Ross River Virus Disease Clusters and Spatial Relationship with Mosquito Biting Exposure in Redland Shire, Southern Queensland, Australia

Page created by Jacob Farmer
 
CONTINUE READING
MODELING/GIS, RISK ASSESSMENT, ECONOMIC IMPACT

       Ross River Virus Disease Clusters and Spatial Relationship with
                Mosquito Biting Exposure in Redland Shire,
                      Southern Queensland, Australia
                        P. A. RYAN,1 D. ALSEMGEEST,2 M. L. GATTON,1, 3                       AND   B. H. KAY1

                                              J. Med. Entomol. 43(5): 1042Ð1059 (2006)

                                                                                                                                        Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
      ABSTRACT The spatial heterogeneity in the risk of Ross River virus (family Togaviridae, genus
      Alphavirus, RRV) disease, the most common mosquito-borne disease in Australia, was examined in
      Redland Shire in southern Queensland, Australia. Disease cases, complaints from residents of intense
      mosquito biting exposure, and human population data were mapped using a geographic information
      system. Surface maps of RRV disease age-sex standardized morbidity ratios and mosquito biting
      complaint morbidity ratios were created. To determine whether there was signiÞcant spatial variation
      in disease and complaint patterns, a spatial scan analysis method was used to test whether the number
      of cases and complaints was distributed according to underlying population at risk. Several noncon-
      tiguous areas in proximity to productive saline water habitats of Aedes vigilax (Skuse), a recognized
      vector of RRV, had higher than expected numbers of RRV disease cases and complaints. Disease rates
      in human populations in areas which had high numbers of adult Ae. vigilax in carbon dioxide- and
      octenol-baited light traps were up to 2.9 times those in areas that rarely had high numbers of
      mosquitoes. It was estimated that targeted control of adult Ae. vigilax in these high-risk areas could
      potentially reduce the RRV disease incidence by an average of 13.6%. Spatial correlation was found
      between RRV disease risk and complaints from residents of mosquito biting. Based on historical
      patterns of RRV transmission throughout Redland Shire and estimated future human population
      growth in areas with higher than average RRV disease incidence, it was estimated that RRV incidence
      rates will increase by 8% between 2001 and 2021. The use of arbitrary administrative areas that ranged
      in size from 4.6 to 318.3 km2, has the potential to mask any small scale heterogeneity in disease patterns.
      With the availability of georeferenced data sets and high-resolution imagery, it is becoming more
      feasible to undertake spatial analyses at relatively small scales.

      KEY WORDS mosquito, Ross River virus, spatial statistics, SaTScan, vector-borne disease

Vector populations are spatially heterogeneous in                       Thompson et al. 1997, Carter et al. 2000, Brooker et al.
their densities, and this heterogeneity, together with                  2004). In Maputo, Mozambique, malaria prevalence
temporal changes in abundance, constitute important                     was 6.2 times higher for individuals living within 200 m
elements in insect population dynamics (Liebhold et                     of anopheline mosquito breeding sites than for indi-
al. 1993, Nestel and Klein 1995, Papadopoulos et al.                    viduals living ⬎500 m away (Thompson et al. 1997).
2003, Ryan et al. 2004). Tools such as global positioning               Malaria transmission, at least in Africa, is focused
systems, geographic information systems (GIS), geosta-                  around speciÞc mosquito breeding sites and can nor-
tistics, and remote sensing have been used to investigate               mally occur only within a few hundred meters to 1 km
the spatial determinants of insect distributions, and the               from the breeding sites, and it rarely in excess of 2Ð3
relationships between vector abundance and disease in-                  km (Carter et al. 2000). It has been proposed that
cidence. If used soundly, these tools have the potential                accurately targeted interventions to reduce transmis-
to identify high-risk areas and allow control measures to               sion rates can be expected to give greatly improved
be targeted for maximum effect.                                         levels of malaria control compared with untargeted
   Small-scale variations in the density of anopheline                  strategies (Carter et al. 2000).
vectors have been shown to be important determi-                           Small-scale heterogeneity in dengue vector abun-
nants of malaria transmission risk (Trape et al. 1992,                  dance and disease transmission has been examined
                                                                        (Waterman et al. 1985, Morrison et al. 1998, Russell et
  1 Queensland Institute of Medical Research and Australian Centre      al. 2002, Ali et al. 2003, Getis et al. 2003, Morrison et al.
for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition, P.O. Royal Bris-   2004, Van Benthem et al. 2005), as has the landscape
bane Hospital, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia.
  2 Redland Shire Council, P.O. Box 21, Cleveland 4163, Australia.      ecology of western equine encephalomyelitis and St.
  3 School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston      Louis encephalitis viruses in California (Reisen et al.
Rd., Herston QLD 4006, Australia.                                       1995a,b; Lothrop and Reisen 1999) and spatial deter-

0022-2585/06/1042Ð1059$04.00/0 䉷 2006 Entomological Society of America
September 2006               RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                    1043

minants of West Nile virus transmission (Brownstein        a total area of 539 km2, and the majority (60%) of this
et al. 2002, Mostashari et al. 2003, Ruiz et al. 2004).    area is made up of the Southern Moreton Bay Islands.
   In Australia, Ross River virus (family Togaviridae,     Ninety-Þve percent of the 114,486 residents live on the
genus Alphavirus, RRV) disease is the most common          mainland, with the remaining population distributed
mosquito-borne disease with ⬇5,000 human cases re-         between the Southern Moreton Bay Islands of North
ported annually (Russell 2002). Infection is not life      Stradbroke, Coochiemudlo, Macleay, Lamb, Karra-
threatening; however, the debilitation associated with     garra, and Russell (Australian Bureau of Statistics
clinical disease (polyarthritis, fever, and rash) is of    2003).
considerable social and economic concern for local            Redland Shire has a warm and humid subtropical
communities. Although RRV has been isolated from 42        climate, characterized by mean daily maximum sum-
mosquito species, with 10 able to transmit under lab-      mer (DecemberÐJanuary) and winter (JuneÐAugust)
oratory conditions, only a relatively small number of      temperatures of 28 Ð29 and 20 Ð21⬚C, respectively
species are regarded as being primary vectors in dif-      (Commonwealth Bureau of Meteorology 2004). The

