IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION ON FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY AND COMPOSITION OF MARINE ECOSYSTEMS

Page created by April Brown
 
CONTINUE READING
[Palaeontology, Vol. 61, Part 1, 2018, pp. 133–148]

IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION
ON FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY AND COMPOSITION
OF MARINE ECOSYSTEMS
by ALEXANDER M. DUNHILL 1                                        , WILLIAM J. FOSTER 2 , JAMES SCIBERRAS 3
and RICHARD J. TWITCHETT 4
1
 School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; a.dunhill@leeds.ac.uk
2
 Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA
3
 Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK
4
 Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK

Typescript received 23 June 2017; accepted in revised form 15 September 2017

Abstract: Mass extinctions have profoundly influenced the                         the extinction event was, however, highly selective against
history of life, not only through the death of species but also                   some modes of life, in particular sessile suspension feeders.
through changes in ecosystem function and structure. Impor-                       Although taxa with heavily calcified skeletons suffered higher
tantly, these events allow us the opportunity to study ecologi-                   extinction than other taxa, lightly calcified taxa also appear to
cal dynamics under levels of environmental stress for which                       have been selected against. The extinction appears to have
there are no recent analogues. Here, we examine the impact                        invigorated the already ongoing faunal turnover associated
and selectivity of the Late Triassic mass extinction event on                     with the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. The ecological effects
the functional diversity and functional composition of the glo-                   of the Late Triassic mass extinction were preferentially felt in
bal marine ecosystem, and test whether post-extinction com-                       the tropical latitudes, especially amongst reefs, and it took
munities in the Early Jurassic represent a regime shift away                      until the Middle Jurassic for reef ecosystems to fully recover to
from pre-extinction communities in the Late Triassic. Our                         pre-extinction levels.
analyses show that, despite severe taxonomic losses, there is no
unequivocal loss of global functional diversity associated with                   Key words: mass extinction, Triassic, Jurassic, functional
the extinction. Even though no functional groups were lost,                       diversity, niche, regime shift.

T H E Late Triassic mass extinction event (LTE), which                            to understanding mass extinction events (Barnosky et al.
occurred ~201.6 million years ago (Blackburn et al. 2013),                        2012; Aberhan & Kiessling 2015). The LTE has been under-
is the second biggest biodiversity loss (Alroy 2010) and the                      studied in comparison with other major Phanerozoic biotic
third biggest ecological crisis (McGhee et al. 2004) since                        crises (Twitchett 2006) and, despite the importance of
the Cambrian. The proposed mechanism for the crisis was                           functional diversity changes or ecological regime shifts on
CO2-induced environmental changes, including global                               ecosystem function, a palaeoecological perspective on long-
warming (McElwain et al. 1999; Wignall 2001), sea-level                           term trends through deep-time, including the effects of
changes (Hallam 1981), ocean anoxia (Hallam & Wignall                             mass extinctions, is still lacking (Villeger et al. 2011). Con-
2000; Jaraula et al. 2013) and ocean acidification (Haut-                         sequently, little is known about the ecological impact of the
mann 2004; Hautmann et al. 2008a) as a result of the erup-                        LTE, aside from the preferential extinction of tropical taxa
tion of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Large Igneous                               inhabiting shallow marine environments, particularly
Province (CAMP) (Whiteside et al. 2010; Blackburn et al.                          hypercalcifiers, and the subsequent reef crisis in the Early
2013). This makes the LTE an attractive candidate for                             Jurassic (Kiessling & Aberhan 2007; Kiessling et al. 2007;
drawing ecological comparisons with the current anthro-                           Kiessling & Simpson 2011).
pogenically-driven biodiversity decline. Recognizing when                            Understanding the nature and patterns of extinction
ecosystems reach a threshold in response to environmental                         selectivity during this event may help in better under-
pressures, resulting in a change in ecosystem structure                           standing the cause(s) of the event, and/or may help pin-
often characterized by a shift in dominance among organ-                          point sampling biases or deficiencies. Selective loss of reef
isms with different modes of life (i.e. a regime shift) is key                    ecosystems is a common outcome of past biotic crises

©The Authors.                                                             doi: 10.1111/pala.12332                                              133
Palaeontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Palaeontological Association.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
134    PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

driven by CO2-induced environmental change (Fl€             ugel   Database (PaleoDB) on 13 April 2016 (Clapham et al.
2002; Veron 2008; Kiessling & Simpson 2011; Foster &               2016; Dunhill et al. 2017). This database consists of
Twitchett 2014) and may be interpreted as a consequence            55 608 occurrences of 2615 genera compiled at stage
of their sensitivity to environmental change. Apart from           level. Filtering protocols were used to exclude ichnotaxa,
selection against specific regions, ecosystems or habitats         form taxa and any uncertain generic assignments (e.g.
(Foster & Twitchett, 2014), other studies have suggested           aff., cf., ex gr., sensu lato, ‘[quotation marks]’, and ‘infor-
that traits such as skeletal composition, motility and feed-       mal’). Although there is concern that some of the data
ing are also critical in explaining patterns of selectivity.       within the PaleoDB is inaccurate in terms of taxonomic
Past extinction events associated with elevated CO2 have           and stratigraphic assignment, a number of studies have
been shown to be selective against epifaunal, sessile, sus-        shown that taxonomic errors in these datasets are ran-
pension feeders (Bush & Bambach 2011; Foster & Twitch-             domly distributed and have only minimal effects on long-
ett 2014; Clapham 2017), and selective against heavily             term diversification and extinction patterns (Miller 2000;
calcified organisms (Hautmann 2004; Knoll et al. 2007;             Peters 2007; Wagner et al. 2007; Miller & Foote 2009).
Hautmann et al. 2008a; Clapham & Payne 2011; Kiessling             Erroneous taxonomic and/or stratigraphic assignments
& Simpson 2011; Bush & Pruss 2013; Payne et al. 2016a)             were identified and corrected as far as was possible. This
but as epifaunal, sessile suspension feeders tend to be            process involved drawing on the expertise of the authors
heavily calcified, it is unclear which of those traits is most     and consultation with experts in specific taxonomic
important. Also, apparent selectivity may simply be an             groups where necessary (all cited in Acknowledgements
artefact of preservation or sampling biases that may exist         below). As well as systematic information, from phylum
between different modes of life, at least regionally (Man-         to generic level, information relating to palaeolongitude
der & Twitchett 2008).                                             and palaeolatitude, depositional environment, and both
   The main aim of this study is to understand the patterns        chrono- and lithostratigraphy were downloaded. Strati-
of diversity change and extinction selectivity in marine           graphic assignments were made to the stage level, and
ecosystems during the Triassic–Jurassic interval and, in par-      Triassic and Jurassic occurrences falling outside of a Ladi-
ticular, in relation to the LTE. In order to investigate the       nian to Aalenian range were omitted from the data set.
functional diversity of ecosystems and to study key traits         Occurrences without stage-level designations were omit-
such as feeding, tiering and motility, the ecospace model of       ted. However, occurrence data do not capture Lazarus
Bambach et al. (2007) was used to provide a quantitative           taxa (i.e. an organism that disappears from the fossil
autecological analysis of all known Middle Triassic to Middle      record, often for millions of years, before reappearing
Jurassic marine animal genera. This approach has been pre-         unchanged; Flessa & Jablonski 1983) which can lead to
viously successfully applied to analysis of the Cambrian radi-     the overestimation of extinction rates, particularly across
ation (Bambach et al. 2007), comparisons of Palaeozoic and         major extinction events (Twitchett 2001). A second data-
modern ecosystems (Bush et al. 2007; Villeger et al. 2011;        base was therefore constructed by ranging-through 2844
Knope et al. 2015) and studies of both the late Permian            genera between first and last occurrences at substage level
(Dineen et al. 2014; Foster & Twitchett 2014) and end-             derived from the PaleoDB and from Sepkoski et al.
Cretaceous (Aberhan & Kiessling 2015) mass extinction              (2002). To avoid edge effects in the range database, pre-
events. The following individual hypotheses were tested: (1)       Middle Triassic and post-Middle Jurassic occurrences
in common with the Late Permian extinction (Foster &               were used for determining the stratigraphic ranges of gen-
Twitchett 2014), despite significant taxonomic losses, the         era. This approach was used by Foster & Twitchett (2014)
LTE did not result in a reduction in global functional diver-      and compensates for the out-of-date nature of much of
sity; (2) sessile suspension feeders were selected against,        Sepkoski et al. (2002) such as truncation of generic ranges
compared to other modes of life across the LTE; (3) heavily        in the Norian which are now known to extend into the
calcified organisms were selected against and suffered higher      Rhaetian, whilst filling in the gaps of the incomplete
extinction rates than lightly calcified taxa; and (4) taxonomic    PaleoDB. The occurrence-based PaleoDB also allows for
and functional diversity loss was greater in the tropics than      the accounting of variation in sampling intensity which is
at higher latitudes.                                               not possible with a range-through data set. The PaleoDB
                                                                   bins data at the stage level whilst the ranged-through data
                                                                   (Sepkoski et al. 2002) is binned at the substage level.
MATERIAL AND METHOD                                                Therefore, taxonomic and functional richness data are
                                                                   calculated from ranged-through data at the substage level
Marine animal database                                             and occurrence data (raw and subsampled) at the stage
                                                                   level. As it is only possible to use the occurrence data in
A database of all Middle Triassic to Middle Jurassic mar-          the regional subset analyses, all of these are at stage-level
ine animal genera was downloaded from the Paleobiology             only.
DUNHILL ET AL.: IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION                             135

