluid 4 µL min-1 H2O vapor 1 µL min-1 H2O osmotic 16 µL min-1 Table 5: Calculated in- and outgoing mass flows in the fuel-cell power-system.
c) tanks b) accumulators e) PCB a) pumps d) fuel cell Figure 10: Overview of the size for the main components From left to right: a) available pumps, b) available intermediate accumulators, c) the water and methanol tanks, d) the final fuel-cell design, and e) the PCB. 4.4 Sizing the intermediate accumulator The list of requirements demanded that the power-system should be able to follow the load profile as described in Figure 6. In the first 10 and the following 60 seconds of this load curve the power needed will be realized by the fuel cell (150mW) plus power from the added accumulator (171mW). The following 30 seconds will be powered by the fuel cell (150mW) and the battery (80mW). In the final 3 minutes the fuel cell will power the MP3 player on its own (99mW), and the remainder power (51mW) will charge the battery to its nominal capacity (80-100% SOC). The minimum capacity of the battery needed to fulfill the load of this 4 minute song is approximately 2,6mWh. During the 30 seconds startup the system uses 700mW. To deal with the this load a minimum of 6mWh is needed. Options to accumulate this amount of energy are a Nickel Metal Hydrate (NiMH) button-cell, a lithium rechargeable button cell, or a capacitor (see Figure 10b). Five important factors will influence the choice: the technical lifespan, the ability to charge and discharge at high currents (C), the working voltage, the available capacity and its volume. Both the Lion as the NiMH battery have a short life- span when discharged to 0-10%SOC. To increase life-span the batteries should be discharged to 90%SOC, resulting in a minimum capacity of 26mWh for both the batteries. Lithium based button- cells are mostly Lithium Vanadium or Aluminum-Manganese batteries working at a voltage of 3V. The rated (dis)charge rates (
16,7mL of water is dragged through too the cathode during one take. If this water is not recycled a water tank of at least 18mL is needed. If the water is fully or partially recycled the water tank will take up less space. To decrease volume we assume water will be recycled as much as possible. The tanks are made of flexible plastics which is blow-molded in its final shape (Figure 10c). 4.6 Fuel and air pumps Fuel is introduced into the fuel cell by a pump. The flow rate of the fuel mixture is approximately 0,82mL min-1 (Table 5). Three micro pumps found comply with this requirement, the HNP mzr®- 2521 micro annular gear pump , the ThinXXS MDP1304 piezo actuated micro diaphragm pump  and the Bartels Mikrotechnik MP5 piezo actuated micro diaphragm pump . Both the HNP and ThinXXS pumps are quite bulky compared to the Bartels MP5 (see Figure 10a). The MP5 complies with the required low thickness of 4mm. Further specifics of this pump can be found in Table 6. Air supply to the fuel cell can be done passively, semi-active by means of a blower or active by means of an air pump. To decrease volume and add more control to the cells performance an active air pump is chosen. One Bartels MP5 pump can only power an air flow of 15mL min-1. To comply with minimum of 26,8mL min-1 air flow required, two MP5 pumps are needed. For this design two pumps are linked in parallel. 4.7 Other components The largest components have been defined above. Other smaller components needed to make the system work are a methanol sensor, water recycle system and a water-methanol mixer (e.g. from ISSYS ). Furthermore some temperature and flow sensors could be added to improve the performance of the fuel cell system. The processor used in the MP3 player could be used to control the system. We assume this is possible in this design. 4.8 Final design of the power system in the MP3 player The specifications of the main components are summarized in Table 6. To get more insight in the size of all components they are drawn in CAD. Different structural variants have been evaluated and the final assembly is shown in Figure 11. Electronic interconnections haven’t been modeled. Component Type specs. volume Fuel cell membrane Nafion 117 3 x 14 x 14 mm2 Capacitor Varta V40HR NiMH 2x 1,2V; 20mAh Ø11,5 x 5,4 mm3 Methanol tank Blow molded 3,1Wh; ~4mL; 4000 mm3 Water tank t=0,5mm 4000 mm3 Fuel pump Bartels MP5 50 µl/min - 5 ml/min 14 x 14 x 3,5 mm3 Air pump Bartels MP5 50 µl/min -15 ml/min 2 x 14 x 14 x 3,5 mm3 Table 6: Specifications of the main components used in the fuel cell power system.
Figure 11: The fuel-cell power-system assembly. 5 Conclusions and discussion A design of a 128mW fuel cell power system is designed. This fuel cell hybrid system can power a flash-drive MP3 player. The model of the power system shows the system can fit into the space available in the Samsung MP3 player. The power systems size is 35x86x8,1mm3 (24,4mL) and the total volume of all main components is equal to 16,3mL. The volume breakdown of the system without empty space is shown in Figure 12. The system doesn’t fit in the compartment available for the battery, but uses up other empty space available in the MP3 player. water methanol mixer 1% varta v40hr Air and fuel 5% pumps Tubing 11% 6% Methanol tank Fuel cells 25% 27% Water tank 25% Figure 12: Volume breakdown of the fuel-cell power-system at a total volume of 16,3mL (excl. empty space).