                                                                                                                        Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
ferent regional environments in Australia (Russell         area has a mean annual rainfall total of 1284 mm, with
2002). In coastal areas of Queensland, Aedes vigilax       74% of this rainfall occurring between November and
(Skuse) is considered to be the major vector (Kay and      May (Commonwealth Bureau of Meteorology 2004).
Aaskov 1989). The freshwater species Culex annuliros-         RRV Notifications. NotiÞcations of RRV disease
tris Skuse is the principal inland vector, but a number    from Redland Shire residents for the period June 1991
of other species, including Aedes notoscriptus (Skuse),    to May 2001 were obtained from Queensland Health.
Verrallina funerea (Theobald), and Aedes procax            For each case, data were obtained for date of disease
(Skuse), have been shown to be involved in virus           onset along with the patientÕs sex, age, and approxi-
transmission during epidemics in urban areas (Ritchie      mate residential address (suburb, street, and house
et al. 1997). The natural vertebrate hosts are assumed     number ⫾ 6). The masked address was then entered
to be macropodids (e.g., kangaroos and wallabies)          into a GIS (ArcView GIS 3.2a; ESRI 1996a) maintained
(Doherty 1972, Kay et al. 1986), although pteropodid       by Redland Shire Council. Five hundred and seventy-
fruit bats, horses, brushtail possums, and humans have     Þve notiÞcations of RRV disease were provided of
been implicated (Rosen et al. 1981, Kay and Aaskov         which 522 (91%) cases were able to be mapped. The
1989, Ryan et al. 1997, Harley et al. 2000, Boyd et al.    53 cases that were unable to be mapped because of
2001). There is evidence that RRV survives in arid and     missing data were generally distributed throughout
semiarid areas by transovarial transmission (Russell       the study area, with coverage rates in the 12 statistical
2002); however, transmission can occur throughout          local areas (SLA) (Fig. 1) of 77Ð100%.
the year in tropical and subtropical coastal areas in         Cases were Þrst mapped to the level of SLA. Sta-
Queensland.                                                tistical local areas were deÞned by the Australian Bu-
   Our aim was to deÞne the spatial distribution of        reau of Statistics (ABS 1991Ð2000) and represented
RRV disease in Redland Shire in southern Queens-           the smallest geographic areas for which estimated res-
land. To determine whether there was signiÞcant vari-      ident populations were available. The SLAs ranged in
ation in the risk of RRV disease and exposure of hu-       area from 4.6 km2 (Ormiston) to 318.3 km2 (southern
mans to mosquito populations, we mapped RRV                Moreton Bay Islands, Balance SLA), and had human
disease notiÞcations and mosquito biting complaints,       populations of between 3,496 (Thorneside) and 18,359
respectively, from residents in Redland Shire. Surface     (Alexandra Hills) individuals (Australian Bureau of
maps of RRV disease age-sex standardized morbidity         Statistics 2003). To facilitate spatial analyses at a Þner
ratios and mosquito biting complaint morbidity ratios      resolution, we overlaid a 500- by 500-m grid (Fig. 1)
were created, and the spatial scan analysis method was     on the Redland Shire area and then mapped the RRV
used to test whether the number of cases and com-          disease cases to each of these grids. To estimate the
plaints was distributed according to underlying pop-       resident population in each of the 500- by 500-m
ulation at risk. The spatial relationship between the      square grids, we obtained the centroid coordinates of
distributions of RRV disease cases, mosquito biting        each occupied residential premises in Redland Shire,
complaints, and the numbers of adult Ae. vigilax also      each year between 1991Ð1992 and 2000 Ð2001 from a
were examined. Based on these historical patterns of       GIS (ArcView GIS 3.2a) maintained by Redland Shire
RRV transmission, we then estimated the potential          Council. The resident population in each SLA was
impact of future population growth in Redland Shire        then distributed across the respective 500- by 500-m
on the numbers of RRV disease notiÞcations.                grids in direct proportion to the number of occupied
                                                           residential premises contained in each grid. Analyses
                                                           were conducted using ArcView GIS 3.2a and ArcView
                                                           Spatial Analyst extension (ESRI 1996b).
               Materials and Methods
                                                              Spatial Analysis of RRV Disease Patterns. To deter-
   Study Area. Redland Shire (153⬚ 25⬘ E, 27⬚ 34⬘ S) is    mine whether there were differences in the notiÞca-
a local government administrative area located in the      tion rates among the 12 SLAs, age-sex standardized
southeast of Queensland. The area is bounded by            morbidity ratios and conÞdence intervals were calcu-
Brisbane to the west, Logan and Gold Coast cities to       lated for each SLA by using the whole Redland Shire
the south, and Moreton Bay and the PaciÞc Ocean to         population as the reference group. The expected num-
the north and east, respectively (Fig. 1). The Shire has   ber of notiÞcations for each area was calculated from
1044                                  JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                         Vol. 43, no. 5

                                                                                                                               Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021

   Fig. 1. Location of Redland Shire (shaded and diagonal line Þlled areas) in southeastern Queensland, Australia. SLA
boundaries are shown for the 11 SLAs located on the mainland, and the balance SLA comprising the southern Moreton Bay
Islands. Populated areas were overlaid with a 500- by 500-m grid to facilitate SaTScan cluster analyses of RRV disease cases
and mosquito biting complaints.

age-sex-speciÞc incidence rates for the general pop-              RRV disease patterns also were examined using the
ulation applied to the particular age distribution in          spatial scan statistic (Kulldorff and Nagarwalla 1995,
each area. Ninety-Þve percent conÞdence limits (CL)            Hjalmars et al. 1996). This method was used to scan the
for the expected numbers of cases were calculated              whole area for possible disease clusters and identify
based on a Poisson distribution model. Standardized            the approximate location of statistically signiÞcant
morbidity ratios and 95% conÞdence intervals were              clusters. Brießy, using the SaTScan software, version
calculated by dividing the actual number of cases by           5.0 (http://satscan.org), a circular window was im-
the expected number of cases, and the 95% CL for the           posed on the map and its center was moved over the
expected number of cases, in each area, respectively.          area so that at any given position, the window included
September 2006                RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                    1045

different sets of neighboring 500- by 500-m grids. Sep-     ber of sampling occasions in which the estimated
arate analyses were conducted using maximum-sized           ranked value of each cell (100 by 100 m) exceeded the
windows with radii of 0, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 m to       75th percentile. Of the three species examined, Co-
determine whether the clustering of cases was related       quillettidia linealis (Skuse), Cx. annulirostris, and Ae.
to the spatial scale of the analyses. For each window       vigilax, weekly distribution patterns were most stable
size, the method created a circular window at each          for Ae. vigilax, with a consistent pattern of relatively
grid node, and then tested the null hypothesis against      high (⬎75th percentile) numbers in the northern,
the alternative hypothesis that there is an elevated risk   central, and southern areas on the mainland, and on
of RRV disease within, compared with outside the            Macleay Island. Given the stability of Ae. vigilax spatial
window. Using the SaTScan program, a likelihood ra-         patterns over the two consecutive seasons, we com-
tio test statistic was calculated for each window and its   bined the data from 1999 Ð2000 and 2000 Ð2001 and
distribution under the null hypothesis was obtained by      created a probability map based on 15 wk of light trap
repeating the calculation on 999 random replications        sampling (Fig. 2). These analyses were limited to Ae.

                                                                                                                         Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
of the data set generated under the null hypothesis.        vigilax as the probability maps for other mosquito
The P value for each cluster was obtained through           species were not reliable (Ryan et al. 2004). The map
Monte Carlo simulation, by comparing the rank of the        was used to deÞne areas with consistently high (⬎75th
likelihood test statistic from the real data set with the   percentile) numbers of Ae. vigilax, and each cell was
likelihood test statistics from the random data sets. The   assigned a probability that mosquito numbers will be
null hypothesis of no clusters was rejected at an ␣ level   ranked in the top 25% of values. The probability values
of 0.05 exactly, if the simulated P ⱕ 0.05 (Dwass 1957).    were grouped into Þve categories: 0 Ð⬍20, 20 Ð⬍40,
   Mosquito Biting Complaints. Complaints from Red-         40 Ð⬍60, 60 Ð⬍80, and 80 Ð100%. Seven noncontiguous
land Shire residents of mosquito biting were examined       geographic areas were found to have ⱖ20% chance of
as potential indicators of risk of mosquito borne dis-      having high Ae. vigilax numbers. We then compared
ease. Council records the period June 1991 to May           the age-sex standardized RRV disease incidence rates
2001 were examined for complaints from residents of         in the areas with 0 Ð⬍20% chance of having high Ae.
mosquito biting activity. Each complaint record was         vigilax numbers (i.e., 80 Ð100% chance of never having
screened to ensure the complainant stated speciÞcally       high vector numbers), to the RRV incidence in areas
that there were high levels of adult mosquito biting.       with 20 Ð⬍40, 40 Ð⬍60, 60 Ð⬍80, and 80 Ð100% chance
Each validated complaint was geocoded according to          of having high Ae. vigilax numbers. Analyses were
the street address at which the reported mosquito           limited to the mainland and Macleay Island areas of
biting occurred. In total, 1,263 validated complaints       Redland Shire as mosquito abundance data were not
were obtained, and all of these complaints were able        available for the remainder. To determine whether
to be mapped to the approximate address (suburb,            there was a consistent relationship in each of the seven
street, and house number ⫾ 6) at which the reported         geographic areas deÞned in Fig. 2, separate analyses
mosquito biting occurred. To determine whether              were undertaken for each area. Analyses also were
there were differences in complaint rates from pop-         undertaken to determine whether there was any as-
ulations in different areas of Redland Shire, we ana-       sociation between Ae. vigilax abundance and the num-
lyzed the data as for the RRV disease notiÞcation data.     bers of mosquito biting complaints.
   Spatial Relationship between RRV Disease and                Impact of Future Population Growth on RRV Dis-
Mosquito Biting Complaint Patterns. To determine            ease Morbidity Patterns. Population projections for
whether there was a spatial association between RRV         2001Ð2021 were obtained for each of the SLAs in
disease incidence and mosquito biting complaints re-        Redland Shire (Queensland Government 2005). To
ceived from residents, we plotted the SaTScan results       estimate the potential future RRV disease morbidity in
for each of the four scanning windows. The RRV              Redland Shire, we applied the long-term average in-
disease standardized morbidity ratios SMR) and the          cidence rates for each SLA between 1991 and 2001 to
mosquito biting complaint morbidity ratios (MR) cal-        estimated populations in each SLA in 2021. This was
culated for each grid coordinate were plotted, and the      based on the assumption that the age-sex proÞles of
statistical results for each ratio, obtained from Monte     each SLA remained constant and the long-term (1991Ð
Carlo simulations, are presented.                           2001) RRV disease incidence rates for each SLA re-
   To determine whether there was a spatial associa-        ßected the pattern of disease in 2021.
tion between areas with high numbers of RRV vectors
and high RRV disease incidence rates, we used the
adult mosquito abundance maps from Ryan et al.
                                                                                     Results
(2004) to deÞne areas of high vector abundance.
Brießy, Ryan et al. (2004) used an array of 81 carbon          The 10-yr RRV disease incidence rate in Redland
dioxide and octenol-baited light traps to obtain weekly     Shire was 52.1 cases per 100,000 person years (py),
samples of adult mosquitoes from the mainland and           with yearly rates of between 9.3 (1992Ð1993) and 121.4
Macleay Island areas of Redland Shire during 1999 Ð         (1993Ð1994) cases per 100,000 py. The 10-yr mosquito
2000 (11 weekly samples) and 2000 Ð2001 (four weekly        biting complaint rate was 126.1 complaints per 100,000
samples). Kriged mosquito counts from weekly col-           py, with yearly rates ranging between 25.1 (1999 Ð
lections were converted to percentile rank, and prob-       2000) and 387.5 (1993Ð1994) complaints per 100,000
ability maps were then calculated based on the num-         py.
1046                                  JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                            Vol. 43, no. 5