Functional characterization of marine animal genera               classified as photosymbiotic or predatory; this would
                                                                  only change the mode of life code from 261 to 265 or
Modes of life for all marine genera within the database           266.
were inferred using data from previous publications,                 Some previous studies have also considered skeletal cal-
functional morphology, online taxonomic databases and             cification to be an important trait that may confer selec-
data from extant relatives. Each genus was assigned to a          tive advantage during extinction events (P€    ortner et al.
functional bin in the ecospace model of Bambach et al.            2005; Knoll et al. 2007; Helmuth 2009; Payne et al.
(2007) based on its tiering, motility and feeding habits          2016a). In order to test this, the fossil genera were also
(Tables 1, 2). Scleractinian coral genera were all                assigned to one of three bins based on their calcification
recorded as having suspension-feeding modes of life,              (i.e. light, moderate or heavy), following the classification
despite evidence suggesting that many may have been               scheme of Knoll et al. (2007). We do not go as far as to
photosymbiotic (Stanley & Swart 1995; Frankowiak et al.
2016; Stanley & Swart 2016). Modern scleractinian corals
may employ a variety of feeding strategies, but most,             TABLE 2.   Mode of life assignments (Bambach et al. 2007) pre-
                                                                  sent in Middle Triassic to Middle Jurassic marine environments.
including zooplankton microcarnivory, are consistent
with suspension-feeding (Bambach et al. 2007; Bush                Numeric     Mode of life defintion
et al. 2007). However, as the dominant organisms within                       (tiering; motility; feeding mechanism)
this mode of life (which suffer the greatest reduction in
                                                                  115         Pelagic; freely, fast; predatory
generic richness and occurrences at the LTE) it would
                                                                  141         Pelagic; facultative, attached; suspension
not alter the results of this analysis if corals were to be
                                                                  241         Erect; facultative, attached; suspension
                                                                  261         Erect; non-motile, attached; suspension
                                                                  312         Surficial; freely, fast; surface deposit
TABLE 1.     Mode of life categories for tiering, motility, and
                                                                  315         Surficial; freely, fast; predatory
feeding following Bambach et al. (2007).
                                                                  321         Surficial; freely, slow; suspension
Ecologic   Description                                            322         Surficial; freely, slow; surface deposit
category                                                          324         Surficial; freely, slow; grazing
                                                                  325         Surficial; freely, slow; predatory
Tiering                                                           331         Surficial; facultative, unattached; suspension
 1         Pelagic: in the water column                           341         Surficial; facultative, attached; suspension
 2         Erect: benthic, extending into the water mass          351         Surficial; non-motile, unattached; suspension
 3         Surficial: benthic, not extending significantly into   361         Surficial; non-motile, attached; suspension
            the water column                                      415         Semi-infaunal; freely, fast; predatory
 4         Semi-infaunal: partly infaunal, partly exposed         421         Semi-infaunal; freely, slow; suspension
 5         Shallow infaunal: living in the top ~5 cm of the       422         Semi-infaunal; freely, slow; surface deposit
            sediment                                              425         Semi-infaunal; freely, slow; predatory
 6         Deep infaunal: living more than ~5 cm deep in the      441         Semi-infaunal; facultative, attached; suspension
            sediment                                              442         Semi-infaunal; facultative, attached; surface deposit
Motility                                                          451         Semi-infaunal; non-motile, unattached; suspension
1          Freely, fast: regularly moving, unencumbered           456         Semi-infaunal; non-motile, unattached; other
2          Freely, slow: as above, but strong bond to substrate   461         Semi-infaunal; non-motile, attached; suspension
3          Facultative, unattached: moving only when necessary,   521         Shallow infaunal; freely, slow; suspension
            free-lying                                            522         Shallow infaunal; freely, slow; surface deposit
 4         Facultative, attached: moving only when necessary,     523         Shallow infaunal; freely, slow; mining
            attached                                              525         Shallow infaunal; freely, slow; predatory
 5         Non-motile, unattached: not capable of moving,         526         Shallow infaunal; freely, slow; other
            free-lying                                            531         Shallow infaunal; facultative, unattached; suspension
 6         Non-motile, attached: not capable of moving,           532         Shallow infaunal; facultative, unattached; surface
            attached                                                           deposit
Feeding                                                           533         Shallow infaunal; facultative, unattached; mining
 1         Suspension: capturing food particles from the water    535         Shallow infaunal; facultative, unattached; predatory
 2         Surface deposit: capturing loose particles from a      541         Shallow infaunal; facultative, attached; suspension
            substrate                                             546         Shallow infaunal; facultative, attached; other
 3         Mining: recovering buried food                         621         Deep infaunal; freely, slow; suspension
 4         Grazing: scraping or nibbling food from a substrate    631         Deep infaunal; facultative, unattached; suspension
 5         Predatory: capturing prey capable of resistance        641         Deep infaunal; facultative, attached; suspension
 6         Other: e.g. photo- or chemosymbiosis, parasites        646         Deep infaunal; facultative, attached; other
136    PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