The list of requirements stated that the total volume should not exceed 8,7mL, at equal specifics. The total amount of energy the designed power system delivers is equal to that of the used battery, resulting in a power density of a third of the lithium polymer battery used (Table 7). The energy density of the system can be increased by the following design changes: - Reducing empty space in the power system can increase the energy density to 190 Wh L-1 an improvement of 50%. System architecture is a major contributor to improving the energy density. - The fuel cells efficiency is still very low (21%). Improvements in membrane efficiency can improve the total energy density. An efficiency increase of 5% will decrease the amount of methanol and water needed with 20%. Furthermore the cells active area can be decreased to 12,5x12,5cm2 per cell. These improvements can result in an overall energy-density improvement of 10-12%. - Because of osmotic drag a large amount of water is drawn through the membrane. When this water and the water produced can be fully recycled the water tank can be halved in size. This option will result in a energy density improvement of 8-9%; - The pumps needed to drive the different mass flows are still very bulky. The methanol pump is over dimensioned and smaller pumps or pumps integrated in the PCB can increase the overall energy density largely. If the DMFC pump is halved in size an overall energy density improvement of 5% is achievable. - Increase of the amount of fuel (methanol) would increase the energy density severely. In this configuration the energy density of only methanol is approximately 1000Wh L-1. By increasing the amount of fuel with a factor two results in an overall energy density equal to the lithium battery. Lithium polymer DMFC power battery system Volume 8,7mL 24,4mL Component volume 16,3mL Energy density 348 Wh L-1 127 Wh L-1 Peak power density 103 W L-1 37 W L-1 Table 7: Comparison between the lithium polymer battery used and the designed power system. Besides the energy density the power density is of great importance. The power density of the battery is near 100W L-1, and the designed DMFC only reaches a peak power density of only 55 W L-1. The improvements presented above would also increase power density. Other problems not treated in this paper are usability and produceability. When the MP3 player is in use the fuel cells extracts oxygen from the outer room. If the player is worn inside a pocket the fuel cell can not ‘breathe’ anymore and the power output will decrease. A total redesign of portable music players is recommended when fuel cells are introduced. Furthermore the costs of the system designed above will be very large compared to the simple and low-priced lithium ion batteries. Integrating components, for instance in the PCB by means of MEMS technology is greatly recommended. 6 Acknowledgement The author would like to thank Maarten Kamphuis for making the CAD model and the final renderings of the fuel-cell power-system. Furthermore special thanks to my colleague Ruben Strijk for support in the fuel cell model and calculations.
7 Literature  M. Ryynanen and S. Tasa, "Optimized Energy for Future Mobile Multimedia Devices," Nokia 010805 Sara Tasa: 2005.  M. Broussely and G. Archdale, "Li-ion batteries and portable power source prospects for the next 5-10 years," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 386-394, Oct.2004.  S. F. J. Flipsen, "Power sources compared: the ultimate truth?," Journal of Power Sources, Apr.2005.  J. Bostaph, C. Xie, J. Pavio, A. Fisher, B. Mylan, and J. Hallmark, "1 W Direct Methanol Fuel Cell System as a desktop charger," 2003.  A. K. Shukla, C. L. Jackson, K. Scott, and R. K. Raman, "An improved-performance liquid- feed solid-polymer-electrolyte direct methanol fuel cell operating at near-ambient conditions," Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 21, pp. 3401-3407, Aug.2002.  N. Nakagawa and Y. Xiu, "Performance of a direct methanol fuel cell operated at atmospheric pressure," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 248-255, May2003.  k. Okajima, M. Suetaka, K. Furukawa, and M. Sudoh, "Evaluation of Liquid-feed direct methanol fuel cell at near-ambient temperature for mobile applications," Electrochemistry, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 928-930, Sept.2002.  J. Larminie and A. Dicks, Fuel cell systems explained, 2nd ed ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2003, p. - 406.  V. Ramani, H. R. Kunz, and J. M. Fenton, "Effect of particle size reduction on the conductivity of Nafion[trademark]/phosphotungstic acid composite membranes," Journal of Membrane Science, vol. In Press, Corrected Proof.  Z. H. Wang and C. Y. Wang, "Mathematical Modeling of Liquid-Feed Direct Methanol Fuel Cells," Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 150, no. 4, p. A508-A519, Apr.2003.  Varta Microbattery GmbH, "Varta V40H, rechargeable Ni-MH button, data sheet," 2005.  HNP Mikrosysteme GmbH, "Micro annular gear pump mzr®-2521, Dosing pump for analytical instrumentation," 2006.  ThinXXS GmbH, "MDP1304 micro diaphragm pump," 2006.  Bartels Mikrotechnik GmbH, "The Micropump – A New Heartbeat in Microfluidics," 2006.  D. Sparks, C. Laroche, N. Tran, D. Goetzinger, N. Najafi, K. Kawaguchi, and M. Yasuda, "A New Methanol Concentration Microsensor for Improved DMFC Performance," in Fuel Cell Summit 2005 Connecticut, USA: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2005.
You can also read