                                                                                                                                  Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021

    Fig. 2. Probability that kriged adult Ae. vigilax numbers throughout mainland and Macleay Island areas of Redland Shire
exceeded the 75th percentile each week, during 2000 (11 wk of sampling) and 2001 (4 wk of sampling) (data from Ryan et
al. 2004). Areas 1Ð7 refer to noncontiguous areas in which the probability of Ae. vigilax numbers exceeding the 75th percentile
was ⱖ20%.

   Analysis of RRV Disease and Mosquito Complaint                on the mainland (Victoria Point and Redland Bay),
Patterns at the SLA Level. There were large variations           and the Moreton Bay Islands (Balance), were found to
in the RRV disease incidence rates among individual              have signiÞcantly (P ⬍ 0.05) higher than expected
SLAs (Table 1; Fig. 3), and these values ranged from             numbers of cases (SMRs 1.50 Ð2.77), four had signiÞ-
29.6 (Thorneside) to 144.2 (Balance) cases per 100,000           cantly (P ⬍ 0.05) lower than expected numbers of
py. Three LGAs comprising the southern coastal areas             cases (Alexandra Hills, Birkdale, Capalaba and Cleve-
September 2006

  Table 1.   Age-sex standardized RRVdisease incidence rates and SMR, and mosquito biting complaint incidence rates and MR in Redland Shire, 1991–2001

                                           RRV disease notiÞcations (June 1991ÐMay 2001)                                                      Mosquito biting complaints (June 1991ÐMay 2001)
                          Pop                                                                                            Pop
       SLA                            Observed        Expected             Rate                    c
                                                                                                         95% CId                     Observed       Expected           Rate
                         (py)a                                                              SMR                         (py)a                                                         MRf    (95% CI)d
                                       cases           casesb          (/100,000 py)                                                complaints     complaintse     (/100,000 py)
Alexandra Hills          166,632          54             81.7               34.5            0.66       (0.54Ð0.86)       166,632         17            210.2             10.2         0.08   (0.07Ð0.09)
Balance                   50,925          84             30.4              144.2            2.77       (2.00Ð4.42)        50,925        310             64.3            608.5         4.82   (3.88Ð6.46)
Birkdale                 115,062          37             59.3               32.5            0.62       (0.49Ð0.84)       115,062         68            145.1             59.1         0.47   (0.40Ð0.56)
Capalaba                 164,027          50             81.2               32.1            0.62       (0.51Ð0.79)       164,027         19            206.9             11.6         0.09   (0.08Ð0.11)
Cleveland                111,101          41             61.1               35.0            0.67       (0.53Ð0.91)       111,101        115            140.2            103.5         0.82   (0.70Ð0.99)
Ormiston                  34,802          16             18.7               44.5            0.85       (0.57Ð1.60)        34,802         52             43.9            149.4         1.19   (0.91Ð1.68)
Redland Bay               58,470          66             31.6              108.8            2.09       (1.54Ð3.30)        58,470        410             73.6            702.3         5.57   (4.51Ð7.32)
Sheldon-Mt Cotton         34,051          27             17.8               79.3            1.52       (1.00Ð3.00)        34,051         21             42.9             61.7         0.49   (0.38Ð0.70)
Thorneside                34,777          10             17.6               29.6            0.57       (0.37Ð1.11)        34,777         35             43.9            100.6         0.80   (0.61Ð1.13)
Thornlands                73,306          30             38.8               40.4            0.77       (0.58Ð1.15)        73,306         19             92.4             25.9         0.21   (0.17Ð0.26)
Victoria Point            93,223          75             50.1               78.0            1.50       (1.17Ð2.08)        93,223         94            117.6            100.8         0.80   (0.68Ð0.98)
Wellington Point          64,947          32             33.7               49.5            0.95       (0.71Ð1.46)        64,947        103             81.9            158.6         1.26   (1.03Ð1.61)
Total                  1,001,323         522                                52.1                                       1,001,323       1263            126.1

  a
    Populations expressed as the number of py.
  b
    Expected number of cases calculated by applying age-sex speciÞc RRV disease incidence rates from the whole Redland Shire population, to the population in the statistical local area.
  c
    Standardized morbidity ratio calculated by dividing the observed number of cases by the expected number of cases.
  d
    Ninety-Þve percent conÞdent interval (CI) for the standardized morbidity ratio or morbidity ratio.
  e
    Expected number of complaints calculated by applying mosquito biting complaint incidence rates from the whole Redland Shire population, to the populations in the 12 SLA.
  f
    Morbidity ratio calculated by dividing the observed number of complaints by the expected number of complaints.
                                                                                                                                                                                                           RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES
                                                                                                                                                                                                           1047

                                       Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
1048                               JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                     Vol. 43, no. 5

                                                                                                                      Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
   Fig. 3. Relationship between annual mosquito biting complaint morbidity ratios (x-axis) and RRV disease age-sex
standardized morbidity ratios (y-axis) in statistical local areas in Redland Shire between 1991 and 2001.

land; SMRs 0.62Ð 0.67), and the remainder were not         expected cases) for RRV disease for each of the grid
signiÞcantly different (SMRs 0.57Ð1.52) from the           squares ranged between 0 and 250; however, when
overall Redland Shire rate. A similar pattern was found    these were tested against the null hypothesis, i.e., the
with mosquito biting complaints, with higher than          observed counts in each grid were proportional to the
expected numbers of complaints from residents in           age-sex adjusted population at risk in each grid, only
Balance and Redland Bay SLAs (MRs 4.80 Ð5.86) and          eight clusters of signiÞcantly higher than expected
signiÞcantly (P ⬍ 0.05) lower than expected numbers        numbers of cases were found (Fig. 4). The number of
in the remaining areas (MRs 0.08 Ð 0.65), except for       observed cases in each of these eight grids ranged
Wellington Point, Ormiston, Cleveland, and Victoria        between 3 and 12, compared with the expected num-
Point (MRs 0.70 Ð1.54) (Table 1; Fig. 3).                  bers of 0.02Ð2.57. The difference between the total
   The temporal relationship between RRV disease           observed number of cases (49) and the total expected
cases and mosquito biting complaints was examined at       number (5.77) from these eight grids was 43.23 cases,
the LGA level (Fig. 3). There was a clear positive         which represented only 2.3% of the total number of
association between annual RRV disease standardized        RRV disease cases in Redland Shire. There did not
morbidity ratios and mosquito biting complaint mor-        seem to be any spatial relationship among these eight
bidity ratios at the SLA level.                            disease clusters (Fig. 4). In comparison, when we
   Analysis of RRV Disease and Mosquito Complaint          increased the scan window to 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 m,
Patterns by Using Spatial Scan Method. The number          the number of overlapping clusters increased to 28, 60,
and location of clusters of higher than expected num-      and 95, respectively, and the total observed numbers
bers of RRV disease cases was dependent on the size        (95, 128, and 204, respectively) and expected numbers
on the scan window (i.e., 0-, 1,000-, 2,000-, or 3,000-m   (30.30, 49.89, and 102.90, respectively) of RRV cases
radii) used in the SaTScan analyses. With a 0-m radius     also increased. The difference between the total ex-
scan window, the observed number of RRV cases in           pected and total observed numbers of RRV cases in
each of the 500- by 500-m grids ranged between 0 and       these areas ranged from 64.7 to 101.1 and represented
12. Standardized morbidity ratios (observed cases/         12.4 Ð19.4% of the total number of RRV disease cases
September 2006                  RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                       1049