consider skeletal mineralogy, however, previous results            Statistical analyses
from Kiessling et al. (2007) found no overall selectivity
associated with skeletal mineralogy.                               To account for biases brought about by uneven sampling
   Where sufficient geological information was available,          across space and through time, we applied a subsampling
fossil occurrences were assigned to one of three deposi-           regime to standardize both taxonomic and functional
tional settings: inshore, offshore or reef (Table 3). Occur-       diversity on the basis of the number of fossil occurrences.
rences with insufficient environmental data were not used          Subsampling quotas were set at n = 2000 occurrences per
in the depositional settings analyses. All occurrences were        bin for global analyses, and at n = 350 for the smaller-
assigned to 30° palaeolatitudinal bands, irrespective of           scale analyses pertaining to palaeolatitude, depositional
hemispheric orientation: polar (> 60°N or S), temperate            setting and oceanic basin. Any time bins that did not
(between 30 and 60°N or S) or tropical (< 30°N or S).              reach the subsampling quota were omitted from the anal-
All occurrences were, using palaeolatitude and palaeolon-          yses. In each case, subsampling was carried out across
gitude, plotted on to Triassic–Jurassic plate-tectonic             1000 iterations. We do not use shareholder quorum sub-
basemaps (Scotese 2010) to identify which palaeo-oceano-           sampling (SQS) (Alroy 2010), which has been proven to
graphic basin they were derived from (i.e. Tethys, Pantha-         avoid the problems rarefaction has with dampening true
lassa, Boreal) (Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S1).                     differences in diversity, as our data show no trend in
                                                                   alpha diversity (i.e. number of taxa per collection)
                                                                   through time or across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary.
TABLE 3.    Categorization   of   depositional      environments   Dissimilarity in ecological community structure between
recorded in the PaleoDB following Kiessling et al. (2007).         time bins was tested for using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity
                                                                   (Bray & Curtis 1957) tests on subsampled occurrence data
PaleoDB classification                 Category from this study    to detect changes in relative abundances of functional
Coastal indet.                         Inshore                     groups and significance testing was achieved by randomly
Delta plain                            Inshore                     assigning fossil occurrences to pre- and post-extinction
Deltaic indet.                         Inshore                     time bins across 1000 iterations and performing a Manly
Estuary/bay                            Inshore                     test (Manly 1997) to detect whether the observed dissimi-
Foreshore                              Inshore                     larity is significantly different to the distribution of ran-
Lagoonal                               Inshore                     dom occurrences. The simulations were achieved by
Lagoonal/restricted shallow subtidal   Inshore                     randomly assigning Rhaetian and Hettangian occurrences
Marginal marine indet.                 Inshore                     to pre- and post-extinction assemblages and calculating
Open shallow subtidal                  Inshore
                                                                   Bray–Curtis dissimilarity across the boundary.
Paralic indet.                         Inshore
Peritidal                              Inshore
Prodelta                               Inshore
Sand shoal                             Inshore                     RESULTS
Shallow subtidal indet.                Inshore
Shoreface                              Inshore                     Global changes in functional diversity
Transition zone/lower shoreface        Inshore
Basinal (carbonate)                    Offshore                    Global genus-level extinction across the LTE is estimated
Basinal (siliciclastic)                Offshore                    at between 46% (using ranged-through data) and 72–73%
Deep subtidal (indet.)                 Offshore                    (raw and subsampled occurrence) (Fig. 1A). There are
Deep subtidal ramp                     Offshore                    considerable differences between the ranged-through and
Deep subtidal shelf                    Offshore
                                                                   occurrence data throughout the results, with the former
Deep-water indet.                      Offshore
                                                                   providing lower extinction estimates. This is unsurprising
Offshore                               Offshore
Offshore indet.                        Offshore                    as the incomplete nature of the fossil record leads to
Offshore ramp                          Offshore                    inflated levels of extinction in occurrence data due to dis-
Offshore shelf                         Offshore                    appearances brought about by Lazarus taxa. The same
Slope                                  Offshore                    difference between the datasets is evident in functional
Submarine fan                          Offshore                    diversity loss too: seven modes of life apparently disap-
Basin reef                             Reef                        peared across the LTE according to the occurrence data,
Intrashelf/intraplatform reef          Reef                        whereas five of those modes of life are recorded as being
Perireef or subreef                    Reef                        present by the range-through data (Fig. 1B). A maximum
Platform/shelf-margin reef             Reef                        of two modes of life, therefore, disappeared across the
Reef, buildup or bioherm               Reef
                                                                   Triassic–Jurassic (T–J) boundary: pelagic, facultatively
Slope/ramp reef                        Reef
                                                                   mobile, suspension feeders and semi-infaunal, unattached
DUNHILL ET AL.: IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION                                         137

non-motile, ‘other’ feeders, associated with the extinction                     between the Carnian–Norian (Tuvalian–Lacian) and across
of pelagic crinoids and megalodontid bivalves, respec-                          the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary (Fig. 1B). Neither of
tively.                                                                         these reductions in functional diversity are reflected in the
   In the immediate aftermath of a mass extinction, it is                       generic richness curve, but approximately correspond to
hypothesized that there would be a radiation in func-                           known lesser extinction events: the Carnian Pluvial Event
tional diversity as taxa evolve to fill vacant ecospace left                    (CPE) in the mid-Carnian (Dal Corso et al. 2015) and the
by the high levels of extinction (Bambach et al. 2007).                         early Toarcian Ocean Anoxic Event (OAE) (Little & Benton
Despite this, only one new mode of life originated in the                       1995). The early Toarcian OAE is only detected in the
aftermath of the LTE (Fig. 1B): semi-infaunal, slow-mov-                        occurrence (raw and subsampled) data and not in the ran-
ing, deposit-feeding gastropods of the family Nerinellidae.                     ged-through data, suggesting that extinctions may have
However, a greater increase in ecospace occupation                              been regional with functional groups rapidly recolonizing
apparently preceded the LTE, in the Rhaetian, with the                          affected environments in the Middle Jurassic.
occupation or reoccupation of three modes of life: semi-
infaunal, slow-moving, predators; shallow infaunal, slow-
moving, ‘other’ feeders; shallow infaunal, facultatively                        Regional changes in functional diversity
mobile attached, ‘other’ feeders (Fig. 1B).
   Similar losses of global functional diversity that are                       Based on subsampled data, the LTE records the biggest
recorded in the aftermath of the LTE are also recorded                          declines in both generic and functional richness in

FIG. 1.    Global diversity from the         A
Middle Triassic to the Middle Juras-                               1200
sic. A, ranged, raw sampledand sub-
sampled generic richness. B, ranged,                               1000
raw sampled and subsampled func-
                                             Generic richness

tional diversity. Alternate white and                               800
grey bars represent chronostrati-
graphic stages (from left to right):
                                                                    600           ●
L, Ladinian; C, Carnian; N, Norian;                                                              ●
R, Rhaetian; H, Hettangian; S, Sine-                                       ●
murian; P, Pliensbachian; T, Toar-                                  400                                    ●                               ●
                                                                                                               ●       ●         ●
cian; A, Aalenian.                                                                                                                     ●
                                                                    200

                                                                      0
                                             B
                                                                     40
                                             Functional richness

                                                                     30                                                ●                   ●
                                                                                  ●                        ●                     ●
                                                                                                 ●                                     ●
                                                                           ●
                                                                     20

                                                                     10                                                    raw occurrence
                                                                                                                   ●       n = 2000
                                                                                                                           ranged-through
                                                                      0
                                                                           L      C              N         RH          S         P     T   A

                                                                          Mid             Late                              Early          Mid
                                                                                      Triassic                              Jurassic
                                                                          240   230       220        210    200            190       180   170
                                                                                                     Age (Ma)
138                         PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

tropical latitudes (Fig. 2A; Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2).                                               Hettangian. After subsampling, functional richness shows
Erect, facultatively mobile, suspension feeders disappeared                                               a much more pronounced drop from the Pliensbachian
from the tropics and did not return until the Middle                                                      to the Toarcian, suggesting that although the LTE pro-
Jurassic. A number of mostly suspension-feeding, surficial                                                foundly affected tropical and polar latitudes, the Toarcian
and infaunal modes of life also vacated the tropics, but                                                  OAE extinction was a more important event in the mid-
returned in the Sinemurian–Pliensbachian. Tropical func-                                                  latitudes. The drop in functional richness across the
tional diversity returned to pre-extinction levels by the                                                 Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary is associated with the
Sinemurian–Pliensbachian, but generic richness remained                                                   temporary loss of ten infaunal modes of life, of which
much lower than it was prior to the extinction, in the                                                    seven returned in the Aalenian.
Carnian–Norian. Similar patterns are recorded in polar                                                       The effects of the LTE are much more apparent in Pan-
latitudes, but both generic and functional richness took                                                  thalassa than in the Tethys or Boreal oceans (Fig. 2B).
longer to recover and remained low until the Aalenian                                                     Pelagic suspension feeders apparently disappeared earlier
(Fig. 2A; Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2).                                                                  in Panthalassa, at the end of the Carnian. Facultatively
   In contrast, the mid-latitudes record a markedly differ-                                               mobile, erect suspension feeders, all of which are crinoids,
ent pattern, with only a slight decrease in generic and                                                   are absent from Panthalassa during the Hettangian. A
functional richness across the T–J boundary (Fig. 2A;                                                     number of epifaunal and infaunal suspension feeding
Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2). Although pelagic suspension-                                               guilds are also absent until the Sinemurian or Pliens-
feeders and a single guild of deep-infaunal suspension-                                                   bachian. Panthalassan generic and functional richness
feeders disappeared, most other guilds are present in the                                                 recovered to pre-extinction levels by the Sinemurian,