                                                                                                                               Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021

   Fig. 4. Age-sex SMR for each of 809 grids (500 by 500 m) throughout Redland Shire, by using overlapping windows with
radii of 0, 1,000, 2,000, and 3000 m. SMRs were calculated by dividing the observed number of RRV disease cases by the
expected number RRV disease cases. Statistical analyses were completed using the SaTScan analysis package using scan
windows of maximum sizes of 0, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 m. Statistical signiÞcance was evaluated with Monte Carlo simulation.
Grids located within statistically signiÞcant clusters are shaded.

in Redland Shire. At these larger scanning window              using a scan window of radius ⬍1,000 m, and one of
sizes (1,000 Ð3,000 m), there were consistent patterns         these was signiÞcant at the remaining scan window
of signiÞcantly higher than expected numbers of RRV            sizes (0, 2,000, and 3,000 m). The latter cluster was
disease cases in four areas: Victoria Point and Redland        limited to a single 500- by 500-m grid in Sheldon-Mt
Bay on the mainland; Southern Moreton Bay Islands of           Cotton, which had three RRV disease cases (single
Macleay, Lamb, Karragarra, Russell; and Dunwich on             cases reported in 1991, 1994, and 1995) from a total
North Stradbroke Island. Two statistically signiÞcant          population of six people. Although SMRs for RRV
clusters also were found in inland areas (Fig. 4) by           disease were consistently ⬎1.0 in surrounding areas in
1050                             JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                  Vol. 43, no. 5

                                                                                                                 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021

                                             Fig. 4. Continued.

Sheldon-Mt Cotton, these were not statistically sig-    observed for RRV disease. For example, at a 0-m radius
niÞcant. A similar trend was found on Coochiemudlo      scan window, the observed number of mosquito biting
Island and in northern areas in Wellington Point and    complaints in each of the 500- by 500-m grids ranged
Ormiston.                                               between 0 and 58, and 35 clusters of signiÞcantly
   Geographic clustering of higher than expected        higher than expected numbers of complaints were
numbers of mosquito biting complaints also was          found (Fig. 5). The number of observed complaints in
found; however, the variation in the rate of mosquito   each of these 35 grids ranged between 3 and 58, com-
biting complaint per population was greater than that   pared with the expected numbers of 0.05Ð 6.25. The
September 2006                 RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                       1051

                                                                                                                              Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021

  Fig. 5. Mosquito biting complaint MR for each of 809 grids (500 by 500 m) throughout Redland Shire, by using overlapping
windows with radii of 0, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 m. Morbidity ratios were calculated by dividing the observed number of
mosquito biting complaints by the expected number of complaints. Statistical analyses were completed using the SaTScan
analysis package using scan windows of maximum sizes of 0, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 m. Statistical signiÞcance was evaluated
with Monte Carlo simulation. Grids located within statistically signiÞcant clusters are shaded.

difference between the total observed number of                Shire. In comparison, when we increased the scan
complaints (594) and the total expected number                 window to 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 m, the number of
(44.0) from these 35 grids was 550, which represented          overlapping clusters increased to 141, 215, and 233,
43.5% of the total number of complaints in Redland             respectively, and the observed numbers (845, 907, and
1052                              JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                   Vol. 43, no. 5

                                                                                                                   Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021

                                               Fig. 5. Continued.

984, respectively) and expected numbers (164.72,          quito biting complaints in Redland Shire. The majority
251.79, and 326.93, respectively) of complaints also      of mosquito biting complaints (93.9%) came from
increased. The difference between the total expected      residents living within two km of the coast, and of
and total observed numbers of mosquito biting com-        these, most (60.3%) were from residents in coastal
plaints in these areas ranged from 655.21 to 680.28 and   areas in Redland Bay and the southern Moreton Bay
represented 51.9 Ð53.9% of the total number of mos-       Islands.
September 2006                  RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                       1053

                                                                                                                               Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
   Fig. 6. Relationship between RRV disease age-sex SMR and mosquito biting complaint MR calculated for each of 809 grid
nodes (500 by 500 m) throughout Redland Shire, by using overlapping buffer windows with radii of 0, ⬍1,000, ⬍2,000, and
⬍3,000 m. Each SMR and MR was examined to determine whether the observed number of RRV disease cases and number
of complaints, respectively, was signiÞcantly greater than the expected numbers. Analyses were completed using SaTScan
analysis package and statistical signiÞcance was evaluated with Monte Carlo simulation. Statistical signiÞcance was reported
as white circles, SMR and MR not signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⬎ 0.05); gray circles, SMR signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⱕ 0.05) and MR not
signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⬎ 0.05); gray triangles, SMR not signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⬎ 0.05) and MR signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⱕ 0.05); and
black circles, SMR signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⱕ 0.05) and MR signiÞcantly ⬎1.0 (P ⱕ 0.05).

   Relationship between RRV Disease Incidence and              ters of higher than expected numbers of mosquito
Mosquito Biting Exposure at Different Spatial Scales.          biting complaints (Figs. 4 and 5).
To determine whether there was a spatial association              The strength of the relationship between RRV in-
between RRV disease incidence and mosquito biting              cidence and mosquito biting exposure, and the sensi-
complaints received from residents, we plotted the             tivity of mosquito biting complaints as a marker of
SaTScan results for each of the four scanning windows          increased risk of RRV disease, was dependent on the
(Fig. 6). The RRV disease SMR and the mosquito                 size of the SaTScan scanning window. For example,
biting complaint MR calculated for each grid coordi-           with a 0-m scanning window (i.e., cases and com-
nate was plotted, and the statistical results for each         plaints mapped to 500- by 500-m grids and SMRs and
ratio, obtained from SaTScan Monte Carlo simula-               MRs calculated for each grid separately), there were
tions, are presented. There was a clear, positive rela-        eight grids that had signiÞcantly higher than expected
tionship between RRV disease incidence and mos-                numbers of RRV disease cases (Fig. 6). Of these grids,
quito biting exposure in humans, and a spatial                 only three had signiÞcantly higher than expected
association between the location of clusters of higher         numbers of mosquito biting complaints, and three
than expected numbers of RRV disease cases and clus-           grids had no reported mosquito biting complaints at
1054                                        JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                                       Vol. 43, no. 5

   Table 2. Age-sex standardized RRV disease incidence rates and SMR in mainland and Macleay Island areas of Redland Shire versus
probability of the area having consistently high (>75th percentile) numbers of Ae. vigilax mosquitoes

                      Probability (%)
                                                                                                          RRV rate
      Areaa            Ae. vigilax no.         Area (ha)       Pop (py)c        Cases        Expd                            SMRe        P valuef
                                                                                                        (/100,000 py)
                     ⱖ75th percentileb
Reference pop               0Ð⬍20                15,748          676,776          263        263.0            39.1
All areas                  20Ð⬍40                 2,374          134,244           61         52.1            45.7            1.2         ⬎0.05
                           40Ð⬍60                 1,106           48,215           25         19.2            50.9            1.3         ⬎0.05
                           60Ð⬍80                 1,687           56,249           49         22.5            85.3            2.2         ⬍0.001
                           80Ð100                 3,997           46,349           56         19.0           115.3            2.9         ⬍0.001
Area 1                     20Ð⬍40                   895           60,059           27         22.9            46.2            1.2         ⬎0.05
                           40Ð⬍60                   266            4,460            1          1.7            22.8            0.6         ⬎0.05
Area 2                     20Ð⬍40                   400           47,479           13         18.4            27.6            0.7         ⬎0.05
                           40Ð⬍60                   274           21,699            4          8.6            18.3            0.5         ⬎0.05
                           60Ð⬍80                   659           42,915           24         17.0            55.1            1.4         ⬎0.05

                                                                                                                                                     Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
                           80Ð100                   362           23,493           18          9.3            76.0            1.9         ⬍0.01
Area 3                     20Ð⬍40                    33              756            0        ⬍0.1              0              0           ⬎0.05
Area 4                     20Ð⬍40                   343            9,226            7          3.7            73.3            1.9         ⬎0.05
                           40Ð⬍60                   230           20,273           16          8.2            76.2            1.9         ⬍0.01
                           60Ð⬍80                   255            1,627            3          0.7           179.4            4.6         ⬍0.05
                           80Ð100                   310            5,730           13          2.3           219.8            5.6         ⬍0.001
Area 5                     20Ð⬍40                   118            3,236            2          1.3            59.7            1.5         ⬎0.05
Area 6                     20Ð⬍40                   585           13,489           12          5.5            85.0            2.2         ⬍0.01
                           40Ð⬍60                   335            1,784            4          0.7           214.3            5.5         ⬍0.01
                           60Ð⬍80                   773           11,707           22          4.8           179.7            4.6         ⬍0.001
                           80Ð100                 2326             5,696            9          2.3           151.6            3.9         ⬍0.001
Area 7                     80Ð100                   999           11,431           16          5.1           122.7            3.1         ⬍0.001

  a
    Areas deÞned in Fig. 2.
  b
    Based on data from Ryan et al. (2004), probability maps were used to deÞne areas with consistently high (⬎75th percentile) numbers of
Ae. vigilax (Fig. 2). The probability values were grouped into Þve categories: 0 Ð⬍20, 20-⬍40, 40 Ð⬍60, 60-⬍80, and 80 Ð100%. Seven
noncontiguous, geographic areas were found to have ⱖ20% chance of having high Ae. vigilax numbers.
  c
    Populations expressed as the number of py.
  d
    Expected numbers of cases calculated by applying age-sex speciÞc RRV disease incidence rates from the pop residing in the 0 Ð⬍20% area,
to populations in the 20 Ð⬍40, 40 Ð⬍60, 60 Ð⬍80, and 80 Ð100% areas.
  e
    Standardized morbidity ratio calculated by dividing the actual number of cases by the expected number of cases.
  f
    Probability that the SMR is signiÞcantly greater than or ⬍1.0, based on the assumption that the observed cases followed a Poisson distribution
with a mean equal to the expected number of cases.

all. In comparison, when larger sized scanning win-                        chance of having high Ae. vigilax numbers were not
dows were used, the sensitivity of mosquito biting                         associated with increased risk of RRV disease. Of the
complaints as a marker for RRV disease risk increased.                     seven noncontiguous areas in Fig. 2, four had a positive
For example, for a 2,000-m scanning window analysis,                       relationship between high Ae. vigilax abundance and
60 windows had signiÞcantly higher than expected                           RRV disease risk (areas 2, 4, 6, and 7). The three
numbers of RRV disease cases. Of these windows, 43                         remaining areas had ⬍60% chance of having high Ae.
(72%) also had signiÞcantly higher than expected                           vigilax number (areas 1, 3, and 5) and relatively small
numbers of mosquito biting complaints. This propor-                        human populations (areas three and 5). In areas in
tion increased to 80% when a 3,000-m scanning win-                         Victoria Point (area 4) and Redland Bay (area 6) with
dow was used. Based on 3,000-m scanning window                             ⬎60% chance of having high Ae. vigilax numbers, the
results, we identiÞed 290 overlapping, circular areas                      RRV disease incidence rates were 3.9 Ð5.6 times the
with mosquito biting complaint MRs of ⬎1.0. This                           disease rate (39.1 cases per 100,000 py) in the area that
combined area contained 83% of the windows (95)
                                                                           never or rarely (0 Ð⬍20% chance) had high Ae. vigilax
with signiÞcantly higher than expected numbers of
                                                                           numbers.
RRV disease cases.
                                                                             High rates of mosquito biting complaints also were
   Spatial Relationships between RRV Disease–Mos-
quito Biting Complaints and Ae. vigilax Adult Abun-                        associated with high Ae. vigilax adult abundance (Ta-
dance. Increased risk of RRV disease in humans was                         ble 3). Overall, areas with 40 Ð⬍60% chance of high Ae.
associated with high Ae. vigilax adult abundance (Ta-                      vigilax numbers had almost double the numbers of
ble 2). Overall, based on the Þve probability categories                   complaints compared with the reference (0 Ð⬍20%)
(0 Ð⬍20, 20 Ð⬍40, 40 Ð⬍60, 60 Ð⬍80, and 80 Ð100%)                          population. In areas with 60 Ð⬍80 and 80 Ð⬍100%
that were used to deÞne areas with consistently high                       probabilities, the mosquito biting complaint MRs in-
(ⱖ75th percentile) numbers of Ae. vigilax (Fig. 2), we                     creased to 11.8 and 12.8, respectively. The relationship
found areas with a 60 Ð⬍80% and 80 Ð100% chance of                         between high Ae. vigilax numbers and complaints was
having high Ae. vigilax numbers had 2.2 and 2.9 times                      consistent in all areas except for area 1 (Fig. 2; Table
the risk of RRV disease, respectively, compared with                       3). In areas in Victoria Point (area 4) and Redland Bay
areas that had 0 Ð⬍20% chance of having high Ae.                           (area 6) with ⱖ60% chance of having high Ae. vigilax
vigilax numbers. Areas with 20 Ð⬍40 and 40 Ð⬍60%                           numbers, the mosquito biting complaint incidence
September 2006                      RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                                     1055

   Table 3. Mosquito biting complaint incidence rates and MR in mainland and Macleay Island areas of Redland Shire, versus probability
of the area having consistently high (>75th percentile) numbers of Ae. vigilax mosquitoes

                      Probability (%)
                                                  Area           Pop                                  Complaint rate
      Areaa         Ae. vigilax numbers                                    Complaints      Expd                            MRe       P valuef
                                                  (ha)          (py)c                                 (/100,000 py)
                     ⱖ75th percentileb
Reference pop              0Ð⬍20              15,748        676,776           315         315                46.5
All areas                 20Ð⬍40               2,374        134,244            80          62.5              59.6           1.3       ⬍0.05
                          40Ð⬍60               1,106         48,215            41          22.42             85.04          1.8       ⬍0.001
                          60Ð⬍80               1,687         56,249           310          26.8             551.1          11.8       ⬍0.001
                          80Ð100               3,997         46,349           277          12.8             597.6          12.8       ⬍0.001
Area 1                    20Ð⬍40                 895         60,059            35          28.0              58.3           1.3       ⬎0.05
                          40Ð⬍60                 266          4460.0            1           2.1              22.4           0.5       ⬎0.05
Area 2                    20Ð⬍40                 400         47,479            22          22.1              46.3           1.0       ⬎0.05
                          40Ð⬍60                 274         21,699            17          10.1              78.3           1.7       ⬍0.05
                          60Ð⬍80                 659         42,915            80          20.0             186.4           4.0       ⬍0.001