                             A                                                  20     B                                                 C
                                                 ●                                                                                 25
                       15                                                                                              ●
                             ●                                                                                                                ●
 Functional richness

                                                                                                                                                                               ●
                                                                                                                                                              ●            ●
                                                                                15                                                 20                ●
                                                     ●                                                                                   ●
                       10                                                                                                                                              ●
                                                                                                                                   15
                                                                                10
                                                                                                                                   10
                        5
                                                                                  5
                                                                                                                                    5                             raw occurrence
                             Polar (>60ºNS)                                            Boreal Ocean                                      Inshore          ●       n = 350
                        0                                                        0                                                  0
                                                                                25
                                                                                                                                   25
                       30                                                                                                                                              ●
 Functional richness

                                                                                20                                             ●
                                                                                                                   ●                                      ●
                                                                   ●                        ●
                                                                                                                                   20                                          ●
                                                             ●                                             ●                                  ●                    ●
                                                         ●                  ●                         ●                ●                                                   ●
                                                                                                                           ●                         ●        ●
                       20         ●                  ●                          15                             ●                         ●
                                                                        ●              ●
                                                                                                                                   15
                                                 ●
                                                                                10                                                 10
                       10
                                                                                  5                                                 5

                        0    Mid (30-60ºNS)                                       0    Panthalassa                                  0    Offshore

                       30                                                       30                                                 20
 Functional richness

                                                                                                                                              ●
                                  ●                                                         ●                                  ●
                       20                        ●
                                                     ●                                                         ●                   15    ●           ●
                             ●                                                  20     ●              ●                ●
                                                             ●          ●                                                  ●                              ●
                                                                   ●        ●

                                                                                                                                   10
                                                         ●
                       10                                                       10
                                                                                                                                    5

                        0    Tropical (< 30ºNS)                                   0    Tethys                                            Reefs
                                                                                                                                    0
                            Mid          Late                    Early      Mid       Mid      Late           Early    Mid              Mid      Late           Early    Mid
                                      Triassic                   Jurassic                   Triassic          Jurassic                        Triassic          Jurassic
                            240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170                           240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170                   240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170
                                        Age (Ma)                                                     Age (Ma)                                          Age (Ma)

FIG. 2.    Regional functional diversity from the Middle Triassic to the Middle Jurassic. A, subdivided by latitude (polar, mid-, tropi-
cal). B, subdivided by palaeo-oceanic basin (Boreal Ocean, Panthalassa, Tethys). C, subdivided by depositional environment (inshore,
offshore, reef). Gaps in the subsampled time series represent time bins where the subsampling quotas were not met. Chronostrati-
graphic scale is the same as Figure 1.
DUNHILL ET AL.: IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION                          139

although functional richness decreased once more                fig. S2). Facultatively motile, erect suspension feeders (i.e.
through the Pliensbachian and Toarcian before recovering        crinoids) are present in offshore environments during the
again in the Aalenian (Fig. 2B; Dunhill et al. 2017, fig.       Hettangian, suggesting that those settings remained hos-
S2). The effects of the LTE appear less pronounced in the       pitable to this mode of life whilst they were excluded
Tethys Ocean: the slight drop in raw generic and func-          from shallower ecosystems. There is a drop in functional
tional richness vanishes entirely after subsampling             richness, although not in generic richness, between the
(Fig. 2B; Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2). Although generic       Pliensbachian and Toarcian in offshore environments
richness was higher in the Late Triassic than the Early         (Fig. 2C; Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2), with the loss of
Jurassic, the decrease appears in the Norian–Rhaetian           many shallow and deep-infaunal guilds.
transition (Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2), rather than across
the T–J boundary, and functional richness appears to be
stable across the entire study interval. However, pelagic       Changes in ecological structure
suspension feeders disappear at the LTE along with the
temporary absence of some semi-infaunal and deep infau-         There is a significant reduction in within-mode-of-life
nal guilds until the Sinemurian and Pliensbachian. The          richness from the Rhaetian to the lower Hettangian (Wil-
Toarcian OAE is characterized by the temporary loss of          coxon paired test: V = 293, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3A), with 19
some infaunal guilds, which all returned in the Aalenian.       modes of life, including the most taxonomically diverse
We see no evidence for a pronounced LTE or early Toar-          groups, suffering a significant reduction in richness.
cian event in the Boreal Ocean (Fig. 2B), although the          Attached, erect, suspension feeders suffer a 50% reduction
data are too sparse to carry out meaningful subsampling.        in their generic richness, whilst pelagic, fast-moving,
   Reefs suffered greater losses than other depositional set-   predators and surficial, attached suspension feeders suffer
tings during the LTE (Fig. 2C). The generic and func-           a 30–40% reduction in generic richness. No change in
tional richness of reef environments plummeted across           generic richness was recorded for 11 modes of life, and
the T–J boundary, with the loss of over 90% of genera           increases in richness were recorded in 4 modes of life.
(Fig. 2C; Dunhill et al. 2017, fig. S2). With the exception        There is no significant reduction in the occurrence (i.e.
of benthic suspension feeders, represented by one bivalve,      number of occurrences within PaleoDB collections) of
one echinoid and seven coral genera, all functional guilds      each mode of life across the T–J boundary (Wilcoxon
are absent from Hettangian reef ecosystems. All known           paired test: V = 256, p = 0.89) (Fig. 3B). However, there
Hettangian reefs are from mid-palaeolatitudes. The com-         is a reduction in the occurrence of attached, surficial sus-
plete absence of tropical reefs is not due to sampling fail-    pension feeders of over 25% and attached, erect, suspen-
ure as there is a large sample size of Hettangian tropical      sion feeders suffer a decline of around 75%. There are
occurrences in general. Reef ecosystems also record low         reductions in the occurrence of many other suspension
functional diversity in the Toarcian (Fig. 2C). This            feeding groups whilst the number of occurrences of
decline in the Toarcian is similar to the LTE, with the         motile, surficial grazers, deposit feeders, and predators
temporary exclusion of most functional guilds apart from        increase. There is also a dramatic increase in the number
certain surficial suspension-feeding coral and bivalve gen-     of occurrences of fast-moving, pelagic carnivores, which
era. However, in contrast to the Hettangian, all Toarcian       is unexpected given the reduction in generic richness
reefs are from the tropics, with none recorded from the         recorded within this group.
mid-latitudes despite a large sample size of mid-latitude          Despite the significant losses to generic richness across
Toarcian occurrences in general.                                all modes of life, the relative richness amongst modes of
   Inshore environments record a drop in raw generic and        life does not deviate a great deal across the T–J boundary
functional richness across the T–J boundary, although this      (Fig. 4A). Both erect and surficial, stationary, attached
is not retained after subsampling (Fig. 2C; Dunhill et al.      suspension feeders suffered a reduction in proportional
2017, fig. S2). The LTE appears to driven the loss of some      richness across the LTE and remained at lower relative
epifaunal and infaunal groups, which returned in the            richness throughout the subsequent Early Jurassic. In con-
Sinemurian, but pelagic and facultatively mobile suspen-        trast, infaunal groups and motile surficial modes of life
sion feeding crinoids disappeared earlier. Neither of these     show increases in proportional richness whilst pelagic
functional guilds returned to inshore environments until        predators suffer a reduction in proportional richness
the Middle Jurassic, suggesting that Early Jurassic shallow     across the extinction but recover to pre-extinction levels
marine conditions remained inhospitable to some groups          by the late Hettangian (Fig. 4A). Long-term proportional
of motile, suspension feeding crinoids.                         occurrence patterns were, as expected, much more vari-
   Offshore environments record modest drops in generic         able than the smoother trends of proportional richness,
and functional richness across the T–J boundary, with the       with the LTE appearing more pronounced (Fig. 4B). Sur-
loss of a few infaunal guilds (Fig. 2C; Dunhill et al. 2017,    ficial and erect, non-motile, suspension feeders suffered a
140                  PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