                                                                                                                                                 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
                          80Ð100                 362         23,493            54          10.9             229.9           4.9       ⬍0.001
Area 3                    20Ð⬍40                  33            756             4           0.4             529.2          11.4       ⬍0.001
Area 4                    20Ð⬍40                 343          9,226             1           4.3              10.8           0.2       ⬎0.05
                          40Ð⬍60                 230         20,273            16           9.4              78.9           1.7       ⬍0.05
                          60Ð⬍80                 255          1627             30           0.8           1,844.2          39.6       ⬍0.001
                          80Ð100                 310          5730              4           2.7              87.3           1.9       ⬎0.05
Area 5                    20Ð⬍40                 118          3,236             2           1.5              61.8           1.3       ⬎0.05
Area 6                    20Ð⬍40                 585         13,489            16           6.3             118.6           2.6       ⬍0.001
                          40Ð⬍60                 335          1,784             7           0.8             392.5           8.4       ⬍0.001
                          60Ð⬍80                 773         11,707           200           5.5           1,708.4          36.7       ⬍0.001
                          80Ð100               2,326          5,696           148           2.7           2,598.2          55.8       ⬍0.001
Area 7                    80Ð100                 999         11,431            70           5.3             612.4          13.2       ⬍0.001

  a
     Areas deÞned in Fig. 2.
  b
     Based on data from Ryan et al. (2004), probability maps were used to deÞne areas with consistently high (⬎75th percentile) numbers of
Ae. vigilax (Fig. 2). The probability values were grouped into Þve categories: 0 Ð⬍20, 20 Ð⬍40, 40 Ð⬍60, 60 Ð⬍80, and 80 Ð100%. Seven
noncontiguous, geographic areas were found to have ⱖ20% chance of having high Ae. vigilax numbers.
   c
     Populations expressed as the number of py.
   d
     Expected numbers of complaints calculated by applying complaint incidence rates from the pop residing in the 0 Ð⬍20% area, to populations
in the 20 Ð⬍40, 40 Ð⬍60, 60 Ð⬍80, and 80 Ð100% areas.
   e
     Morbidity ratio calculated by dividing the actual number of complaints by the expected number of complaints.
   f
     Probability that the MR is signiÞcantly greater than or ⬍1.0, based on the assumption that the observed numbers of complaints followed
a Poisson distribution with a mean equal to the expected number of cases.

rates were 39.6 Ð55.8 times the rate in the area that                        Impact of Future Population Growth on RRV Dis-
never or rarely (0 Ð⬍20% chance) had high Ae. vigilax                      ease Morbidity Patterns. The projected population for
numbers (46.5 complaints per 100,000 py).                                  Redland Shire for the year 2021(Queensland Govern-
                                                                           ment 2005) is 168,434 people, which represents an
   Table 4. Estimated resident population and numbers of RRV               increase of 42.2% from the 2001 population of 118,408
disease cases in Redland Shire in 2021, based on average disease           (Table 4). Projections for each of the 12 SLAs indicate
incidence rates for each statistical local between 1991 and 2001           the largest population increase will be in the Thorn-
                                                                           lands SLA with an estimated population of 24,158
                                                         2021 estimated    people, representing an increase of 216.5% from the
                       Estimated         % pop              no. RRV
         SLA            resident        increase          disease cases    2001 population (7,632). Based on the long-term av-
                       pop 2021a      (2001Ð2021)                          erage incidence rates for each SLA between 1991 and
                                                         no.b      %c
                                                                           2001 (Table 1) and the estimated populations in 2021,
Alexandra Hills           17,396           -6.0           6.0      (6.3)   we estimate that there will be ⬇95 RRV disease cases
Balance                    8,715           41.2          12.6     (13.2)
Birkdale                  16,028           16.7           5.2      (5.5)   per year and an average Shire incidence rate of 56.3
Capalaba                  17,824           -0.4           5.7      (6.0)   cases per 100,000 py. The population growth in SLAs
Cleveland                 16,405           20.1           5.7      (6.1)   (Balance, 41.2%; Redland Bay, 128.8%; Sheldon-Mt
Ormiston                   7,417           44.3           3.3      (3.5)   Cotton, 134.4%; and Victoria Point, 39.1%) with higher
Redland Bay               16,138          128.8          17.6     (18.5)
Sheldon-Mt Cotton         10,313          134.4           8.2      (8.6)   than average RRV disease rates, may result in an 8%
Thorneside                 4,129           17.0           1.2      (1.3)   increase in the average risk of RRV disease in Redland
Thornlands                24,158          216.5           9.8     (10.3)   Shire in 2021, compared with long-term rate between
Victoria Point            16,851           39.1          13.1     (13.9)   1991 and 2001.
Wellington Point          13,060           52.0           6.5      (6.8)
Total                    168,434           42.2          94.9

  a
                                                                                                    Discussion
    Projected populations for Redland Shire in 2021 (Queensland
Government 2005).                                                            Our analyses of RRV disease and mosquito biting
  b
    Estimated numbers of RRV disease cases calculated by multiply-
ing long-term RRV disease incidence rates (Table 1) by the projected
                                                                           complaint patterns, together with published data on
populations in the 12 SLA.                                                 vector abundance (Ryan et al. 2004), have highlighted
  c
    Estimated number of RRV disease cases in each SLA divided by           the interaction between human and mosquito vector
total estimated number from Redland Shire in 2021.                         populations in urban areas. There was considerable
1056                                JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                      Vol. 43, no. 5

heterogeneity in both human and vector population            centage of the incidence of RRV disease in the
densities in Redland Shire, and together, these two          mainland and Macleay Island areas (both in areas with
factors explained a signiÞcant amount of the variation       and without high Ae. vigilax numbers) that would be
in RRV morbidity. It is clear from Ryan et al. (2004)        eliminated if targeted adult mosquito control activities
that the distribution of adult Ae. vigilax was not uni-      were undertaken in areas with consistently high
form throughout Redland Shire. Several noncontigu-           (ⱖ60% chance) numbers of Ae. vigilax. If we were able
ous areas (Wellington Point, Victoria Point, Redland         to reduce the risk factors for RRV disease in the areas
Bay, and the Southern Moreton Bay Islands) in prox-          with consistently high numbers of Ae. vigilax to the
imity to productive saline water habitats of this species    same levels as those in other areas in Redland Shire,
had relatively high numbers of adult mosquitoes. Al-         then we could expect to reduce the RRV disease
though most vector-borne disease transmission cycles         incidence by an average of 13.6%. This relatively small
are complex and density of vector mosquitoes is not          reduction in RRV morbidity is due to the fact that the
always correlated with pathogen transmission inten-          majority of people in Redland Shire reside in areas

                                                                                                                         Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
sity (Beier et al. 1999), the current study has shown        where Ae. vigilax numbers are not extremely high and
that areas with consistently high numbers of adult Ae.       the risk of RRV disease is relatively low. Interestingly,
vigilax (Table 2) have higher than expected numbers          when we calculated the population attributable risk
of RRV disease cases. RRV disease rates in these areas       percentage for mosquito biting complaint incidence
are up to 2.9 times those in areas which rarely had high     that was associated with areas with consistently high
Ae. vigilax numbers. It should be noted, however, that       Ae. vigilax numbers, we estimated that 58.4% of the
a range of mosquito species, in addition to Ae. vigilax,     mosquito biting complaint incidence could be elimi-
were probably involved in RRV transmission in Red-           nated if areas with consistently high numbers of Ae.
land Shire (Ryan et al. 2004). These species include         vigilax were targeted. Basically, the majority of RRV
the brackish water species Ve. funerea and the fresh-        disease cases occurred in areas with relatively low Ae.
water species Cx. annulirostris, Cq. linealis, Ae. noto-     vigilax numbers, whereas the majority of mosquito
scriptus, and Ae. procax (Ryan et al. 2000, 2004; Jeffery    biting complaints occurred in areas with consistently
et al. 2002a,b). Although these species were abundant        high numbers of Ae. vigilax adults. Therefore, a tar-
in some areas in Redland Shire, the lack of signiÞcant       geted approach to adult mosquito control in areas with
autocorrelation in trap catches or the high seasonal         high Ae. vigilax numbers will probably have a signif-
variability in the spatial patterns meant that probabil-     icant effect on the number of mosquito biting com-
ity maps to deÞne areas with consistently high num-          plaints, but a limited effect on the number of RRV
bers were not reliable (Ryan et al. 2004). Surveillance      disease cases.
activities to deÞne the seasonal and spatial distributions      Although targeted control of adult Ae. vigilax in
of these mosquito species are required. In addition, het-    high-risk areas may result in modest reductions in RRV
erogeneity in the density of vertebrate hosts of RRV such    disease morbidity, effective control of immature
as macropods and possums (Kay et al. 1986, Boyd et al.       stages in productive saline water habitats may result in
2001) probably occurred throughout the study area, and       widespread reductions in adult Ae. vigilax densities
this also may have an affect on virus ampliÞcation and the   throughout wider areas in Redland Shire. Ae. vigilax
spillover of virus in human populations.                     adults are known to disperse inland on purposive
   It has been proposed that accurately targeted in-         ßights (Marks 1969, Lee et al. 1984), and in Redland
terventions in areas around speciÞc mosquito breed-          Shire upwards of 300 adults were collected in carbon
ing sites can be expected to give greatly improved           dioxide- and 1-octen-3-ol-baited light traps per night,
levels of malaria control compared with untargeted           in areas located ⬎10 km from the nearest saline water
strategies (Carter et al. 2000). In terms of resources       habitat (P.A.R. and D.A., unpublished data). There-
and environmental impacts, it is desirable to target         fore, it would be more prudent to focus control mea-
control activities to speciÞc areas. Although some ar-       sures against immature stages in aquatic environ-
eas in Redland Shire had consistently high numbers of        ments, before emergence and dispersal of adult
Ae. vigilax and high risk of RRV disease in humans, it       mosquitoes. This is consistent with most local govern-
is clear that targeted control of adult Ae. vigilax in       ment mosquito control programs in coastal areas of
these areas alone would not be effective in preventing       southeastern Queensland (Bell 1989), which involve
RRV disease. For example, based on the 60 Ð⬍80 and           the application of various formulations of Bacillus thu-
80 Ð100% probability categories that were used to de-        ringiensis variety israelensis and (S)-methoprene to
Þne areas with consistently high numbers of Ae. vigilax      saline water habitats.
(Fig. 2), we calculated RRV disease relative risks of 2.2       Our mapping of RRV disease cases was to the pa-
and 2.9, respectively, compared with the risk of disease     tientsÕ usual place of residence, and we recognize that
in areas that had 0 Ð⬍20% chance of having high num-         this may not necessarily be the same location at which
bers of Ae. vigilax. The areas with consistently high Ae.    the person was infected. The retrospective nature of
vigilax numbers comprised 5,684 ha or 22.8% of the           the study prevented us from ascertaining whether
total mainland and Macleay Island area, yet only 10.7%       patients had traveled before RRV disease onset and
of the human population resided in these areas. To           whether these areas represented potential foci of RRV
estimate the potential beneÞt of targeted adult mos-         transmission. Therefore, if we accept that a proportion
quito control in these areas, we calculated the popu-        of the RRV disease cases were infected in areas other
lation attributable risk percentage, which is the per-       than where they lived, and we assume that peoplesÕ
September 2006               RYAN ET AL.: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROSS RIVER VIRUS DISEASE CASES                  1057

travel habits are fairly uniform throughout the Shire,    window but instead use a ßexibly shaped spatial scan
then our mapping of disease cases to usual place of       statistic that can detect irregular shaped clusters may
residence probably underestimated the heterogeneity       prove useful for detecting irregular shaped clusters of
in disease risk. Heterogeneity in RRV disease risk has    vector-borne disease (Ozdenerol et al. 2005, Tango
been noted in other areas, such as Brisbane and Dar-      and Takahashi 2005).
win, where higher than expected numbers of RRV               There was a clear spatial association between re-
disease cases were reported from areas near wetlands      ports of mosquito biting exposure from residents and
and other major mosquito breeding sites (Whelan et        RRV disease incidence. Although tolerance to mos-
al. 1997, Muhar et al. 2000).                             quito attack is likely to vary from person to person and
   Information on the heterogeneity in vector borne       complaints of mosquito biting may not always be due
disease risk also can lead to a more informed deci-       to attack by competent RRV vectors, in Redland Shire
sion-making framework to help balance the needs           at least, reports of mosquito biting exposure was found
for human development, public health, and respon-         to be a sensitive indicator of elevated risk of RRV

                                                                                                                      Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
sible land use. Based on the long-term average inci-      disease. Areas with high numbers of mosquito biting
dence rates between 1991 and 2001 and the 2021            complaints should be surveyed to determine whether
population projections for each of the 12 SLAs in         there is exposure to medically important species, and
Redland Shire, we estimated that there will be ⬇95        if necessary, additional mosquito control measures can
RRV disease cases per year and an average Shire in-       be implemented.
cidence rate of 56.3 cases per 100,000 py. The popu-         At the larger scanning window sizes (1,000 Ð3,000
lation growth in SLAs with higher than average RRV        m) there were consistent patterns of signiÞcantly
disease rates may result in an 8% increase in the av-     higher than expected numbers of RRV disease cases in
erage risk of RRV disease in Redland Shire in 2021,       four areas: Victoria Point and Redland Bay on the
compared with the long-term rate between 1991 and         mainland; Southern Moreton Bay Islands of Macleay,
2001. Although land use change in these areas can         Lamb, Karragarra, Russell; and Dunwich on North
potentially have a large impact on local ecology and      Stradbroke Island. The disadvantage of mapping cases
habitats that effect mosquito abundance, species com-     to the SLA level boundaries was the potential to mask
position, and ultimately pathogen transmission (Nor-      any patterns within the SLA administrative area. This
ris 2004), urban planning usually occurs without con-     was evident for mosquito biting complaints in the
sideration for environmental affects that can lead to     Wellington Point area, which were not signiÞcantly
increased vector-borne disease burden. Incorporation      different from the expected numbers when analyzed
of basic surveillance data on vectors and vector-borne    by SLA, yet SaTScan analyses indicated higher than
diseases into a land use planning framework has the       expected numbers of complaints in coastal areas (Fig.
potential to guide development into areas of low dis-     5). Similarly with RRV and mosquito biting complaints
ease risk or alternatively identify the need for miti-    from the Southern Moreton Bay Islands (Balance
gation strategies to reduce future disease burden in      SLA), where the SaTScan analysis method was able to
these populations.                                        identify speciÞc areas with higher than expected num-
   With the aim of providing practical information to     bers of cases (Macleay, Lamb, Karragarra, and Russell
local governments on methods for mapping vector-          Islands, and Dunwich) and complaints (Macleay,
borne disease patterns, we examined RRV cases and         Lamb, Karragarra, and Russell Islands). Based on SLA
mosquito complaints patterns at two spatial scales: 1)    level analysis, one could only assume homogeneity in
broad patterns, using predeÞned SLA level boundaries      cases and complaints throughout the region and this
as deÞned by the Australian Bureau of Statistics; and     was clearly not the case (i.e., no clusters of signiÞ-
2) Þner patterns ranging from individual 500- by 500-m    cantly higher than expected numbers of cases or com-
grids, through to circular windows with radii ranging     plaints in the northern population centers of Amity or
from 1,000 to 3,000 m (SaTScan analyses). Generally,      Point Lookout).
results from the two approaches were in agreement,           As demonstrated above, the issue of spatial scale is
with higher than expected RRV disease cases and           important for mapping of vector-borne disease pat-
mosquito biting complaints from Victoria Point, Red-      terns. Clustering of vector-borne disease cases can be
land Bay, and the Southern Moreton Bay Island areas.      a result of broad environmental risk factors such as
Given the fact that RRV disease notiÞcation data are      weather events, which can be correlated with arbo-
now provided to local governments according to the        virus disease incidence over several hundred kilome-
suburb in which the patient resided, mapping cases to     ters (Gatton et al. 2004, 2005), through to clustering of
the level of SLA is probably sufÞcient to highlight       cases over several kilometers such as those found in
broad differences in RRV disease incidence. Depend-       southern coastal areas in Redland Shire, which had
ing on the size and shape of the SLA, additional anal-    consistently high Ae. vigilax numbers. In Dakar, Sene-
yses using SaTScan or similar cluster detection soft-     gal, Plasmodium falciparum prevalence in humans and
ware may be undertaken. One potential limitation of       their proximity to Anopheles arabiensis Patton imma-
SaTScan is the fact that it uses a circular window to     ture habitats was correlated over several hundred
scan for clusters, which makes it difÞcult to correctly   meters (Trape et al. 1992), as opposed to dengue cases
detect noncircular based clusters such as those that      in Florida, Puerto Rico, which showed signiÞcant clus-
may occur along rivers or transport routes. Several       tering within households and at very short distances
new methods that do not rely on a circular scanning       (⬍10 m) (Morrison et al. 1998). The use of arbitrary
1058                                   JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY                                               Vol. 43, no. 5