A

                   200     pre-extinction
                                                                         115                                 415
                           post-extinction
                                                              36
Generic richness

                                                                   1
                   150                                                                                                  526
                                                                                      261

                                                                                                   533
                   100

                    50

                     0
                         331
                         341
                         351
                         361
                         415
                         421
                         422
                         425
                         441
                         442
                         451
                         456
                         461
                         521
                         522
                         523
                         525
                         526
                         531
                         532
                         533
                         535
                         541
                         546
                         621
                         631
                         641
                         646
                         115
                         141
                         241
                         261
                         312
                         315
                         321
                         322
                         324
                         325

                                                               Mode of life
B

                                                                         531                                    115
                   600

                                                                                                                            541
                                                              36
                                                                   1
Occurrences

                                                                                    261              324

                   400

                   200

                     0
                         331
                         341
                         351
                         361
                         415
                         421
                         422
                         425
                         441
                         442
                         451
                         456
                         461
                         521
                         522
                         523
                         525
                         526
                         531
                         532
                         533
                         535
                         541
                         546
                         621
                         631
                         641
                         646
                         115
                         141
                         241
                         261
                         312
                         315
                         321
                         322
                         324
                         325

                                                               Mode of life
FIG. 3.   A, pre-extinction (Rhaetian) and post-extinction (lower Hettangain) within-mode-of-life generic richness based on ranged-
through richness data. B, pre-extinction (Rhaetian) and post-extinction (Hettangian) within-mode-of-life occurrence data based on
subsampling to n = 2000. Silhouettes represent examples of modes of life that increased/decreased in richness/occurrence across the
extinction event. See Tables 1 and 2 for mode of life definitions.

reduction in proportional richness whereas surficial, slow-               Global ecological structure of the Rhaetian is more dis-
moving grazers, deposit feeders and predators showed an                similar to that of the Hettangian than would be expected
increase. A large increase is also recorded in pelagic, fast-          by chance (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity value of 0.3,
moving predators. Surficial, non-motile suspension feed-               p < 0.001), and the change recorded across the LTE is
ers recovered quickly, reaching their pre-extinction level             greater than any other time period, bar the Toarcian–Aale-
of proportional occurrence by the Sinemurian, but erect,               nian (Fig. 5A and see Table 4 for Bray–Curtis scores).
non-motile suspension feeders (a guild dominated by                    However, these dissimilarity values are only slightly higher
scleractinian corals and crinoids) remained depressed in               than those recorded between other time bins (Fig. 5A).
terms of number of occurrences with only a slight hint of              There is a clear dip in dissimilarity between the Hettangian
recovery into the Aalenian. Another change in propor-                  and Sinemurian, before an increase in dissimilarity across
tional occurrence occurs between the Pliensbachian and                 the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary, and then a further
the Toarcian, which is coincident with the biotic crisis at            increase in dissimilarity into the Middle Jurassic, possibly
that time.                                                             signifying the recovery of reef ecosystems (Fig. 5A). The
DUNHILL ET AL.: IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION                                                   141

FIG. 4.   Proportional richness and             A
occurrence of modes of life from                                        1.0                                                                           115
                                                                                                                                                      141
the Middle Triassic to the Middle
                                                                                                                                                      241
Jurassic. A, proportional generic
                                                                                                                                                      261
richness of modes of life, based on                                     0.8                                                                           311
ranged-through data. B, propor-                                                                                                                       312

                                             Proportional richness
tional occurrence of modes of life                                                                                                                    315
based on occurrence data subsam-                                                                                                                      321
pled to n = 2000 occurrences. See                                       0.6                                                                           322
Tables 1 and 2 for mode of life defi-                                                                                                                 324
nitions.                                                                                                                                              325
                                                                                                                                                      331
                                                                        0.4                                                                           336
                                                                                                                                                      341
                                                                                                                                                      351
                                                                                                                                                      361
                                                                        0.2                                                                           415
                                                                                                                                                      421
                                                                                                                                                      422
                                                                                                                                                      424
                                                                                    ●                                                                 425
                                                                        0.0
                                                                                                                                                      431
                                                B                       1.0                                                                           441
                                                                                                                                                      442
                                                                                                                                                      451
                                                                                                                                                      456
                                                                        0.8                                                                           461
                                             Proportional occurrences

                                                                                                                                                      513
                                                                                                                                                      521
                                                                                                                                                      522
                                                                        0.6                                                                           523
                                                                                                                                                      525
                                                                                                                                                      526
                                                                                                                                                      531
                                                                        0.4                                                                           532
                                                                                                                                                      533
                                                                                                                                                      535
                                                                                                                                                      541
                                                                        0.2                                                                           546
                                                                                                                                                      561
                                                                                                                                                      621
                                                                                                                                                      631
                                                                        0.0                                                                           636
                                                                              Mid                Late                       Early         Mid         641
                                                                                              Triassic                     Jurassic                   646

                                                                                        230     220      210 200          190      180
                                                                                                         Age (Ma)

Rhaetian is more ecologically similar to the Sinemurian                                       calcified genera (Fig. 6A). This result is also reflected in
than it is to the Hettangian, suggesting the onset of recov-                                  extinction magnitude, where heavily calcified genera suffer
ery through the Hettangian (Fig. 5A). However, the Pliens-                                    the highest level of extinction, closely followed by light
bachian and Toarcian are less similar to the Rhaetian than                                    calcifiers, with much lower extinction among moderately
to the Hettangian or the Sinemurian. The functional com-                                      calcified genera (Fig. 6C). Analyses were also carried out
position of the Aalenian is more similar to the Rhaetian                                      on just the benthic taxa, to test whether the erratic
than any of the Early Jurassic stages (Fig. 5A).                                              extinction rates of pelagic organisms, such as ammonoids,
   Skeletal calcification appears to have had an influence                                    may have influenced these results, but no difference was
on richness and proportional extinction across the T–J                                        recorded. Benthic taxa record very similar results, in
boundary (Fig. 6). Moderately calcified genera record a                                       terms of both generic richness (Fig. 6B) and extinction
small net increase in relative richness, whereas the greatest                                 magnitude (Fig. 6D). However, in the benthic-only analy-
loss of richness is recorded by the lightly and heavily                                       ses, there is a slightly larger difference between the
142                          PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

   A                                                                                                              B
                             0.5

                                                                                               OAE
                                                                          LTE
                                     ●   sequential BC                                                                        150
 Bray–Curtis dissimilarity

                                         BC compared to
                             0.4         Rhaetian

                                                                                                                              100

                                                                                                                  Frequency
                             0.3                                                ●                        ●
                                                                           ●
                                                ●              ●
                                                                                                     ●
                             0.2                                                    ●

                                                                                           ●                                   50
                             0.1                         reef recovery
                                                level bottom recovery
                             0.0                     pelagic recovery                                                          0
                                   Mid                 Late                             Early            Mid
                                                    Triassic                            Jurassic                                    0.0         0.1       0.2         0.3

                                   240     230        220      210 200                  190 180          170                              Bray–Curtis dissimilarity
                                                               Age (Ma)
FIG. 5.   Bray–Curtis dissimilarity analyses of global faunal composition from the Middle Triassic to the Middle Jurassic. A, Bray–Cur-
tis dissimilarity values (BC) amongst sequential time bins (black); each point represents the dissimilarity between the time bin and the
previous time bin and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity values between the Rhaetian and Jurassic time bins; all Bray–Curtis analyses were per-
formed on occurrence data subsampled to n = 2000. B, Manly test for significance of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between observed Rhae-
tian and Hettangian occurrences (dotted line) (p  0.001) as compared to randomized occurrences across 1000 iterations
(histogram).

TABLE 4.                           Bray–Curtis dissimilarity analyses.                                   very little evidence for significant reductions in global
Stage                                    Sequential                Dissimilarity to Rhaetian
                                                                                                         functional diversity. Global functional stability appears to
                                                                                                         be a common factor among mass extinction events, hav-
                                         Raw        n = 2000       Raw              n = 2000             ing been previously recorded for the Late Triassic (Kies-
                                                                                                         sling et al. 2007), late Permian (Foster & Twitchett 2014)
Ladinian
                                                                                                         and the end-Cretaceous (Aberhan & Kiessling 2015). The
Carnian                                  0.37       0.25
Norian                                   0.25       0.25                                                 LTE fits the ‘skeleton crew hypothesis’ of Foster &
Rhaetian                                 0.28       0.27                                                 Twitchett (2014), in which each ecological guild survives,
Hettangian                               0.38       0.3            0.38             0.3                  but is ‘manned’ by only a few individual taxa during the
Sinemurian                               0.29       0.2            0.27             0.27                 recovery period.
Pliensbachian                            0.54       0.15           0.57             0.31                    The two modes of life that are apparently lost across
Toarcian                                 0.22       0.22           0.55             0.44                 the extinction interval are both equivocal because of
Aalenian                                 0.53       0.3            0.25             0.25                 uncertain taxonomy and autecology. The pelagic, faculta-
                                                                                                         tively mobile, suspension feeders are all represented by
Sequential analyses represent mean value of dissimilarity across
1000 iterations from previous time bin to labelled time bin. Dis-
                                                                                                         one order of crinoids, the Roveacrinida, which originated
similarity to Rhaetian analyses represent dissimilarity from Rhae-                                       in the Ladinian (Hess et al. 2016) and range-through to
tian to labelled time bin.                                                                               the Rhaetian when they apparently became extinct at the
                                                                                                         LTE. However, different taxa assigned to the Roveacrinida
extinction magnitude of heavy and light calcifying genera,                                               appear again in the Bajocian (Middle Jurassic) and range-
suggesting a slightly greater selection against heavy calci-                                             through to the Miocene (Gorzelak et al. 2011). As this
fiers (Fig. 6D). The only time interval that appears to be                                               mode of life is re-occupied by the same order of organ-
exclusively selective against heavily calcifying organisms is                                            isms in the Middle Jurassic, we consider it unlikely that
across the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary (Fig. 6D).                                                    this mode of life was completely vacated at the LTE, and
                                                                                                         instead infer that the Roveacrinida persisted in abun-
                                                                                                         dances that were too low to be recorded in the fossil
DISCUSSION                                                                                               record, or in areas that have yet to be sampled for Early
                                                                                                         Jurassic fossils, as observed for Cenozoic occurrences of
Although the LTE caused significant reductions in generic                                                this group (Gorzelak et al. 2011). Alternatively, if the
richness within almost all classes of animal life, we find                                               Roveacrinida is in fact paraphyletic, as has been suggested
DUNHILL ET AL.: IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION                                                                     143

A                                                                                                    B
                        1.0                                                                                                  1.0

                        0.8                                                                                                  0.8
Proportional richness

                                                                                                     Proportional richness
                        0.6                                                                                                  0.6

                        0.4                                                                                                  0.4

                        0.2                                                       light                                      0.2             light
                                                                                  moderate                                                   moderate
                                                                                  heavy                                                      heavy
                        0.0                                                                                                  0.0
                              Mid              Late                              Early    Mid                                      Mid            Late                      Early               Mid
                                            Triassic                            Jurassic                                                       Triassic                    Jurassic
                          240                    220         200                             180                               240                  220         200                     180
                                                       Age (Ma)                                                                                           Age (Ma)
C                                                                                                    D
                        0.6                                                             light                                0.6                                                   light
                                                                                ●       moderate                                                                           ●       moderate
                                                                                        heavy                                                                                      heavy
Extinction magnitude

                                                                                                     Extinction magnitude

                        0.4                                                                                                  0.4
                                                                ●
                                                                                                                                                                 ●
                                                            ●
                                             ●

                        0.2                                                                                                                     ●            ●
                                    ●
                                                                                        ●
                                                                                                 ●
                                                                                                                             0.2
                                                                            ●
                                        ●                                                                                                                                          ●        ●
                                                                    ●                                                                    ●
                                                        ●                                    ●
                                                   ●                                ●                                                                             ●    ●
                                                                        ●
                                                                ●                                                                                     ●          ● ●           ●        ●
                        0.0                                                                                                  0.0
                               Mid             Late                         Early    Mid                                            Mid            Late                Early    Mid
                                            Triassic                        Jurassic                                                            Triassic               Jurassic
                               240               220        200                             180                                     240             220        200                     180
                                                       Age (Ma)                                                                                           Age (Ma)
FIG. 6.  Proportional generic richness and extinction magnitude of groups of calcifying organisms, from the Middle Triassic to the
Middle Jurassic, distinguishing between light, moderate and heavy calcification. A–B, proportional generic richness; A, all groups; B,
benthic groups. C–D, extinction magnitude; C, all groups; D, benthic groups.

(Simms 1990), then this may represent a real functional                                                              palaeoecological interpretation, where either: (1) no
extinction and later re-occupation of the same niche by a                                                            megalodontids were photosymbiotic; or, (2) some photo-
different lineage of hemi-pelagic crinoids.                                                                          symbiotic megalondontids also survived the extinction.
   The surficial, unattached, ‘other’ feeders are represented                                                           The single new mode of life that appears in the after-
by certain genera of megalondontid bivalves that have                                                                math of the extinction and the three new modes of life
been interpreted as possessing photosynthetic symbionts                                                              that appear in the Rhaetian, immediately preceding the
(Yancey & Stanley 1999). A number of megalondontids                                                                  extinction, are all reoccurrences of niches that are found
that are not regarded as photosymbiotic are, however,                                                                earlier in the Permian or Triassic, but not previously in
known to have survived the extinction (Ros-Franch et al.                                                             the Late Triassic (i.e. Carnian and Norian). The reappear-
2014). Given that the identification and interpretation of                                                           ance of semi-infaunal, slow-moving, deposit feeders and
photosymbiosis in alatoform bivalves is regarded as prob-                                                            predators, represented by nuculoid bivalves, gastropods,
lematic (Yancey & Stanley 1999; Vermeij 2013) the appar-                                                             asteroids and ophuiroids, which were apparently absent
ent loss of this mode of life may be an artefact of                                                                  through the Carnian and Norian, is probably an artefact.
144   PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