administrative boundaries for spatial analyses has the                in Queensland, Australia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 71:
potential to mask any small-scale heterogeneity in                    629 Ð 635.
disease patterns. With the availability of georefer-              Gatton, M., B. Kay, and P. Ryan. 2005. Environmental pre-
enced data sets and high-resolution imagery, it is be-                dictors of Ross River virus disease outbreaks in Queens-
coming more feasible to undertake spatial analyses at                 land, Australia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72: 792Ð799.
                                                                  Getis, A., A. C. Morrison, K. Gray, and T. W. Scott. 2003.
these relatively small scales.
                                                                      Characteristics of the spatial pattern of the dengue vec-
                                                                      tor, Aedes aegypti, in Iquitos, Peru. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
                                                                      69: 494 Ð505.
                    Acknowledgments                               Harley, D., S. Ritchie, D. Phillips, and A. van den Hurk. 2000.
                                                                      Mosquito isolates of Ross River virus from Cairns,
  Funding for this research was provided, in part, by an              Queensland, Australia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 62: 561Ð
Arbovirus Prevention Research grant (ARBO 00-06) from                 565.
Queensland Health.                                                Hjalmars, U., M. Kulldorff, G. Gustafsson, and N. Nagarwalla,
                                                                      N. 1996. Childhood leukaemia in Sweden: using GIS and

                                                                                                                                       Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/43/5/1042/881278 by guest on 03 January 2021
                                                                      a spatial scan statistic for cluster detection. Stat. Med. 15:
                     References Cited                                 707Ð715.
                                                                  Jeffery, J.A.L., P. A. Ryan, S. A. Lyons, P. T. Thomas, and B. H.
Ali, M., Y. Wagatsuma, M. Emch, and R. F. Breiman. 2003.              Kay. 2002a. Spatial distribution of Ross River virus and
    Use of a geographic information system for deÞning spa-
                                                                      Barmah Forest virus vectors on Russell Island, Moreton
    tial risk for dengue transmission in Bangladesh: role for
                                                                      Bay, Queensland. Aust. J. Entomol. 41: 329 Ð338.
    Aedes albopictus in an urban outbreak. Am. J. Trop. Med.
                                                                  Jeffery, J.A.L., P. A. Ryan, S. A. Lyons, and B. H. Kay. 2002b.
    Hyg. 69: 634Ð640.
                                                                      Vector competence of Coquillettidia linealis (Skuse)
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2003. Census of population
                                                                      (Diptera: Culicidae) for Ross River and Barmah Forest
    and housing, selected social and housing characteristics
                                                                      viruses. Aust. J. Entomol. 41: 339 Ð344.
    for statistical local areas, Queensland, 2001 (2015.1).
                                                                  Kay, B. H., and J. G. Aaskov. 1989. Ross River virus (epi-
    Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia.
                                                                      demic polyarthritis), pp. 93Ð112. In T. P. Monath [ed.],
Beier, J. C., G. F. Killeen, and J. I. Githure. 1999. Entomo-
                                                                      The arboviruses: epidemiology and ecology, vol. 4. CRC,
    logic inoculation rates and Plasmodium falciparum ma-
    laria prevalence in Africa. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61:            Boca Raton, FL.
    109Ð113.                                                      Kay, B. H., R. A. Hall, I. D. Fanning, P. Mottram, P. L. Young,
Bell, K. M. 1989. Development and review of the contiguous            and C. C. Pollitt. 1986. Experimental infection of verte-
    local authority group programme on saltmarsh mosquito             brates with Murray Valley encephalitis and Ross River
    control. Arbovirus Res. Aust. 5: 168Ð171.                         viruses. Arbovirus Res. Aust. 4: 71Ð75.
Boyd, A. M., R. A. Hall, R. T. Gemmell, and B. H. Kay. 2001.      Kulldorff, M., and N. Nagarwalla N. 1995. Spatial disease
    Experimental infection of Australian brushtail possums,           clusters: detection and inference. Stat. Med. 14: 799 Ð 810.
    Trichosurus vulpecula (Phalangeridae: Marsupialia), with      Lee, D. J., M. M. Hicks, M. Griffiths, R. C. Russell, and E. N.
    Ross River and Barmah Forest viruses by use of a natural          Marks. 1984. Monograph Series, Entomology Mono-
    mosquito vector system. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65: 777Ð           graph No. 2, The Culicidae of the Australasian Region,
    782.                                                              vol. 3. pp 207Ð233, Australian Government Publishing
Brooker, S., S. Clarke, J. K. Njagi, S. Polack, B. Mugo, B.           Service, Canberra, Australia.
    Estambale, E. Muchiri, P. Magnussen, and J. Cox. 2004.        Liebhold, A. M., R. E. Rossi, and W. P. Kemp. 1993. Geosta-
    Spatial clustering of malaria and associated risk factors         tistics and geographic information systems in applied in-
    during an epidemic in a highland area of western Kenya.           sect ecology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 38: 303Ð327.
    Trop. Med. Int. Health 9: 757Ð766.                            Lothrop, H. D., and W. K. Reisen. 1999. A geographical
Brownstein, J. S., H. Rosen, D. Purdy, J. R. Miller, M. Mer-          information system to manage mosquito and arbovirus
    lino, F. Mostashari, and D. Fish. 2002. Spatial analysis of       surveillance and control data in the Coachella Valley of
    West Nile virus: rapid risk assessment of an introduced           California. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 15: 299 Ð307.
    vector-borne zoonosis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2:          Marks, E. N. 1969. Mosquitoes (Culicidae) on QueenslandÕs
    157Ð164.                                                          coral cays. Qld Nat. 19: 94 Ð98.
Carter, R., K. N. Mendis, and D. Roberts. 2000. Spatial tar-      Morrison, A. C., A. Getis, M. Santiago, J. G. Rigau-Perez, and
    geting of interventions against malaria. Bull. World              P. Reiter. 1998. Exploratory space-time analysis of re-
    Health Organ. 78: 1401Ð1411.                                      ported dengue cases during an outbreak in Florida,
Commonwealth Bureau of Meteorology. 2004. Climate Av-                 Puerto Rico, 1991Ð1992. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58: 287Ð
    erages for Australian Sites-Averages for Redlands                 298.
    (http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_            Morrison, A. C., K. Gray, A. Getis, H. Astete, M. Sihuincha,
    040265.shtml).                                                    D. Focks, D. Watts, J. D. Stancil, J. Olson, P. Blair, and
Doherty, R. L. 1972. Arboviruses in Australia. Aust. Vet. J.          T. W. Scott. 2004. Temporal and geographic patterns of
    48: 172Ð180.                                                      Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) production in Iquitos.
Dwass, M. 1957. ModiÞed randomization tests for nonpara-              Peru J. Med. Entomol. 41: 1123Ð1142.
    metric hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 28: 181Ð187.              Mostashari, F., M. Kulldorff, J. J. Hartman, J. R. Miller, and
[ESRI] Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.                  V. Kulasekera. 2003. Dead bird clusters as an early warn-
    1996a. ArcView GIS 3.2a for Windows. ESRI, Redlands,              ing system for West Nile virus activity. Emerg. Infect. Dis.
    CA.                                                               9: 641Ð 646.
[ESRI] Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.              Muhar, A., P.E.R. Dale, L. Thalib, and E. Arito. 2000. The
    1996b. Using the ArcView Spatial Analyst. ESRI, Red-              spatial distribution of Ross River virus infections in Bris-
    lands, CA.                                                        bane: signiÞcance of residential location and relation-
Gatton, M., L. Kelly-Hope, B. Kay, and P. Ryan. 2004. Spa-            ships with vegetation types. Environ. Health Prev. Med.
    tial-temporal analysis of Ross River virus disease patterns       4: 184 Ð189.
You can also read