These taxa are rare throughout the entire sequence and           early Hettangian and maintain this throughout the Early
their absence from the Carnian and Norian is probably            Jurassic and into the Middle Jurassic. This is a common
due to sampling failure. A further two modes of life in          pattern that is also recorded in the aftermath of the late
the Rhaetian are reoccupied following gaps in the Mid-           Permian (Twitchett 2006; Foster & Twitchett 2014; Foster
dle–Late Triassic and are represented by shallow infaunal,       et al. 2016, 2017) and end-Cretaceous (Aberhan & Kies-
slow moving or facultatively mobile, chemosymbiotic              sling 2015) extinction events, when suspension feeders
bivalves of the family Lucinidae known also from the             suffered a crash primarily attributed to epicontinental
Early Triassic (Hautmann & N€     utzel 2005). Therefore, as     shelf turbidity (Foster & Twitchett 2014) or a productivity
has been recorded for the late Permian mass extinction           crisis (Aberhan & Kiessling 2015) respectively. Given the
(Erwin et al. 1987; Foster & Twitchett 2014), even though        similarities between the causal mechanisms of the late
taxonomic richness was low in the aftermath of the Late          Permian and LTE events, it seems more likely that high
Triassic extinction, global ecosystem functioning of key-        sediment fluxes and eutrophication-driven dysoxia caused
stone species was maintained with each functional group          by increased runoff from the terrestrial realm may have
occupied by only a few individual genera.                        spelled the downfall of benthic suspension feeding groups
   As happened in the late Permian mass extinction, the          at the LTE (Algeo & Twitchett 2010; Jaraula et al. 2013;
LTE was felt most intensely in the tropics and dispropor-        Foster et al. 2015; Schobben et al. 2015, 2016). Such a
tionally affected reef-dwelling organisms with suspension        scenario may also explain the earlier exclusion of suspen-
and/or photosymbiotic feeding habits, whilst deposit-feed-       sion feeding guilds after the Carnian as a result of the
ing modes of life appear to benefit (Kiessling & Aberhan         CPE (Dal Corso et al. 2015; Ruffell et al. 2016). Increased
2007; Kiessling et al. 2007; Martindale et al. 2012). The        runoff and subsequent eutrophication of shallow shelf sea
strong extinction signal in the tropical latitudes and the       settings would have simultaneously choked suspension
preferential extinction of reef taxa supports the hypothesis     feeders, pushing them offshore, whilst benefiting deposit-
of a CAMP-driven, climate-warming kill mechanism driv-           feeding organisms (Algeo & Twitchett 2010). It is also
ing high sea surface temperatures and anoxia for the LTE         possible that reductions in suspension feeder richness
(Hallam & Wignall 2000; Kiessling et al. 2007; McRoberts         may be, in part, because many are heavily calcified (i.e.
et al. 2012; Jaraula et al. 2013; Bond & Wignall 2014; van       crinoids, brachiopods etc.), and heavily calcified organ-
de Schootbrugge & Wignall 2016).                                 isms, particularly in reef settings, were selected against.
   Previous studies have suggested that global warming dri-         Although the LTE appears to have been concentrated
ven by rapid CO2 release should also preferentially impact       in the tropical latitudes, the Toarcian OAE appears to
heavily calcified marine organisms, due to the effects of        have been felt most severely in the mid-latitudes, with the
acidification (Hautmann 2004; Knoll et al. 2007). Although       temporary exclusion of infaunal taxa being consistent
heavily calcified organisms do record the highest extinction     with widespread dysoxia and/or anoxia being the main
rates across the T–J boundary, it is not clear that acidifica-   driving force of the early Toarcian extinction (Little &
tion was driving extinction because lightly calcified organ-     Benton 1995). This is further supported by the complete
isms also record high rates of extinction. This result           absence of reef environments in the tropics during the
contrasts with those of some previous studies where there        Hettangian and the mid-latitudes during the Toarcian.
appear to be clear differences in extinction rates between       High extinction levels in Panthalassa, as compared to
physiologically buffered and unbuffered organisms (Haut-         Tethys, particularly amongst erect suspension feeders and
mann et al. 2008a; Kiessling & Simpson 2011). In other           infaunal taxa may be a real signal, or may be a conse-
warming-related extinctions in the study interval, such as       quence of the high levels of extinction recorded in tropi-
the early Toarcian, selection against heavily calcified organ-   cal latitudes and reef ecosystems. Further investigation of
isms is much clearer (Fig. 6). The extinction pattern across     the determinants of extinction is required to answer this.
the LTE is consistent with that of previous studies, which          Although we see a general trend of reduced generic
show that although heavy calcifiers experienced higher           richness within modes of life across the LTE, a number of
extinction rates, there are not huge differences between         modes of life actually show an increase in richness. These
light, moderate and heavy calcifiers (Bush & Pruss 2013)         functional groups, although not particularly diverse, all
and that selectivity against heavy calcifiers only becomes       display feeding strategies that are expected to fare well in
apparent after the removal of other confounding factors          a stressed, post-extinction world (i.e. deposit-feeding,
(Payne et al. 2016b). Therefore, it appears that even if acid-   mining and chemosymbiosis) (Foster & Twitchett 2014;
ification contributed to the LTE and reef collapse, other kill   Clapham 2017). Some functional groups, such as pelagic,
mechanisms (i.e. temperature change) were also important.        fast-moving carnivores, suffered a significant reduction in
   The reductions in suspension-feeder richness contrast         relative richness at the LTE, but then quickly recovered to
with the slow moving, surficial, deposit feeders, grazers        pre-extinction levels by the late Hettangian, reinforcing
and predators, which increase in relative richness in the        the idea that both vertebrates (Thorne et al. 2011)
DUNHILL ET AL.: IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION                         145

(excluding conodonts which become extinct) and cepha-           somewhat at odds with previous studies of a single clade
lopods (Longridge & Smith 2015) passed through an evo-          (i.e. bivalves) which showed selectivity against infaunal
lutionary bottleneck at the T–J boundary where rapid            taxa (McRoberts & Newton 1995; McRoberts et al. 1995).
turnover rates aided rapid recovery. Despite this reduc-        Apparent high rates of extinction seen in infaunal bivalves
tion in relative richness across the LTE, we see an increase    are most likely to be the result of preservational biases
in relative occurrences of pelagic, fast-moving carnivores.     (Mander & Twitchett 2008). Also, similar increases in
An explanation for this discrepancy is that the ranged-         deposit-feeders, grazers and predators, as well as in preda-
through richness data is compiled at the substage-level,        tion-resistant modes of life, have also been recorded in
and thus distinguishes the lower and upper Hettangian,          the aftermath of the late Permian (Foster & Twitchett
whereas the occurrence data from the PaleoDB is com-            2014) and end-Cretaceous mass extinctions (Aberhan &
piled at the stage-level, and thus bins together the entire     Kiessling 2015). Although initial recovery from the LTE
Hettangian. Several studies have demonstrated that recov-       was rapid in level-bottom and pelagic communities, full
ery was rapid and complete by the upper Hettangian              benthic recovery, i.e. the reestablishment of reef ecosys-
(Barras & Twitchett 2007; Hautmann et al. 2008b; Man-           tems, appears to have been delayed by the subsequent cri-
der et al. 2008) and it is likely that some of the extinction   sis in the Early Toarcian. Overall, the similarities in
effects are being masked due to the resolution of this          functional, environmental and biogeographical extinction
study. Nevertheless, some of the pre–post-extinction            selectivity and recovery between the late Permian and the
changes are still evident in the occurrence data, most          Late Triassic events are striking, although not surprising
notably the reduction in non-motile suspension feeders          given the similarities in the causal mechanisms of the two
and the increase in motile grazers, deposit feeders and         events (van de Schootbrugge & Wignall 2016).
predators.
   Whilst dissimilarity analyses show that the global eco-
logical shift from Rhaetian to Hettangian communities           CONCLUSIONS
was greater than would be expected by chance, it is not
notably larger than the ecological shifts witnessed at many     Although the LTE does not appear to have resulted in
other stage-level transitions and is similar to the ecologi-    the extinction of any ecological guilds or a permanent
cal shift witnessed between the Toarcian and Aalenian           global ecological regime shift, it had very profound
(the Early to Middle Jurassic transition). Comparing the        regional and environmental effects, with the temporary
dissimilarity between the Rhaetian and each Jurassic time       complete collapse of tropical reef ecosystems (McGhee
bin in turn shows that dissimilarity is higher between the      et al. 2004; Kiessling & Simpson 2011; Martindale et al.
Rhaetian and Hettangian than it is between the Rhaetian         2012) that did not fully recover until the Middle Juras-
and Sinemurian, indicating that the global ecosystem was        sic. The effects of the LTE were largely confined to the
returning to its pre-extinction state by the Sinemurian.        tropical latitudes and there was significant selection
This is followed by a slight increase in dissimilarity          against some modes of life, particularly stationary sus-
between the Rhaetian and Pliensbachian, followed by a           pension feeders. We did not find any conclusive evi-
large increase in dissimilarity between the Rhaetian and        dence that heavily calcifying organisms were selected
Toarcian, as a result of the early Toarcian OAE. However,       against during the LTE, as compared to light calcifiers,
the Aalenian has a more similar ecological composition to       but this may well have been the case during the early
the Rhaetian than the latter does to any of the Early           Toarcian OAE. The lack of evidence of permanent global
Jurassic time intervals, thus signifying a recovery to some-    regime shifts across major mass extinction events (Foster
thing more similar to pre-extinction levels at the onset of     & Twitchett 2014), coupled with reduced estimates of
the Middle Jurassic, probably driven by the beginning of        taxonomic extinction (Stanley 2016), suggest that mass
the recovery of reef ecosystems (Hautmann 2012, 2016).          extinctions may not have been as ecologically catas-
   Benthic marine deposit-feeders, predators and grazers,       trophic as once suspected. However, profound regional
dominated by gastropods, echinoderms and malacostra-            ecological effects and global taxonomic losses of 30–80%
cans, flourished during the earliest Jurassic in the after-     of species (Stanley 2016) still represent global biotic
math of the crisis. Non-motile epifauna declined across         catastrophes of unimaginable magnitudes when thought
the LTE, but infauna, motile epifauna and pelagic preda-        of in terms of modern biodiversity. It therefore remains
tors all increased in taxonomic richness and number of          that the mass extinctions of the distant past, particularly
occurrences. This trend is associated with the Mesozoic         those linked to rapid greenhouse warming, ocean anoxia,
Marine Revolution and was ongoing throughout the Late           and ocean acidification (e.g. late Permian and Late Tri-
Triassic (Tackett & Bottjer 2016), before being invigorated     assic), offer a stark reminder of the possible future con-
by the preferential extinction of non-motile, suspension-       sequences of anthropogenic influences on the biosphere
feeding benthic guilds at the LTE. Our findings are             (Harnik et al. 2012; Hull 2015).
146    PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61

Acknowledgements. The authors thank the numerous authors of                B L A C K B U R N , T. J., O L S E N , P. E., B O W R I N G , S. A.,
the original studies that provide the source data on which this               M C L E A N , N. M., K E N T , D. V., P U F F E R , J., M C H O N E ,
study is based, and the many data-enterers of the Paleobiology                G., R A S B U R Y , E. T. and E T - T O U H A M I , M. 2013. Zir-
Database for the provision of the fossil occurrence data, particu-            con U-Pb geochronology links the end-Triassic extinction with
larly: Matthew Clapham, Wolfgang Kiessling, Franz F€       ursich,            the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province. Science, 340, 941–945.
Martin Aberhan, Andy Rees, J    ozsef Palfy, Matthew Carrano,            B O N D , D. P. G. and W I G N A L L , P. B. 2014. Large igneous
David Bottjer, Alistair McGowan, Arnold Miller, Luc Villier,                  provinces and mass extinctions: an update. Geological Society
Roger Benson, John Alroy, and Richard Butler. Thanks also to                  of America Special Papers, 505, 29–55.
Martin Aberhan, Timothy Astrop, Kenneth De Baets, Mariel Fer-              B R A Y , J. R. and C U R T I S , J. T. 1957. An ordination of the
rari, Andy Gale, Stefanie Klug, and Crispin Little for discussion             upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological
of fossil modes of life, taxonomic assignment and stratigraphic               Monographs, 27, 325–349.
range data. Thanks to Michael Hautmann, Andrew Bush, and                   B U S H , A. M. and B A M B A C H , R. K. 2011. Paleoecologic
two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that                        megatrends in marine Metazoa. Annual Review of Earth &
greatly improved this manuscript. Thanks to Sally Thomas for                  Planetary Sciences, 39, 241–269.
editorial comments. Thanks to Autumn Pugh, Crispin Little,                 B U S H , A. and P R U S S , S. 2013. Theoretical ecospace for
and Paul Wignall for discussion of the manuscript. AMD is                     ecosystem paleobiology: energy, nutrients, biominerals, and
funded by a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship (ECF-2015-                     macroevolution. The Paleontological Society Papers, 19, 1–20.
044) and a NERC research grant (NE/P013724/1). WJF is funded               B U S H , A. M., B A M B A C H , R. K. and D A L E Y , G. M. 2007.
by a Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship from the University                Changes in theoretical ecospace utilization in marine fossil
of Texas at Austin. This is Paleobiology Database publication                 assemblages between the mid-Paleozoic and late Cenozoic.
293.                                                                          Paleobiology, 33, 76–97.
                                                                           C L A P H A M , M. E. 2017. Organism activity levels predict mar-
                                                                              ine invertebrate survival during ancient global change extinc-
DATA ARCHIVING STATEMENT                                                      tions. Global Change Biology, 23, 1477–1485.
                                                                           -and P A Y N E , J. L. 2011. Acidification, anoxia, and extinc-
Data for this study are available in the Dryad Digital Repository:            tion: a multiple logistic regression analysis of extinction selec-
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bg30k                                           tivity during the Middle and Late Permian. Geology, 39, 1059–
                                                                              1062.
Editor. Michael Hautmann                                                   - K I E S S L I N G , W., F U       € R S I C H , F., A B E R H A N , M.,
                                                                                              
                                                                              R E E S , A., P A L F Y , J., C A R R A N O , M. T., B O T T J E R , D.
                                                                              B., M C G O W A N , A. J., M I L L E R , A. I., V I L L I E R , L.,
REFERENCES                                                                    B E N S O N , R. B. J., A L R O Y , J. and B U T L E R , R. J. 2016.
                                                                              Taxonomic occurrences of Triassic to Jurassic marine animals.
A B E R H A N , M. and K I E S S L I N G , W. 2015. Persistent eco-           Paleobiology Database, accessed 13 April 2016. http://paleob
  logical shifts in marine molluscan assemblages across the end-              iodb.org
  Cretaceous mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Acad-            D A L C O R S O , J., G I A N O L L A , P., N E W T O N , R. J.,
  emy of Sciences, 112, 7207–7212.                                            F R A N C E S C H I , M., R O G H I , G., C A G G I A T I , M.,
A L G E O , T. J. and T W I T C H E T T , R. J. 2010. Anomalous               R A U C S I K , B., B U D A I , T., H A A S , J. and P R E T O , N.
  Early Triassic sediment fluxes due to elevated weathering rates             2015. Carbon isotope records reveal synchronicity between
  and their biological consequences. Geology, 38, 1023–1026.                  carbon cycle perturbation and the “Carnian Pluvial Event” in
A L R O Y , J. 2010. The shifting balance of diversity among major            the Tethys realm (Late Triassic). Global & Planetary Change,
  marine animal groups. Science, 329, 1191–1194.                              127, 79–90.
B A M B A C H , R. K., B U S H , A. M. and E R W I N , D. H. 2007.         D I N E E N , A. A., F R A I S E R , M. L. and S H E E H A N , P. M.
  Autecology and the filling of ecospace: key metazoan radia-                 2014. Quantifying functional diversity in pre- and post-extinc-
  tions. Palaeontology, 50, 1–22.                                             tion paleocommunities: a test of ecological restructuring after
B A R N O S K Y , A. D., H A D L Y , E. A., B A S C O M P T E , J.,           the end-Permian mass extinction. Earth-Science Reviews, 136,
  B E R L O W , E. L., B R O W N , J. H., F O R T E L I U S , M.,             339–349.
  G E T Z , W. M., H A R T E , J., H A S T I N G S , A., M A R -           D U N H I L L , A. M., S C I B E R R A S , J., F O S T E R , W. J. and
  Q U E T , P. A., M A R T I N E Z , N. D., M O O E R S , A.,                 T W I T C H E T T , R. J. 2017. Data from: Functional diversity
  R O O P N A R I N E , P., V E R M E I J , G., W I L L I A M S , J. W.,      of marine ecosystems across the Late Triassic mass extinction.
  G I L L E S P I E , R., K I T Z E S , J., M A R S H A L L , C.,             Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bg30k
  M A T Z K E , N., M I N D E L L , D. P., R E V I L L A , E. and          E R W I N , D. H., V A L E N T I N E , J. W. and S E P K O S K I , J. J. J.
  S M I T H , A. B. 2012. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s bio-           1987. A comparative study of diversification events: the early
  sphere. Nature, 486, 52–58.                                                 Palaeozoic versus the Mesozoic. Evolution, 41, 1177–1186.
B A R R A S , C. G. and T W I T C H E T T , R. J. 2007. Response of        F L E S S A , K. W. and J A B L O N S K I , D. 1983. Extinction is
  the marine infauna to Triassic-Jurassic environmental change:               here to stay. Paleobiology, 9, 315–321.
  ichnological data from southern England. Palaeogeography,                FLU  € G E L , E. 2002. Triassic reef patterns. SEPM Special Publica-
  Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 244, 223–241.                             tion, 72, 391–463.
You can also read